Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration

The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of colorectal disease 1997-02, Vol.12 (1), p.37-41
Hauptverfasser: OSORIO GULLON, A, DE OCA, J, LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A, VIRGILI, J, RAMOS, E, DEL RIO, C, MARTI RAGUE, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title International journal of colorectal disease
container_volume 12
creator OSORIO GULLON, A
DE OCA, J
LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A
VIRGILI, J
RAMOS, E
DEL RIO, C
MARTI RAGUE, J
description The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour included endometrial (n = 6), rectal (n = 1), anal (n = 1), cervical (n = 2), prostatic (n = 1) and bladder (n = 2). Indications for pelvic exenteration were locally advanced disease, recurrence and severe radiation or surgical damage. Six patients had pre-existing colostomy, and three had a Bricker ureteroileal diversion. The double-barrelled-wet colostomy technique consisted in anastomosing both ureters to a colon segment 25 cm distal to the loop colostomy. There was no operative mortality. Complications included one urinary leak which closed with conservative management and one case of recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis which finally required nephrectomy. Intravenous urography in the remaining patients showed good flow through the ureters to the conduit with no reflux. Postoperative plasma electrolytes, urea and creatinine were normal from day seven onwards. Urodynamic studies in four patients showed efficient contraction of the colon conduit with pressure levels similar to those in the colon proximal to the colostomy. In five cases biopsies of the conduit were taken at 3 and 16 months; no dysplasias were found. Four patients died due to disease progression. The overall mean survival was 41.2 months. The remainder are currently disease-free, maximum followup period being 19 months. Double-barrelled wet colostomy is a safe and simple technique with low morbidity. The patient needs to carry only one stoma and functional results are good.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s003840050076
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78963351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4275965751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-a59ee4a82b09034a05e6951f5b8c9730731759bd1c87836b5cd327dd4682bd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LxDAQxYMo67p69CgEFG_VpEmaxJusnyAI4r2kyRQrabMmrR__vRGXBT0Nj_nNm-ENQoeUnFFC5HkihClOiMii2kJzyllZ0LIqt9GcUKkLqoXaRXspvZKsK8lnaKYpLSnXc_R0FabGQ9GYGMGDwx8wYht8SGPov_AFNjiZFrAZHE5dv_KAexhfgsOmHSHiFfj3zmL4hCFLM3Zh2Ec7rfEJDtZ1gZ5vrp-Xd8XD4-398vKhsIyLsTBCA3CjyoZowrghAiotaCsaZbVkRDIqhW4ctUoqVjXCOlZK53iVR5xkC3T6a7uK4W2CNNZ9lyx4bwYIU6ql0hVjgmbw-B_4GqY45NNqqrjUKq8lmSp-KRtDShHaehW73sSvmpL6J-j6T9CZP1q7Tk0PbkOvk839k3XfJGt8G81gu7TB8n-IFCX7BriOgyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847986950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>OSORIO GULLON, A ; DE OCA, J ; LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A ; VIRGILI, J ; RAMOS, E ; DEL RIO, C ; MARTI RAGUE, J</creator><creatorcontrib>OSORIO GULLON, A ; DE OCA, J ; LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A ; VIRGILI, J ; RAMOS, E ; DEL RIO, C ; MARTI RAGUE, J</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour included endometrial (n = 6), rectal (n = 1), anal (n = 1), cervical (n = 2), prostatic (n = 1) and bladder (n = 2). Indications for pelvic exenteration were locally advanced disease, recurrence and severe radiation or surgical damage. Six patients had pre-existing colostomy, and three had a Bricker ureteroileal diversion. The double-barrelled-wet colostomy technique consisted in anastomosing both ureters to a colon segment 25 cm distal to the loop colostomy. There was no operative mortality. Complications included one urinary leak which closed with conservative management and one case of recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis which finally required nephrectomy. Intravenous urography in the remaining patients showed good flow through the ureters to the conduit with no reflux. Postoperative plasma electrolytes, urea and creatinine were normal from day seven onwards. Urodynamic studies in four patients showed efficient contraction of the colon conduit with pressure levels similar to those in the colon proximal to the colostomy. In five cases biopsies of the conduit were taken at 3 and 16 months; no dysplasias were found. Four patients died due to disease progression. The overall mean survival was 41.2 months. The remainder are currently disease-free, maximum followup period being 19 months. Double-barrelled wet colostomy is a safe and simple technique with low morbidity. The patient needs to carry only one stoma and functional results are good.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s003840050076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9112149</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCDE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colon ; Colon - surgery ; Colostomy - adverse effects ; Colostomy - methods ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Ostomy ; Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects ; Pelvic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Pelvic Neoplasms - surgery ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Rate ; Ureter - surgery ; Urinary Diversion - methods ; Urodynamics</subject><ispartof>International journal of colorectal disease, 1997-02, Vol.12 (1), p.37-41</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-a59ee4a82b09034a05e6951f5b8c9730731759bd1c87836b5cd327dd4682bd73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2620752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9112149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OSORIO GULLON, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE OCA, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VIRGILI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMOS, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEL RIO, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTI RAGUE, J</creatorcontrib><title>Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration</title><title>International journal of colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour included endometrial (n = 6), rectal (n = 1), anal (n = 1), cervical (n = 2), prostatic (n = 1) and bladder (n = 2). Indications for pelvic exenteration were locally advanced disease, recurrence and severe radiation or surgical damage. Six patients had pre-existing colostomy, and three had a Bricker ureteroileal diversion. The double-barrelled-wet