Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy
The timing of treatment for stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is complicated by conflicting concerns for fetal survival and control of malignancy. There were 11 pregnant women with stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed prior to fetal viability since 1969. Six patients were man...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 1989-07, Vol.34 (1), p.61-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Greer, B.E. Easterling, T.R. Mclennan, D.A. Benedetti, T.J. Cain, J.M. Figge, D.C. Tamimi, H.K. Jackson, J.C. |
description | The timing of treatment for stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is complicated by conflicting concerns for fetal survival and control of malignancy. There were 11 pregnant women with stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed prior to fetal viability since 1969. Six patients were managed with termination of pregnancy and radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 5 patients, treatment was delayed for 6 to 17 weeks and then delivery was accomplished by cesarean section followed directly by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Two of the infants experienced complicated neonatal courses and would have benefited from additional delay. Benefits that could be achieved by delaying delivery for the fetus were calculated from a review of 600 inborn infants without congenital anomalies admitted to the neonatal intensive care (NICU) during 1984 and 1985. Neonatal mortality decreased from 32.8% at 26–27 weeks to 2.7% at 34–35 weeks gestation. Similar improvements in neonatal morbidity were demonstrated. Although adverse maternal outcomes were not associated with delay, an evaluation of risk cannot be derived from this series. Significant fetal benefit can accrue from relatively short delays in planned delivery dates. When stage I-B cervical carcinoma is diagnosed during pregnancy and when fetal survival is desired, delivery should be delayed to achieve fetal maturity, rather than only potential viability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90108-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79052607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>009082588990108X</els_id><sourcerecordid>79052607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c7ecaadd2110d46668e06366104a640a661fca13c74491f4996141fb6c939a563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEGLFDEQhYMo67j6DxRyEHEPrZVOOp1cBF12dWHBi8LeQm1SPUam02OSWdh_b8YZ5ugpr_LeK5KPsdcCPggQ-iOAhc70g3lv7IUFAaa7e8JWAuzQaTPYp2x1ijxnL0r5DQASRH_GzvpRjkNvVgyvqeKGYwp8xko5tcEvqcRAGWtsisfE6y9qdsI1zZQqXyZeahv4TfeFe8oP0e9rmJrmYZdjWvNtpnVqN48v2bMJN4VeHc9z9vP66sflt-72-9eby8-3nZdG186P5BFD6IWAoLTWhkBLrQUo1AqwqcmjkH5UyopJWauFEtO99lZaHLQ8Z-8Oe7d5-bOjUt0ci6fNBhMtu-JGC0OvYWxBdQj6vJSSaXLbHGfMj06A25N1e2xuj80Z6_6RdXet9ua4f3c_UziVjiib__boY2k4ptw-H8spNko5gupb7NMhRo3FQ6Tsio_UyIWYyVcXlvj_d_wFm8aUPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79052607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Greer, B.E. ; Easterling, T.R. ; Mclennan, D.A. ; Benedetti, T.J. ; Cain, J.M. ; Figge, D.C. ; Tamimi, H.K. ; Jackson, J.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greer, B.E. ; Easterling, T.R. ; Mclennan, D.A. ; Benedetti, T.J. ; Cain, J.M. ; Figge, D.C. ; Tamimi, H.K. ; Jackson, J.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The timing of treatment for stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is complicated by conflicting concerns for fetal survival and control of malignancy. There were 11 pregnant women with stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed prior to fetal viability since 1969. Six patients were managed with termination of pregnancy and radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 5 patients, treatment was delayed for 6 to 17 weeks and then delivery was accomplished by cesarean section followed directly by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Two of the infants experienced complicated neonatal courses and would have benefited from additional delay. Benefits that could be achieved by delaying delivery for the fetus were calculated from a review of 600 inborn infants without congenital anomalies admitted to the neonatal intensive care (NICU) during 1984 and 1985. Neonatal mortality decreased from 32.8% at 26–27 weeks to 2.7% at 34–35 weeks gestation. Similar improvements in neonatal morbidity were demonstrated. Although adverse maternal outcomes were not associated with delay, an evaluation of risk cannot be derived from this series. Significant fetal benefit can accrue from relatively short delays in planned delivery dates. When stage I-B cervical carcinoma is diagnosed during pregnancy and when fetal survival is desired, delivery should be delayed to achieve fetal maturity, rather than only potential viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90108-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2737528</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic - therapy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Time Factors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1989-07, Vol.34 (1), p.61-65</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c7ecaadd2110d46668e06366104a640a661fca13c74491f4996141fb6c939a563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c7ecaadd2110d46668e06366104a640a661fca13c74491f4996141fb6c939a563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90108-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7337042$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2737528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greer, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterling, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclennan, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figge, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamimi, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, J.