Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants
The analysis of nuclear-encoded chitinase sequences from various angiosperms has allowed the categorization of the chitinases into discrete classes. Nucleotide sequences of their catalytic domains were compared in this study to investigate the evolutionary relationships between chitinase classes. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular evolution 1997-06, Vol.44 (6), p.614-624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 614 |
container_title | Journal of molecular evolution |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.) Boivin, R Tremblay, C Bellemare, G |
description | The analysis of nuclear-encoded chitinase sequences from various angiosperms has allowed the categorization of the chitinases into discrete classes. Nucleotide sequences of their catalytic domains were compared in this study to investigate the evolutionary relationships between chitinase classes. The functionally distinct class III chitinases appear to be more closely related to fungal enzymes involved in morphogenesis than to other plant chitinases. The ordering of other plant chitinases into additional classes mainly relied on the presence of auxiliary domains--namely, a chitin-binding domain and a carboxy-terminal extension--flanking the main catalytic domain. The results of our phylogenetic analyses showed that classes I and IV form discrete and well-supported monophyletic groups derived from a common ancestral sequence that predates the divergence of dicots and monocots. In contrast, other sequences included in classes I* and II, lacking one or both types of auxiliary domains, were nested within class I sequences, indicating that they have a polyphyletic origin. According to phylogenetic analyses and the calculation of evolutionary rates, these chitinases probably arose from different class I lineages by relatively recent deletion events. The occurrence of such evolutionary trends in cultivated plants and their potential involvement in host-pathogen interactions are discussed |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/pl00006184 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79041786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16020170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2803b6dd9e369f9b1290b28d9adc1a88fa0de2ed721a276a950401fad5fba91e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMoun5cPApCQfAgrE7SNG2OsvgFiwqr5zBtErdLt6lJq_jvzbKrBy_OYWaYeRhm3iHkmMIlBcivugaiCVrwLTKiPGXjldsmIwDGxqzgfI_sh7AAoHkm012yK6mQWZaOyOOs90PVDx6bBFudmA_XDH3tWvRfiTcNrvIwr7uQ4NK1b0k1r_u6xWBC4mxiG_dpfB3rXYNtHw7JjsUmmKNNPCCvtzcvk_vx9OnuYXI9HVeciT6uBGkptJYmFdLKkjIJJSu0RF1RLAqLoA0zOmcUWS5QZsCBWtSZLVFSkx6Q8_Xczrv3wYReLetQmSYuYdwQVC6B07wQ_4JUAIuqQATP_oALN_g2HqEYh4xnUVIZqYs1VXkXgjdWdb5eRq0UBbX6hXqe_vwiwqebkUO5NPoX3Ygf-yfrvkWn8M3XQb3OZM5zQbP0G5FvjFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405451439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.) ; Boivin, R ; Tremblay, C ; Bellemare, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.) ; Boivin, R ; Tremblay, C ; Bellemare, G</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of nuclear-encoded chitinase sequences from various angiosperms has allowed the categorization of the chitinases into discrete classes. Nucleotide sequences of their catalytic domains were compared in this study to investigate the evolutionary relationships between chitinase classes. The functionally distinct class III chitinases appear to be more closely related to fungal enzymes involved in morphogenesis than to other plant chitinases. The ordering of other plant chitinases into additional classes mainly relied on the presence of auxiliary domains--namely, a chitin-binding domain and a carboxy-terminal extension--flanking the main catalytic domain. The results of our phylogenetic analyses showed that classes I and IV form discrete and well-supported monophyletic groups derived from a common ancestral sequence that predates the divergence of dicots and monocots. In contrast, other sequences included in classes I* and II, lacking one or both types of auxiliary domains, were nested within class I sequences, indicating that they have a polyphyletic origin. According to phylogenetic analyses and the calculation of evolutionary rates, these chitinases probably arose from different class I lineages by relatively recent deletion events. The occurrence of such evolutionary trends in cultivated plants and their potential involvement in host-pathogen interactions are