A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the longevity and quality of Class I and Class II resin composite (Herculite XR ™) restorations placed in private practice. Methods: One thousand two hundred and nine Class I and Class II composite restorations with margins in enamel were evalua...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 1997-05, Vol.25 (3), p.229-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the longevity and quality of Class I and Class II resin composite (Herculite XR
™) restorations placed in private practice.
Methods: One thousand two hundred and nine Class I and Class II composite restorations with margins in enamel were evaluated clinically after periods of between 12 months and 4·5 years in clinical service by two calibrated examiners using a modified version of established criteria.
Results: Of the restorations investigated 94.8% were rated as ‘good’ (Alpha 79.3%) or ‘clinically acceptable’ (Bravo 15.5%). Significantly more restorations in premolar teeth were rated as Alpha (82%) than in permanent molar teeth (77%). The survival rate after 4 years was around 87%. The 50% survival-time, calculated by extrapolation according to Weibull, was approximately 9 years.
Conclusions: It is concluded that the composite investigated is an appropriate material for the restoration of Class I and Class II lesions with margins located in enamel in premolar and permanent molar teeth. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00027-9 |