Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets
Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of bracket...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 605 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Lindauer, Steven J. Browning b, Henry Shroff, Bhavna Marshall, Frank Anderson, Ralph H.B. Moon, Peter C. |
description | Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79079071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540697703111</els_id><sourcerecordid>79079071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_QZiV6GL0ppNMJiuRUh9QcKGuQya5Y6PtpCYZsf_emba4FS7cxTnnPj5CzilcU6DlzQtUlcw5g_JSiisBBaU53SMjClLkpeDjfTL6sxyR4xg_AECyMRySQ0ml5BJG5GnaNGhS5pts1S2dwWwV_Gq-XugfFzPfZmmOWe1bm8UUsH1P88HqQ5p769vkTFYHbT4xxVNy0OhFxLNdPyFv99PXyWM-e354mtzNclOUkPLK6tJWti6ZrjQzknHBi4IZxIZVdT0u2LjgKKEGxhopqC1FA5xpygFZyaE4IRfbuf2hXx3GpJYuGlwsdIu-i0pIGIr2Rr41muBjDNioVXBLHdaKghoQqg1CNfBRUqgNQjXkzncLunqJ9i-1Y9brt1sd-y-_HQYVjcPWoHWhR6msd_9s-AWjDIBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79079071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C. ; From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><description>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9199590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental ; Analysis of Variance ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Enamel - ultrastructure ; Dental Prophylaxis - methods ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Resin Cements ; Silicates ; Stainless Steel ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605</ispartof><rights>1997 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9199590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning b, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Bhavna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Dental Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_QZiV6GL0ppNMJiuRUh9QcKGuQya5Y6PtpCYZsf_emba4FS7cxTnnPj5CzilcU6DlzQtUlcw5g_JSiisBBaU53SMjClLkpeDjfTL6sxyR4xg_AECyMRySQ0ml5BJG5GnaNGhS5pts1S2dwWwV_Gq-XugfFzPfZmmOWe1bm8UUsH1P88HqQ5p769vkTFYHbT4xxVNy0OhFxLNdPyFv99PXyWM-e354mtzNclOUkPLK6tJWti6ZrjQzknHBi4IZxIZVdT0u2LjgKKEGxhopqC1FA5xpygFZyaE4IRfbuf2hXx3GpJYuGlwsdIu-i0pIGIr2Rr41muBjDNioVXBLHdaKghoQqg1CNfBRUqgNQjXkzncLunqJ9i-1Y9brt1sd-y-_HQYVjcPWoHWhR6msd_9s-AWjDIBX</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Lindauer, Steven J.</creator><creator>Browning b, Henry</creator><creator>Shroff, Bhavna</creator><creator>Marshall, Frank</creator><creator>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creator><creator>Moon, Peter C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><author>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Dental Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning b, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Bhavna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindauer, Steven J.</au><au>Browning b, Henry</au><au>Shroff, Bhavna</au><au>Marshall, Frank</au><au>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</au><au>Moon, Peter C.</au><aucorp>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9199590</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605 |
issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79079071 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Acid Etching, Dental Analysis of Variance Chi-Square Distribution Dental Bonding - methods Dental Enamel - ultrastructure Dental Prophylaxis - methods Dentistry Humans Orthodontic Brackets Resin Cements Silicates Stainless Steel Surface Properties Tensile Strength |
title | Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20pumice%20prophylaxis%20on%20the%20bond%20strength%20of%20orthodontic%20brackets&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Lindauer,%20Steven%20J.&rft.aucorp=From%20the%20Department%20of%20Orthodontics,%20School%20of%20Dentistry,%20Medical%20College%20of%20Virginia,%20Virginia%20Commonwealth%20University,%20Richmond,%20Va&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79079071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79079071&rft_id=info:pmid/9199590&rft_els_id=S0889540697703111&rfr_iscdi=true |