Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women

Indicators of vitamin A status were evaluated in nonpregnant breast-feeding (n = 265) and nonpregnant non-breast-feeding (n = 49) Indonesian women. The concentration of vitamin A (not including provitamin A carotenoids) and fat in breast milk was 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a br...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 1997-07, Vol.66 (1), p.160-167
Hauptverfasser: de Pee, S, Yuniar, Y, West, CE, Muhilal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 1
container_start_page 160
container_title The American journal of clinical nutrition
container_volume 66
creator de Pee, S
Yuniar, Y
West, CE
Muhilal
description Indicators of vitamin A status were evaluated in nonpregnant breast-feeding (n = 265) and nonpregnant non-breast-feeding (n = 49) Indonesian women. The concentration of vitamin A (not including provitamin A carotenoids) and fat in breast milk was 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 mo old than for women with an infant 3-6 mo old. The vitamin A content of milk fat was constant throughout lactation. Breast-milk vitamin A was most sensitive to changes in vitamin A status when expressed per volume. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations < 0.70 mumol/L were < 75% for the concentration of breast-milk vitamin A and serum retinol binding protein (RBP). The modified-relative-dose-response (MRDR) method suffers from a relatively large intraindividual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability of the dehydroretinol concentration to laboratory errors and to variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of dehydroretinol:retinol, serum retinol concentration was lower in breast-feeding women than in non-breast-feeding women. Thus, it may be necessary to use different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration, which was just above marginal (0.85 mumol/L), had the smallest within-person variation and was also the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status postintervention, requiring only 19 subjects per group. Serum RBP concentration, breast-milk vitamin A expressed per volume or per gram milk fat, and the MRDR method required groups of 35, 36, 139, and 53 subjects, respectively. Although serum retinol concentration is the most widely used biochemical method for assessing vitamin A status, it is not sensitive to changes over a wide range of vitamin A status and is temporarily lowered during infections. Alternative indicators of vitamin A status--breast milk vitamin A concentration, serum retinol binding protein (RBP) concentration, and the modified relative dose response (MRDR) method--were evaluated in a cross-sectional and intervention study of 265 breast feeding women and 49 nonpregnant, non-breast-feeding women from West Java, Indonesia. Concentrations of vitamin A and fat in breast milk were 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 months of age than for mothers of a 3-6 month old infant. Sensitivity and specificity for det
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcn/66.1.160
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79100093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002916523178981</els_id><sourcerecordid>79100093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c3105dfdd48fe6fb53db5f01af4f6369592927e4f7a7c374d2cdc1b942c8ccec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9rFDEcxYNY6tp69CgEEW-zzY-ZZHIspWqh4KU9h0zyjWaZSWqSWel_b5Zdeih4-sL3fXg83kPoIyVbShS_Mjsbr4TY0i0V5A3aUMXHjjMi36INIYR1iorhHXpfyo4QyvpRnKNzxYii47BB-XZv5tXUkCJOHk8h2d-wBGtmHKJrt6ZcDso-VLOEiK9xqaaupcl4ymBK7TyAC_EXNtHhmGL36n0XXYpQgon4b1ogXqIzb-YCH073Aj1-u324-dHd__x-d3N939me09pZTsngvHP96EH4aeBuGjyhxvdecKEGxRST0HtppOWyd8w6SyfVMztaC5ZfoK9H36ec_qxQql5CsTDPJkJai5aKtn4Ub-DnV-AurTm2bJpxqnrOB9Kg7gjZnErJ4PVTDovJz5oSfRhCH4bQQmiq2xCN_3QyXacF3At9ar7pX066Ka1tn020obxgTEpCySGbPGLQmtoHyLrYANG2ajPYql0K_wnwD4GMpXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231943350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>de Pee, S ; Yuniar, Y ; West, CE ; Muhilal</creator><creatorcontrib>de Pee, S ; Yuniar, Y ; West, CE ; Muhilal</creatorcontrib><description>Indicators of vitamin A status were evaluated in nonpregnant breast-feeding (n = 265) and nonpregnant non-breast-feeding (n = 49) Indonesian women. The concentration of vitamin A (not including provitamin A carotenoids) and fat in breast milk was 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 mo old than for women with an infant 3-6 mo old. The vitamin A content of milk fat was constant throughout lactation. Breast-milk vitamin A was most sensitive to changes in vitamin A status when expressed per volume. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations &lt; 0.70 mumol/L were &lt; 75% for the concentration of breast-milk vitamin A and serum retinol binding protein (RBP). The modified-relative-dose-response (MRDR) method suffers from a relatively large intraindividual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability of the dehydroretinol concentration to laboratory errors and to variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of dehydroretinol:retinol, serum retinol concentration was lower in breast-feeding women than in non-breast-feeding women. Thus, it may be necessary to use different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration, which was just above marginal (0.85 mumol/L), had the smallest within-person variation and was also the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status postintervention, requiring only 19 subjects per group. Serum RBP concentration, breast-milk vitamin A expressed per volume or per gram milk fat, and the MRDR method required groups of 35, 36, 139, and 53 subjects, respectively. Although serum retinol concentration is the most widely used biochemical method for assessing vitamin A status, it is not sensitive to changes over a wide range of vitamin A status and is temporarily lowered during infections. Alternative indicators of vitamin A status--breast milk vitamin A concentration, serum retinol binding protein (RBP) concentration, and the modified relative dose response (MRDR) method--were evaluated in a cross-sectional and intervention study of 265 breast feeding women and 49 nonpregnant, non-breast-feeding women from West Java, Indonesia. Concentrations of vitamin A and fat in breast milk were 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 months of age than for mothers of a 3-6 month old infant. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations under 0.70 mcmol/l were less than 75% for the concentration of breast milk vitamin A and serum RBP. The MRDR method yielded large intra-individual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability to laboratory errors and variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of this ratio, serum retinol concentrations were 20-25% lower in breast-feeding women. This finding suggests a need for different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration had the smallest within-person variation and was the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status post-nutritional intervention. However, more data are required on breast milk composition and its changes throughout lactation before conclusions can be drawn about how to use breast milk vitamin A as an indicator of vitamin A status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/66.1.160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9209185</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCNAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Animals ; Asia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biology ; Breast Feeding ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Clinical Research ; Cross Sectional Analysis ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Developing Countries ; Diet ; Female ; Health ; Human Milk ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Indonesia ; Infant Nutrition ; Lactation ; Lactation - blood ; Maternal Physiology ; Measurement ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Milk, Human - chemistry ; Milk, Human - metabolism ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Indexes ; Nutritional Status ; Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement ; Physiology ; Population ; Pregnancy ; Research Methodology ; Research Report ; Retinol-Binding Proteins - analysis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Southeastern Asia ; Vitamin A ; Vitamin A - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Vitamin A - analysis ; Vitamin A - blood ; Vitamins</subject><ispartof>The American journal of clinical nutrition, 1997-07, Vol.66 (1), p.160-167</ispartof><rights>1997 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. Jul 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c3105dfdd48fe6fb53db5f01af4f6369592927e4f7a7c374d2cdc1b942c8ccec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c3105dfdd48fe6fb53db5f01af4f6369592927e4f7a7c374d2cdc1b942c8ccec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2770103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9209185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Pee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuniar, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhilal</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women</title><title>The American journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Indicators of vitamin A status were evaluated in nonpregnant breast-feeding (n = 265) and nonpregnant non-breast-feeding (n = 49) Indonesian women. The concentration of vitamin A (not including provitamin A carotenoids) and fat in breast milk was 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 mo old than for women with an infant 3-6 mo old. The vitamin A content of milk fat was constant throughout lactation. Breast-milk vitamin A was most sensitive to changes in vitamin A status when expressed per volume. