Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass

During regular bacteriological surveillance of cardiac surgical equipment and patients, the Cell Saver apparatus (CSA) was prospectively evaluated to determine if it represented an additional risk for infection. Nineteen patients were studied. After each operation, the effluent from the CSA was ster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 1989-07, Vol.48 (1), p.51-53
Hauptverfasser: Schwieger, Ian M., Gallagher, Christopher J., Finlayson, Donald C., Daly, William L., Maher, Kathryn L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 48
creator Schwieger, Ian M.
Gallagher, Christopher J.
Finlayson, Donald C.
Daly, William L.
Maher, Kathryn L.
description During regular bacteriological surveillance of cardiac surgical equipment and patients, the Cell Saver apparatus (CSA) was prospectively evaluated to determine if it represented an additional risk for infection. Nineteen patients were studied. After each operation, the effluent from the CSA was sterilely sealed for subsequent culture. A total of 42 aerobic and 42 anaerobic cultures were nude. Postoperatively all patients were evaluated daily for four days and before discharge for clinical evidence of infection. Four patients had positive CSA cultures without evidence of postoperative clinical infection. Five patients in whom postoperative infectious complications developed had negative CSA cultures. Ten patients had negative CSA cultures and no evidence of postoperative infection. We conclude that the CSA does not appear to contribute to the risk of infection in cardiac surgical patients and that it is a safe adjunct to cardiac surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90175-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79157926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0003497589901756</els_id><sourcerecordid>79157926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e33df5d075b40877b27de031786aea41adc3b727a11ba6c9ec476b46017d8043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo7-A4UuRHRRTdp8NBtBih8DAy6cfUiTVCJtU5N2YP69qVNm6erxuOc9LgeAKwQfEET0EUKYp5gzclfwew4RIyk9AgtESJbSjPBjsDggZ-A8hO-4ZjE-BacZo5hCuADlqlNWm06ZxNVJaZom_ZRb4xPlukG2tpODdV2iR2-7r0RJr63rx6Z1nfS7pNr1MoQLcFLLJpjLeS7B5vVlU76n64-3Vfm8ThWmdEhNnuuaaMhIhWHBWJUxbWCOWEGlkRhJrfKKZUwiVEmquFGY0SrWREwXEOdLcLt_23v3M5owiNYGFRvLzrgxCMYRYTyjEcR7UHkXgje16L1tY1-BoJjUicmLmLyIgos_dWI6u57_j1Vr9OFodhXzmzmXQcmm9jKqCweMZZwhgiL2tMdMVLG1xoug7CRYW2_UILSz__f4BZvgid0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79157926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schwieger, Ian M. ; Gallagher, Christopher J. ; Finlayson, Donald C. ; Daly, William L. ; Maher, Kathryn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwieger, Ian M. ; Gallagher, Christopher J. ; Finlayson, Donald C. ; Daly, William L. ; Maher, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><description>During regular bacteriological surveillance of cardiac surgical equipment and patients, the Cell Saver apparatus (CSA) was prospectively evaluated to determine if it represented an additional risk for infection. Nineteen patients were studied. After each operation, the effluent from the CSA was sterilely sealed for subsequent culture. A total of 42 aerobic and 42 anaerobic cultures were nude. Postoperatively all patients were evaluated daily for four days and before discharge for clinical evidence of infection. Four patients had positive CSA cultures without evidence of postoperative clinical infection. Five patients in whom postoperative infectious complications developed had negative CSA cultures. Ten patients had negative CSA cultures and no evidence of postoperative infection. We conclude that the CSA does not appear to contribute to the risk of infection in cardiac surgical patients and that it is a safe adjunct to cardiac surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90175-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2764600</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ATHSAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Bacterial Infections - transmission ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Transfusion, Autologous - instrumentation ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Centrifugation - instrumentation ; Equipment Contamination ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - instrumentation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 1989-07, Vol.48 (1), p.51-53</ispartof><rights>1989 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e33df5d075b40877b27de031786aea41adc3b727a11ba6c9ec476b46017d8043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e33df5d075b40877b27de031786aea41adc3b727a11ba6c9ec476b46017d8043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7297151$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2764600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwieger, Ian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlayson, Donald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maher, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>During regular bacteriological surveillance of cardiac surgical equipment and patients, the Cell Saver apparatus (CSA) was prospectively evaluated to determine if it represented an additional risk for infection. Nineteen patients were studied. After each operation, the effluent from the CSA was sterilely sealed for subsequent culture. A total of 42 aerobic and 42 anaerobic cultures were nude. Postoperatively all patients were evaluated daily for four days and before discharge for clinical evidence of infection. Four patients had positive CSA cultures without evidence of postoperative clinical infection. Five patients in whom postoperative infectious complications developed had negative CSA cultures. Ten patients had negative CSA cultures and no evidence of postoperative infection. We conclude that the CSA does not appear to contribute to the risk of infection in cardiac surgical patients and that it is a safe adjunct to cardiac surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion, Autologous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Centrifugation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo7-A4UuRHRRTdp8NBtBih8DAy6cfUiTVCJtU5N2YP69qVNm6erxuOc9LgeAKwQfEET0EUKYp5gzclfwew4RIyk9AgtESJbSjPBjsDggZ-A8hO-4ZjE-BacZo5hCuADlqlNWm06ZxNVJaZom_ZRb4xPlukG2tpODdV2iR2-7r0RJr63rx6Z1nfS7pNr1MoQLcFLLJpjLeS7B5vVlU76n64-3Vfm8ThWmdEhNnuuaaMhIhWHBWJUxbWCOWEGlkRhJrfKKZUwiVEmquFGY0SrWREwXEOdLcLt_23v3M5owiNYGFRvLzrgxCMYRYTyjEcR7UHkXgje16L1tY1-BoJjUicmLmLyIgos_dWI6u57_j1Vr9OFodhXzmzmXQcmm9jKqCweMZZwhgiL2tMdMVLG1xoug7CRYW2_UILSz__f4BZvgid0</recordid><startdate>19890701</startdate><enddate>19890701</enddate><creator>Schwieger, Ian M.</creator><creator>Gallagher, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Finlayson, Donald C.</creator><creator>Daly, William L.</creator><creator>Maher, Kathryn L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890701</creationdate><title>Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass</title><author>Schwieger, Ian M. ; Gallagher, Christopher J. ; Finlayson, Donald C. ; Daly, William L. ; Maher, Kathryn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-e33df5d075b40877b27de031786aea41adc3b727a11ba6c9ec476b46017d8043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion, Autologous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Centrifugation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwieger, Ian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlayson, Donald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maher, Kathryn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwieger, Ian M.</au><au>Gallagher, Christopher J.</au><au>Finlayson, Donald C.</au><au>Daly, William L.</au><au>Maher, Kathryn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>1989-07-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>51-53</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><coden>ATHSAK</coden><abstract>During regular bacteriological surveillance of cardiac surgical equipment and patients, the Cell Saver apparatus (CSA) was prospectively evaluated to determine if it represented an additional risk for infection. Nineteen patients were studied. After each operation, the effluent from the CSA was sterilely sealed for subsequent culture. A total of 42 aerobic and 42 anaerobic cultures were nude. Postoperatively all patients were evaluated daily for four days and before discharge for clinical evidence of infection. Four patients had positive CSA cultures without evidence of postoperative clinical infection. Five patients in whom postoperative infectious complications developed had negative CSA cultures. Ten patients had negative CSA cultures and no evidence of postoperative infection. We conclude that the CSA does not appear to contribute to the risk of infection in cardiac surgical patients and that it is a safe adjunct to cardiac surgery.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2764600</pmid><doi>10.1016/0003-4975(89)90175-6</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 1989-07, Vol.48 (1), p.51-53
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79157926
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia depending on type of surgery
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Bacterial Infections - transmission
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Transfusion, Autologous - instrumentation
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Centrifugation - instrumentation
Equipment Contamination
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Care - instrumentation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass
title Incidence of Cell-Saver contamination during cardiopulmonary bypass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A14%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20Cell-Saver%20contamination%20during%20cardiopulmonary%20bypass&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Schwieger,%20Ian%20M.&rft.date=1989-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=51-53&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft.coden=ATHSAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-4975(89)90175-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79157926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79157926&rft_id=info:pmid/2764600&rft_els_id=0003497589901756&rfr_iscdi=true