Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET
Multidetector SPECT systems equipped with a high-energy, or 511-keV collimator, have been proposed to offer a less expensive alternative to PET in myocardial viability studies with [18F]FDG. The objectives of this investigation included: (a) measuring the physical imaging characteristics of SPECT sy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1997-04, Vol.38 (4), p.582-586 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 586 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 582 |
container_title | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Chen, Eric Q MacIntyre, William J Go, Raymundo T Brunken, Richard C Saha, Gopal B Wong, Ching-yee O Neumann, Donald R Cook, Sebastian A Khandekar, Shashi P |
description | Multidetector SPECT systems equipped with a high-energy, or 511-keV collimator, have been proposed to offer a less expensive alternative to PET in myocardial viability studies with [18F]FDG. The objectives of this investigation included: (a) measuring the physical imaging characteristics of SPECT systems equipped with either a high-energy general-purpose collimator (HE), or the dedicated 511-keV collimator (UH), when imaging 511-keV photons, and comparing them with conventional FDG PET; and (b) directly and quantitatively comparing the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, with either an UH or HE collimator, to that of PET in myocardial viability studies using 18F-FDG.
Physical imaging characteristics of SPECT and PET were measured and compared. Both SPECT and PET studies were performed in two groups of 18 patients each, with Group I using HE SPECT and Group II using UH SPECT. Myocardial perfusion studies were also performed using 82Rb PET at rest and during dipyridamole stress to identify areas of persistent hypoperfusion. For each myocardial region with a persistent perfusion defect, a perfusion-metabolism match or mismatch pattern was established independently, based on the results of 18F-FDG SPECT as well as PET.
PET is superior to SPECT in all physical imaging characteristics, particularly in sensitivity and contrast resolution. PET had a sensitivity 40-80 times higher than that of SPECT, and its contrast resolution was 40-100% better than SPECT. Between FDG-SPECT using an HE collimator and that using a 511-keV collimator, the latter showed marked reduction in septal penetration (from 56% to 38%), improvement in spatial resolution (from 17 mm to 11 mm FWHM) as well as contrast resolution (from 34% to 45%), while suffering reduced system sensitivity (from 75 to 34 cpm/microCi). Patient studies demonstrated that although FDG-SPECT, using a HE or UH collimator, provided concordant viability information as FDG PET in a large majority of myocardial segments with persistent perfusion defects (88% and 90%, respectively), there is an excellent statistical agreement (kappa = 0.736) between SPECT with UH collimator and PET, while the agreement between SPECT using HE collimator and PET are moderate (kappa = 0.413).
Despite its markedly inferior physical imaging characteristics compared with PET, SPECT with the dedicated 511-keV collimator offers a low-cost, practical alternative to PET in studying myocardial viability using [18F]FDG. SPECT systems with a high-energy, ge |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78938508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13373128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h293t-b92f43ccfa30df8a7bce7dab3766f1513bb5bd51270b71786f068511dbb58c303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF1LwzAYhYsoc05_glBEvCvkY_mod6NuU5g42OZtSNJ0y0jbmbSM_XsrFgW9OvCeh8M571k0hASThFDKzqMhgBQmhAByGV2FsAcAUM75IBqkIOUI0GEkXk-1lj630sXvVirrbHOKV02bWxPiTbDVNp65tva2MgnkyexpHq-W02z9GE_irC4P0ttQV_HRNrt_4HK6vo4uCumCuel1FG1m03X2nCze5i_ZZJHsUIqbRKWoGGOtC4lBXnDJlDYslwozSgtIIFaKqJxAxIBikHFadEsIhHl35xoDPIoevnMPvv5oTWhEaYM2zsnK1G0QjKeYE8A78O4PuK9bX3XdBIIppGOO0w667aFWlSYXB29L6U-if1vn3_e-DFq6wstK2_CDIYogIOy31M5ud0frjaha7Yz0X5n7qsRcjAXhCH8C43uBIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219164839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Chen, Eric Q ; MacIntyre, William J ; Go, Raymundo T ; Brunken, Richard C ; Saha, Gopal B ; Wong, Ching-yee O ; Neumann, Donald R ; Cook, Sebastian A ; Khandekar, Shashi P</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Eric Q ; MacIntyre, William J ; Go, Raymundo T ; Brunken, Richard C ; Saha, Gopal B ; Wong, Ching-yee O ; Neumann, Donald R ; Cook, Sebastian A ; Khandekar, Shashi P</creatorcontrib><description>Multidetector SPECT systems equipped with a high-energy, or 511-keV collimator, have been proposed to offer a less expensive alternative to PET in myocardial viability studies with [18F]FDG. The objectives of this investigation included: (a) measuring the physical imaging characteristics of SPECT systems equipped with either a high-energy general-purpose collimator (HE), or the dedicated 511-keV collimator (UH), when imaging 511-keV photons, and comparing them with conventional FDG PET; and (b) directly and quantitatively comparing the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, with either an UH or HE collimator, to that of PET in myocardial viability studies using 18F-FDG.