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations &lt; 0.70 mumol/L were &lt; 75% for the concentration of breast-milk vitamin A and serum retinol binding protein (RBP). The modified-relative-dose-response (MRDR) method suffers from a relatively large intraindividual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability of the dehydroretinol concentration to laboratory errors and to variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of dehydroretinol:retinol, serum retinol concentration was lower in breast-feeding women than in non-breast-feeding women. Thus, it may be necessary to use different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration, which was just above marginal (0.85 mumol/L), had the smallest within-person variation and was also the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status postintervention, requiring only 19 subjects per group. Serum RBP concentration, breast-milk vitamin A expressed per volume or per gram milk fat, and the MRDR method required groups of 35, 36, 139, and 53 subjects, respectively. Although serum retinol concentration is the most widely used biochemical method for assessing vitamin A status, it is not sensitive to changes over a wide range of vitamin A status and is temporarily lowered during infections. Alternative indicators of vitamin A status--breast milk vitamin A concentration, serum retinol binding protein (RBP) concentration, and the modified relative dose response (MRDR) method--were evaluated in a cross-sectional and intervention study of 265 breast feeding women and 49 nonpregnant, non-breast-feeding women from West Java, Indonesia. Concentrations of vitamin A and fat in breast milk were 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 months of age than for mothers of a 3-6 month old infant. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations under 0.70 mcmol/l were less than 75% for the concentration of breast milk vitamin A and serum RBP. The MRDR method yielded large intra-individual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability to laboratory errors and variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of this ratio, serum retinol concentrations were 20-25% lower in breast-feeding women. This finding suggests a need for different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration had the smallest within-person variation and was the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status post-nutritional intervention. However, more data are required on breast milk composition and its changes throughout lactation before conclusions can be drawn about how to use breast milk vitamin A as an indicator of vitamin A status.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Cross Sectional Analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Human Milk</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Infant Nutrition</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Lactation - blood</subject><subject>Maternal Physiology</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Milk, Human - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk, Human - metabolism</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Indexes</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Retinol-Binding Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Southeastern Asia</subject><subject>Vitamin A</subject><subject>Vitamin A - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Vitamin A - analysis</subject><subject>Vitamin A - blood</subject><subject>Vitamins</subject><issn>0002-9165</issn><issn>1938-3207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9rFDEcxYNY6tp69CgEEW-zzY-ZZHIspWqh4KU9h0zyjWaZSWqSWel_b5Zdeih4-sL3fXg83kPoIyVbShS_Mjsbr4TY0i0V5A3aUMXHjjMi36INIYR1iorhHXpfyo4QyvpRnKNzxYii47BB-XZv5tXUkCJOHk8h2d-wBGtmHKJrt6ZcDso-VLOEiK9xqaaupcl4ymBK7TyAC_EXNtHhmGL36n0XXYpQgon4b1ogXqIzb-YCH073Aj1-u324-dHd__x-d3N939me09pZTsngvHP96EH4aeBuGjyhxvdecKEGxRST0HtppOWyd8w6SyfVMztaC5ZfoK9H36ec_qxQql5CsTDPJkJai5aKtn4Ub-DnV-AurTm2bJpxqnrOB9Kg7gjZnErJ4PVTDovJz5oSfRhCH4bQQmiq2xCN_3QyXacF3At9ar7pX066Ka1tn020obxgTEpCySGbPGLQmtoHyLrYANG2ajPYql0K_wnwD4GMpXM</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>de Pee, S</creator><creator>Yuniar, Y</creator><creator>West, CE</creator><creator>Muhilal</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women</title><author>de Pee, S ; Yuniar, Y ; West, CE ; Muhilal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c3105dfdd48fe6fb53db5f01af4f6369592927e4f7a7c374d2cdc1b942c8ccec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Cross Sectional Analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Human Milk</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Infant Nutrition</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Lactation - blood</topic><topic>Maternal Physiology</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Milk, Human - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk, Human - metabolism</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Indexes</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Retinol-Binding Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Southeastern Asia</topic><topic>Vitamin A</topic><topic>Vitamin A - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Vitamin A - analysis</topic><topic>Vitamin A - blood</topic><topic>Vitamins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Pee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuniar, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhilal</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Pee, S</au><au>Yuniar, Y</au><au>West, CE</au><au>Muhilal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>160-167</pages><issn>0002-9165</issn><eissn>1938-3207</eissn><coden>AJCNAC</coden><abstract>Indicators of vitamin A status were evaluated in nonpregnant breast-feeding (n = 265) and nonpregnant non-breast-feeding (n = 49) Indonesian women. The concentration of vitamin A (not including provitamin A carotenoids) and fat in breast milk was 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 mo old than for women with an infant 3-6 mo old. The vitamin A content of milk fat was constant throughout lactation. Breast-milk vitamin A was most sensitive to changes in vitamin A status when expressed per volume. