Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population

A review of the early performance of Ohio's statewide infant hearing screening program was performed to provide insight as to the impact of the current medical and socioeconomic climate on its implementation. In March 1988, the State of Ohio enacted a law that required universal screening of ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1997-05, Vol.18 (3), p.368-372
Hauptverfasser: ABRAMS, M. J, PENSAK, M. L, BUHRER, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 372
container_issue 3
container_start_page 368
container_title The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 18
creator ABRAMS, M. J
PENSAK, M. L
BUHRER, K
description A review of the early performance of Ohio's statewide infant hearing screening program was performed to provide insight as to the impact of the current medical and socioeconomic climate on its implementation. In March 1988, the State of Ohio enacted a law that required universal screening of newborn children for hearing loss through a program known as the Infant Hearing Screening and Assessment Program (IHSAP). The program design consisted of a universally applied high-risk questionnaire followed by a screening auditory assessment for those who fail. Although the value of such a program engendered little early public debate, the institution of such a program represented a significant challenge from a public health perspective. The program performance was analyzed using data from the index population of 160,000 live births per annum and hospital surveys. The questionnaires were found to be failing twice the number of newborns as originally projected, whereas completion rates and compliance were excellent. The assessment arm was plagued with poor compliance rates and limited resources. Lack of resources for effective data management has prevented an accurate evaluation of the program's sensitivity and specificity. IHSAP performance is being hampered by poor assessment follow-up and resource limitations, both in terms of screening equipment and habilitative follow-up services for infants identified as hearing impaired. The reasons for these problems are discussed in relation to existing legislative guidelines and medicoeconomic realities.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79008958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79008958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-20415deacf104039ad80a69ec0c2f1d58532790bdbe07a7e739490941d3ffba53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAYhHtQ1nX1Jwg5iLdC0jRtclyW9QMWXFg9l7fJ2zXSJjVJFf-9KxZPMzDPzGHOsiVlqshVXfGL7DLGd0qZ4JwusoVipZKcL7N2jyGOqJP9xEi8I0AOCRKSrQOd0JBHhGDdkRx0QHS_Dpwh6xgxxgFdIvvgjwEGYh1Jb0gcfrU-ODL6ceohWe-usvMO-ojXs66y1_vty-Yx3z0_PG3Wu3wsuEh5QUsmDILuGC0pV2AkhUqhprromBFS8KJWtDUt0hpqrLkqFVUlM7zrWhB8ld397Y7Bf0wYUzPYqLHvwaGfYnMqU6mEPIE3Mzi1A5pmDHaA8N3Mp5zy2zmHqKHvAjht4z9WVJUUTPIfwrJqQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79008958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ABRAMS, M. J ; PENSAK, M. L ; BUHRER, K</creator><creatorcontrib>ABRAMS, M. J ; PENSAK, M. L ; BUHRER, K</creatorcontrib><description>A review of the early performance of Ohio's statewide infant hearing screening program was performed to provide insight as to the impact of the current medical and socioeconomic climate on its implementation. In March 1988, the State of Ohio enacted a law that required universal screening of newborn children for hearing loss through a program known as the Infant Hearing Screening and Assessment Program (IHSAP). The program design consisted of a universally applied high-risk questionnaire followed by a screening auditory assessment for those who fail. Although the value of such a program engendered little early public debate, the institution of such a program represented a significant challenge from a public health perspective. The program performance was analyzed using data from the index population of 160,000 live births per annum and hospital surveys. The questionnaires were found to be failing twice the number of newborns as originally projected, whereas completion rates and compliance were excellent. The assessment arm was plagued with poor compliance rates and limited resources. Lack of resources for effective data management has prevented an accurate evaluation of the program's sensitivity and specificity. IHSAP performance is being hampered by poor assessment follow-up and resource limitations, both in terms of screening equipment and habilitative follow-up services for infants identified as hearing impaired. The reasons for these problems are discussed in relation to existing legislative guidelines and medicoeconomic realities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-9763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9149833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOTBN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Audiology - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Jurisprudence ; Medical sciences ; Neonatal Screening ; Non tumoral diseases ; Ohio ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Risk Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.), 1997-05, Vol.18 (3), p.368-372</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2668518$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9149833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ABRAMS, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENSAK, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUHRER, K</creatorcontrib><title>Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population</title><title>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><description>A review of the early performance of Ohio's statewide infant hearing screening program