A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging

We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 1997, Vol.15 (3), p.301-306
Hauptverfasser: Dantendorfer, Karl, Amering, Michaela, Bankier, Alexander, Helbich, Thomas, Prayer, Daniela, Youssefzadeh, Soraya, Alexandrowicz, Rainer, Imhof, Herwig, Katschnig, Heinz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 15
creator Dantendorfer, Karl
Amering, Michaela
Bankier, Alexander
Helbich, Thomas
Prayer, Daniela
Youssefzadeh, Soraya
Alexandrowicz, Rainer
Imhof, Herwig
Katschnig, Heinz
description We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional differences between a 1.5 and a 0.5 tesla scanner on the frequency of MA. Two hundred and ninety-seven first time MRI patients were surveyed before and after imaging with anxiety and attitude questionnaires. Frequency and impact on diagnostic quality of MA were documented. 12.8% of all scans showed MA not related to normal body pulsations. In 6.4% the diagnostic quality was impaired. Constructional differences did not influence the frequency of MA. Also, anxiety as determined with the most common anxiety measuring instrument was not related to the development of MA. Concern about the technical apparatus identified 70.6% of all individuals developing MA. Patients at risk for the development of MA can be identified prior to scanning. It seems necessary to further develop reliable methods to detect them and to evaluate strategies to prevent MA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79109685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X96003852</els_id><sourcerecordid>79109685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-65ea58a4cc6e45c942570664ee6bff2a09d81988fbd4420bcd35095eba8c2d6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrHCEUxyW0JJs0HyHgoZQGMq3jjI6eSghNWgj00BZ6E0efiWVXJ-qE7revk132mpP4_r_3fPxE6KIln1rS8s8_ydCRZqDsz0fJLwnpBGvoEVq1YugaJmT_Bq0OyAk6zfkvIYTRjh2jY0nriGFYoedrnMtstzg6XB4Bg3NgSl6uky4eQsE6_PNQtld4gmRgKj6GXIsWw9Psp82CxIA3cQmwTsU7vUzwtaYfAhRvcIIcgw4GsK81Hx7eobdOrzOc788z9Pv266-bb839j7vvN9f3jekZKw1noJnQvTEcemZkT9lAOO8B-Ogc1URa0Uoh3Gj7npLR2I4RyWDUwlDLx-4MfdjNnVJ8miEXtfHZwHqtA8Q5q0G2RHLBKsh2oEkx5wROTanumraqJWrxrV58q0Wmkly9-Fa09l3sH5jHDdhD115wzd_vc52NXrtULfh8wOjQCSFFxb7sMKgynj0klU2Vb8D6VP9D2ehfWeQ_f8Se_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79109685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Dantendorfer, Karl ; Amering, Michaela ; Bankier, Alexander ; Helbich, Thomas ; Prayer, Daniela ; Youssefzadeh, Soraya ; Alexandrowicz, Rainer ; Imhof, Herwig ; Katschnig, Heinz</creator><creatorcontrib>Dantendorfer, Karl ; Amering, Michaela ; Bankier, Alexander ; Helbich, Thomas ; Prayer, Daniela ; Youssefzadeh, Soraya ; Alexandrowicz, Rainer ; Imhof, Herwig ; Katschnig, Heinz</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional differences between a 1.5 and a 0.5 tesla scanner on the frequency of MA. Two hundred and ninety-seven first time MRI patients were surveyed before and after imaging with anxiety and attitude questionnaires. Frequency and impact on diagnostic quality of MA were documented. 12.8% of all scans showed MA not related to normal body pulsations. In 6.4% the diagnostic quality was impaired. Constructional differences did not influence the frequency of MA. Also, anxiety as determined with the most common anxiety measuring instrument was not related to the development of MA. Concern about the technical apparatus identified 70.6% of all individuals developing MA. Patients at risk for the development of MA can be identified prior to scanning. It seems necessary to further develop reliable methods to detect them and to evaluate strategies to prevent MA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9201677</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRIMDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Anxiety Agents - therapeutic use ; Anxiety ; Anxiety - physiopathology ; Anxiety - psychology ; Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diazepam - therapeutic use ; Equipment Design ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Motion ; Motion artifacts ; Phobic Disorders - physiopathology ; Phobic Disorders - psychology ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 1997, Vol.15 (3), p.301-306</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-65ea58a4cc6e45c942570664ee6bff2a09d81988fbd4420bcd35095eba8c2d6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-65ea58a4cc6e45c942570664ee6bff2a09d81988fbd4420bcd35095eba8c2d6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2738898$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9201677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dantendorfer, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amering, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbich, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prayer, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssefzadeh, Soraya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrowicz, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imhof, Herwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katschnig, Heinz</creatorcontrib><title>A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional differences between a 1.5 and a 0.5 tesla scanner on the frequency of MA. Two hundred and ninety-seven first time MRI patients were surveyed before and after imaging with anxiety and attitude questionnaires. Frequency and impact on diagnostic quality of MA were documented. 