Oral Iron and the Hemoccult Test: A Controversy on the Teaching Wards
To the Editor: Teaching rounds have been criticized for encouraging the passive acquisition of facts in place of analysis and inquiry. 1 , 2 The teaching of an approach to scientific inquiry may be improved by prompting the ward team to investigate a clinical problem actively on its own ward. We rep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1989-06, Vol.320 (22), p.1500-1500 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Teaching rounds have been criticized for encouraging the passive acquisition of facts in place of analysis and inquiry.
1
,
2
The teaching of an approach to scientific inquiry may be improved by prompting the ward team to investigate a clinical problem actively on its own ward. We report the investigation of a clinical controversy that was performed by a single medical-ward team during a month-long rotation: Does oral iron therapy cause a positive guaiac test for occult blood in stool (Hemoccult)?
This debate was sparked by a case discussion early in the month. A poll of the team members . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM198906013202222 |