discussed</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/pl00006184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9169553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence ; Angiosperms ; Chitin ; CHITINASE ; Chitinases - genetics ; COMPOSICION QUIMICA ; COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE ; Cultivated plants ; DICOTILEDONEAS ; DICOTYLEDONE ; DIFERENCIAS BIOLOGICAS ; DIFFERENCE BIOLOGIQUE ; Divergence ; Domains ; EVOLUCION ; EVOLUTION ; Flowering ; Flowering plants ; GENE ; GENES ; Molecular Sequence Data ; MONOCOTILEDONEAS ; MONOCOTYLEDONE ; Morphogenesis ; Nucleotides ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plants (botany) ; Plants - genetics ; QUITINASA ; SECUENCIA NUCLEOTIDICA ; Sequence Alignment ; Sequence Analysis ; SEQUENCE NUCLEOTIDIQUE</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular evolution, 1997-06, Vol.44 (6), p.614-624</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1997.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2803b6dd9e369f9b1290b28d9adc1a88fa0de2ed721a276a950401fad5fba91e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9169553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boivin, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellemare, G</creatorcontrib><title>Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants</title><title>Journal of molecular evolution</title><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><description>The analysis of nuclear-encoded chitinase sequences from various angiosperms has allowed the categorization of the chitinases into discrete classes. Nucleotide sequences of their catalytic domains were compared in this study to investigate the evolutionary relationships between chitinase classes. The functionally distinct class III chitinases appear to be more closely related to fungal enzymes involved in morphogenesis than to other plant chitinases. The ordering of other plant chitinases into additional classes mainly relied on the presence of auxiliary domains--namely, a chitin-binding domain and a carboxy-terminal extension--flanking the main catalytic domain. The results of our phylogenetic analyses showed that classes I and IV form discrete and well-supported monophyletic groups derived from a common ancestral sequence that predates the divergence of dicots and monocots. In contrast, other sequences included in classes I* and II, lacking one or both types of auxiliary domains, were nested within class I sequences, indicating that they have a polyphyletic origin. According to phylogenetic analyses and the calculation of evolutionary rates, these chitinases probably arose from different class I lineages by relatively recent deletion events. The occurrence of such evolutionary trends in cultivated plants and their potential involvement in host-pathogen interactions are discussed</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Chitin</subject><subject>CHITINASE</subject><subject>Chitinases - genetics</subject><subject>COMPOSICION QUIMICA</subject><subject>COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>Cultivated plants</subject><subject>DICOTILEDONEAS</subject><subject>DICOTYLEDONE</subject><subject>DIFERENCIAS BIOLOGICAS</subject><subject>DIFFERENCE BIOLOGIQUE</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>EVOLUCION</subject><subject>EVOLUTION</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering plants</subject><subject>GENE</subject><subject>GENES</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>MONOCOTILEDONEAS</subject><subject>MONOCOTYLEDONE</subject><subject>Morphogenesis</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Plants - genetics</subject><subject>QUITINASA</subject><subject>SECUENCIA NUCLEOTIDICA</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis</subject><subject>SEQUENCE NUCLEOTIDIQUE</subject><issn>0022-2844</issn><issn>1432-1432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMoun5cPApCQfAgrE7SNG2OsvgFiwqr5zBtErdLt6lJq_jvzbKrBy_OYWaYeRhm3iHkmMIlBcivugaiCVrwLTKiPGXjldsmIwDGxqzgfI_sh7AAoHkm012yK6mQWZaOyOOs90PVDx6bBFudmA_XDH3tWvRfiTcNrvIwr7uQ4NK1b0k1r_u6xWBC4mxiG_dpfB3rXYNtHw7JjsUmmKNNPCCvtzcvk_vx9OnuYXI9HVeciT6uBGkptJYmFdLKkjIJJSu0RF1RLAqLoA0zOmcUWS5QZsCBWtSZLVFSkx6Q8_Xczrv3wYReLetQmSYuYdwQVC6B07wQ_4JUAIuqQATP_oALN_g2HqEYh4xnUVIZqYs1VXkXgjdWdb5eRq0UBbX6hXqe_vwiwqebkUO5NPoX3Ygf-yfrvkWn8M3XQb3OZM5zQbP0G5FvjFo</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.)