Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures

To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 1997-02, Vol.12 (2), p.114-117
Hauptverfasser: MAZUR, D. J, HICKAM, D. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 2
container_start_page 114
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 12
creator MAZUR, D. J
HICKAM, D. H
description To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risks of the procedure. A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cross-sectional study using structured interviews of consecutive patients seen for continuity care visits in a general medicine clinic. Four hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 10.70 years, range 31-88 years) and with a mean of 12.6 years (SD 2.96 years, range 0-24 years) of formal education. In the context of an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, patients were asked whether they preferred patient-based, physician-based, or shared patient-physician decision making. Patients were asked to give the ratio of patient-to-physician decision making they preferred, and whether they preferred discussions using words, numbers, or both. Of 467 subjects, 318 (68%) preferred shared decision making; 100 (21.4%) preferred physician-based decision making; and 49 (10.5%) preferred patient-based decision making. In terms of risk disclosure, 436 (93.4%) preferred that their physician disclose risk information to them. Of these 436 patients, 42.7% preferred disclosure of information about the probability of adverse outcomes using qualitative (verbal) expressions of probability; 35.7% preferred disclosure in terms of quantitative (numeric) expressions of probability; and 9.8% preferred disclosure in both qualitative and quantitative terms. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.99), patients who had at least one stroke (OR 3.03; CI 1.03, 8.90), and patients who preferred to discuss risk information with their physicians in terms of numbers (OR 2.39; CI 1.40, 4.06) tended to prefer patient-based or shared decision making. Male veterans consistently preferred shared patient-physician decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-006-5006-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78872337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78872337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-489d25a44f7c954e3891086b1b270601d506744b7b9357093ef6b68c12e3367b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtuFDEQRS0ECpPHB7BAshAKq4by272MIl5SJLKAteV2VyMnPe7gmo6Uv8fDjLJgYXtR516XDmNvBHwUAO4TCWHBdtCO2V_-BdsII00ndO9esg14rzvvlH7NTonuAISS0p-wkx6MMFZsGN7GXcayow_8oeKEFUtC4tNSec10z8dMaV5orchjGXldZuS58BFTprwUvo33ufz-x-fyGCk_It_imFOcW-GScGxROmevpjgTXhzfM_bry-ef19-6mx9fv19f3XRJer3rtO9HaaLWk0u90ah8L8DbQQzSgQUxGrBO68ENvTIOeoWTHaxPQqJS1g3qjF0eetvXf1akXdi2_XGeY8FlpeC8d1Ip18B3_4F3y1pL2y14ZxUI43WDxAFKdSFqdsJDzdtYn4KAsPcfDv5DUx_2_oNvmbfH4nVoHp4TR-Ft_v44j9QcTTWWZvIZk6YHa6T6C0p4jCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876301584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>MAZUR, D. J ; HICKAM, D. H</creator><creatorcontrib>MAZUR, D. J ; HICKAM, D. H</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risks of the procedure. A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cross-sectional study using structured interviews of consecutive patients seen for continuity care visits in a general medicine clinic. Four hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 10.70 years, range 31-88 years) and with a mean of 12.6 years (SD 2.96 years, range 0-24 years) of formal education. In the context of an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, patients were asked whether they preferred patient-based, physician-based, or shared patient-physician decision making. Patients were asked to give the ratio of patient-to-physician decision making they preferred, and whether they preferred discussions using words, numbers, or both. Of 467 subjects, 318 (68%) preferred shared decision making; 100 (21.4%) preferred physician-based decision making; and 49 (10.5%) preferred patient-based decision making. In terms of risk disclosure, 436 (93.4%) preferred that their physician disclose risk information to them. Of these 436 patients, 42.7% preferred disclosure of information about the probability of adverse outcomes using qualitative (verbal) expressions of probability; 35.7% preferred disclosure in terms of quantitative (numeric) expressions of probability; and 9.8% preferred disclosure in both qualitative and quantitative terms. