Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)

Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients with predominately stage IIB or IIIB cervical carcinoma underwent pretreatment surgical staging including selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SPAL), followed by pelvic irradiation with or without paraaortic irradiation (RT). Four patients were excluded from an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1989-06, Vol.33 (3), p.283-289
Hauptverfasser: Weiser, Edward B., Bundy, Brian N., Hoskins, William J., Heller, Paul B., Whittington, Richard R., DiSaia, Philip J., Curry, Stephen L., Schlaerth, John, Thigpen, J.Tate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 33
creator Weiser, Edward B.
Bundy, Brian N.
Hoskins, William J.
Heller, Paul B.
Whittington, Richard R.
DiSaia, Philip J.
Curry, Stephen L.
Schlaerth, John
Thigpen, J.Tate
description Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients with predominately stage IIB or IIIB cervical carcinoma underwent pretreatment surgical staging including selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SPAL), followed by pelvic irradiation with or without paraaortic irradiation (RT). Four patients were excluded from analysis (two received no RT and two were insufficiently documented). Of the remaining 284 patients, 128 underwent extraperitoneal (EP) SPAL and 156 transperitoneal (TP) SPAL procedures. Age, race, and stage (clinical and surgical), cell type, paraaortic nodal status, and peritoneal cytology findings were similar in both groups. Complications presumed to arise from operative staging were infection, which was similar for both groups, and vascular injury, which was higher in the TP group, although not statistically significant. Complications subsequent to RT fell into two categories: local—pelvic necrosis, vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas, proctitis, etc., and regional—enterovaginal fistula, bowel obstruction, enteritis, bowel perforation, etc. The frequency of local complications was similar for both EP and TP patients. Utilizing univariant analysis, among regional complications, both bowel obstruction and nonobstructive enteric injuries were observed significantly more often in TP patients than in EP patients (11.5% vs 3.9%, P = 0.03, for both types). Multivariant analysis confirmed these observations. This report supports the conclusions that in advanced cervical carcinoma (1) EP- and TP-SPAL are of similar sensitivity in detecting nodal spread, (2) no significant differences in the frequency of surgical complications could be detected between EP- and TP-SPAL groups, and (3) TP-SPAL is associated with a higher frequency of certain postirradiation regional enteric complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78968082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0090825889905131</els_id><sourcerecordid>78968082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-d3810cd598b7c74cbf7eb1241cc5797edeef6567cc0080f00bf916c55fa931e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhSMEKtvCPwDJB4TaQ2CcrBP7glRVZUGq1AucLceZbI0SO9hORP4XP7DO7mrFiZOteW-eRu_LsncUPlGg1WcAATkvGL_m4kYAo2VOX2QbCoLlFWfiZbY5W15nlyH8AoASaHGRXRR1UQCDTfb3_k_0akRvorOoejKjD1MgaWjDP-OAPepoZiSj8ko5H40m_TKMT6pFmyQ3LMRYEp-Sw2P0qOKANpIw-b3Ra0JUe2P3xHVEtbOyGlui0c8HUSuvjXWDIte3ZLekQNe7tEce7eG3kJ1305hCpna5eZO96lQf8O3pvcp-fr3_cfctf3jcfb-7fcj1lhUxb0tOQbdM8KbW9VY3XY0NLbZUa1aLGlvErmJVrTUAhw6g6QStNGOdEiXFurzKPh5zR-9-TxiiHEzQ2PfKopuCrLmoOPAiGbdHo_YuBI-dHL0ZlF8kBbnCkisJuZKQXMgDLEnT2vtT_tQM2J6XTnSS_uGkq5Ba6hITbcLZlm4XnK0xX442TF3MBr0M2uBasPGJjGyd-f8dz-82tlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78968082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Weiser, Edward B. ; Bundy, Brian N. ; Hoskins, William J. ; Heller, Paul B. ; Whittington, Richard R. ; DiSaia, Philip J. ; Curry, Stephen L. ; Schlaerth, John ; Thigpen, J.Tate</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Edward B. ; Bundy, Brian N. ; Hoskins, William J. ; Heller, Paul B. ; Whittington, Richard R. ; DiSaia, Philip J. ; Curry, Stephen L. ; Schlaerth, John ; Thigpen, J.Tate</creatorcontrib><description>Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients with predominately stage IIB or IIIB cervical carcinoma underwent pretreatment surgical staging including selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SPAL), followed by pelvic irradiation with or without paraaortic irradiation (RT). Four patients were excluded from analysis (two received no RT and two were insufficiently documented). Of the remaining 284 patients, 128 underwent extraperitoneal (EP) SPAL and 156 transperitoneal (TP) SPAL procedures. Age, race, and stage (clinical and surgical), cell type, paraaortic nodal status, and peritoneal cytology findings were similar in both groups. Complications presumed to arise from operative staging were infection, which was similar for both groups, and vascular injury, which was higher in the TP group, although not statistically significant. Complications subsequent to RT fell into two categories: local—pelvic necrosis, vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas, proctitis, etc., and regional—enterovaginal fistula, bowel obstruction, enteritis, bowel perforation, etc. The frequency of local complications was similar for both EP and TP patients. Utilizing univariant analysis, among regional complications, both bowel obstruction and nonobstructive enteric injuries were observed significantly more often in TP patients than in EP patients (11.5% vs 3.9%, P = 0.03, for both types). Multivariant analysis confirmed these observations. This report supports the conclusions that in advanced cervical carcinoma (1) EP- and TP-SPAL are of similar sensitivity in detecting nodal spread, (2) no significant differences in the frequency of surgical complications could be detected between EP- and TP-SPAL groups, and (3) TP-SPAL is associated with a higher frequency of certain postirradiation regional enteric complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2722050</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications ; Random Allocation ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1989-06, Vol.33 (3), p.283-289</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-d3810cd598b7c74cbf7eb1241cc5797edeef6567cc0080f00bf916c55fa931e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-d3810cd598b7c74cbf7eb1241cc5797edeef6567cc0080f00bf916c55fa931e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6569851$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2722050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Edward B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bundy, Brian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskins, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiSaia, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaerth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thigpen, J.Tate</creatorcontrib><title>Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients with predominately stage IIB or IIIB cervical carcinoma underwent pretreatment surgical staging including selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SPAL), followed by pelvic irradiation with or without paraaortic irradiation (RT). Four patients were excluded from analysis (two received no RT and two were insufficiently documented). Of the remaining 284 patients, 128 underwent extraperitoneal (EP) SPAL and 156 transperitoneal (TP) SPAL procedures. Age, race, and stage (clinical and surgical), cell type, paraaortic nodal status, and peritoneal cytology findings were similar in both groups. Complications presumed to arise from operative staging were infection, which was similar for both groups, and vascular injury, which was higher in the TP group, although not statistically significant. Complications subsequent to RT fell into two categories: local—pelvic necrosis, vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas, proctitis, etc., and regional—enterovaginal fistula, bowel obstruction, enteritis, bowel perforation, etc. The frequency of local complications was similar for both EP and TP patients. Utilizing univariant analysis, among regional complications, both bowel obstruction and nonobstructive enteric injuries were observed significantly more often in TP patients than in EP patients (11.5% vs 3.9%, P = 0.03, for both types). Multivariant analysis confirmed these observations. This report supports the conclusions that in advanced cervical carcinoma (1) EP- and TP-SPAL are of similar sensitivity in detecting nodal spread, (2) no significant differences in the frequency of surgical complications could be detected between EP- and TP-SPAL groups, and (3) TP-SPAL is associated with a higher frequency of certain postirradiation regional enteric complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhSMEKtvCPwDJB4TaQ2CcrBP7glRVZUGq1AucLceZbI0SO9hORP4XP7DO7mrFiZOteW-eRu_LsncUPlGg1WcAATkvGL_m4kYAo2VOX2QbCoLlFWfiZbY5W15nlyH8AoASaHGRXRR1UQCDTfb3_k_0akRvorOoejKjD1MgaWjDP-OAPepoZiSj8ko5H40m_TKMT6pFmyQ3LMRYEp-Sw2P0qOKANpIw-b3Ra0JUe2P3xHVEtbOyGlui0c8HUSuvjXWDIte3ZLekQNe7tEce7eG3kJ1305hCpna5eZO96lQf8O3pvcp-fr3_cfctf3jcfb-7fcj1lhUxb0tOQbdM8KbW9VY3XY0NLbZUa1aLGlvErmJVrTUAhw6g6QStNGOdEiXFurzKPh5zR-9-TxiiHEzQ2PfKopuCrLmoOPAiGbdHo_YuBI-dHL0ZlF8kBbnCkisJuZKQXMgDLEnT2vtT_tQM2J6XTnSS_uGkq5Ba6hITbcLZlm4XnK0xX442TF3MBr0M2uBasPGJjGyd-f8dz-82tlY</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Weiser, Edward B.