Telling the diagnosis of cancer

Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 1989-05, Vol.7 (5), p.583-589
Hauptverfasser: Lind, S E, DelVecchio Good, M J, Seidel, S, Csordas, T, Good, B J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 589
container_issue 5
container_start_page 583
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 7
creator Lind, S E
DelVecchio Good, M J
Seidel, S
Csordas, T
Good, B J
description Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this process occurs. The majority of patients were told by surgeons (74%) and only a minority by primary care physicians (11%). Most were told in a traditional medical setting (42% in the doctor's office, 17% in a hospital room), but 23% were told over the telephone and 19% in the recovery room. Two indicators of patient satisfaction with the telling process suggested that different sites of telling were not equivalent. Patients told over the telephone or in the recovery room were more likely to describe the telling in negative terms and less likely to describe their doctors as being helpful in understanding their illness than those told in a doctor's office or in their hospital bed. This pilot study indicates considerable variation in this aspect of patient care and suggests directions for future research. To determine whether interviews that explore these issues with cancer patients are unpleasant or stressful, patients' reactions to being subjects in this study were sought. Patients asked directly at the completion of the interview or surveyed 2 to 4 months later said the interview had been helpful and/or a positive experience. None expressed negative feelings about participating. Concerns about the psychological harm resulting from such study of this patient group do not appear to be warranted and should not impede future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.583
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78926798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78926798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c89e2a3c7a0cbe71757178222868927277553230156bacdd92e8a035bcac1d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb3bsRZiLsZkxvTmyyl-KTQTQV3IZPJtCnzqElL8d-b0urichfnweEj5JrRggGlDx-TWcGUVAUWohCSn5AhE4A5ohCnZEiRQ84k_zonFzGuKGWPkosBGQBSRSUOye3cNY3vFtlm6bLKm0XXRx-zvs6s6awLl-SsNk10V8c_Ip8vz_PJWz6dvb5Pnqa55cA3uZXKgeEWDbWlQ4YinQQAOZYKEPZ7kpEyMS6NrSoFThrKRWmNZVXSRuT-0LsO_ffWxY1ufbRpm-lcv40aU80YlUxGejDa0McYXK3Xwbcm_GhG9Z6JTkz0nolGLXRikiI3x-5t2brqP3CEkPS7g770i-XOB6dja5omuUGvbP9X8wtWLWbW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78926798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telling the diagnosis of cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lind, S E ; DelVecchio Good, M J ; Seidel, S ; Csordas, T ; Good, B J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lind, S E ; DelVecchio Good, M J ; Seidel, S ; Csordas, T ; Good, B J</creatorcontrib><description>Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this process occurs. The majority of patients were told by surgeons (74%) and only a minority by primary care physicians (11%). Most were told in a traditional medical setting (42% in the doctor's office, 17% in a hospital room), but 23% were told over the telephone and 19% in the recovery room. Two indicators of patient satisfaction with the telling process suggested that different sites of telling were not equivalent. Patients told over the telephone or in the recovery room were more likely to describe the telling in negative terms and less likely to describe their doctors as being helpful in understanding their illness than those told in a doctor's office or in their hospital bed. This pilot study indicates considerable variation in this aspect of patient care and suggests directions for future research. To determine whether interviews that explore these issues with cancer patients are unpleasant or stressful, patients' reactions to being subjects in this study were sought. Patients asked directly at the completion of the interview or surveyed 2 to 4 months later said the interview had been helpful and/or a positive experience. None expressed negative feelings about participating. Concerns about the psychological harm resulting from such study of this patient group do not appear to be warranted and should not impede future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2709087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Female ; General Surgery ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Physician's Role ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians, Family ; Role</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 1989-05, Vol.7 (5), p.583-589</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c89e2a3c7a0cbe71757178222868927277553230156bacdd92e8a035bcac1d553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2709087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lind, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVecchio Good, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csordas, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, B J</creatorcontrib><title>Telling the diagnosis of cancer</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this process occurs. The majority of patients were told by surgeons (74%) and only a minority by primary care physicians (11%). Most were told in a traditional medical setting (42% in the doctor's office, 17% in a hospital room), but 