Oral Iron and the Hemoccult Test: A Controversy on the Teaching Wards

To the Editor: Teaching rounds have been criticized for encouraging the passive acquisition of facts in place of analysis and inquiry. 1 , 2 The teaching of an approach to scientific inquiry may be improved by prompting the ward team to investigate a clinical problem actively on its own ward. We rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1989-06, Vol.320 (22), p.1500-1500
Hauptverfasser: Kulbaski, M J, Goold, S D, Tecce, M A, Friedenheim, R E, Palarski, J D, Brancati, F L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Teaching rounds have been criticized for encouraging the passive acquisition of facts in place of analysis and inquiry. 1 , 2 The teaching of an approach to scientific inquiry may be improved by prompting the ward team to investigate a clinical problem actively on its own ward. We report the investigation of a clinical controversy that was performed by a single medical-ward team during a month-long rotation: Does oral iron therapy cause a positive guaiac test for occult blood in stool (Hemoccult)? This debate was sparked by a case discussion early in the month. A poll of the team members . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM198906013202222