Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets

Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of bracket...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605
Hauptverfasser: Lindauer, Steven J., Browning b, Henry, Shroff, Bhavna, Marshall, Frank, Anderson, Ralph H.B., Moon, Peter C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 6
container_start_page 599
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 111
creator Lindauer, Steven J.
Browning b, Henry
Shroff, Bhavna
Marshall, Frank
Anderson, Ralph H.B.
Moon, Peter C.
description Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79079071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540697703111</els_id><sourcerecordid>79079071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_QZiV6GL0ppNMJiuRUh9QcKGuQya5Y6PtpCYZsf_emba4FS7cxTnnPj5CzilcU6DlzQtUlcw5g_JSiisBBaU53SMjClLkpeDjfTL6sxyR4xg_AECyMRySQ0ml5BJG5GnaNGhS5pts1S2dwWwV_Gq-XugfFzPfZmmOWe1bm8UUsH1P88HqQ5p769vkTFYHbT4xxVNy0OhFxLNdPyFv99PXyWM-e354mtzNclOUkPLK6tJWti6ZrjQzknHBi4IZxIZVdT0u2LjgKKEGxhopqC1FA5xpygFZyaE4IRfbuf2hXx3GpJYuGlwsdIu-i0pIGIr2Rr41muBjDNioVXBLHdaKghoQqg1CNfBRUqgNQjXkzncLunqJ9i-1Y9brt1sd-y-_HQYVjcPWoHWhR6msd_9s-AWjDIBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79079071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C. ; From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><description>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9199590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental ; Analysis of Variance ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Enamel - ultrastructure ; Dental Prophylaxis - methods ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Resin Cements ; Silicates ; Stainless Steel ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605</ispartof><rights>1997 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9199590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning b, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Bhavna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Dental Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWh8_QZiV6GL0ppNMJiuRUh9QcKGuQya5Y6PtpCYZsf_emba4FS7cxTnnPj5CzilcU6DlzQtUlcw5g_JSiisBBaU53SMjClLkpeDjfTL6sxyR4xg_AECyMRySQ0ml5BJG5GnaNGhS5pts1S2dwWwV_Gq-XugfFzPfZmmOWe1bm8UUsH1P88HqQ5p769vkTFYHbT4xxVNy0OhFxLNdPyFv99PXyWM-e354mtzNclOUkPLK6tJWti6ZrjQzknHBi4IZxIZVdT0u2LjgKKEGxhopqC1FA5xpygFZyaE4IRfbuf2hXx3GpJYuGlwsdIu-i0pIGIr2Rr41muBjDNioVXBLHdaKghoQqg1CNfBRUqgNQjXkzncLunqJ9i-1Y9brt1sd-y-_HQYVjcPWoHWhR6msd_9s-AWjDIBX</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Lindauer, Steven J.</creator><creator>Browning b, Henry</creator><creator>Shroff, Bhavna</creator><creator>Marshall, Frank</creator><creator>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creator><creator>Moon, Peter C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</title><author>Lindauer, Steven J. ; Browning b, Henry ; Shroff, Bhavna ; Marshall, Frank ; Anderson, Ralph H.B. ; Moon, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-8da6d8db64a8a4c94575334ceef48bb234235e90b044f971d67f054a150e46503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Dental Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindauer, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning b, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroff, Bhavna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindauer, Steven J.</au><au>Browning b, Henry</au><au>Shroff, Bhavna</au><au>Marshall, Frank</au><au>Anderson, Ralph H.B.</au><au>Moon, Peter C.</au><aucorp>From the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Pumice prophylaxis has long been accepted as a prerequisite for achieving adequate enamel etching during orthodontic bonding procedures. Three methods were used in this study to examine the effects of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets: (1) shear bond strength of brackets that were bonded to extracted premolars after surface preparation procedures, which either included or did not include prior pumice prophylaxis, was evaluated; (2) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface characteristics of teeth that had been etched with and without prior pumice prophylaxis; and (3) rate of bracket failure in patients who had had brackets bonded with and without prior pumice prophylaxis was recorded during an average treatment time of 18 months. No significant differences were noted in bond strength, general etched enamel surface characteristics, or bracket retention rates. Some specific differences, however, were noted on SEM in localized areas of the etched enamel surfaces, although these did not appear to affect the bond strength or bracket retention rates ultimately attained. (Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:599-605.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9199590</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1997-06, Vol.111 (6), p.599-605
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79079071
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Acid Etching, Dental
Analysis of Variance
Chi-Square Distribution
Dental Bonding - methods
Dental Enamel - ultrastructure
Dental Prophylaxis - methods
Dentistry
Humans
Orthodontic Brackets
Resin Cements
Silicates
Stainless Steel
Surface Properties
Tensile Strength
title Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20pumice%20prophylaxis%20on%20the%20bond%20strength%20of%20orthodontic%20brackets&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Lindauer,%20Steven%20J.&rft.aucorp=From%20the%20Department%20of%20Orthodontics,%20School%20of%20Dentistry,%20Medical%20College%20of%20Virginia,%20Virginia%20Commonwealth%20University,%20Richmond,%20Va&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70311-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79079071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79079071&rft_id=info:pmid/9199590&rft_els_id=S0889540697703111&rfr_iscdi=true