23% were told over the telephone and 19% in the recovery room. Two indicators of patient satisfaction with the telling process suggested that different sites of telling were not equivalent. Patients told over the telephone or in the recovery room were more likely to describe the telling in negative terms and less likely to describe their doctors as being helpful in understanding their illness than those told in a doctor's office or in their hospital bed. This pilot study indicates considerable variation in this aspect of patient care and suggests directions for future research. To determine whether interviews that explore these issues with cancer patients are unpleasant or stressful, patients' reactions to being subjects in this study were sought. Patients asked directly at the completion of the interview or surveyed 2 to 4 months later said the interview had been helpful and/or a positive experience. None expressed negative feelings about participating. Concerns about the psychological harm resulting from such study of this patient group do not appear to be warranted and should not impede future research.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians, Family</subject><subject>Role</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb3bsRZiLsZkxvTmyyl-KTQTQV3IZPJtCnzqElL8d-b0urichfnweEj5JrRggGlDx-TWcGUVAUWohCSn5AhE4A5ohCnZEiRQ84k_zonFzGuKGWPkosBGQBSRSUOye3cNY3vFtlm6bLKm0XXRx-zvs6s6awLl-SsNk10V8c_Ip8vz_PJWz6dvb5Pnqa55cA3uZXKgeEWDbWlQ4YinQQAOZYKEPZ7kpEyMS6NrSoFThrKRWmNZVXSRuT-0LsO_ffWxY1ufbRpm-lcv40aU80YlUxGejDa0McYXK3Xwbcm_GhG9Z6JTkz0nolGLXRikiI3x-5t2brqP3CEkPS7g770i-XOB6dja5omuUGvbP9X8wtWLWbW</recordid><startdate>19890501</startdate><enddate>19890501</enddate><creator>Lind, S E</creator><creator>DelVecchio Good, M J</creator><creator>Seidel, S</creator><creator>Csordas, T</creator><creator>Good, B J</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890501</creationdate><title>Telling the diagnosis of cancer</title><author>Lind, S E ; DelVecchio Good, M J ; Seidel, S ; Csordas, T ; Good, B J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-c89e2a3c7a0cbe71757178222868927277553230156bacdd92e8a035bcac1d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians, Family</topic><topic>Role</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lind, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVecchio Good, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csordas, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, B J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lind, S E</au><au>DelVecchio Good, M J</au><au>Seidel, S</au><au>Csordas, T</au><au>Good, B J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telling the diagnosis of cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1989-05-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>583-589</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Although a concensus has emerged in this country that patients should be told when cancer is discovered, no data is available to indicate how and where patients are currently told that they have cancer. Fifty-five patients undergoing anticancer therapy were therefore interviewed to learn how this process occurs. The majority of patients were told by surgeons (74%) and only a minority by primary care physicians (11%). Most were told in a traditional medical setting (42% in the doctor's office, 17% in a hospital room), but 23% were told over the telephone and 19% in the recovery room. Two indicators of patient satisfaction with the telling process suggested that different sites of telling were not equivalent. Patients told over the telephone or in the recovery room were more likely to describe the telling in negative terms and less likely to describe their doctors as being helpful in understanding their illness than those told in a doctor's office or in their hospital bed. This pilot study indicates considerable variation in this aspect of patient care and suggests directions for future research. To determine whether interviews that explore these issues with cancer patients are unpleasant or stressful, patients' reactions to being subjects in this study were sought. Patients asked directly at the completion of the interview or surveyed 2 to 4 months later said the interview had been helpful and/or a positive experience. None expressed negative feelings about participating. Concerns about the psychological harm resulting from such study of this patient group do not appear to be warranted and should not impede future research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>2709087</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.583</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 1989-05, Vol.7 (5), p.583-589
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78926798
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Female
General Surgery
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - psychology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Physician's Role
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians, Family
Role
title Telling the diagnosis of cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telling%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Lind,%20S%20E&rft.date=1989-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=583-589&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78926798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78926798&rft_id=info:pmid/2709087&rfr_iscdi=true