</creator><creator>Bundy, Brian N.</creator><creator>Hoskins, William J.</creator><creator>Heller, Paul B.</creator><creator>Whittington, Richard R.</creator><creator>DiSaia, Philip J.</creator><creator>Curry, Stephen L.</creator><creator>Schlaerth, John</creator><creator>Thigpen, J.Tate</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)</title><author>Weiser, Edward B. ; Bundy, Brian N. ; Hoskins, William J. ; Heller, Paul B. ; Whittington, Richard R. ; DiSaia, Philip J. ; Curry, Stephen L. ; Schlaerth, John ; Thigpen, J.Tate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-d3810cd598b7c74cbf7eb1241cc5797edeef6567cc0080f00bf916c55fa931e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiser, Edward B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bundy, Brian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskins, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiSaia, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curry, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaerth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thigpen, J.Tate</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiser, Edward B.</au><au>Bundy, Brian N.</au><au>Hoskins, William J.</au><au>Heller, Paul B.</au><au>Whittington, Richard R.</au><au>DiSaia, Philip J.</au><au>Curry, Stephen L.</au><au>Schlaerth, John</au><au>Thigpen, J.Tate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>283-289</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients with predominately stage IIB or IIIB cervical carcinoma underwent pretreatment surgical staging including selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy (SPAL), followed by pelvic irradiation with or without paraaortic irradiation (RT). Four patients were excluded from analysis (two received no RT and two were insufficiently documented). Of the remaining 284 patients, 128 underwent extraperitoneal (EP) SPAL and 156 transperitoneal (TP) SPAL procedures. Age, race, and stage (clinical and surgical), cell type, paraaortic nodal status, and peritoneal cytology findings were similar in both groups. Complications presumed to arise from operative staging were infection, which was similar for both groups, and vascular injury, which was higher in the TP group, although not statistically significant. Complications subsequent to RT fell into two categories: local—pelvic necrosis, vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas, proctitis, etc., and regional—enterovaginal fistula, bowel obstruction, enteritis, bowel perforation, etc. The frequency of local complications was similar for both EP and TP patients. Utilizing univariant analysis, among regional complications, both bowel obstruction and nonobstructive enteric injuries were observed significantly more often in TP patients than in EP patients (11.5% vs 3.9%, P = 0.03, for both types). Multivariant analysis confirmed these observations. This report supports the conclusions that in advanced cervical carcinoma (1) EP- and TP-SPAL are of similar sensitivity in detecting nodal spread, (2) no significant differences in the frequency of surgical complications could be detected between EP- and TP-SPAL groups, and (3) TP-SPAL is associated with a higher frequency of certain postirradiation regional enteric complications.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2722050</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 1989-06, Vol.33 (3), p.283-289
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78968082
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Female genital diseases
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Complications
Random Allocation
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy
title Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A41%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extraperitoneal%20versus%20transperitoneal%20selective%20paraaortic%20lymphadenectomy%20in%20the%20pretreatment%20surgical%20staging%20of%20advanced%20cervical%20carcinoma%20(A%20Gynecologic%20Oncology%20Group%20study)&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Weiser,%20Edward%20B.&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=283-289&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78968082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78968082&rft_id=info:pmid/2722050&rft_els_id=0090825889905131&rfr_iscdi=true