The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests
The efficacy of CPR has been questioned. A major criticism is that neurologic outcomes have not been adequately studied. For a 26-month period, 138 patients from six major receiving hospitals were discharged alive following prehospital cardiac arrests. For 65 138 (47.1%) patients, either the patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 1989-02, Vol.17 (1), p.91-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Resuscitation |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Troiano, Philip Masaryk, John Stueven, Harlan A Olson, David Barthell, Edward Waite, Elizabeth M |
description | The efficacy of CPR has been questioned. A major criticism is that neurologic outcomes have not been adequately studied. For a 26-month period, 138 patients from six major receiving hospitals were discharged alive following prehospital cardiac arrests. For
65
138
(47.1%) patients, either the patient or a direct family member was contacted for information concerning neurologic outcome. For
63
138
(45.7%) patients, contact with patient or family was unsuccessful, consequently neurologic outcome at time of discharge was obtained from the medical record. For
10
138
(7.2%) patients, no data on neurologic outcome was obtainable. Neurologic outcome was rated by a 5-point Cerebral Performance Categories Scale (CPC); (1) Minimal Disability; (2) Moderate; (3) Severe; (4) Vegetative; and (5) Brain Dead. The bystander/first responder CPR group had 55.1% CPC-1; 24.4% CPC-2; 16.7% CPC-3; and 3.8% CPC-4 outcomes. The bystander/first responder NO CPR group had 58.0% CPC-1;18.0% CPC-2; 16.0% CPC-3; and 8.0% CPC-4 outcomes. There was no significant difference at any CPC level (
P not significant). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between either group when compared forage, response time, resuscitation time, witnessing of arrest or distribution of presenting rhythms. In conclusion, no significant effect in neurologic outcome among saved cardiac arrest victims was found between bystander/first responder CPR and bystander/first responder NO CPR groups in the paramedic program studied. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0300-9572(89)90082-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78915497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0300957289900828</els_id><sourcerecordid>78915497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-4eb506bf602048b8f21cb6a52e20b38174aeb5fc19fba4ce71ddccea5aee57533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEQx4Mo9Vr9Bgp5ENGHtZPdZJO8FOSwVigoUh8lZGcnNrK3OZPdg3777nnHPfZpHub3nxl-w9gbAZ8EiPYSGoDKKl1_MPajBTB1ZZ6xlTC6qYTS8JytTshLdl7KXwBolNVn7KxWjbEgV-z33T1xCoFw4inw7qFMfuwp8_WPnzyNfKQ5pyH9icjTPGHaEI8jL3PexV3KZZ_ZZrpPZRsnP3D0uY8euc-ZylResRfBD4VeH-sF-3X95W59U91-__pt_fm2QqnqqZLUKWi70EIN0nQm1AK71quaaugaI7T0CxFQ2NB5iaRF3yOSV55IadU0F-z9Ye42p3_zstltYkEaBj9SmovTxgolrV5AeQAxp1IyBbfNcePzgxPg9lbdXpnbK3PGuv9WnVlib4_z525D_Sl01Lj03x37vqAfQvYjxnLCtJCtbdsFuzpgtLjYRcquYKQRqY95eYDrU3z6jkf7D5S_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78915497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Troiano, Philip ; Masaryk, John ; Stueven, Harlan A ; Olson, David ; Barthell, Edward ; Waite, Elizabeth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Philip ; Masaryk, John ; Stueven, Harlan A ; Olson, David ; Barthell, Edward ; Waite, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of CPR has been questioned. A major criticism is that neurologic outcomes have not been adequately studied. For a 26-month period, 138 patients from six major receiving hospitals were discharged alive following prehospital cardiac arrests. For
65
138
(47.1%) patients, either the patient or a direct family member was contacted for information concerning neurologic outcome. For
63
138
(45.7%) patients, contact with patient or family was unsuccessful, consequently neurologic outcome at time of discharge was obtained from the medical record. For
10
138
(7.2%) patients, no data on neurologic outcome was obtainable. Neurologic outcome was rated by a 5-point Cerebral Performance Categories Scale (CPC); (1) Minimal Disability; (2) Moderate; (3) Severe; (4) Vegetative; and (5) Brain Dead. The bystander/first responder CPR group had 55.1% CPC-1; 24.4% CPC-2; 16.7% CPC-3; and 3.8% CPC-4 outcomes. The bystander/first responder NO CPR group had 58.0% CPC-1;18.0% CPC-2; 16.0% CPC-3; and 8.0% CPC-4 outcomes. There was no significant difference at any CPC level (
P not significant). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between either group when compared forage, response time, resuscitation time, witnessing of arrest or distribution of presenting rhythms. In conclusion, no significant effect in neurologic outcome among saved cardiac arrest victims was found between bystander/first responder CPR and bystander/first responder NO CPR groups in the paramedic program studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(89)90082-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2538904</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSUSBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bystander CPR ; First Aid ; Heart Arrest - complications ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Nervous System Diseases - etiology ; Neurologic outcome ; Prehospital cardiac arrest ; Resuscitation</subject><ispartof>Resuscitation, 1989-02, Vol.17 (1), p.91-98</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-4eb506bf602048b8f21cb6a52e20b38174aeb5fc19fba4ce71ddccea5aee57533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-4eb506bf602048b8f21cb6a52e20b38174aeb5fc19fba4ce71ddccea5aee57533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0300957289900828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7146966$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2538904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masaryk, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueven, Harlan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests</title><title>Resuscitation</title><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><description>The efficacy of CPR has been questioned. A major criticism is that neurologic outcomes have not been adequately studied. For a 26-month period, 138 patients from six major receiving hospitals were discharged alive following prehospital cardiac arrests. For
