The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide

The purpose of this study was to compare the value of low- vs high-field MR systems in the detection of focal liver lesions after IV administration of iron oxide particles. A prospective study was undertaken which included 20 patients with focal liver lesions on CT or US, or strong clinical suspicio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 1997, Vol.7 (6), p.887-892
Hauptverfasser: Deckers, F, Corthouts, B, Nackaerts, Y, Ozsarlak, O, Parizel, P M, De Schepper, A M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 892
container_issue 6
container_start_page 887
container_title European radiology
container_volume 7
creator Deckers, F
Corthouts, B
Nackaerts, Y
Ozsarlak, O
Parizel, P M
De Schepper, A M
description The purpose of this study was to compare the value of low- vs high-field MR systems in the detection of focal liver lesions after IV administration of iron oxide particles. A prospective study was undertaken which included 20 patients with focal liver lesions on CT or US, or strong clinical suspicion of focal liver disease. Iron oxide particles were administered in an IV drip infusion over 30 min. Magnetic resonance imaging was subsequently performed on a 0.2 and a 1.5-T system. Both examinations were performed in one session. Turbo spin-echo T2-weighted sequences were used for further analysis (at 0.2 T: TR 4050 ms, TE 96 ms; 1.5 T: TR 3000 ms, TE 103 ms). After randomisation, images were analysed by two blinded readers. The evaluation included lesion counts, determination of lesion conspicuity and overall image quality (both graded on a scale 1-5). Quantitative analysis was performed on 29 lesions. Lesion-to-liver signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. The total lesion count (cumulative counts for two observers) was 59 on the high-field system and 63 on the low-field system. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference. On both systems median value for lesion conspicuity was 3. No statistically significant difference was found. Global image quality was rated higher on the high-field system: 3 vs 2 for the low-field system (p = 0.0017). Quantitative analysis showed no significant difference for lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios or CNRs. Although subjective image quality is significantly better on the high-field system, this does not result in better lesion detection or better lesion conspicuity. No significant difference in objective quantitative parameters was found in our series.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s003300050222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79146840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79146840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-21f2e8246446c0fa9e8d416831734da9e9d6945497853a2f35684118d77d8f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0UtLAzEQAOAgSq3Vo0chePC2mtfuJkcRX1ARpJ6XuJm0KdmHya6Pf29Ki6CnYYZvhmEGoVNKLikh5VUkhHNCSE4YY3toSgVnGSVS7KMpUVxmpVLiEB3FuE5KUVFO0EQxJikRU-QXK8CutX6EtgbcWfz0gq0Db3AcArTLYYW7Fg9JGRigHlzKkrJdrT327gMC9hBTNeJPl3Acewi9DrrRyxYGV2MXNi1fzsAxOrDaRzjZxRl6vbtd3Dxk8-f7x5vreVZzmg8Zo5aBZKIQoqiJ1QqkEbSQnJZcmJQqUyiRC1XKnGtmeV5IQak0ZWmkzXM-QxfbuX3o3keIQ9W4WIP3uoVujFWZrpBaSILn_-C6G0ObdqukFEXBpVAJZVtUhy7GALbqg2t0-K4oqTYvqP68IPmz3dDxrQHzq3c35z8DgH-9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884663849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Deckers, F ; Corthouts, B ; Nackaerts, Y ; Ozsarlak, O ; Parizel, P M ; De Schepper, A M</creator><creatorcontrib>Deckers, F ; Corthouts, B ; Nackaerts, Y ; Ozsarlak, O ; Parizel, P M ; De Schepper, A M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the value of low- vs high-field MR systems in the detection of focal liver lesions after IV administration of iron oxide particles. A prospective study was undertaken which included 20 patients with focal liver lesions on CT or US, or strong clinical suspicion of focal liver disease. Iron oxide particles were administered in an IV drip infusion over 30 min. Magnetic resonance imaging was subsequently performed on a 0.2 and a 1.5-T system. Both examinations were performed in one session. Turbo spin-echo T2-weighted sequences were used for further analysis (at 0.2 T: TR 4050 ms, TE 96 ms; 1.5 T: TR 3000 ms, TE 103 ms). After randomisation, images were analysed by two blinded readers. The evaluation included lesion counts, determination of lesion conspicuity and overall image quality (both graded on a scale 1-5). Quantitative analysis was performed on 29 lesions. Lesion-to-liver signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. The total lesion count (cumulative counts for two observers) was 59 on the high-field system and 63 on the low-field system. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference. On both systems median value for lesion conspicuity was 3. No statistically significant difference was found. Global image quality was rated higher on the high-field system: 3 vs 2 for the low-field system (p = 0.0017). Quantitative analysis showed no significant difference for lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios or CNRs. Although subjective image quality is significantly better on the high-field system, this does not result in better lesion detection or better lesion conspicuity. No significant difference in objective quantitative parameters was found in our series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s003300050222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9228104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Dextrans ; Female ; Ferrosoferric Oxide ; Humans ; Image Enhancement ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Iron - administration &amp; dosage ; Liver - pathology ; Liver Diseases - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetite Nanoparticles ; Male ; Middle Aged ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Oxides - administration &amp; dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Random Allocation</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 1997, Vol.7 (6), p.887-892</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-21f2e8246446c0fa9e8d416831734da9e9d6945497853a2f35684118d77d8f553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9228104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deckers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corthouts, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nackaerts, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozsarlak, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parizel, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schepper, A M</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the value of low- vs