A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes

Objectives: To evaluate to what degree anthropometric measurements are useful and efficient in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes in different country settings and to develop appropriate reference curves for maternal weight gain. Methods: A meta-analysis of 25 data sets providing information on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 1997-04, Vol.57 (1), p.1-15
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 57
description Objectives: To evaluate to what degree anthropometric measurements are useful and efficient in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes in different country settings and to develop appropriate reference curves for maternal weight gain. Methods: A meta-analysis of 25 data sets providing information on over 111000 births worldwide. Results: Attained weight indicators from pre-pregnancy (Pp) through 9 lunar months demonstrated high odds ratios (O.R.) for both low birth weight (LBW) and intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR). The strongest effect size (O.R. = 4.0) was provided by attained weight at 7 lunar months for IUGR, when applied to women of below average pre-pregnancy weight. The study indicators showed only minor and inconsistent O.R. for preterm birth (PTB). The ability of study indicators to predict the three maternal outcomes was much weaker. Maternal height as a predictor of assisted delivery showed the highest positive O.R. (1.6), but did not meet the screening criteria. Conclusions: A single measurement of attained weight at 5 or 7 lunar months (16–20 or 24–28 weeks) is the most practical screening instrument for LBW and IUGR in most primary health care settings and provides warning of the need for intervention. The operational value of these findings should be demonstrated through their successful large-scale application in service settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02882-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79053450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020729297028828</els_id><sourcerecordid>79053450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-9cbdd43d2d9a310d1d7f57518a53466171046515f8d2e66964b8beab11f5832d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EKtPSn1ApC4RgEerrxK8VqiroQ5VmAahLy7FvwCiJBzspmn9ftzOabVlZ1j3ffRxCzoB-Bgri_DuljNaSafZRy0-UKcVq9YqsQEldN63Ur8nqgLwlxzn_oZSCBDgiRxokF6JZkduL6v56Xbk4DLaLyc7hAas8L35bxb4a7YxpskNlp_l3ips44py25eerTcJfk51c4ZbZlUJ-R970dsh4un9PyM9vX39cXtd366uby4u72rWNglq7zvu28cxr2wD14GXPJQdledMKURakreDAe-UZCqFF26kObQfQc9Uw35yQD7u-mxT_LphnM4bssBwwYVyykZqWTpwWkO9Al2LOCXuzSWG0aWuAmieH5tmheRJktDTPDo0qubP9gKUb0R9Se2ml_n5ft9nZoU9FQ8gHjIlyghYFUzvsXxhw-3-zzc3t1RpK9MsuisXjQ8Bksgs4OfQhoZuNj-GFGx4BqW6dlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79053450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><description>Objectives: To evaluate to what degree anthropometric measurements are useful and efficient in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes in different country settings and to develop appropriate reference curves for maternal weight gain. Methods: A meta-analysis of 25 data sets providing information on over 111000 births worldwide. Results: Attained weight indicators from pre-pregnancy (Pp) through 9 lunar months demonstrated high odds ratios (O.R.) for both low birth weight (LBW) and intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR). The strongest effect size (O.R. = 4.0) was provided by attained weight at 7 lunar months for IUGR, when applied to women of below average pre-pregnancy weight. The study indicators showed only minor and inconsistent O.R. for preterm birth (PTB). The ability of study indicators to predict the three maternal outcomes was much weaker. Maternal height as a predictor of assisted delivery showed the highest positive O.R. (1.6), but did not meet the screening criteria. Conclusions: A single measurement of attained weight at 5 or 7 lunar months (16–20 or 24–28 weeks) is the most practical screening instrument for LBW and IUGR in most primary health care settings and provides warning of the need for intervention. The operational value of these findings should be demonstrated through their successful large-scale application in service settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02882-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9175663</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJGOAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Embryonic and Fetal Development - physiology ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Low birth weight ; Maternal nutrition ; Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring ; Medical sciences ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Weight Gain ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 1997-04, Vol.57 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-9cbdd43d2d9a310d1d7f57518a53466171046515f8d2e66964b8beab11f5832d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-9cbdd43d2d9a310d1d7f57518a53466171046515f8d2e66964b8beab11f5832d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2897%2902882-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02882-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,3536,27903,27904,45553,45554,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2671096$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9175663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objectives: To evaluate to what degree anthropometric measurements are