A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report
The clinical usefulness of a newly developed beltless external tocodynamometer system was evaluated in a group of 56 patients in active, early, premature, or false labor. The uterine activity records so obtained were compared with those made in the same patients using the tocodynamometer with belt (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1989-05, Vol.73 (5), p.823-827 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 827 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 823 |
container_title | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Fukushima, Teiichiro Ogunyemi, Dotun Butler, Micheal Davidson, Ezra C |
description | The clinical usefulness of a newly developed beltless external tocodynamometer system was evaluated in a group of 56 patients in active, early, premature, or false labor. The uterine activity records so obtained were compared with those made in the same patients using the tocodynamometer with belt (49 patients) and the intrauterine pressure catheter (seven patients). The records were classified as “usable” if the baseline was above zero and the peak of the recorded contraction was at least 15 mmHg above the baseline. Both systems were studied under similar clinical conditions. Overall, of the 7434 minutes of recordings in 49 patients using the beltless system, 7008 minutes (94%) were usable. In contrast, only 2515 out of 5667 minutes (45%) of recordings made with the belted system were usable (P < .001). Seven additional patients were monitored simultaneously with the beltless tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter systems. Of the 1367 minutesʼ total monitoring time, the recovery rates of usable data for the beltless and intrauterine pressure catheter systems were 85 and 87%, respectively (P = not significant). These preliminary results indicate that the beltless system is a convenient, simple-to-use external tocodynamometric system that assesses uterine activity more efficiently than the belted system. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78905579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78905579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-bca3f650580da51be34260fc715c60e8d37a343855c71e08e1556b47cfe7d8743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKxEAQRRtRxnH0E4QsxF2gOv3Mchh8wYAbBXeh06kw0c7D7oTBnR_hF_ol9jDBVVF1D1V17wlZUq1YmjH2dkqWAFmeKs35ObkI4R0AqMzZgiwyBVxQuiR0nZToRochJGNv--qrM23f4oj-9_vHJINH17RNZ_xX4nHo_XhJzmrjAl7NdUVe7-9eNo_p9vnhabPepkOmIU9La1gtBQgNlRG0RMYzCbVVVFgJqCumDONMCxFHCBqpELLkytaoKq04W5Hb497B958ThrFom2DROdNhP4VC6RyEUHkEr2dwKlusisE3bXy3mD1G_WbWTbDG1d50tgn_mBR5xrSMGD9i-95F9-HDTXv0xQ6NG3dFjA5kJiCl-eFu7FI4pMv-AOEXap4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78905579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Fukushima, Teiichiro ; Ogunyemi, Dotun ; Butler, Micheal ; Davidson, Ezra C</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Teiichiro ; Ogunyemi, Dotun ; Butler, Micheal ; Davidson, Ezra C</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical usefulness of a newly developed beltless external tocodynamometer system was evaluated in a group of 56 patients in active, early, premature, or false labor. The uterine activity records so obtained were compared with those made in the same patients using the tocodynamometer with belt (49 patients) and the intrauterine pressure catheter (seven patients). The records were classified as “usable” if the baseline was above zero and the peak of the recorded contraction was at least 15 mmHg above the baseline. Both systems were studied under similar clinical conditions. Overall, of the 7434 minutes of recordings in 49 patients using the beltless system, 7008 minutes (94%) were usable. In contrast, only 2515 out of 5667 minutes (45%) of recordings made with the belted system were usable (P < .001). Seven additional patients were monitored simultaneously with the beltless tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter systems. Of the 1367 minutesʼ total monitoring time, the recovery rates of usable data for the beltless and intrauterine pressure catheter systems were 85 and 87%, respectively (P = not significant). These preliminary results indicate that the beltless system is a convenient, simple-to-use external tocodynamometric system that assesses uterine activity more efficiently than the belted system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2704511</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBGNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiotocography - instrumentation ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Labor, Obstetric - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Obstetric Labor, Premature - physiopathology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1989-05, Vol.73 (5), p.823-827</ispartof><rights>1989 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6592386$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2704511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Teiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunyemi, Dotun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Micheal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Ezra C</creatorcontrib><title>A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The clinical usefulness of a newly developed beltless external tocodynamometer system was evaluated in a group of 56 patients in active, early, premature, or false labor. The uterine activity records so obtained