Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation

A retrospective review of the outcome of treatment for primary, Stage I and II breast cancer with segmental mastectomy (SGM) alone or segmental mastectomy plus postoperative irradiation (SGM + RT) at four Rochester, New York, city hospitals is reported. Between January 1971 and March 1984, 99 women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 1989-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150
Hauptverfasser: Kantorowitz, David A., Poulter, Colin A., Rubin, Philip, Patterson, Eileen, Sobel, Sidney H., Sischy, Benjamin, Dvoretsky, Philip M., Michalak, William A., Doane, Kathryn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Radiotherapy and oncology
container_volume 15
creator Kantorowitz, David A.
Poulter, Colin A.
Rubin, Philip
Patterson, Eileen
Sobel, Sidney H.
Sischy, Benjamin
Dvoretsky, Philip M.
Michalak, William A.
Doane, Kathryn
description A retrospective review of the outcome of treatment for primary, Stage I and II breast cancer with segmental mastectomy (SGM) alone or segmental mastectomy plus postoperative irradiation (SGM + RT) at four Rochester, New York, city hospitals is reported. Between January 1971 and March 1984, 99 women were treated with SGM and 146 with SGM + RT. Groups were similar regarding significant clinical and histologic prognostic factors; they differed, however, in that the SGM group was considerably older ( x = 72 ) than the SGM + RT group ( x = 56 ). Among SGM patients, local and total locoregional failure was 26.44 and 35.2%, respectively. Local and total locoregional failure (7.6 and 12.4%, respectively) was significantly reduced among patients treated with SGM + RT ( p < 0.0001). Among SGM patients, there was scant advantage in enlarging the extent of resection from local excision (29.5% local failure) to wide local excision (27.3%) to quadrantectomy (22.2%). Among women receiving SGM + RT, similar rates of local failure occurred among patients receiving local excision (15.5%) and wide local excision (12.5%). By contrast, only 2.8% of those receiving quadrantectomy failed. Results are viewed as supportive of findings of NSABP-B06. Findings suggest that SGM constitutes inadequate treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. Locoregional failure rates of 30–40% may be reduced to around 10% with postoperative irradiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90128-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79155282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016781408990128X</els_id><sourcerecordid>79155282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f0f919feab18645277ea5b548bb492959fbabfad5950335db2677c765ff06cee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78A4WcRA_VpG2a5CKI-AWClxX2FpJ0opG2WZOusv_erLt4Eg9hCM87k8yD0DElF5TQ5jIfXghakzMhzyWhpShmW2hCBZcFEYJvo8lvZA_tp_ROCClJxXfRbslIJZicID2NoMcehhEHh02-pBFbPViI-MuPbzjB64rqDvcZgR1Dv8S6CwPgEP-m826RcNSt16MPwyHacbpLcLSpB-jl7nZ681A8Pd8_3lw_FbZifCwccZJKB9pQ0dSs5Bw0M6wWxtSylEw6o43TLZP56xVrTdlwbnnDnCONBagO0Ol67jyGjwWkUfU-Weg6PUBYJMUlZawUZQ7W66CNIaUITs2j73VcKkrUyqxaaVMrbUpI9WNWzXLbyWb-wvTQ_jZtVGZ-teaQl_z0EFWyHrLI1scsRrXB___AN6UdilU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79155282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kantorowitz, David A. ; Poulter, Colin A. ; Rubin, Philip ; Patterson, Eileen ; Sobel, Sidney H. ; Sischy, Benjamin ; Dvoretsky, Philip M. ; Michalak, William A. ; Doane, Kathryn</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantorowitz, David A. ; Poulter, Colin A. ; Rubin, Philip ; Patterson, Eileen ; Sobel, Sidney H. ; Sischy, Benjamin ; Dvoretsky, Philip M. ; Michalak, William A. ; Doane, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective review of the outcome of treatment for primary, Stage I and II breast cancer with segmental mastectomy (SGM) alone or segmental mastectomy plus postoperative irradiation (SGM + RT) at four Rochester, New York, city hospitals is reported. Between January 1971 and March 1984, 99 women were treated with SGM and 146 with SGM + RT. Groups were similar regarding significant clinical and histologic prognostic factors; they differed, however, in that the SGM group was considerably older ( x = 72 ) than the SGM + RT group ( x = 56 ). Among SGM patients, local and total locoregional failure was 26.44 and 35.2%, respectively. Local and total locoregional failure (7.6 and 12.4%, respectively) was significantly reduced among patients treated with SGM + RT ( p &lt; 0.0001). Among SGM patients, there was scant advantage in enlarging the extent of resection from local excision (29.5% local failure) to wide local excision (27.3%) to quadrantectomy (22.2%). Among women receiving SGM + RT, similar rates of local failure occurred among patients receiving local excision (15.5%) and wide local excision (12.5%). By contrast, only 2.8% of those receiving quadrantectomy failed. Results are viewed as supportive of findings of NSABP-B06. Findings suggest that SGM constitutes inadequate treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. Locoregional failure rates of 30–40% may be reduced to around 10% with postoperative irradiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90128-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2503859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lumpectomy ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy, High-Energy ; Retrospective Studies ; Segmental mastectomy</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 1989-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f0f919feab18645277ea5b548bb492959fbabfad5950335db2677c765ff06cee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f0f919feab18645277ea5b548bb492959fbabfad5950335db2677c765ff06cee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(89)90128-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2503859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantorowitz, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Colin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, Sidney H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sischy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvoretsky, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doane, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>A