Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models

Smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth characteristics are affected by endothelial cells (ECs)in vivoandin vitro.In this study, we compare a bilayer EC/SMC coculture model that allows cell contact with a model of SMCs growing in media continuously conditioned by ECs, but without physical contact. Bovine ao...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 1997-02, Vol.67 (2), p.169-178
Hauptverfasser: Fillinger, Mark F., Sampson, Lawrence N., Cronenwett, Jack L., Powell, Richard J., Wagner, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 67
creator Fillinger, Mark F.
Sampson, Lawrence N.
Cronenwett, Jack L.
Powell, Richard J.
Wagner, Robert J.
description Smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth characteristics are affected by endothelial cells (ECs)in vivoandin vitro.In this study, we compare a bilayer EC/SMC coculture model that allows cell contact with a model of SMCs growing in media continuously conditioned by ECs, but without physical contact. Bovine aortic SMCs were plated on one side of a 13-μm-thick, semipermeable membrane. Three models were compared: (1) SMCs cultured alone (with no cells on the opposite side of the membrane, O/SMC); (2) SMCs cultured with ECs on the opposite side of the membrane in a bilayer coculture system that allows physical contact between ECs and SMCs (EC/SMC); and (3) SMCs cultured in media continuously conditioned by adjacent ECs, without contact (conditioned media, CM). After cultures were established, SMCs were harvested at 7 and 14 days after plating (n= 5 cultures/day/group). SMC DNA and protein content and [3H]thymidine incorporation were measured in each group. On Days 7 and 14 after plating, ECs in both the EC/SMC and CM models stimulated SMC proliferation >50% compared to O/SMC controls (P< 0.05). SMC density was similar for the EC/SMC and CM models at Day 7, but SMC density was higher in the EC/SMC group at Day 14 in culture (P< 0.05). At Day 7, protein synthesis was similar in the three groups, but by Day 14, SMCs in the EC/SMC group had produced significantly less cellular protein/DNA than SMCs in the CM group (P< 0.05), which in turn had less protein/DNA than the control (O/SMC) group (P< 0.05). SMCs in the EC/SMC and CM groups retained a thin, spindle shape with filamentous projections, compared to the hypertrophic appearance of SMCs in the absence of ECs. Electron microscopy revealed projections from SMCs which traversed the pores in the coculture membrane and made intimate contact with ECs. The degree of EC/SMC contact increased from 7 to 14 days (P< 0.05). Compared to SMCs alone, ECs in bilayer coculture or conditioned media altered SMCs growth characteristics similarly after 7 days in culture. By 14 days, however, the bilayer coculture had a significantly greater effect on SMC density and protein synthesis. The bilayer model is unique in terms of luminal/abluminal orientation of the cells, the proximity of the cell layers, and the presence of physical cell contact. Since the bilayer model amplifies the effect of ECs on SMCs, it may be more useful than conditioned media to study EC–SMC interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jsre.1996.4978
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78899373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480496949781</els_id><sourcerecordid>78899373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-271d9ad2f0dfe13c511323444c5055ecb0bbcb3b96a8b555a04a21645f4e8c553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFP5DAQRq0TJ1g42uuQXCC6LHZsJ3EJEQdIrK6Aa7EceyKMvDHYCdL-e5zbiI5qNDNvPo0eQr8pWVNCqsvXFGFNpazWXNbND7SiRIqiqWp2gFaElGXBG8KP0HFKryT3smaH6FCSmomKr9BzG8zkxykCDj2-GWwYX8A77XEL3iesB4sftyFP8WZKxsMydwO-dl7vIP5H2jBYN7owgMUbsE7jTbDg0y_0s9c-welST9C_PzdP7V3x8Pf2vr16KAxnfCzKmlqpbdkT2wNlRlDKSsY5N4IIAaYjXWc61slKN50QQhOuS1px0XNojBDsBF3sc99ieJ8gjWrrksmf6gHClFTdNFKymmVwvQdNDCmr69VbdFsdd4oSNQtVs1A1C1Wz0HxwtiRP3RbsF74YzPvzZa-T0b6PejAufWFlRWsq5phmj2Up8OEgqmQcDCa7imBGZYP77oNPaAaRTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78899373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fillinger, Mark F. ; Sampson, Lawrence N. ; Cronenwett, Jack L. ; Powell, Richard J. ; Wagner, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fillinger, Mark F. ; Sampson, Lawrence N. ; Cronenwett, Jack L. ; Powell, Richard