high-field MR systems in the detection of focal liver lesions after IV administration of iron oxide particles. A prospective study was undertaken which included 20 patients with focal liver lesions on CT or US, or strong clinical suspicion of focal liver disease. Iron oxide particles were administered in an IV drip infusion over 30 min. Magnetic resonance imaging was subsequently performed on a 0.2 and a 1.5-T system. Both examinations were performed in one session. Turbo spin-echo T2-weighted sequences were used for further analysis (at 0.2 T: TR 4050 ms, TE 96 ms; 1.5 T: TR 3000 ms, TE 103 ms). After randomisation, images were analysed by two blinded readers. The evaluation included lesion counts, determination of lesion conspicuity and overall image quality (both graded on a scale 1-5). Quantitative analysis was performed on 29 lesions. Lesion-to-liver signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. The total lesion count (cumulative counts for two observers) was 59 on the high-field system and 63 on the low-field system. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference. On both systems median value for lesion conspicuity was 3. No statistically significant difference was found. Global image quality was rated higher on the high-field system: 3 vs 2 for the low-field system (p = 0.0017). Quantitative analysis showed no significant difference for lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios or CNRs. Although subjective image quality is significantly better on the high-field system, this does not result in better lesion detection or better lesion conspicuity. No significant difference in objective quantitative parameters was found in our series.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ferrosoferric Oxide</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Iron - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Oxides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0UtLAzEQAOAgSq3Vo0chePC2mtfuJkcRX1ARpJ6XuJm0KdmHya6Pf29Ki6CnYYZvhmEGoVNKLikh5VUkhHNCSE4YY3toSgVnGSVS7KMpUVxmpVLiEB3FuE5KUVFO0EQxJikRU-QXK8CutX6EtgbcWfz0gq0Db3AcArTLYYW7Fg9JGRigHlzKkrJdrT327gMC9hBTNeJPl3Acewi9DrrRyxYGV2MXNi1fzsAxOrDaRzjZxRl6vbtd3Dxk8-f7x5vreVZzmg8Zo5aBZKIQoqiJ1QqkEbSQnJZcmJQqUyiRC1XKnGtmeV5IQak0ZWmkzXM-QxfbuX3o3keIQ9W4WIP3uoVujFWZrpBaSILn_-C6G0ObdqukFEXBpVAJZVtUhy7GALbqg2t0-K4oqTYvqP68IPmz3dDxrQHzq3c35z8DgH-9</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Deckers, F</creator><creator>Corthouts, B</creator><creator>Nackaerts, Y</creator><creator>Ozsarlak, O</creator><creator>Parizel, P M</creator><creator>De Schepper, A M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide</title><author>Deckers, F ; Corthouts, B ; Nackaerts, Y ; Ozsarlak, O ; Parizel, P M ; De Schepper, A M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-21f2e8246446c0fa9e8d416831734da9e9d6945497853a2f35684118d77d8f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ferrosoferric Oxide</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Iron - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Oxides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deckers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corthouts, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nackaerts, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozsarlak, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parizel, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schepper, A M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deckers, F</au><au>Corthouts, B</au><au>Nackaerts, Y</au><au>Ozsarlak, O</au><au>Parizel, P M</au><au>De Schepper, A M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>887-892</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the value of low- vs high-field MR systems in the detection of focal liver lesions after IV administration of iron oxide particles. A prospective study was undertaken which included 20 patients with focal liver lesions on CT or US, or strong clinical suspicion of focal liver disease. Iron oxide particles were administered in an IV drip infusion over 30 min. Magnetic resonance imaging was subsequently performed on a 0.2 and a 1.5-T system. Both examinations were performed in one session. Turbo spin-echo T2-weighted sequences were used for further analysis (at 0.2 T: TR 4050 ms, TE 96 ms; 1.5 T: TR 3000 ms, TE 103 ms). After randomisation, images were analysed by two blinded readers. The evaluation included lesion counts, determination of lesion conspicuity and overall image quality (both graded on a scale 1-5). Quantitative analysis was performed on 29 lesions. Lesion-to-liver signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. The total lesion count (cumulative counts for two observers) was 59 on the high-field system and 63 on the low-field system. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference. On both systems median value for lesion conspicuity was 3. No statistically significant difference was found. Global image quality was rated higher on the high-field system: 3 vs 2 for the low-field system (p = 0.0017). Quantitative analysis showed no significant difference for lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios or CNRs. Although subjective image quality is significantly better on the high-field system, this does not result in better lesion detection or better lesion conspicuity. No significant difference in objective quantitative parameters was found in our series.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>9228104</pmid><doi>10.1007/s003300050222</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 1997, Vol.7 (6), p.887-892
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79146840
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Dextrans
Female
Ferrosoferric Oxide
Humans
Image Enhancement
Infusions, Intravenous
Iron - administration & dosage
Liver - pathology
Liver Diseases - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetite Nanoparticles
Male
Middle Aged
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Oxides - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Random Allocation
title The influence of MR field strength on the detection of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T04%3A40%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20MR%20field%20strength%20on%20the%20detection%20of%20focal%20liver%20lesions%20with%20superparamagnetic%20iron%20oxide&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Deckers,%20F&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=887-892&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s003300050222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79146840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884663849&rft_id=info:pmid/9228104&rfr_iscdi=true