useful and efficient in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes in different country settings and to develop appropriate reference curves for maternal weight gain. Methods: A meta-analysis of 25 data sets providing information on over 111000 births worldwide. Results: Attained weight indicators from pre-pregnancy (Pp) through 9 lunar months demonstrated high odds ratios (O.R.) for both low birth weight (LBW) and intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR). The strongest effect size (O.R. = 4.0) was provided by attained weight at 7 lunar months for IUGR, when applied to women of below average pre-pregnancy weight. The study indicators showed only minor and inconsistent O.R. for preterm birth (PTB). The ability of study indicators to predict the three maternal outcomes was much weaker. Maternal height as a predictor of assisted delivery showed the highest positive O.R. (1.6), but did not meet the screening criteria. Conclusions: A single measurement of attained weight at 5 or 7 lunar months (16–20 or 24–28 weeks) is the most practical screening instrument for LBW and IUGR in most primary health care settings and provides warning of the need for intervention. The operational value of these findings should be demonstrated through their successful large-scale application in service settings.</description><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Embryonic and Fetal Development - physiology</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Low birth weight</subject><subject>Maternal nutrition</subject><subject>Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EKtPSn1ApC4RgEerrxK8VqiroQ5VmAahLy7FvwCiJBzspmn9ftzOabVlZ1j3ffRxCzoB-Bgri_DuljNaSafZRy0-UKcVq9YqsQEldN63Ur8nqgLwlxzn_oZSCBDgiRxokF6JZkduL6v56Xbk4DLaLyc7hAas8L35bxb4a7YxpskNlp_l3ips44py25eerTcJfk51c4ZbZlUJ-R970dsh4un9PyM9vX39cXtd366uby4u72rWNglq7zvu28cxr2wD14GXPJQdledMKURakreDAe-UZCqFF26kObQfQc9Uw35yQD7u-mxT_LphnM4bssBwwYVyykZqWTpwWkO9Al2LOCXuzSWG0aWuAmieH5tmheRJktDTPDo0qubP9gKUb0R9Se2ml_n5ft9nZoU9FQ8gHjIlyghYFUzvsXxhw-3-zzc3t1RpK9MsuisXjQ8Bksgs4OfQhoZuNj-GFGx4BqW6dlQ</recordid><startdate>199704</startdate><enddate>199704</enddate><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199704</creationdate><title>A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-9cbdd43d2d9a310d1d7f57518a53466171046515f8d2e66964b8beab11f5832d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Embryonic and Fetal Development - physiology</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Low birth weight</topic><topic>Maternal nutrition</topic><topic>Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>1997-04</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><coden>IJGOAL</coden><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate to what degree anthropometric measurements are useful and efficient in predicting maternal and fetal outcomes in different country settings and to develop appropriate reference curves for maternal weight gain. Methods: A meta-analysis of 25 data sets providing information on over 111000 births worldwide. Results: Attained weight indicators from pre-pregnancy (Pp) through 9 lunar months demonstrated high odds ratios (O.R.) for both low birth weight (LBW) and intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR). The strongest effect size (O.R. = 4.0) was provided by attained weight at 7 lunar months for IUGR, when applied to women of below average pre-pregnancy weight. The study indicators showed only minor and inconsistent O.R. for preterm birth (PTB). The ability of study indicators to predict the three maternal outcomes was much weaker. Maternal height as a predictor of assisted delivery showed the highest positive O.R. (1.6), but did not meet the screening criteria. Conclusions: A single measurement of attained weight at 5 or 7 lunar months (16–20 or 24–28 weeks) is the most practical screening instrument for LBW and IUGR in most primary health care settings and provides warning of the need for intervention. The operational value of these findings should be demonstrated through their successful large-scale application in service settings.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>9175663</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02882-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7292
ispartof International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 1997-04, Vol.57 (1), p.1-15
issn 0020-7292
1879-3479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79053450
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anthropometry
Biological and medical sciences
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Embryonic and Fetal Development - physiology
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Low birth weight
Maternal nutrition
Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring
Medical sciences
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Weight Gain
World Health Organization
title A WHO collaborative study of maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A30%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20WHO%20collaborative%20study%20of%20maternal%20anthropometry%20and%20pregnancy%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.date=1997-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft.coden=IJGOAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0020-7292(97)02882-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79053450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79053450&rft_id=info:pmid/9175663&rft_els_id=S0020729297028828&rfr_iscdi=true