Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty

Study Objectives: To determine whether lumbar epidural anesthesia, when combined with general anesthesia, decreases perioperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cardiac dysrhythmias, and ischemia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Ran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 1997-05, Vol.9 (3), p.200-203
Hauptverfasser: Dauphin, Alezandre, Raymer, Karen E., Stanton, Eric B., Fuller, Hugh D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue 3
container_start_page 200
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 9
creator Dauphin, Alezandre
Raymer, Karen E.
Stanton, Eric B.
Fuller, Hugh D.
description Study Objectives: To determine whether lumbar epidural anesthesia, when combined with general anesthesia, decreases perioperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cardiac dysrhythmias, and ischemia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: A university hospital. Patients: 37 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, undergoing elective THA. Intervention: Patients were divided into two statistically comparable groups: Group GA = general anesthesia; Group CEGA = general anesthesia plus lumbar epidural anesthesia. All patients had 48-hour perioperative Holter monitoring, applied on admission, the day prior to surgery. In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and muscle relaxant, and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, opioid, and muscle relaxant. Group B received lumbar epidural anesthesia with 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine prior to anesthesia induction. Blood loss was measured by suction bottle contents, sponge weights, and collection drainage. DVT was assessed with postoperative leg scanning, plethysmography, and venogram. Measurements and Main Results: Intraoperative blood loss was less after combined epidural-general anesthesia (663.8 ml ± 299.0 ml) than after general anesthesia alone (1,259.2 ml ± 366.0 ml). The difference was found to be statistically significant ( p < 0.00005). No difference was found between the two groups in postoperative blood loss, incidence of DVT, cardiac dysrhythmias, or ischemia. Conclusion: Combined regional-general anesthesia decreases intraoperative blood loss in THA, and thereby offers an advantage over general anesthesia alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00035-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79036724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818097000354</els_id><sourcerecordid>79036724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-43b65806fc02313f764d05efc49a7349a2dfc5100df21e70249bf1853ce75ed23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EKtvCI1TyCcEh4D9xHHNB1aoFpEocgLPl2GPWkKyD7YD6DLw0zu5qD1y42DOa38xovg-ha0peU0K7N5-JEqzpaU9eKvmKEMJF0z5CG9pL3rSCqcdoc0aeosucv1eoFugFulBUMsK6DfqzjdNsUshxj6PH32APyYzY7CGXHeRg8O9QdjV3hyAuBY_LNJiEYQ5uWVkfEy6x1GgXZmxS2aU4jyaXh7f41nuwJa-jz_wwRvsD133_4s_QE2_GDM9P_xX6enf7Zfuhuf_0_uP25r6xvFelafnQiZ503hLGKfeyax0R4G2rjOT1Yc5bQQlxnlGQhLVq8LQX3IIU4Bi_Qi-Oc-cUfy71UD2FbGEc69VxyVoqwjvJ2gqKI2hTzDmB13MKk0kPmhK9mqAPJuhVYa2kPpig177r04JlmMCdu06q1_q7Yx3qlb8CJJ1tgL0FF1KVS7sY_rPhL_YMmWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79036724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dauphin, Alezandre ; Raymer, Karen E. ; Stanton, Eric B. ; Fuller, Hugh D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauphin, Alezandre ; Raymer, Karen E. ; Stanton, Eric B. ; Fuller, Hugh D.</creatorcontrib><description>Study Objectives: To determine whether lumbar epidural anesthesia, when combined with general anesthesia, decreases perioperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cardiac dysrhythmias, and ischemia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: A university hospital. Patients: 37 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, undergoing elective THA. Intervention: Patients were divided into two statistically comparable groups: Group GA = general anesthesia; Group CEGA = general anesthesia plus lumbar epidural anesthesia. All patients had 48-hour perioperative Holter monitoring, applied on admission, the day prior to surgery. In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and muscle relaxant, and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, opioid, and muscle relaxant. Group B received lumbar epidural anesthesia with 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine prior to anesthesia induction. Blood loss was measured by suction bottle contents, sponge weights, and collection drainage. DVT was assessed with postoperative leg scanning, plethysmography, and venogram. Measurements and Main Results: Intraoperative blood loss was less after combined epidural-general anesthesia (663.8 ml ± 299.0 ml) than after general anesthesia alone (1,259.2 ml ± 366.0 ml). The difference was found to be statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.00005). No difference was found between the two groups in postoperative blood loss, incidence of DVT, cardiac dysrhythmias, or ischemia. Conclusion: Combined regional-general anesthesia decreases intraoperative blood loss in THA, and thereby offers an advantage over general anesthesia alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00035-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9172026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia, Epidural ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetic ; blood loss ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Double-Blind Method ; epidural ; Female ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; hip arthroplasty ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; intraoperative ; Male ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 1997-05, Vol.9 (3), p.200-203</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-43b65806fc02313f764d05efc49a7349a2dfc5100df21e70249bf1853ce75ed23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-43b65806fc02313f764d05efc49a7349a2dfc5100df21e70249bf1853ce75ed23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00035-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9172026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauphin, Alezandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Eric B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Hugh D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Study Objectives: To determine whether lumbar epidural anesthesia, when combined with general anesthesia, decreases perioperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cardiac dysrhythmias, and ischemia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: A university hospital. Patients: 37 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, undergoing elective THA. Intervention: Patients were divided into two statistically comparable groups: Group GA = general anesthesia; Group CEGA = general anesthesia plus lumbar epidural anesthesia. All patients had 48-hour perioperative Holter monitoring, applied on admission, the day prior to surgery. In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and muscle relaxant, and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, opioid, and muscle relaxant. Group B received lumbar epidural anesthesia with 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine prior to anesthesia induction. Blood loss was measured by suction bottle contents, sponge weights, and collection drainage. DVT was assessed with postoperative leg scanning, plethysmography, and venogram. Measurements and Main Results: Intraoperative blood loss was less after combined epidural-general anesthesia (663.8 ml ± 299.0 ml) than after general anesthesia alone (1,259.2 ml ± 366.0 ml). The difference was found to be statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.00005). No difference was found between the two groups in postoperative blood loss, incidence of DVT, cardiac dysrhythmias, or ischemia. Conclusion: Combined regional-general anesthesia decreases intraoperative blood loss in THA, and thereby offers an advantage over general anesthesia alone.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthetic</subject><subject>blood loss</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>epidural</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraoperative</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>surgery</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EKtvCI1TyCcEh4D9xHHNB1aoFpEocgLPl2GPWkKyD7YD6DLw0zu5qD1y42DOa38xovg-ha0peU0K7N5-JEqzpaU9eKvmKEMJF0z5CG9pL3rSCqcdoc0aeosucv1eoFugFulBUMsK6DfqzjdNsUshxj6PH32APyYzY7CGXHeRg8O9QdjV3hyAuBY_LNJiEYQ5uWVkfEy6x1GgXZmxS2aU4jyaXh7f41nuwJa-jz_wwRvsD133_4s_QE2_GDM9P_xX6enf7Zfuhuf_0_uP25r6xvFelafnQiZ503hLGKfeyax0R4G2rjOT1Yc5bQQlxnlGQhLVq8LQX3IIU4Bi_Qi-Oc-cUfy71UD2FbGEc69VxyVoqwjvJ2gqKI2hTzDmB13MKk0kPmhK9mqAPJuhVYa2kPpig177r04JlmMCdu06q1_q7Yx3qlb8CJJ1tgL0FF1KVS7sY_rPhL_YMmWM</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>Dauphin, Alezandre</creator><creator>Raymer, Karen E.</creator><creator>Stanton, Eric B.</creator><creator>Fuller, Hugh D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty</title><author>Dauphin, Alezandre ; Raymer, Karen E. ; Stanton, Eric B. ; Fuller, Hugh D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-43b65806fc02313f764d05efc49a7349a2dfc5100df21e70249bf1853ce75ed23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthetic</topic><topic>blood loss</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>epidural</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraoperative</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauphin, Alezandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raymer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Eric B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Hugh D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauphin, Alezandre</au><au>Raymer, Karen E.</au><au>Stanton, Eric B.</au><au>Fuller, Hugh D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>200</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>200-203</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Study Objectives: To determine whether lumbar epidural anesthesia, when combined with general anesthesia, decreases perioperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cardiac dysrhythmias, and ischemia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: A university hospital. Patients: 37 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, undergoing elective THA. Intervention: Patients were divided into two statistically comparable groups: Group GA = general anesthesia; Group CEGA = general anesthesia plus lumbar epidural anesthesia. All patients had 48-hour perioperative Holter monitoring, applied on admission, the day prior to surgery. In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and muscle relaxant, and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, opioid, and muscle relaxant. Group B received lumbar epidural anesthesia with 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine prior to anesthesia induction. Blood loss was measured by suction bottle contents, sponge weights, and collection drainage. DVT was assessed with postoperative leg scanning, plethysmography, and venogram. Measurements and Main Results: Intraoperative blood loss was less after combined epidural-general anesthesia (663.8 ml ± 299.0 ml) than after general anesthesia alone (1,259.2 ml ± 366.0 ml). The difference was found to be statistically significant ( p &lt; 0.00005). No difference was found between the two groups in postoperative blood loss, incidence of DVT, cardiac dysrhythmias, or ischemia. Conclusion: Combined regional-general anesthesia decreases intraoperative blood loss in THA, and thereby offers an advantage over general anesthesia alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9172026</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00035-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 1997-05, Vol.9 (3), p.200-203
issn 0952-8180
1873-4529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79036724
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Anesthesia, Epidural
Anesthesia, General
Anesthetic
blood loss
Blood Loss, Surgical
Double-Blind Method
epidural
Female
Hemodynamics - physiology
hip arthroplasty
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
intraoperative
Male
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
surgery
title Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: Effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20general%20anesthesia%20with%20and%20without%20lumbar%20epidural%20for%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty:%20Effects%20of%20epidural%20block%20on%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Dauphin,%20Alezandre&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=200-203&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00035-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79036724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79036724&rft_id=info:pmid/9172026&rft_els_id=S0952818097000354&rfr_iscdi=true