Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices
The Ortho Ranger is a new device available for measurement of joint motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the clinical reliability of the Ortho Ranger compared to the reliability of the standard goniometer and (2) to investigate the correlation between the Ortho Ranger and the gon...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1989-04, Vol.70 (4), p.288-290 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 290 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 288 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Greene, B L Wolf, S L |
| description | The Ortho Ranger is a new device available for measurement of joint motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the clinical reliability of the Ortho Ranger compared to the reliability of the standard goniometer and (2) to investigate the correlation between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for upper extremity joint movements in healthy adults. Three measurements with each instrument were taken during three different sessions for active shoulder, elbow, and wrist movements. The within-session reliability was higher for the goniometer. The Pearson correlation coefficients suggest a strong relationship between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for shoulder internal and external rotation, and a poor relationship for elbow movements. The Ortho Ranger does not provide remarkable advantages in measurement compared to the goniometer. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78932284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78932284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-f697f1ed655cfb639de2f2dd703d92fce0518c9bf9310d426358ab6282ff0d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLxDAYRbNQxnH0JwhZuSvk0aaNOxnGBwy4GdclTb5AhqaJSTo6_95Bu7oc7uHCvUJrQgivpJT8Bt3mfLygaDhdoRWTnPCardHuM0ZIGH5KAu_KGR-Dmwr24QQepvKEdfBRJZfDhIPF5TtgDyrP6a_GBk5OQ75D11aNGe6X3KDDy-6wfav2H6_v2-d9FSmjpbJCtpaCEU2j7SC4NMAsM6Yl3EhmNZCGdloOVnJKTM0Ebzo1CNYxa4kRfIMe_2djCl8z5NJ7lzWMo5ogzLlvO8kZ6-qL-LCI8-DB9DE5r9K5X27zX3BCU8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78932284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Greene, B L ; Wolf, S L</creator><creatorcontrib>Greene, B L ; Wolf, S L</creatorcontrib><description>The Ortho Ranger is a new device available for measurement of joint motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the clinical reliability of the Ortho Ranger compared to the reliability of the standard goniometer and (2) to investigate the correlation between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for upper extremity joint movements in healthy adults. Three measurements with each instrument were taken during three different sessions for active shoulder, elbow, and wrist movements. The within-session reliability was higher for the goniometer. The Pearson correlation coefficients suggest a strong relationship between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for shoulder internal and external rotation, and a poor relationship for elbow movements. The Ortho Ranger does not provide remarkable advantages in measurement compared to the goniometer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2930342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Elbow Joint - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Movement ; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine - instrumentation ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Wrist Joint - physiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1989-04, Vol.70 (4), p.288-290</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2930342$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greene, B L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S L</creatorcontrib><title>Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>The Ortho Ranger is a new device available for measurement of joint motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the clinical reliability of the Ortho Ranger compared to the reliability of the standard goniometer and (2) to investigate the correlation between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for upper extremity joint movements in healthy adults. Three measurements with each instrument were taken during three different sessions for active shoulder, elbow, and wrist movements. The within-session reliability was higher for the goniometer. The Pearson correlation coefficients suggest a strong relationship between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for shoulder internal and external rotation, and a poor relationship for elbow movements. The Ortho Ranger does not provide remarkable advantages in measurement compared to the goniometer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - physiology</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tLxDAYRbNQxnH0JwhZuSvk0aaNOxnGBwy4GdclTb5AhqaJSTo6_95Bu7oc7uHCvUJrQgivpJT8Bt3mfLygaDhdoRWTnPCardHuM0ZIGH5KAu_KGR-Dmwr24QQepvKEdfBRJZfDhIPF5TtgDyrP6a_GBk5OQ75D11aNGe6X3KDDy-6wfav2H6_v2-d9FSmjpbJCtpaCEU2j7SC4NMAsM6Yl3EhmNZCGdloOVnJKTM0Ebzo1CNYxa4kRfIMe_2djCl8z5NJ7lzWMo5ogzLlvO8kZ6-qL-LCI8-DB9DE5r9K5X27zX3BCU8o</recordid><startdate>198904</startdate><enddate>198904</enddate><creator>Greene, B L</creator><creator>Wolf, S L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198904</creationdate><title>Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices</title><author>Greene, B L ; Wolf, S L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-f697f1ed655cfb639de2f2dd703d92fce0518c9bf9310d426358ab6282ff0d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greene, B L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greene, B L</au><au>Wolf, S L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1989-04</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>288-290</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><abstract>The Ortho Ranger is a new device available for measurement of joint motion. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the clinical reliability of the Ortho Ranger compared to the reliability of the standard goniometer and (2) to investigate the correlation between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for upper extremity joint movements in healthy adults. Three measurements with each instrument were taken during three different sessions for active shoulder, elbow, and wrist movements. The within-session reliability was higher for the goniometer. The Pearson correlation coefficients suggest a strong relationship between the Ortho Ranger and the goniometer for shoulder internal and external rotation, and a poor relationship for elbow movements. The Ortho Ranger does not provide remarkable advantages in measurement compared to the goniometer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>2930342</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1989-04, Vol.70 (4), p.288-290 |
| issn | 0003-9993 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78932284 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Adult Elbow Joint - physiology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Movement Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine - instrumentation Shoulder Joint - physiology Wrist Joint - physiology |
| title | Upper extremity joint movement: comparison of two measurement devices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T16%3A08%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper%20extremity%20joint%20movement:%20comparison%20of%20two%20measurement%20devices&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Greene,%20B%20L&rft.date=1989-04&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=288-290&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78932284%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78932284&rft_id=info:pmid/2930342&rfr_iscdi=true |