Physical imaging characteristics of SPECT and PET were measured and compared. Both SPECT and PET studies were performed in two groups of 18 patients each, with Group I using HE SPECT and Group II using UH SPECT. Myocardial perfusion studies were also performed using 82Rb PET at rest and during dipyridamole stress to identify areas of persistent hypoperfusion. For each myocardial region with a persistent perfusion defect, a perfusion-metabolism match or mismatch pattern was established independently, based on the results of 18F-FDG SPECT as well as PET.
PET is superior to SPECT in all physical imaging characteristics, particularly in sensitivity and contrast resolution. PET had a sensitivity 40-80 times higher than that of SPECT, and its contrast resolution was 40-100% better than SPECT. Between FDG-SPECT using an HE collimator and that using a 511-keV collimator, the latter showed marked reduction in septal penetration (from 56% to 38%), improvement in spatial resolution (from 17 mm to 11 mm FWHM) as well as contrast resolution (from 34% to 45%), while suffering reduced system sensitivity (from 75 to 34 cpm/microCi). Patient studies demonstrated that although FDG-SPECT, using a HE or UH collimator, provided concordant viability information as FDG PET in a large majority of myocardial segments with persistent perfusion defects (88% and 90%, respectively), there is an excellent statistical agreement (kappa = 0.736) between SPECT with UH collimator and PET, while the agreement between SPECT using HE collimator and PET are moderate (kappa = 0.413).
Despite its markedly inferior physical imaging characteristics compared with PET, SPECT with the dedicated 511-keV collimator offers a low-cost, practical alternative to PET in studying myocardial viability using [18F]FDG. SPECT systems with a high-energy, general-purpose collimator, on the other hand, are inadequate in such studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9098206</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Coronary Circulation ; Deoxyglucose - analogs & derivatives ; Fluorine Radioisotopes ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Radionuclide investigations ; Rubidium Radioisotopes ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1997-04, Vol.38 (4), p.582-586</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Apr 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2621057$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9098206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Eric Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacIntyre, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Go, Raymundo T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunken, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Gopal B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ching-yee O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Sebastian A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khandekar, Shashi P</creatorcontrib><title>Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Multidetector SPECT systems equipped with a high-energy, or 511-keV collimator, have been proposed to offer a less expensive alternative to PET in myocardial viability studies with [18F]FDG. The objectives of this investigation included: (a) measuring the physical imaging characteristics of SPECT systems equipped with either a high-energy general-purpose collimator (HE), or the dedicated 511-keV collimator (UH), when imaging 511-keV photons, and comparing them with conventional FDG PET; and (b) directly and quantitatively comparing the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, with either an UH or HE collimator, to that of PET in myocardial viability studies using 18F-FDG.
Physical imaging characteristics of SPECT and PET were measured and compared. Both SPECT and PET studies were performed in two groups of 18 patients each, with Group I using HE SPECT and Group II using UH SPECT. Myocardial perfusion studies were also performed using 82Rb PET at rest and during dipyridamole stress to identify areas of persistent hypoperfusion. For each myocardial region with a persistent perfusion defect, a perfusion-metabolism match or mismatch pattern was established independently, based on the results of 18F-FDG SPECT as well as PET.
PET is superior to SPECT in all physical imaging characteristics, particularly in sensitivity and contrast resolution. PET had a sensitivity 40-80 times higher than that of SPECT, and its contrast resolution was 40-100% better than SPECT. Between FDG-SPECT using an HE collimator and that using a 511-keV collimator, the latter showed marked reduction in septal penetration (from 56% to 38%), improvement in spatial resolution (from 17 mm to 11 mm FWHM) as well as contrast resolution (from 34% to 45%), while suffering reduced system sensitivity (from 75 to 34 cpm/microCi). Patient studies demonstrated that although FDG-SPECT, using a HE or UH collimator, provided concordant viability information as FDG PET in a large majority of myocardial segments with persistent perfusion defects (88% and 90%, respectively), there is an excellent statistical agreement (kappa = 0.736) between SPECT with UH collimator and PET, while the agreement between SPECT using HE collimator and PET are moderate (kappa = 0.413).