J. ; Wagner, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>Smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth characteristics are affected by endothelial cells (ECs)in vivoandin vitro.In this study, we compare a bilayer EC/SMC coculture model that allows cell contact with a model of SMCs growing in media continuously conditioned by ECs, but without physical contact. Bovine aortic SMCs were plated on one side of a 13-μm-thick, semipermeable membrane. Three models were compared: (1) SMCs cultured alone (with no cells on the opposite side of the membrane, O/SMC); (2) SMCs cultured with ECs on the opposite side of the membrane in a bilayer coculture system that allows physical contact between ECs and SMCs (EC/SMC); and (3) SMCs cultured in media continuously conditioned by adjacent ECs, without contact (conditioned media, CM). After cultures were established, SMCs were harvested at 7 and 14 days after plating (n= 5 cultures/day/group). SMC DNA and protein content and [3H]thymidine incorporation were measured in each group. On Days 7 and 14 after plating, ECs in both the EC/SMC and CM models stimulated SMC proliferation &gt;50% compared to O/SMC controls (P&lt; 0.05). SMC density was similar for the EC/SMC and CM models at Day 7, but SMC density was higher in the EC/SMC group at Day 14 in culture (P&lt; 0.05). At Day 7, protein synthesis was similar in the three groups, but by Day 14, SMCs in the EC/SMC group had produced significantly less cellular protein/DNA than SMCs in the CM group (P&lt; 0.05), which in turn had less protein/DNA than the control (O/SMC) group (P&lt; 0.05). SMCs in the EC/SMC and CM groups retained a thin, spindle shape with filamentous projections, compared to the hypertrophic appearance of SMCs in the absence of ECs. Electron microscopy revealed projections from SMCs which traversed the pores in the coculture membrane and made intimate contact with ECs. The degree of EC/SMC contact increased from 7 to 14 days (P&lt; 0.05). Compared to SMCs alone, ECs in bilayer coculture or conditioned media altered SMCs growth characteristics similarly after 7 days in culture. By 14 days, however, the bilayer coculture had a significantly greater effect on SMC density and protein synthesis. The bilayer model is unique in terms of luminal/abluminal orientation of the cells, the proximity of the cell layers, and the presence of physical cell contact. Since the bilayer model amplifies the effect of ECs on SMCs, it may be more useful than conditioned media to study EC–SMC interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1996.4978</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9073564</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSGRA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cell Communication ; Cell Count ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell cycle, cell proliferation ; Cell Division ; Cell physiology ; Cells, Cultured ; Culture Media, Conditioned ; DNA - metabolism ; Endothelium, Vascular - cytology ; Endothelium, Vascular - metabolism ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Kinetics ; Microscopy, Electron ; Models, Biological ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology ; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - metabolism ; Proteins - metabolism</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 1997-02, Vol.67 (2), p.169-178</ispartof><rights>1997 Academic Press</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-271d9ad2f0dfe13c511323444c5055ecb0bbcb3b96a8b555a04a21645f4e8c553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-271d9ad2f0dfe13c511323444c5055ecb0bbcb3b96a8b555a04a21645f4e8c553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480496949781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2617158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9073564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fillinger, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Lawrence N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth characteristics are affected by endothelial cells (ECs)in vivoandin vitro.In this study, we compare a bilayer EC/SMC coculture model that allows cell contact with a model of SMCs growing in media continuously conditioned by ECs, but without physical contact. Bovine aortic SMCs were plated on one side of a 13-μm-thick, semipermeable membrane. Three models were compared: (1) SMCs cultured alone (with no cells on