colostomy technique consisted in anastomosing both ureters to a colon segment 25 cm distal to the loop colostomy. There was no operative mortality. Complications included one urinary leak which closed with conservative management and one case of recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis which finally required nephrectomy. Intravenous urography in the remaining patients showed good flow through the ureters to the conduit with no reflux. Postoperative plasma electrolytes, urea and creatinine were normal from day seven onwards. Urodynamic studies in four patients showed efficient contraction of the colon conduit with pressure levels similar to those in the colon proximal to the colostomy. In five cases biopsies of the conduit were taken at 3 and 16 months; no dysplasias were found. Four patients died due to disease progression. The overall mean survival was 41.2 months. The remainder are currently disease-free, maximum followup period being 19 months. Double-barrelled wet colostomy is a safe and simple technique with low morbidity. The patient needs to carry only one stoma and functional results are good.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colon - surgery</subject><subject>Colostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Colostomy - methods</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pelvic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pelvic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Ureter - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><issn>0179-1958</issn><issn>1432-1262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LxDAQxYMo67p69CgEFG_VpEmaxJusnyAI4r2kyRQrabMmrR__vRGXBT0Nj_nNm-ENQoeUnFFC5HkihClOiMii2kJzyllZ0LIqt9GcUKkLqoXaRXspvZKsK8lnaKYpLSnXc_R0FabGQ9GYGMGDwx8wYht8SGPov_AFNjiZFrAZHE5dv_KAexhfgsOmHSHiFfj3zmL4hCFLM3Zh2Ec7rfEJDtZ1gZ5vrp-Xd8XD4-398vKhsIyLsTBCA3CjyoZowrghAiotaCsaZbVkRDIqhW4ctUoqVjXCOlZK53iVR5xkC3T6a7uK4W2CNNZ9lyx4bwYIU6ql0hVjgmbw-B_4GqY45NNqqrjUKq8lmSp-KRtDShHaehW73sSvmpL6J-j6T9CZP1q7Tk0PbkOvk839k3XfJGt8G81gu7TB8n-IFCX7BriOgyg</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>OSORIO GULLON, A</creator><creator>DE OCA, J</creator><creator>LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A</creator><creator>VIRGILI, J</creator><creator>RAMOS, E</creator><creator>DEL RIO, C</creator><creator>MARTI RAGUE, J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration</title><author>OSORIO GULLON, A ; DE OCA, J ; LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A ; VIRGILI, J ; RAMOS, E ; DEL RIO, C ; MARTI RAGUE, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-a59ee4a82b09034a05e6951f5b8c9730731759bd1c87836b5cd327dd4682bd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colon - surgery</topic><topic>Colostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Colostomy - methods</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pelvic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pelvic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Ureter - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OSORIO GULLON, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE OCA, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VIRGILI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMOS, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEL RIO, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARTI RAGUE, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OSORIO GULLON, A</au><au>DE OCA, J</au><au>LOPEZ COSTEA, M. A</au><au>VIRGILI, J</au><au>RAMOS, E</au><au>DEL RIO, C</au><au>MARTI RAGUE, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration</atitle><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>37-41</pages><issn>0179-1958</issn><eissn>1432-1262</eissn><coden>IJCDE6</coden><abstract>The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour included endometrial (n = 6), rectal (n = 1), anal (n = 1), cervical (n = 2), prostatic (n = 1) and bladder (n = 2). Indications for pelvic exenteration were locally advanced disease, recurrence and severe radiation or surgical damage. Six patients had pre-existing colostomy, and three had a Bricker ureteroileal diversion. The double-barrelled-wet colostomy technique consisted in anastomosing both ureters to a colon segment 25 cm distal to the loop colostomy. There was no operative mortality. Complications included one urinary leak which closed with conservative management and one case of recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis which finally required nephrectomy. Intravenous urography in the remaining patients showed good flow through the ureters to the conduit with no reflux. Postoperative plasma electrolytes, urea and creatinine were normal from day seven onwards. Urodynamic studies in four patients showed efficient contraction of the colon conduit with pressure levels similar to those in the colon proximal to the colostomy. In five cases biopsies of the conduit were taken at 3 and 16 months; no dysplasias were found. Four patients died due to disease progression. The overall mean survival was 41.2 months. The remainder are currently disease-free, maximum followup period being 19 months. Double-barrelled wet colostomy is a safe and simple technique with low morbidity. The patient needs to carry only one stoma and functional results are good.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>9112149</pmid><doi>10.1007/s003840050076</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-1958
ispartof International journal of colorectal disease, 1997-02, Vol.12 (1), p.37-41
issn 0179-1958
1432-1262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78963351
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Colon
Colon - surgery
Colostomy - adverse effects
Colostomy - methods
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mortality
Ostomy
Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects
Pelvic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Pelvic Neoplasms - surgery
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Survival Rate
Ureter - surgery
Urinary Diversion - methods
Urodynamics
title Double-barreled wet colostomy : a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double-barreled%20wet%20colostomy%20:%20a%20safe%20and%20simple%20method%20after%20pelvic%20exenteration&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20colorectal%20disease&rft.au=OSORIO%20GULLON,%20A&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=37-41&rft.issn=0179-1958&rft.eissn=1432-1262&rft.coden=IJCDE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s003840050076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4275965751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847986950&rft_id=info:pmid/9112149&rfr_iscdi=true