was performed to provide insight as to the impact of the current medical and socioeconomic climate on its implementation. In March 1988, the State of Ohio enacted a law that required universal screening of newborn children for hearing loss through a program known as the Infant Hearing Screening and Assessment Program (IHSAP). The program design consisted of a universally applied high-risk questionnaire followed by a screening auditory assessment for those who fail. Although the value of such a program engendered little early public debate, the institution of such a program represented a significant challenge from a public health perspective. The program performance was analyzed using data from the index population of 160,000 live births per annum and hospital surveys. The questionnaires were found to be failing twice the number of newborns as originally projected, whereas completion rates and compliance were excellent. The assessment arm was plagued with poor compliance rates and limited resources. Lack of resources for effective data management has prevented an accurate evaluation of the program's sensitivity and specificity. IHSAP performance is being hampered by poor assessment follow-up and resource limitations, both in terms of screening equipment and habilitative follow-up services for infants identified as hearing impaired. The reasons for these problems are discussed in relation to existing legislative guidelines and medicoeconomic realities.</description><subject>Audiology - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0192-9763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAYhHtQ1nX1Jwg5iLdC0jRtclyW9QMWXFg9l7fJ2zXSJjVJFf-9KxZPMzDPzGHOsiVlqshVXfGL7DLGd0qZ4JwusoVipZKcL7N2jyGOqJP9xEi8I0AOCRKSrQOd0JBHhGDdkRx0QHS_Dpwh6xgxxgFdIvvgjwEGYh1Jb0gcfrU-ODL6ceohWe-usvMO-ojXs66y1_vty-Yx3z0_PG3Wu3wsuEh5QUsmDILuGC0pV2AkhUqhprromBFS8KJWtDUt0hpqrLkqFVUlM7zrWhB8ld397Y7Bf0wYUzPYqLHvwaGfYnMqU6mEPIE3Mzi1A5pmDHaA8N3Mp5zy2zmHqKHvAjht4z9WVJUUTPIfwrJqQA</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>ABRAMS, M. J</creator><creator>PENSAK, M. L</creator><creator>BUHRER, K</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population</title><author>ABRAMS, M. J ; PENSAK, M. L ; BUHRER, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-20415deacf104039ad80a69ec0c2f1d58532790bdbe07a7e739490941d3ffba53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Audiology - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ABRAMS, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENSAK, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUHRER, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ABRAMS, M. J</au><au>PENSAK, M. L</au><au>BUHRER, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>368-372</pages><issn>0192-9763</issn><coden>AJOTBN</coden><abstract>A review of the early performance of Ohio's statewide infant hearing screening program was performed to provide insight as to the impact of the current medical and socioeconomic climate on its implementation. In March 1988, the State of Ohio enacted a law that required universal screening of newborn children for hearing loss through a program known as the Infant Hearing Screening and Assessment Program (IHSAP). The program design consisted of a universally applied high-risk questionnaire followed by a screening auditory assessment for those who fail. Although the value of such a program engendered little early public debate, the institution of such a program represented a significant challenge from a public health perspective. The program performance was analyzed using data from the index population of 160,000 live births per annum and hospital surveys. The questionnaires were found to be failing twice the number of newborns as originally projected, whereas completion rates and compliance were excellent. The assessment arm was plagued with poor compliance rates and limited resources. Lack of resources for effective data management has prevented an accurate evaluation of the program's sensitivity and specificity. IHSAP performance is being hampered by poor assessment follow-up and resource limitations, both in terms of screening equipment and habilitative follow-up services for infants identified as hearing impaired. The reasons for these problems are discussed in relation to existing legislative guidelines and medicoeconomic realities.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>9149833</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-9763
ispartof The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.), 1997-05, Vol.18 (3), p.368-372
issn 0192-9763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79008958
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Audiology - legislation & jurisprudence
Biological and medical sciences
Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology
Hearing Disorders - diagnosis
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Jurisprudence
Medical sciences
Neonatal Screening
Non tumoral diseases
Ohio
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Risk Factors
United States
title Perspectives on a State Enacted Hearing Screening and Assessment Program in the newborn population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A23%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives%20on%20a%20State%20Enacted%20Hearing%20Screening%20and%20Assessment%20Program%20in%20the%20newborn%20population&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20otology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=ABRAMS,%20M.%20J&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=368-372&rft.issn=0192-9763&rft.coden=AJOTBN&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79008958%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79008958&rft_id=info:pmid/9149833&rfr_iscdi=true