MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy

To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, lef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220
Hauptverfasser: Arrive, L, Hricak, H, Goldberg, HI, Thoeni, RF, Margulis, AR
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1220
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1215
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 152
creator Arrive, L
Hricak, H
Goldberg, HI
Thoeni, RF
Margulis, AR
description To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78986340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78986340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMo67p69Sb0IHpqTdKkSY-y-AUrgih4C2k6sV3abU26lv33tmxZvMwc5pl3mAehS4IjSgm702sXEU6jJCKU8CM0J5wlYUwYOUZzHCcklDj-OkVn3q8xxkKmYoZmVBApuZgj9voe6LYF7fTGQNDYoCsgqMpfcIG23VBb7bpSV0EBre7AdE29O0cnVlceLqa-QJ-PDx_L53D19vSyvF-FJuakC6lh0qaUA-RgKWCeCGC50CKLSW4TydPMZJhqI3KZGIZTQ3OBGTWWgDCSxwt0s89tXfOzBd-puvQGqkpvoNl6NTwjk5jhAYz2oHGN9w6sal1Za7dTBKtRkxo0qUGTStSoaVi4mpK3WQ35AZ-8DPPraa690ZUd7ZT-gAkqJMXj3ds9VpTfRV86UL7WVTWEEtX3_b-Df4QNfO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78986340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</creator><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><description>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2718857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver - pathology ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Liver Regeneration ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7278200$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2718857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, HI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoeni, RF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Regeneration</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMo67p69Sb0IHpqTdKkSY-y-AUrgih4C2k6sV3abU26lv33tmxZvMwc5pl3mAehS4IjSgm702sXEU6jJCKU8CM0J5wlYUwYOUZzHCcklDj-OkVn3q8xxkKmYoZmVBApuZgj9voe6LYF7fTGQNDYoCsgqMpfcIG23VBb7bpSV0EBre7AdE29O0cnVlceLqa-QJ-PDx_L53D19vSyvF-FJuakC6lh0qaUA-RgKWCeCGC50CKLSW4TydPMZJhqI3KZGIZTQ3OBGTWWgDCSxwt0s89tXfOzBd-puvQGqkpvoNl6NTwjk5jhAYz2oHGN9w6sal1Za7dTBKtRkxo0qUGTStSoaVi4mpK3WQ35AZ-8DPPraa690ZUd7ZT-gAkqJMXj3ds9VpTfRV86UL7WVTWEEtX3_b-Df4QNfO4</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Arrive, L</creator><creator>Hricak, H</creator><creator>Goldberg, HI</creator><creator>Thoeni, RF</creator><creator>Margulis, AR</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</title><author>Arrive, L ; Hricak, H ; Goldberg, HI ; Thoeni, RF ; Margulis, AR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2c48f925eedef2e0567e4d7a7b31df6859bcb02ac7d86c409c2d7042cf1e7c853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Regeneration</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arrive, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hricak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, HI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoeni, RF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulis, AR</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arrive, L</au><au>Hricak, H</au><au>Goldberg, HI</au><au>Thoeni, RF</au><au>Margulis, AR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1215</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1215-1220</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>To define the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy, we reviewed retrospectively 61 MR examinations performed on 25 patients 10 days to 48 months after surgery. Twenty-seven partial hepatectomies performed in the 25 patients included right lobectomy in 11, trisegmentectomy in two, left lobectomy in five, and wedge resection in nine. By using vascular landmarks, demonstration of the falciform ligament, and the presence of surgical clips, we correctly identified the type of partial hepatectomy in 21 of the 25 patients. The signal intensity of the resection margin was similar to that of the remaining parenchyma in 16 of 18 patients and was poorly defined and had a higher signal intensity (T2-weighted image) in the remaining two. Liver regeneration was observed on serial MR scans 2-16 months after surgery. Findings related to chemotherapy, including periportal changes and inhomogeneous appearance of the liver, were shown in six of eight patients. Tumor recurrence was present in nine patients, either intrahepatic (seven patients) or at the resection margin (two patients), and was consistently identified with MR imaging. The ability of MR imaging to produce images without artifacts from surgical clips is helpful in displaying the MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy. Anatomic landmarks, findings related to chemotherapy, and tumor recurrence were shown well.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>2718857</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1989-06, Vol.152 (6), p.1215-1220
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78986340
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
False Positive Reactions
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver - pathology
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Liver Regeneration
Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Postoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
title MR appearance of the liver after partial hepatectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20appearance%20of%20the%20liver%20after%20partial%20hepatectomy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Arrive,%20L&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1215&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1215-1220&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.152.6.1215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78986340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78986340&rft_id=info:pmid/2718857&rfr_iscdi=true