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations &lt; 0.70 mumol/L were &lt; 75% for the concentration of breast-milk vitamin A and serum retinol binding protein (RBP). The modified-relative-dose-response (MRDR) method suffers from a relatively large intraindividual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability of the dehydroretinol concentration to laboratory errors and to variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of dehydroretinol:retinol, serum retinol concentration was lower in breast-feeding women than in non-breast-feeding women. Thus, it may be necessary to use different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration, which was just above marginal (0.85 mumol/L), had the smallest within-person variation and was also the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status postintervention, requiring only 19 subjects per group. Serum RBP concentration, breast-milk vitamin A expressed per volume or per gram milk fat, and the MRDR method required groups of 35, 36, 139, and 53 subjects, respectively. Although serum retinol concentration is the most widely used biochemical method for assessing vitamin A status, it is not sensitive to changes over a wide range of vitamin A status and is temporarily lowered during infections. Alternative indicators of vitamin A status--breast milk vitamin A concentration, serum retinol binding protein (RBP) concentration, and the modified relative dose response (MRDR) method--were evaluated in a cross-sectional and intervention study of 265 breast feeding women and 49 nonpregnant, non-breast-feeding women from West Java, Indonesia. Concentrations of vitamin A and fat in breast milk were 30% and 20% higher, respectively, for women with a breast-fed child 7-18 months of age than for mothers of a 3-6 month old infant. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting serum retinol concentrations under 0.70 mcmol/l were less than 75% for the concentration of breast milk vitamin A and serum RBP. The MRDR method yielded large intra-individual variation in the ratio of dehydroretinol to retinol because of vulnerability to laboratory errors and variation in dosing and absorption. Within categories of this ratio, serum retinol concentrations were 20-25% lower in breast-feeding women. This finding suggests a need for different cutoff values for the ratio and for serum retinol concentration. Serum retinol concentration had the smallest within-person variation and was the most sensitive indicator for detecting a difference between groups in change in vitamin A status post-nutritional intervention. However, more data are required on breast milk composition and its changes throughout lactation before conclusions can be drawn about how to use breast milk vitamin A as an indicator of vitamin A status.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9209185</pmid><doi>10.1093/ajcn/66.1.160</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9165
ispartof The American journal of clinical nutrition, 1997-07, Vol.66 (1), p.160-167
issn 0002-9165
1938-3207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79100093
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Animals
Asia
Biological and medical sciences
Biology
Breast Feeding
Breastfeeding & lactation
Clinical Research
Cross Sectional Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Developing Countries
Diet
Female
Health
Human Milk
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Indonesia
Infant Nutrition
Lactation
Lactation - blood
Maternal Physiology
Measurement
Medical research
Medical sciences
Milk, Human - chemistry
Milk, Human - metabolism
Nutrition
Nutrition Indexes
Nutritional Status
Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement
Physiology
Population
Pregnancy
Research Methodology
Research Report
Retinol-Binding Proteins - analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Southeastern Asia
Vitamin A
Vitamin A - analogs & derivatives
Vitamin A - analysis
Vitamin A - blood
Vitamins
title Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20biochemical%20indicators%20of%20vitamin%20A%20status%20in%20breast-feeding%20and%20non-breast-feeding%20Indonesian%20women&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=de%20Pee,%20S&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=160-167&rft.issn=0002-9165&rft.eissn=1938-3207&rft.coden=AJCNAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcn/66.1.160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79100093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231943350&rft_id=info:pmid/9209185&rft_els_id=S0002916523178981&rfr_iscdi=true