the opposite side of the membrane, O/SMC); (2) SMCs cultured with ECs on the opposite side of the membrane in a bilayer coculture system that allows physical contact between ECs and SMCs (EC/SMC); and (3) SMCs cultured in media continuously conditioned by adjacent ECs, without contact (conditioned media, CM). After cultures were established, SMCs were harvested at 7 and 14 days after plating (n= 5 cultures/day/group). SMC DNA and protein content and [3H]thymidine incorporation were measured in each group. On Days 7 and 14 after plating, ECs in both the EC/SMC and CM models stimulated SMC proliferation &gt;50% compared to O/SMC controls (P&lt; 0.05). SMC density was similar for the EC/SMC and CM models at Day 7, but SMC density was higher in the EC/SMC group at Day 14 in culture (P&lt; 0.05). At Day 7, protein synthesis was similar in the three groups, but by Day 14, SMCs in the EC/SMC group had produced significantly less cellular protein/DNA than SMCs in the CM group (P&lt; 0.05), which in turn had less protein/DNA than the control (O/SMC) group (P&lt; 0.05). SMCs in the EC/SMC and CM groups retained a thin, spindle shape with filamentous projections, compared to the hypertrophic appearance of SMCs in the absence of ECs. Electron microscopy revealed projections from SMCs which traversed the pores in the coculture membrane and made intimate contact with ECs. The degree of EC/SMC contact increased from 7 to 14 days (P&lt; 0.05). Compared to SMCs alone, ECs in bilayer coculture or conditioned media altered SMCs growth characteristics similarly after 7 days in culture. By 14 days, however, the bilayer coculture had a significantly greater effect on SMC density and protein synthesis. The bilayer model is unique in terms of luminal/abluminal orientation of the cells, the proximity of the cell layers, and the presence of physical cell contact. Since the bilayer model amplifies the effect of ECs on SMCs, it may be more useful than conditioned media to study EC–SMC interactions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cell Communication</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell cycle, cell proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Division</subject><subject>Cell physiology</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Culture Media, Conditioned</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>Endothelium, Vascular - cytology</subject><subject>Endothelium, Vascular - metabolism</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology</subject><subject>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - metabolism</subject><subject>Proteins - metabolism</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFP5DAQRq0TJ1g42uuQXCC6LHZsJ3EJEQdIrK6Aa7EceyKMvDHYCdL-e5zbiI5qNDNvPo0eQr8pWVNCqsvXFGFNpazWXNbND7SiRIqiqWp2gFaElGXBG8KP0HFKryT3smaH6FCSmomKr9BzG8zkxykCDj2-GWwYX8A77XEL3iesB4sftyFP8WZKxsMydwO-dl7vIP5H2jBYN7owgMUbsE7jTbDg0y_0s9c-welST9C_PzdP7V3x8Pf2vr16KAxnfCzKmlqpbdkT2wNlRlDKSsY5N4IIAaYjXWc61slKN50QQhOuS1px0XNojBDsBF3sc99ieJ8gjWrrksmf6gHClFTdNFKymmVwvQdNDCmr69VbdFsdd4oSNQtVs1A1C1Wz0HxwtiRP3RbsF74YzPvzZa-T0b6PejAufWFlRWsq5phmj2Up8OEgqmQcDCa7imBGZYP77oNPaAaRTA</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>Fillinger, Mark F.</creator><creator>Sampson, Lawrence N.</creator><creator>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creator><creator>Powell, Richard J.</creator><creator>Wagner, Robert J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models</title><author>Fillinger, Mark F. ; Sampson, Lawrence N. ; Cronenwett, Jack L. ; Powell, Richard J. ; Wagner, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-271d9ad2f0dfe13c511323444c5055ecb0bbcb3b96a8b555a04a21645f4e8c553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cell Communication</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell cycle, cell proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Division</topic><topic>Cell physiology</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Culture Media, Conditioned</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>Endothelium, Vascular - cytology</topic><topic>Endothelium, Vascular - metabolism</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology</topic><topic>Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - metabolism</topic><topic>Proteins - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fillinger, Mark F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Lawrence N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronenwett, Jack L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fillinger, Mark F.