</creator><creator>Boivin, R</creator><creator>Tremblay, C</creator><creator>Bellemare, G</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants</title><author>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.) ; Boivin, R ; Tremblay, C ; Bellemare, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2803b6dd9e369f9b1290b28d9adc1a88fa0de2ed721a276a950401fad5fba91e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Chitin</topic><topic>CHITINASE</topic><topic>Chitinases - genetics</topic><topic>COMPOSICION QUIMICA</topic><topic>COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>Cultivated plants</topic><topic>DICOTILEDONEAS</topic><topic>DICOTYLEDONE</topic><topic>DIFERENCIAS BIOLOGICAS</topic><topic>DIFFERENCE BIOLOGIQUE</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>EVOLUCION</topic><topic>EVOLUTION</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering plants</topic><topic>GENE</topic><topic>GENES</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>MONOCOTILEDONEAS</topic><topic>MONOCOTYLEDONE</topic><topic>Morphogenesis</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Plants - genetics</topic><topic>QUITINASA</topic><topic>SECUENCIA NUCLEOTIDICA</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis</topic><topic>SEQUENCE NUCLEOTIDIQUE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boivin, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellemare, G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamel, F. (Universite Laval, Quebec Qc, Canada.)</au><au>Boivin, R</au><au>Tremblay, C</au><au>Bellemare, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>614</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>614-624</pages><issn>0022-2844</issn><eissn>1432-1432</eissn><abstract>The analysis of nuclear-encoded chitinase sequences from various angiosperms has allowed the categorization of the chitinases into discrete classes. Nucleotide sequences of their catalytic domains were compared in this study to investigate the evolutionary relationships between chitinase classes. The functionally distinct class III chitinases appear to be more closely related to fungal enzymes involved in morphogenesis than to other plant chitinases. The ordering of other plant chitinases into additional classes mainly relied on the presence of auxiliary domains--namely, a chitin-binding domain and a carboxy-terminal extension--flanking the main catalytic domain. The results of our phylogenetic analyses showed that classes I and IV form discrete and well-supported monophyletic groups derived from a common ancestral sequence that predates the divergence of dicots and monocots. In contrast, other sequences included in classes I* and II, lacking one or both types of auxiliary domains, were nested within class I sequences, indicating that they have a polyphyletic origin. According to phylogenetic analyses and the calculation of evolutionary rates, these chitinases probably arose from different class I lineages by relatively recent deletion events. The occurrence of such evolutionary trends in cultivated plants and their potential involvement in host-pathogen interactions are discussed</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>9169553</pmid><doi>10.1007/pl00006184</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2844 |
ispartof | Journal of molecular evolution, 1997-06, Vol.44 (6), p.614-624 |
issn | 0022-2844 1432-1432 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79041786 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Amino Acid Sequence Angiosperms Chitin CHITINASE Chitinases - genetics COMPOSICION QUIMICA COMPOSITION CHIMIQUE Cultivated plants DICOTILEDONEAS DICOTYLEDONE DIFERENCIAS BIOLOGICAS DIFFERENCE BIOLOGIQUE Divergence Domains EVOLUCION EVOLUTION Flowering Flowering plants GENE GENES Molecular Sequence Data MONOCOTILEDONEAS MONOCOTYLEDONE Morphogenesis Nucleotides Phylogenetics Phylogeny Plants (botany) Plants - genetics QUITINASA SECUENCIA NUCLEOTIDICA Sequence Alignment Sequence Analysis SEQUENCE NUCLEOTIDIQUE |
title | Structural and evolutionary relationships among chitinases of flowering plants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A56%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20and%20evolutionary%20relationships%20among%20chitinases%20of%20flowering%20plants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20evolution&rft.au=Hamel,%20F.%20(Universite%20Laval,%20Quebec%20Qc,%20Canada.)&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=614&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=614-624&rft.issn=0022-2844&rft.eissn=1432-1432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/pl00006184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16020170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405451439&rft_id=info:pmid/9169553&rfr_iscdi=true |