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The timing of treatment for stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is complicated by conflicting concerns for fetal survival and control of malignancy. There were 11 pregnant women with stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed prior to fetal viability since 1969. Six patients were managed with termination of pregnancy and radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 5 patients, treatment was delayed for 6 to 17 weeks and then delivery was accomplished by cesarean section followed directly by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Two of the infants experienced complicated neonatal courses and would have benefited from additional delay. Benefits that could be achieved by delaying delivery for the fetus were calculated from a review of 600 inborn infants without congenital anomalies admitted to the neonatal intensive care (NICU) during 1984 and 1985. Neonatal mortality decreased from 32.8% at 26–27 weeks to 2.7% at 34–35 weeks gestation. Similar improvements in neonatal morbidity were demonstrated. Although adverse maternal outcomes were not associated with delay, an evaluation of risk cannot be derived from this series. Significant fetal benefit can accrue from relatively short delays in planned delivery dates. When stage I-B cervical carcinoma is diagnosed during pregnancy and when fetal survival is desired, delivery should be delayed to achieve fetal maturity, rather than only potential viability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEGLFDEQhYMo67j6DxRyEHEPrZVOOp1cBF12dWHBi8LeQm1SPUam02OSWdh_b8YZ5ugpr_LeK5KPsdcCPggQ-iOAhc70g3lv7IUFAaa7e8JWAuzQaTPYp2x1ijxnL0r5DQASRH_GzvpRjkNvVgyvqeKGYwp8xko5tcEvqcRAGWtsisfE6y9qdsI1zZQqXyZeahv4TfeFe8oP0e9rmJrmYZdjWvNtpnVqN48v2bMJN4VeHc9z9vP66sflt-72-9eby8-3nZdG186P5BFD6IWAoLTWhkBLrQUo1AqwqcmjkH5UyopJWauFEtO99lZaHLQ8Z-8Oe7d5-bOjUt0ci6fNBhMtu-JGC0OvYWxBdQj6vJSSaXLbHGfMj06A25N1e2xuj80Z6_6RdXet9ua4f3c_UziVjiib__boY2k4ptw-H8spNko5gupb7NMhRo3FQ6Tsio_UyIWYyVcXlvj_d_wFm8aUPQ</recordid><startdate>19890701</startdate><enddate>19890701</enddate><creator>Greer, B.E.</creator><creator>Easterling, T.R.</creator><creator>Mclennan, D.A.</creator><creator>Benedetti, T.J.</creator><creator>Cain, J.M.</creator><creator>Figge, D.C.</creator><creator>Tamimi, H.K.</creator><creator>Jackson, J.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890701</creationdate><title>Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy</title><author>Greer, B.E. ; Easterling, T.R. ; Mclennan, D.A. ; Benedetti, T.J. ; Cain, J.M. ; Figge, D.C. ; Tamimi, H.K. ; Jackson, J.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-c7ecaadd2110d46668e06366104a640a661fca13c74491f4996141fb6c939a563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greer, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterling, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclennan, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figge, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamimi, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, J.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greer, B.E.</au><au>Easterling, T.R.</au><au>Mclennan, D.A.</au><au>Benedetti, T.J.</au><au>Cain, J.M.</au><au>Figge, D.C.</au><au>Tamimi, H.K.</au><au>Jackson, J.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1989-07-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>61-65</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The timing of treatment for stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy is complicated by conflicting concerns for fetal survival and control of malignancy. There were 11 pregnant women with stage I-B cervical carcinoma diagnosed prior to fetal viability since 1969. Six patients were managed with termination of pregnancy and radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. In 5 patients, treatment was delayed for 6 to 17 weeks and then delivery was accomplished by cesarean section followed directly by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Two of the infants experienced complicated neonatal courses and would have benefited from additional delay. Benefits that could be achieved by delaying delivery for the fetus were calculated from a review of 600 inborn infants without congenital anomalies admitted to the neonatal intensive care (NICU) during 1984 and 1985. Neonatal mortality decreased from 32.8% at 26–27 weeks to 2.7% at 34–35 weeks gestation. Similar improvements in neonatal morbidity were demonstrated. Although adverse maternal outcomes were not associated with delay, an evaluation of risk cannot be derived from this series. Significant fetal benefit can accrue from relatively short delays in planned delivery dates. When stage I-B cervical carcinoma is diagnosed during pregnancy and when fetal survival is desired, delivery should be delayed to achieve fetal maturity, rather than only potential viability.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2737528</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-8258(89)90108-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 1989-07, Vol.34 (1), p.61-65 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79052607 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Male Management. Prenatal diagnosis Medical sciences Neoplasm Staging Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic - therapy Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Time Factors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy |
title | Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage I-B cervical cancer during pregnancy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A03%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fetal%20and%20maternal%20considerations%20in%20the%20management%20of%20stage%20I-B%20cervical%20cancer%20during%20pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Greer,%20B.E.&rft.date=1989-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=61-65&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90108-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79052607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79052607&rft_id=info:pmid/2737528&rft_els_id=009082588990108X&rfr_iscdi=true |