Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation

The goals of this work were (a) to review the pre- and postsurgical auditory thresholds in a consecutive sample of cochlear implant recipients to determine the fate of residual hearing, and (b) to obtain preliminary indication of the value of a multicenter longitudinal study of residual hearing in i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1997-03, Vol.18 (2), p.179-183
Hauptverfasser: HODGES, A. V, SCHLOFFMAN, J, BALKANY, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 18
creator HODGES, A. V
SCHLOFFMAN, J
BALKANY, T
description The goals of this work were (a) to review the pre- and postsurgical auditory thresholds in a consecutive sample of cochlear implant recipients to determine the fate of residual hearing, and (b) to obtain preliminary indication of the value of a multicenter longitudinal study of residual hearing in implant patients. Indications for cochlear implantation have been expanded to include severely hearing impaired (SHI) adults and may someday include SHI children. Implantation of individuals with more residual hearing is a concern owing to the possible development of better devices that may make use of residual hearing within the lifetime of implanted children if not that of adults. Preservation of residual hearing would be a desirable outcome of implant surgery; however, conventional thought is that implantation destroys any remaining hearing. This study was undertaken to assess if and how often conservation of hearing occurred after implantation in a sample of multichannel implant recipients. Records of 50 profoundly hearing impaired consecutively implanted patients were examined for pre- and post-surgical audiometric results. Standard audiometric techniques were used for all testing procedures. Forty patients were considered to have some hearing conserved based on a response obtained at any one of the three speech frequencies prior to implantation. The most recent postimplantation audiometric results were used providing data from users with 1-41 months of use. Twenty-one of 40 implanted subjects were found to have responses in at least one of the speech frequencies both pre- and postsurgery, with the majority of those displaying responses at all three frequencies. In this preliminary retrospective study, it did not appear that duration of cochlear implant use, gender, level of preoperative hearing, or length of electrode insertion were related to outcome. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on individual devices. Conservation of hearing occurred in approximately half of the subjects reviewed. There is no indication of what factors contributed to the preservation of hearing in those with postsurgical residual hearing or if that hearing is usable. The study does suggest that a larger multicenter longitudinal study would be of value of determine what factors may be related to conserved hearing in implanted patients.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78904539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78904539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-6684a9844b6193e604015ae1b4e5506a7c851463f8874bede5455d63205296d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5iLdCmu_gSRZ1hQUvei5p-tZG0qYmreK_t2jxNDDzMMycoC0pDS2MkuwMnef8TkgpGCMbtDHEMKn4Ft3u45AhfdrJxwHHFifIvpltwB3Y5Ic3_OWnDrvourAY2PdjsMP0i1-g09aGDJer7tDrw_3L_lAcnx-f9nfHYqRMTIWUmlujOa9laRhIwpcZFsqagxBEWuW0KLlkrdaK19CA4EI0klEiqJGNZjt089c7pvgxQ56q3mcHYRkCcc6V0oZwwcwCXq3gXPfQVGPyvU3f1fp2ya_X3GZnQ5vs4Hz-x6ikWlLFfgABjVsT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78904539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>HODGES, A. V ; SCHLOFFMAN, J ; BALKANY, T</creator><creatorcontrib>HODGES, A. V ; SCHLOFFMAN, J ; BALKANY, T</creatorcontrib><description>The goals of this work were (a) to review the pre- and postsurgical auditory thresholds in a consecutive sample of cochlear implant recipients to determine the fate of residual hearing, and (b) to obtain preliminary indication of the value of a multicenter longitudinal study of residual hearing in implant patients. Indications for cochlear implantation have been expanded to include severely hearing impaired (SHI) adults and may someday include SHI children. Implantation of individuals with more residual hearing is a concern owing to the possible development of better devices that may make use of residual hearing within the lifetime of implanted children if not that of adults. Preservation of residual hearing would be a desirable outcome of implant surgery; however, conventional thought is that implantation destroys any remaining hearing. This study was undertaken to assess if and how often conservation of hearing occurred after implantation in a sample of multichannel implant recipients. Records of 50 profoundly hearing impaired consecutively implanted patients were examined for pre- and post-surgical audiometric results. Standard audiometric techniques were used for all testing procedures. Forty patients were considered to have some hearing conserved based on a response obtained at any one of the three speech frequencies prior to implantation. The most recent postimplantation audiometric results were used providing data from users with 1-41 months of use. Twenty-one of 40 implanted subjects were found to have responses in at least one of the speech frequencies both pre- and postsurgery, with the majority of those displaying responses at all three frequencies. In this preliminary retrospective study, it did not appear that duration of cochlear implant use, gender, level of preoperative hearing, or length of electrode insertion were related to outcome. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on individual devices. Conservation of hearing occurred in approximately half of the subjects reviewed. There is no indication of what factors contributed to the preservation of hearing in those with postsurgical residual hearing or if that hearing is usable. The study does suggest that a larger multicenter longitudinal study would be of value of determine what factors may be related to conserved hearing in implanted patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-9763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9093674</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOTBN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Female ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Speech Reception Threshold Test ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve</subject><ispartof>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.), 1997-03, Vol.18 (2), p.179-183</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2628627$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9093674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HODGES, A. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLOFFMAN, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALKANY, T</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation</title><title>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><description>The goals of this work were (a) to review the pre- and postsurgical auditory thresholds in a consecutive sample of cochlear implant recipients to determine the fate of residual hearing, and (b) to obtain preliminary indication of the value of a multicenter longitudinal study of residual hearing in implant patients. Indications for cochlear implantation have been expanded to include severely hearing impaired (SHI) adults and may someday include SHI children. Implantation of individuals with more residual hearing is a concern owing to the possible development of better devices that may make use of residual hearing within the lifetime of implanted children if not that of adults. Preservation of residual hearing would be a desirable outcome of implant surgery; however, conventional thought is that implantation destroys any remaining hearing. This study was undertaken to assess if and how often conservation of hearing occurred after implantation in a sample of multichannel implant recipients. Records of 50 profoundly hearing impaired consecutively implanted patients were examined for pre- and post-surgical audiometric results. Standard audiometric techniques were used for all testing procedures. Forty patients were considered to have some hearing conserved based on a response obtained at any one of the three speech frequencies prior to implantation. The most recent postimplantation audiometric results were used providing data from users with 1-41 months of use. Twenty-one of 40 implanted subjects were found to have responses in at least one of the speech frequencies both pre- and postsurgery, with the majority of those displaying responses at all three frequencies. In this preliminary retrospective study, it did not appear that duration of cochlear implant use, gender, level of preoperative hearing, or length of electrode insertion were related to outcome. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on individual devices. Conservation of hearing occurred in approximately half of the subjects reviewed. There is no indication of what factors contributed to the preservation of hearing in those with postsurgical residual hearing or if that hearing is usable. The study does suggest that a larger multicenter longitudinal study would be of value of determine what factors may be related to conserved hearing in implanted patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve</subject><issn>0192-9763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5iLdCmu_gSRZ1hQUvei5p-tZG0qYmreK_t2jxNDDzMMycoC0pDS2MkuwMnef8TkgpGCMbtDHEMKn4Ft3u45AhfdrJxwHHFifIvpltwB3Y5Ic3_OWnDrvourAY2PdjsMP0i1-g09aGDJer7tDrw_3L_lAcnx-f9nfHYqRMTIWUmlujOa9laRhIwpcZFsqagxBEWuW0KLlkrdaK19CA4EI0klEiqJGNZjt089c7pvgxQ56q3mcHYRkCcc6V0oZwwcwCXq3gXPfQVGPyvU3f1fp2ya_X3GZnQ5vs4Hz-x6ikWlLFfgABjVsT</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>HODGES, A. V</creator><creator>SCHLOFFMAN, J</creator><creator>BALKANY, T</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation</title><author>HODGES, A. V ; SCHLOFFMAN, J ; BALKANY, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-6684a9844b6193e604015ae1b4e5506a7c851463f8874bede5455d63205296d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Speech Reception Threshold Test</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HODGES, A. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLOFFMAN, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALKANY, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HODGES, A. V</au><au>SCHLOFFMAN, J</au><au>BALKANY, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>179-183</pages><issn>0192-9763</issn><coden>AJOTBN</coden><abstract>The goals of this work were (a) to review the pre- and postsurgical auditory thresholds in a consecutive sample of cochlear implant recipients to determine the fate of residual hearing, and (b) to obtain preliminary indication of the value of a multicenter longitudinal study of residual hearing in implant patients. Indications for cochlear implantation have been expanded to include severely hearing impaired (SHI) adults and may someday include SHI children. Implantation of individuals with more residual hearing is a concern owing to the possible development of better devices that may make use of residual hearing within the lifetime of implanted children if not that of adults. Preservation of residual hearing would be a desirable outcome of implant surgery; however, conventional thought is that implantation destroys any remaining hearing. This study was undertaken to assess if and how often conservation of hearing occurred after implantation in a sample of multichannel implant recipients. Records of 50 profoundly hearing impaired consecutively implanted patients were examined for pre- and post-surgical audiometric results. Standard audiometric techniques were used for all testing procedures. Forty patients were considered to have some hearing conserved based on a response obtained at any one of the three speech frequencies prior to implantation. The most recent postimplantation audiometric results were used providing data from users with 1-41 months of use. Twenty-one of 40 implanted subjects were found to have responses in at least one of the speech frequencies both pre- and postsurgery, with the majority of those displaying responses at all three frequencies. In this preliminary retrospective study, it did not appear that duration of cochlear implant use, gender, level of preoperative hearing, or length of electrode insertion were related to outcome. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on individual devices. Conservation of hearing occurred in approximately half of the subjects reviewed. There is no indication of what factors contributed to the preservation of hearing in those with postsurgical residual hearing or if that hearing is usable. The study does suggest that a larger multicenter longitudinal study would be of value of determine what factors may be related to conserved hearing in implanted patients.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>9093674</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-9763
ispartof The American journal of otology (New York, N.Y.), 1997-03, Vol.18 (2), p.179-183
issn 0192-9763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78904539
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Audiometry
Biological and medical sciences
Cochlear Implants
Deafness - diagnosis
Deafness - rehabilitation
Female
Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the ear, the auditive nerve and the facial nerve
title Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A40%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20of%20residual%20hearing%20with%20cochlear%20implantation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20otology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=HODGES,%20A.%20V&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=179-183&rft.issn=0192-9763&rft.coden=AJOTBN&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78904539%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78904539&rft_id=info:pmid/9093674&rfr_iscdi=true