Despite its markedly inferior physical imaging characteristics compared with PET, SPECT with the dedicated 511-keV collimator offers a low-cost, practical alternative to PET in studying myocardial viability using [18F]FDG. SPECT systems with a high-energy, general-purpose collimator, on the other hand, are inadequate in such studies.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation</subject><subject>Deoxyglucose - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Fluorine Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Radionuclide investigations</subject><subject>Rubidium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkF1LwzAYhYsoc05_glBEvCvkY_mod6NuU5g42OZtSNJ0y0jbmbSM_XsrFgW9OvCeh8M571k0hASThFDKzqMhgBQmhAByGV2FsAcAUM75IBqkIOUI0GEkXk-1lj630sXvVirrbHOKV02bWxPiTbDVNp65tva2MgnkyexpHq-W02z9GE_irC4P0ttQV_HRNrt_4HK6vo4uCumCuel1FG1m03X2nCze5i_ZZJHsUIqbRKWoGGOtC4lBXnDJlDYslwozSgtIIFaKqJxAxIBikHFadEsIhHl35xoDPIoevnMPvv5oTWhEaYM2zsnK1G0QjKeYE8A78O4PuK9bX3XdBIIppGOO0w667aFWlSYXB29L6U-if1vn3_e-DFq6wstK2_CDIYogIOy31M5ud0frjaha7Yz0X5n7qsRcjAXhCH8C43uBIw</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Chen, Eric Q</creator><creator>MacIntyre, William J</creator><creator>Go, Raymundo T</creator><creator>Brunken, Richard C</creator><creator>Saha, Gopal B</creator><creator>Wong, Ching-yee O</creator><creator>Neumann, Donald R</creator><creator>Cook, Sebastian A</creator><creator>Khandekar, Shashi P</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET</title><author>Chen, Eric Q ; MacIntyre, William J ; Go, Raymundo T ; Brunken, Richard C ; Saha, Gopal B ; Wong, Ching-yee O ; Neumann, Donald R ; Cook, Sebastian A ; Khandekar, Shashi P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h293t-b92f43ccfa30df8a7bce7dab3766f1513bb5bd51270b71786f068511dbb58c303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation</topic><topic>Deoxyglucose - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Fluorine Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Radionuclide investigations</topic><topic>Rubidium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Eric Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacIntyre, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Go, Raymundo T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunken, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Gopal B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ching-yee O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Sebastian A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khandekar, Shashi P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Eric Q</au><au>MacIntyre, William J</au><au>Go, Raymundo T</au><au>Brunken, Richard C</au><au>Saha, Gopal B</au><au>Wong, Ching-yee O</au><au>Neumann, Donald R</au><au>Cook, Sebastian A</au><au>Khandekar, Shashi P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>582</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>582-586</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>Multidetector SPECT systems equipped with a high-energy, or 511-keV collimator, have been proposed to offer a less expensive alternative to PET in myocardial viability studies with [18F]FDG. The objectives of this investigation included: (a) measuring the physical imaging characteristics of SPECT systems equipped with either a high-energy general-purpose collimator (HE), or the dedicated 511-keV collimator (UH), when imaging 511-keV photons, and comparing them with conventional FDG PET; and (b) directly and quantitatively comparing the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, with either an UH or HE collimator, to that of PET in myocardial viability studies using 18F-FDG.
Physical imaging characteristics of SPECT and PET were measured and compared. Both SPECT and PET studies were performed in two groups of 18 patients each, with Group I using HE SPECT and Group II using UH SPECT. Myocardial perfusion studies were also performed using 82Rb PET at rest and during dipyridamole stress to identify areas of persistent hypoperfusion. For each myocardial region with a persistent perfusion defect, a perfusion-metabolism match or mismatch pattern was established independently, based on the results of 18F-FDG SPECT as well as PET.
PET is superior to SPECT in all physical imaging characteristics, particularly in sensitivity and contrast resolution. PET had a sensitivity 40-80 times higher than that of SPECT, and its contrast resolution was 40-100% better than SPECT. Between FDG-SPECT using an HE collimator and that using a 511-keV collimator, the latter showed marked reduction in septal penetration (from 56% to 38%), improvement in spatial resolution (from 17 mm to 11 mm FWHM) as well as contrast resolution (from 34% to 45%), while suffering reduced system sensitivity (from 75 to 34 cpm/microCi). Patient studies demonstrated that although FDG-SPECT, using a HE or UH collimator, provided concordant viability information as FDG PET in a large majority of myocardial segments with persistent perfusion defects (88% and 90%, respectively), there is an excellent statistical agreement (kappa = 0.736) between SPECT with UH collimator and PET, while the agreement between SPECT using HE collimator and PET are moderate (kappa = 0.413).
Despite its markedly inferior physical imaging characteristics compared with PET, SPECT with the dedicated 511-keV collimator offers a low-cost, practical alternative to PET in studying myocardial viability using [18F]FDG. SPECT systems with a high-energy, general-purpose collimator, on the other hand, are inadequate in such studies.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>9098206</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1997-04, Vol.38 (4), p.582-586 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78938508 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular system Coronary Circulation Deoxyglucose - analogs & derivatives Fluorine Radioisotopes Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Heart - diagnostic imaging Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Radionuclide investigations Rubidium Radioisotopes Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, Emission-Computed Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon |
title | Myocardial Viability Studies Using Fluorine-18-FDG SPECT: A Comparison with Fluorine-18-FDG PET |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myocardial%20Viability%20Studies%20Using%20Fluorine-18-FDG%20SPECT:%20A%20Comparison%20with%20Fluorine-18-FDG%20PET&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Chen,%20Eric%20Q&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=582&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=582-586&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E13373128%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219164839&rft_id=info:pmid/9098206&rfr_iscdi=true |