65
138
(47.1%) patients, either the patient or a direct family member was contacted for information concerning neurologic outcome. For
63
138
(45.7%) patients, contact with patient or family was unsuccessful, consequently neurologic outcome at time of discharge was obtained from the medical record. For
10
138
(7.2%) patients, no data on neurologic outcome was obtainable. Neurologic outcome was rated by a 5-point Cerebral Performance Categories Scale (CPC); (1) Minimal Disability; (2) Moderate; (3) Severe; (4) Vegetative; and (5) Brain Dead. The bystander/first responder CPR group had 55.1% CPC-1; 24.4% CPC-2; 16.7% CPC-3; and 3.8% CPC-4 outcomes. The bystander/first responder NO CPR group had 58.0% CPC-1;18.0% CPC-2; 16.0% CPC-3; and 8.0% CPC-4 outcomes. There was no significant difference at any CPC level (
P not significant). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between either group when compared forage, response time, resuscitation time, witnessing of arrest or distribution of presenting rhythms. In conclusion, no significant effect in neurologic outcome among saved cardiac arrest victims was found between bystander/first responder CPR and bystander/first responder NO CPR groups in the paramedic program studied.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bystander CPR</subject><subject>First Aid</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - complications</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Neurologic outcome</subject><subject>Prehospital cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><issn>0300-9572</issn><issn>1873-1570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEQx4Mo9Vr9Bgp5ENGHtZPdZJO8FOSwVigoUh8lZGcnNrK3OZPdg3777nnHPfZpHub3nxl-w9gbAZ8EiPYSGoDKKl1_MPajBTB1ZZ6xlTC6qYTS8JytTshLdl7KXwBolNVn7KxWjbEgV-z33T1xCoFw4inw7qFMfuwp8_WPnzyNfKQ5pyH9icjTPGHaEI8jL3PexV3KZZ_ZZrpPZRsnP3D0uY8euc-ZylResRfBD4VeH-sF-3X95W59U91-__pt_fm2QqnqqZLUKWi70EIN0nQm1AK71quaaugaI7T0CxFQ2NB5iaRF3yOSV55IadU0F-z9Ye42p3_zstltYkEaBj9SmovTxgolrV5AeQAxp1IyBbfNcePzgxPg9lbdXpnbK3PGuv9WnVlib4_z525D_Sl01Lj03x37vqAfQvYjxnLCtJCtbdsFuzpgtLjYRcquYKQRqY95eYDrU3z6jkf7D5S_</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>Troiano, Philip</creator><creator>Masaryk, John</creator><creator>Stueven, Harlan A</creator><creator>Olson, David</creator><creator>Barthell, Edward</creator><creator>Waite, Elizabeth M</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests</title><author>Troiano, Philip ; Masaryk, John ; Stueven, Harlan A ; Olson, David ; Barthell, Edward ; Waite, Elizabeth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-4eb506bf602048b8f21cb6a52e20b38174aeb5fc19fba4ce71ddccea5aee57533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bystander CPR</topic><topic>First Aid</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - complications</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Neurologic outcome</topic><topic>Prehospital cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Troiano, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masaryk, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueven, Harlan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Troiano, Philip</au><au>Masaryk, John</au><au>Stueven, Harlan A</au><au>Olson, David</au><au>Barthell, Edward</au><au>Waite, Elizabeth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests</atitle><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>91-98</pages><issn>0300-9572</issn><eissn>1873-1570</eissn><coden>RSUSBS</coden><abstract>The efficacy of CPR has been questioned. A major criticism is that neurologic outcomes have not been adequately studied. For a 26-month period, 138 patients from six major receiving hospitals were discharged alive following prehospital cardiac arrests. For
65
138
(47.1%) patients, either the patient or a direct family member was contacted for information concerning neurologic outcome. For
63
138
(45.7%) patients, contact with patient or family was unsuccessful, consequently neurologic outcome at time of discharge was obtained from the medical record. For
10
138
(7.2%) patients, no data on neurologic outcome was obtainable. Neurologic outcome was rated by a 5-point Cerebral Performance Categories Scale (CPC); (1) Minimal Disability; (2) Moderate; (3) Severe; (4) Vegetative; and (5) Brain Dead. The bystander/first responder CPR group had 55.1% CPC-1; 24.4% CPC-2; 16.7% CPC-3; and 3.8% CPC-4 outcomes. The bystander/first responder NO CPR group had 58.0% CPC-1;18.0% CPC-2; 16.0% CPC-3; and 8.0% CPC-4 outcomes. There was no significant difference at any CPC level (
P not significant). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between either group when compared forage, response time, resuscitation time, witnessing of arrest or distribution of presenting rhythms. In conclusion, no significant effect in neurologic outcome among saved cardiac arrest victims was found between bystander/first responder CPR and bystander/first responder NO CPR groups in the paramedic program studied.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>2538904</pmid><doi>10.1016/0300-9572(89)90082-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-9572 |
ispartof | Resuscitation, 1989-02, Vol.17 (1), p.91-98 |
issn | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78915497 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesia: equipment, devices Biological and medical sciences Bystander CPR First Aid Heart Arrest - complications Heart Arrest - therapy Humans Medical sciences Nervous System Diseases - etiology Neurologic outcome Prehospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation |
title | The effect of bystander CPR on neurologic outcome in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20bystander%20CPR%20on%20neurologic%20outcome%20in%20survivors%20of%20prehospital%20cardiac%20arrests&rft.jtitle=Resuscitation&rft.au=Troiano,%20Philip&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=91-98&rft.issn=0300-9572&rft.eissn=1873-1570&rft.coden=RSUSBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0300-9572(89)90082-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78915497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78915497&rft_id=info:pmid/2538904&rft_els_id=0300957289900828&rfr_iscdi=true |