</au><au>Sampson, Lawrence N.</au><au>Cronenwett, Jack L.</au><au>Powell, Richard J.</au><au>Wagner, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>169-178</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><coden>JSGRA2</coden><abstract>Smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth characteristics are affected by endothelial cells (ECs)in vivoandin vitro.In this study, we compare a bilayer EC/SMC coculture model that allows cell contact with a model of SMCs growing in media continuously conditioned by ECs, but without physical contact. Bovine aortic SMCs were plated on one side of a 13-μm-thick, semipermeable membrane. Three models were compared: (1) SMCs cultured alone (with no cells on the opposite side of the membrane, O/SMC); (2) SMCs cultured with ECs on the opposite side of the membrane in a bilayer coculture system that allows physical contact between ECs and SMCs (EC/SMC); and (3) SMCs cultured in media continuously conditioned by adjacent ECs, without contact (conditioned media, CM). After cultures were established, SMCs were harvested at 7 and 14 days after plating (n= 5 cultures/day/group). SMC DNA and protein content and [3H]thymidine incorporation were measured in each group. On Days 7 and 14 after plating, ECs in both the EC/SMC and CM models stimulated SMC proliferation &gt;50% compared to O/SMC controls (P&lt; 0.05). SMC density was similar for the EC/SMC and CM models at Day 7, but SMC density was higher in the EC/SMC group at Day 14 in culture (P&lt; 0.05). At Day 7, protein synthesis was similar in the three groups, but by Day 14, SMCs in the EC/SMC group had produced significantly less cellular protein/DNA than SMCs in the CM group (P&lt; 0.05), which in turn had less protein/DNA than the control (O/SMC) group (P&lt; 0.05). SMCs in the EC/SMC and CM groups retained a thin, spindle shape with filamentous projections, compared to the hypertrophic appearance of SMCs in the absence of ECs. Electron microscopy revealed projections from SMCs which traversed the pores in the coculture membrane and made intimate contact with ECs. The degree of EC/SMC contact increased from 7 to 14 days (P&lt; 0.05). Compared to SMCs alone, ECs in bilayer coculture or conditioned media altered SMCs growth characteristics similarly after 7 days in culture. By 14 days, however, the bilayer coculture had a significantly greater effect on SMC density and protein synthesis. The bilayer model is unique in terms of luminal/abluminal orientation of the cells, the proximity of the cell layers, and the presence of physical cell contact. Since the bilayer model amplifies the effect of ECs on SMCs, it may be more useful than conditioned media to study EC–SMC interactions.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9073564</pmid><doi>10.1006/jsre.1996.4978</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 1997-02, Vol.67 (2), p.169-178
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78899373
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Cell Communication
Cell Count
Cell Culture Techniques - methods
Cell cycle, cell proliferation
Cell Division
Cell physiology
Cells, Cultured
Culture Media, Conditioned
DNA - metabolism
Endothelium, Vascular - cytology
Endothelium, Vascular - metabolism
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Kinetics
Microscopy, Electron
Models, Biological
Molecular and cellular biology
Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - cytology
Muscle, Smooth, Vascular - metabolism
Proteins - metabolism
title Coculture of Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Bilayer and Conditioned Media Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coculture%20of%20Endothelial%20Cells%20and%20Smooth%20Muscle%20Cells%20in%20Bilayer%20and%20Conditioned%20Media%20Models&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Fillinger,%20Mark%20F.&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=169-178&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft.coden=JSGRA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jsre.1996.4978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78899373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78899373&rft_id=info:pmid/9073564&rft_els_id=S0022480496949781&rfr_iscdi=true