MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy
To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, lef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1215 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 152 |
creator | Arrive, L Hricak, H Goldberg, HI Thoeni, RF Margulis, AR |
description | To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78986340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78986340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMo67p69Sb0IHpqTdKkSY-y-AUrgih4C2k6sV3abU26lv33tmxZvMwc5pl3mAehS4IjSgm702sXEU6jJCKU8CM0J5wlYUwYOUZzHCcklDj-OkVn3q8xxkKmYoZmVBApuZgj9voe6LYF7fTGQNDYoCsgqMpfcIG23VBb7bpSV0EBre7AdE29O0cnVlceLqa-QJ-PDx_L53D19vSyvF-FJuakC6lh0qaUA-RgKWCeCGC50CKLSW4TydPMZJhqI3KZGIZTQ3OBGTWWgDCSxwt0s89tXfOzBd-puvQGqkpvoNl6NTwjk5jhAYz2oHGN9w6sal1Za7dTBKtRkxo0qUGTStSoaVi4mpK3WQ35AZ-8DPPraa690ZUd7ZT-gAkqJMXj3ds9VpTfRV86UL7WVTWEEtX3_b-Df4QNfO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78986340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</creator><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><description>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2718857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver - pathology ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Liver Regeneration ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7278200$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2718857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, HI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoeni, RF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Regeneration</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMo67p69Sb0IHpqTdKkSY-y-AUrgih4C2k6sV3abU26lv33tmxZvMwc5pl3mAehS4IjSgm702sXEU6jJCKU8CM0J5wlYUwYOUZzHCcklDj-OkVn3q8xxkKmYoZmVBApuZgj9voe6LYF7fTGQNDYoCsgqMpfcIG23VBb7bpSV0EBre7AdE29O0cnVlceLqa-QJ-PDx_L53D19vSyvF-FJuakC6lh0qaUA-RgKWCeCGC50CKLSW4TydPMZJhqI3KZGIZTQ3OBGTWWgDCSxwt0s89tXfOzBd-puvQGqkpvoNl6NTwjk5jhAYz2oHGN9w6sal1Za7dTBKtRkxo0qUGTStSoaVi4mpK3WQ35AZ-8DPPraa690ZUd7ZT-gAkqJMXj3ds9VpTfRV86UL7WVTWEEtX3_b-Df4QNfO4</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Arrive, L</creator><creator>Hricak, H</creator><creator>Goldberg, HI</creator><creator>Thoeni, RF</creator><creator>Margulis, AR</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><author>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Regeneration</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, HI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoeni, RF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arrive, L</au><au>Hricak, H</au><au>Goldberg, HI</au><au>Thoeni, RF</au><au>Margulis, AR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1215</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1215-1220</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>2718857</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78986340 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool False Positive Reactions Female Hepatectomy Humans Liver - pathology Liver Neoplasms - surgery Liver Regeneration Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Postoperative Period Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system |
title | MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20appearance%20of%20the%20liver%20after%20partial%20hepatectomy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Arrive,%20L&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1215&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1215-1220&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78986340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78986340&rft_id=info:pmid/2718857&rfr_iscdi=true |