were compared with those made in the same patients using the tocodynamometer with belt (49 patients) and the intrauterine pressure catheter (seven patients). The records were classified as “usable” if the baseline was above zero and the peak of the recorded contraction was at least 15 mmHg above the baseline. Both systems were studied under similar clinical conditions. Overall, of the 7434 minutes of recordings in 49 patients using the beltless system, 7008 minutes (94%) were usable. In contrast, only 2515 out of 5667 minutes (45%) of recordings made with the belted system were usable (P < .001). Seven additional patients were monitored simultaneously with the beltless tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter systems. Of the 1367 minutesʼ total monitoring time, the recovery rates of usable data for the beltless and intrauterine pressure catheter systems were 85 and 87%, respectively (P = not significant). These preliminary results indicate that the beltless system is a convenient, simple-to-use external tocodynamometric system that assesses uterine activity more efficiently than the belted system.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiotocography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor, Premature - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKxEAQRRtRxnH0E4QsxF2gOv3Mchh8wYAbBXeh06kw0c7D7oTBnR_hF_ol9jDBVVF1D1V17wlZUq1YmjH2dkqWAFmeKs35ObkI4R0AqMzZgiwyBVxQuiR0nZToRochJGNv--qrM23f4oj-9_vHJINH17RNZ_xX4nHo_XhJzmrjAl7NdUVe7-9eNo_p9vnhabPepkOmIU9La1gtBQgNlRG0RMYzCbVVVFgJqCumDONMCxFHCBqpELLkytaoKq04W5Hb497B958ThrFom2DROdNhP4VC6RyEUHkEr2dwKlusisE3bXy3mD1G_WbWTbDG1d50tgn_mBR5xrSMGD9i-95F9-HDTXv0xQ6NG3dFjA5kJiCl-eFu7FI4pMv-AOEXap4</recordid><startdate>198905</startdate><enddate>198905</enddate><creator>Fukushima, Teiichiro</creator><creator>Ogunyemi, Dotun</creator><creator>Butler, Micheal</creator><creator>Davidson, Ezra C</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198905</creationdate><title>A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report</title><author>Fukushima, Teiichiro ; Ogunyemi, Dotun ; Butler, Micheal ; Davidson, Ezra C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-bca3f650580da51be34260fc715c60e8d37a343855c71e08e1556b47cfe7d8743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiotocography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor, Premature - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Teiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogunyemi, Dotun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Micheal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Ezra C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukushima, Teiichiro</au><au>Ogunyemi, Dotun</au><au>Butler, Micheal</au><au>Davidson, Ezra C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1989-05</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>827</epage><pages>823-827</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><coden>OBGNAS</coden><abstract>The clinical usefulness of a newly developed beltless external tocodynamometer system was evaluated in a group of 56 patients in active, early, premature, or false labor. The uterine activity records so obtained were compared with those made in the same patients using the tocodynamometer with belt (49 patients) and the intrauterine pressure catheter (seven patients). The records were classified as “usable” if the baseline was above zero and the peak of the recorded contraction was at least 15 mmHg above the baseline. Both systems were studied under similar clinical conditions. Overall, of the 7434 minutes of recordings in 49 patients using the beltless system, 7008 minutes (94%) were usable. In contrast, only 2515 out of 5667 minutes (45%) of recordings made with the belted system were usable (P < .001). Seven additional patients were monitored simultaneously with the beltless tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter systems. Of the 1367 minutesʼ total monitoring time, the recovery rates of usable data for the beltless and intrauterine pressure catheter systems were 85 and 87%, respectively (P = not significant). These preliminary results indicate that the beltless system is a convenient, simple-to-use external tocodynamometric system that assesses uterine activity more efficiently than the belted system.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>2704511</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-7844 |
ispartof | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1989-05, Vol.73 (5), p.823-827 |
issn | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78905579 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cardiotocography - instrumentation Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Equipment Design Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Labor, Obstetric - physiology Medical sciences Obstetric Labor, Premature - physiopathology Pregnancy Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta |
title | A beltless tocodynamometer—a preliminary report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20beltless%20tocodynamometer%E2%80%94a%20preliminary%20report&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Fukushima,%20Teiichiro&rft.date=1989-05&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=827&rft.pages=823-827&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.coden=OBGNAS&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78905579%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78905579&rft_id=info:pmid/2704511&rfr_iscdi=true |