retrospective review of the outcome of treatment for primary, Stage I and II breast cancer with segmental mastectomy (SGM) alone or segmental mastectomy plus postoperative irradiation (SGM + RT) at four Rochester, New York, city hospitals is reported. Between January 1971 and March 1984, 99 women were treated with SGM and 146 with SGM + RT. Groups were similar regarding significant clinical and histologic prognostic factors; they differed, however, in that the SGM group was considerably older ( x = 72 ) than the SGM + RT group ( x = 56 ). Among SGM patients, local and total locoregional failure was 26.44 and 35.2%, respectively. Local and total locoregional failure (7.6 and 12.4%, respectively) was significantly reduced among patients treated with SGM + RT ( p &lt; 0.0001). Among SGM patients, there was scant advantage in enlarging the extent of resection from local excision (29.5% local failure) to wide local excision (27.3%) to quadrantectomy (22.2%). Among women receiving SGM + RT, similar rates of local failure occurred among patients receiving local excision (15.5%) and wide local excision (12.5%). By contrast, only 2.8% of those receiving quadrantectomy failed. Results are viewed as supportive of findings of NSABP-B06. Findings suggest that SGM constitutes inadequate treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. Locoregional failure rates of 30–40% may be reduced to around 10% with postoperative irradiation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, High-Energy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Segmental mastectomy</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78A4WcRA_VpG2a5CKI-AWClxX2FpJ0opG2WZOusv_erLt4Eg9hCM87k8yD0DElF5TQ5jIfXghakzMhzyWhpShmW2hCBZcFEYJvo8lvZA_tp_ROCClJxXfRbslIJZicID2NoMcehhEHh02-pBFbPViI-MuPbzjB64rqDvcZgR1Dv8S6CwPgEP-m826RcNSt16MPwyHacbpLcLSpB-jl7nZ681A8Pd8_3lw_FbZifCwccZJKB9pQ0dSs5Bw0M6wWxtSylEw6o43TLZP56xVrTdlwbnnDnCONBagO0Ol67jyGjwWkUfU-Weg6PUBYJMUlZawUZQ7W66CNIaUITs2j73VcKkrUyqxaaVMrbUpI9WNWzXLbyWb-wvTQ_jZtVGZ-teaQl_z0EFWyHrLI1scsRrXB___AN6UdilU</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Kantorowitz, David A.</creator><creator>Poulter, Colin A.</creator><creator>Rubin, Philip</creator><creator>Patterson, Eileen</creator><creator>Sobel, Sidney H.</creator><creator>Sischy, Benjamin</creator><creator>Dvoretsky, Philip M.</creator><creator>Michalak, William A.</creator><creator>Doane, Kathryn</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation</title><author>Kantorowitz, David A. ; Poulter, Colin A. ; Rubin, Philip ; Patterson, Eileen ; Sobel, Sidney H. ; Sischy, Benjamin ; Dvoretsky, Philip M. ; Michalak, William A. ; Doane, Kathryn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f0f919feab18645277ea5b548bb492959fbabfad5950335db2677c765ff06cee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, High-Energy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Segmental mastectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantorowitz, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulter, Colin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobel, Sidney H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sischy, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvoretsky, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doane, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantorowitz, David A.</au><au>Poulter, Colin A.</au><au>Rubin, Philip</au><au>Patterson, Eileen</au><au>Sobel, Sidney H.</au><au>Sischy, Benjamin</au><au>Dvoretsky, Philip M.</au><au>Michalak, William A.</au><au>Doane, Kathryn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>141-150</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>A retrospective review of the outcome of treatment for primary, Stage I and II breast cancer with segmental mastectomy (SGM) alone or segmental mastectomy plus postoperative irradiation (SGM + RT) at four Rochester, New York, city hospitals is reported. Between January 1971 and March 1984, 99 women were treated with SGM and 146 with SGM + RT. Groups were similar regarding significant clinical and histologic prognostic factors; they differed, however, in that the SGM group was considerably older ( x = 72 ) than the SGM + RT group ( x = 56 ). Among SGM patients, local and total locoregional failure was 26.44 and 35.2%, respectively. Local and total locoregional failure (7.6 and 12.4%, respectively) was significantly reduced among patients treated with SGM + RT ( p &lt; 0.0001). Among SGM patients, there was scant advantage in enlarging the extent of resection from local excision (29.5% local failure) to wide local excision (27.3%) to quadrantectomy (22.2%). Among women receiving SGM + RT, similar rates of local failure occurred among patients receiving local excision (15.5%) and wide local excision (12.5%). By contrast, only 2.8% of those receiving quadrantectomy failed. Results are viewed as supportive of findings of NSABP-B06. Findings suggest that SGM constitutes inadequate treatment of Stage I and II breast cancer. Locoregional failure rates of 30–40% may be reduced to around 10% with postoperative irradiation.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>2503859</pmid><doi>10.1016/0167-8140(89)90128-X</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8140
ispartof Radiotherapy and oncology, 1989-06, Vol.15 (2), p.141-150
issn 0167-8140
1879-0887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79155282
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Humans
Lumpectomy
Mastectomy, Segmental
Middle Aged
Radiotherapy, High-Energy
Retrospective Studies
Segmental mastectomy
title Treatment of breast cancer with segmental mastectomy alone or segmental mastectomy plus radiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20breast%20cancer%20with%20segmental%20mastectomy%20alone%20or%20segmental%20mastectomy%20plus%20radiation&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Kantorowitz,%20David%20A.&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=141-150&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0167-8140(89)90128-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79155282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79155282&rft_id=info:pmid/2503859&rft_els_id=016781408990128X&rfr_iscdi=true