12.8% of all scans showed MA not related to normal body pulsations. In 6.4% the diagnostic quality was impaired. Constructional differences did not influence the frequency of MA. Also, anxiety as determined with the most common anxiety measuring instrument was not related to the development of MA. Concern about the technical apparatus identified 70.6% of all individuals developing MA. Patients at risk for the development of MA can be identified prior to scanning. It seems necessary to further develop reliable methods to detect them and to evaluate strategies to prevent MA.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Anxiety Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diazepam - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion artifacts</subject><subject>Phobic Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phobic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrHCEUxyW0JJs0HyHgoZQGMq3jjI6eSghNWgj00BZ6E0efiWVXJ-qE7revk132mpP4_r_3fPxE6KIln1rS8s8_ydCRZqDsz0fJLwnpBGvoEVq1YugaJmT_Bq0OyAk6zfkvIYTRjh2jY0nriGFYoedrnMtstzg6XB4Bg3NgSl6uky4eQsE6_PNQtld4gmRgKj6GXIsWw9Psp82CxIA3cQmwTsU7vUzwtaYfAhRvcIIcgw4GsK81Hx7eobdOrzOc788z9Pv266-bb839j7vvN9f3jekZKw1noJnQvTEcemZkT9lAOO8B-Ogc1URa0Uoh3Gj7npLR2I4RyWDUwlDLx-4MfdjNnVJ8miEXtfHZwHqtA8Q5q0G2RHLBKsh2oEkx5wROTanumraqJWrxrV58q0Wmkly9-Fa09l3sH5jHDdhD115wzd_vc52NXrtULfh8wOjQCSFFxb7sMKgynj0klU2Vb8D6VP9D2ehfWeQ_f8Se_A</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Dantendorfer, Karl</creator><creator>Amering, Michaela</creator><creator>Bankier, Alexander</creator><creator>Helbich, Thomas</creator><creator>Prayer, Daniela</creator><creator>Youssefzadeh, Soraya</creator><creator>Alexandrowicz, Rainer</creator><creator>Imhof, Herwig</creator><creator>Katschnig, Heinz</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Dantendorfer, Karl ; Amering, Michaela ; Bankier, Alexander ; Helbich, Thomas ; Prayer, Daniela ; Youssefzadeh, Soraya ; Alexandrowicz, Rainer ; Imhof, Herwig ; Katschnig, Heinz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-65ea58a4cc6e45c942570664ee6bff2a09d81988fbd4420bcd35095eba8c2d6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Anxiety Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diazepam - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion artifacts</topic><topic>Phobic Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phobic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dantendorfer, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amering, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbich, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prayer, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssefzadeh, Soraya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandrowicz, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imhof, Herwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katschnig, Heinz</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dantendorfer, Karl</au><au>Amering, Michaela</au><au>Bankier, Alexander</au><au>Helbich, Thomas</au><au>Prayer, Daniela</au><au>Youssefzadeh, Soraya</au><au>Alexandrowicz, Rainer</au><au>Imhof, Herwig</au><au>Katschnig, Heinz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>301-306</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><coden>MRIMDQ</coden><abstract>We investigated to see if motion artifacts (MA) occurring in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are related to prescan anxiety measures and test the feasibility of identifying patients at risk for the development of MA before scanning. Furthermore, to determine a possible influence of constructional differences between a 1.5 and a 0.5 tesla scanner on the frequency of MA. Two hundred and ninety-seven first time MRI patients were surveyed before and after imaging with anxiety and attitude questionnaires. Frequency and impact on diagnostic quality of MA were documented. 12.8% of all scans showed MA not related to normal body pulsations. In 6.4% the diagnostic quality was impaired. Constructional differences did not influence the frequency of MA. Also, anxiety as determined with the most common anxiety measuring instrument was not related to the development of MA. Concern about the technical apparatus identified 70.6% of all individuals developing MA. Patients at risk for the development of MA can be identified prior to scanning. It seems necessary to further develop reliable methods to detect them and to evaluate strategies to prevent MA.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9201677</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-725X
ispartof Magnetic resonance imaging, 1997, Vol.15 (3), p.301-306
issn 0730-725X
1873-5894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79109685
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Anti-Anxiety Agents - therapeutic use
Anxiety
Anxiety - physiopathology
Anxiety - psychology
Attitude
Biological and medical sciences
Diazepam - therapeutic use
Equipment Design
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous. Technology
Motion
Motion artifacts
Phobic Disorders - physiopathology
Phobic Disorders - psychology
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Sex Factors
title A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A46%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20patient%20anxiety,%20perceptions%20and%20equipment%20on%20motion%20artifacts%20in%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Dantendorfer,%20Karl&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=301-306&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft.coden=MRIMDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00385-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79109685%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79109685&rft_id=info:pmid/9201677&rft_els_id=S0730725X96003852&rfr_iscdi=true