When touch is not the best approach
Health care professionals have long believed in the value of nonverbal components of communication and the highly significant roles such factors as distance, space, and touch can play in therapeutic relationships. The value of touch is not appreciated by all health care professionals or considered a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 1997-05, Vol.6 (3), p.203-206 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 206 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 203 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical nursing |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | DAVIDHIZAR, R NEWMAN, J |
| description | Health care professionals have long believed in the value of nonverbal components of communication and the highly significant roles such factors as distance, space, and touch can play in therapeutic relationships. The value of touch is not appreciated by all health care professionals or considered appropriate or desirable by some patients. While touch has been described as the most important of all the senses, the astute professional must be cognizant of the times when touch should not be used. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1997.00085.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79065793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764012955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-cc63b09a49690fd9763bc879c31ae1d141abdbd3ae929e373de7b21c7dd9329b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo67r6E4SCoqfWJNMmnaMsfsGCF8VjSJOUdulu16YF_fembtmjnobhfeaDh5CI0YTRVNytEwYii7mkPGGIMqGU5lnydUTmh-CYzCkKHjMq5Ck5835NKQPOYUZmyPIcQM7J1UfltlHfDqaKah9t2z7qKxcVzveR3u26VpvqnJyUuvHuYqoL8v748LZ8jlevTy_L-1VsANI-NkZAQVGnKJCWFmVoTS7RANOOWZYyXdjCgnbI0YEE62TBmZHWInAsYEFu9nvD2c8hfKA2tTeuafTWtYNXEqnIJEIAb_8GRUoZxyz7d2UmUylExgOY70HTtd53rlS7rt7o7lsxqkblaq1Gs2o0q0bl6le5-gqjl9ONodg4exicHIf8esq1N7opO701tT9gXOThV4AfXFSH2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57476652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When touch is not the best approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>DAVIDHIZAR, R ; NEWMAN, J</creator><creatorcontrib>DAVIDHIZAR, R ; NEWMAN, J</creatorcontrib><description>Health care professionals have long believed in the value of nonverbal components of communication and the highly significant roles such factors as distance, space, and touch can play in therapeutic relationships. The value of touch is not appreciated by all health care professionals or considered appropriate or desirable by some patients. While touch has been described as the most important of all the senses, the astute professional must be cognizant of the times when touch should not be used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1997.00085.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9188337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cultural Characteristics ; Evaluation ; Fear ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health participants ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Nonverbal Communication ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Nursing ; Nursing Care - psychology ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Therapeutic Touch ; Touch</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 1997-05, Vol.6 (3), p.203-206</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-cc63b09a49690fd9763bc879c31ae1d141abdbd3ae929e373de7b21c7dd9329b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2681293$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9188337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DAVIDHIZAR, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWMAN, J</creatorcontrib><title>When touch is not the best approach</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Health care professionals have long believed in the value of nonverbal components of communication and the highly significant roles such factors as distance, space, and touch can play in therapeutic relationships. The value of touch is not appreciated by all health care professionals or considered appropriate or desirable by some patients. While touch has been described as the most important of all the senses, the astute professional must be cognizant of the times when touch should not be used.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nonverbal Communication</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Care - psychology</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Therapeutic Touch</subject><subject>Touch</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo67r6E4SCoqfWJNMmnaMsfsGCF8VjSJOUdulu16YF_fembtmjnobhfeaDh5CI0YTRVNytEwYii7mkPGGIMqGU5lnydUTmh-CYzCkKHjMq5Ck5835NKQPOYUZmyPIcQM7J1UfltlHfDqaKah9t2z7qKxcVzveR3u26VpvqnJyUuvHuYqoL8v748LZ8jlevTy_L-1VsANI-NkZAQVGnKJCWFmVoTS7RANOOWZYyXdjCgnbI0YEE62TBmZHWInAsYEFu9nvD2c8hfKA2tTeuafTWtYNXEqnIJEIAb_8GRUoZxyz7d2UmUylExgOY70HTtd53rlS7rt7o7lsxqkblaq1Gs2o0q0bl6le5-gqjl9ONodg4exicHIf8esq1N7opO701tT9gXOThV4AfXFSH2A</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>DAVIDHIZAR, R</creator><creator>NEWMAN, J</creator><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>When touch is not the best approach</title><author>DAVIDHIZAR, R ; NEWMAN, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-cc63b09a49690fd9763bc879c31ae1d141abdbd3ae929e373de7b21c7dd9329b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nonverbal Communication</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Care - psychology</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Therapeutic Touch</topic><topic>Touch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DAVIDHIZAR, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWMAN, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DAVIDHIZAR, R</au><au>NEWMAN, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When touch is not the best approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>203-206</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Health care professionals have long believed in the value of nonverbal components of communication and the highly significant roles such factors as distance, space, and touch can play in therapeutic relationships. The value of touch is not appreciated by all health care professionals or considered appropriate or desirable by some patients. While touch has been described as the most important of all the senses, the astute professional must be cognizant of the times when touch should not be used.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell</pub><pmid>9188337</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2702.1997.00085.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-1067 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical nursing, 1997-05, Vol.6 (3), p.203-206 |
| issn | 0962-1067 1365-2702 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79065793 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Attitude to Health Biological and medical sciences Cultural Characteristics Evaluation Fear Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health participants Humans Medical sciences Miscellaneous Nonverbal Communication Nurse-Patient Relations Nursing Nursing Care - psychology Psychology and medicine Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Therapeutic Touch Touch |
| title | When touch is not the best approach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20touch%20is%20not%20the%20best%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=DAVIDHIZAR,%20R&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=203-206&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2702.1997.00085.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764012955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57476652&rft_id=info:pmid/9188337&rfr_iscdi=true |