Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section
Two previous studies of interval insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) in women with previous cesarean delivery produced conflicting results. We studied the first and subsequent segment IUCD performance in 215 women with one or more cesarean deliveries. All the insertions were perfo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 1989-07, Vol.29 (3), p.243-248 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 248 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 243 |
| container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Holloway, G.A. Goldstuck, N.D. Bowen, D. |
| description | Two previous studies of interval insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) in women with previous cesarean delivery produced conflicting results. We studied the first and subsequent segment IUCD performance in 215 women with one or more cesarean deliveries. All the insertions were performed by doctors in the outpatient department of the hospital. The follow-up rate at 6 months was over 80%. There was a higher than expected expulsion rate of 19 per 100 insertions in the first 12 months, in both the first and subsequent segments. Other IUCD related problems were in keeping with expectations. The IUCD nonetheless remains a useful contraceptive option for these women. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90262-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79135761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0020729289902622</els_id><sourcerecordid>79135761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-45d0971f3109658cd21a43cdd355b4a083ea59ec3c0b9ad4a6058976f3310aac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9LwzAYhoMoc07_A4WeRA_V_Gja5iLI0DkZ7OLOIUu-SqRrZtJ17L83dWNH8RQ-3vd5CQ9C1wQ_EEzyR4wpTgsq6F0p7gWmOU3pCRqSshApywpxiobHyjm6COELY0wKQgZoQHkuMkqHaDFtWvCdqhPbBPCtdU3iqkQ18W692sTQNpBo118a1q3tIDHQWQ1J5erabW3zmWgIykOEAuh-4hKdVaoOcHV4R2jx-vIxfktn88l0_DxLNeM5SzNusChIxQgWOS-1oURlTBvDOF9mCpcMFBegmcZLoUymcsxLUeQVi4RSmo3Q7X537d33BkIrVzZoqGvVgNsEWQjCeJGTWMz2Re1dCB4qufZ2pfxOEix7m7JXJXtVshTy16akEbs57G-WKzBH6KAv5mKfb20Nu39tyun7ZE4zFtmnPQtRUGfBy6AtNBqM9dGiNM7-_bkf1W2VMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79135761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Holloway, G.A. ; Goldstuck, N.D. ; Bowen, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holloway, G.A. ; Goldstuck, N.D. ; Bowen, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Two previous studies of interval insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) in women with previous cesarean delivery produced conflicting results. We studied the first and subsequent segment IUCD performance in 215 women with one or more cesarean deliveries. All the insertions were performed by doctors in the outpatient department of the hospital. The follow-up rate at 6 months was over 80%. There was a higher than expected expulsion rate of 19 per 100 insertions in the first 12 months, in both the first and subsequent segments. Other IUCD related problems were in keeping with expectations. The IUCD nonetheless remains a useful contraceptive option for these women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90262-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2569422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cesarean Section ; Expulsion ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Follow-up ; Humans ; Interval ; Intrauterine contraceptive device ; Intrauterine Devices ; Population ; Single center ; South Africa ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 1989-07, Vol.29 (3), p.243-248</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1989 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-45d0971f3109658cd21a43cdd355b4a083ea59ec3c0b9ad4a6058976f3310aac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2F0020-7292%2889%2990262-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020729289902622$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,3537,27901,27902,45550,45551,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2569422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holloway, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstuck, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Two previous studies of interval insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) in women with previous cesarean delivery produced conflicting results. We studied the first and subsequent segment IUCD performance in 215 women with one or more cesarean deliveries. All the insertions were performed by doctors in the outpatient department of the hospital. The follow-up rate at 6 months was over 80%. There was a higher than expected expulsion rate of 19 per 100 insertions in the first 12 months, in both the first and subsequent segments. Other IUCD related problems were in keeping with expectations. The IUCD nonetheless remains a useful contraceptive option for these women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Expulsion</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-up</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interval</subject><subject>Intrauterine contraceptive device</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Single center</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM9LwzAYhoMoc07_A4WeRA_V_Gja5iLI0DkZ7OLOIUu-SqRrZtJ17L83dWNH8RQ-3vd5CQ9C1wQ_EEzyR4wpTgsq6F0p7gWmOU3pCRqSshApywpxiobHyjm6COELY0wKQgZoQHkuMkqHaDFtWvCdqhPbBPCtdU3iqkQ18W692sTQNpBo118a1q3tIDHQWQ1J5erabW3zmWgIykOEAuh-4hKdVaoOcHV4R2jx-vIxfktn88l0_DxLNeM5SzNusChIxQgWOS-1oURlTBvDOF9mCpcMFBegmcZLoUymcsxLUeQVi4RSmo3Q7X537d33BkIrVzZoqGvVgNsEWQjCeJGTWMz2Re1dCB4qufZ2pfxOEix7m7JXJXtVshTy16akEbs57G-WKzBH6KAv5mKfb20Nu39tyun7ZE4zFtmnPQtRUGfBy6AtNBqM9dGiNM7-_bkf1W2VMw</recordid><startdate>198907</startdate><enddate>198907</enddate><creator>Holloway, G.A.</creator><creator>Goldstuck, N.D.</creator><creator>Bowen, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198907</creationdate><title>Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section</title><author>Holloway, G.A. ; Goldstuck, N.D. ; Bowen, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3563-45d0971f3109658cd21a43cdd355b4a083ea59ec3c0b9ad4a6058976f3310aac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Expulsion</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-up</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interval</topic><topic>Intrauterine contraceptive device</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Single center</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holloway, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstuck, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holloway, G.A.</au><au>Goldstuck, N.D.</au><au>Bowen, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>1989-07</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>243-248</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Two previous studies of interval insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) in women with previous cesarean delivery produced conflicting results. We studied the first and subsequent segment IUCD performance in 215 women with one or more cesarean deliveries. All the insertions were performed by doctors in the outpatient department of the hospital. The follow-up rate at 6 months was over 80%. There was a higher than expected expulsion rate of 19 per 100 insertions in the first 12 months, in both the first and subsequent segments. Other IUCD related problems were in keeping with expectations. The IUCD nonetheless remains a useful contraceptive option for these women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>2569422</pmid><doi>10.1016/0020-7292(89)90262-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
| ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 1989-07, Vol.29 (3), p.243-248 |
| issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79135761 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Cesarean Section Expulsion Family Planning Services Female Follow-up Humans Interval Intrauterine contraceptive device Intrauterine Devices Population Single center South Africa Time Factors |
| title | Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following cesarean section |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T03%3A07%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interval%20insertion%20of%20an%20intrauterine%20contraceptive%20device%20following%20cesarean%20section&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Holloway,%20G.A.&rft.date=1989-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=243-248&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0020-7292(89)90262-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79135761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79135761&rft_id=info:pmid/2569422&rft_els_id=0020729289902622&rfr_iscdi=true |