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.99), patients who had at least one stroke (OR 3.03; CI 1.03, 8.90), and patients who preferred to discuss risk information with their physicians in terms of numbers (OR 2.39; CI 1.40, 4.06) tended to prefer patient-based or shared decision making. Male veterans consistently preferred shared patient-physician decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-006-5006-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9051561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bioethics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood vessels ; Catheters ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Disclosure ; Female ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Internal medicine ; Intervention ; Interviews as Topic ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Patient Participation ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Preferences ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1997-02, Vol.12 (2), p.114-117</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-489d25a44f7c954e3891086b1b270601d506744b7b9357093ef6b68c12e3367b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2590652$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9051561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAZUR, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HICKAM, D. H</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risks of the procedure. A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cross-sectional study using structured interviews of consecutive patients seen for continuity care visits in a general medicine clinic. Four hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 10.70 years, range 31-88 years) and with a mean of 12.6 years (SD 2.96 years, range 0-24 years) of formal education. In the context of an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, patients were asked whether they preferred patient-based, physician-based, or shared patient-physician decision making. Patients were asked to give the ratio of patient-to-physician decision making they preferred, and whether they preferred discussions using words, numbers, or both. Of 467 subjects, 318 (68%) preferred shared decision making; 100 (21.4%) preferred physician-based decision making; and 49 (10.5%) preferred patient-based decision making. In terms of risk disclosure, 436 (93.4%) preferred that their physician disclose risk information to them. Of these 436 patients, 42.7% preferred disclosure of information about the probability of adverse outcomes using qualitative (verbal) expressions of probability; 35.7% preferred disclosure in terms of quantitative (numeric) expressions of probability; and 9.8% preferred disclosure in both qualitative and quantitative terms. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.99), patients who had at least one stroke (OR 3.03; CI 1.03, 8.90), and patients who preferred to discuss risk information with their physicians in terms of numbers (OR 2.39; CI 1.40, 4.06) tended to prefer patient-based or shared decision making. Male veterans consistently preferred shared patient-physician decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtuFDEQRS0ECpPHB7BAshAKq4by272MIl5SJLKAteV2VyMnPe7gmo6Uv8fDjLJgYXtR516XDmNvBHwUAO4TCWHBdtCO2V_-BdsII00ndO9esg14rzvvlH7NTonuAISS0p-wkx6MMFZsGN7GXcayow_8oeKEFUtC4tNSec10z8dMaV5orchjGXldZuS58BFTprwUvo33ufz-x-fyGCk_It_imFOcW-GScGxROmevpjgTXhzfM_bry-ef19-6mx9fv19f3XRJer3rtO9HaaLWk0u90ah8L8DbQQzSgQUxGrBO68ENvTIOeoWTHaxPQqJS1g3qjF0eetvXf1akXdi2_XGeY8FlpeC8d1Ip18B3_4F3y1pL2y14ZxUI43WDxAFKdSFqdsJDzdtYn4KAsPcfDv5DUx_2_oNvmbfH4nVoHp4TR-Ft_v44j9QcTTWWZvIZk6YHa6T6C0p4jCk</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>MAZUR, D. J</creator><creator>HICKAM, D. H</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures</title><author>MAZUR, D. J ; HICKAM, D. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-489d25a44f7c954e3891086b1b270601d506744b7b9357093ef6b68c12e3367b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAZUR, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HICKAM, D. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAZUR, D. J</au><au>HICKAM, D. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>114-117</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risks of the procedure. A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cross-sectional study using structured interviews of consecutive patients seen for continuity care visits in a general medicine clinic. Four hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 10.70 years, range 31-88 years) and with a mean of 12.6 years (SD 2.96 years, range 0-24 years) of formal education. In the context of an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, patients were asked whether they preferred patient-based, physician-based, or shared patient-physician decision making. Patients were asked to give the ratio of patient-to-physician decision making they preferred, and whether they preferred discussions using words, numbers, or both. Of 467 subjects, 318 (68%) preferred shared decision making; 100 (21.4%) preferred physician-based decision making; and 49 (10.5%) preferred patient-based decision making. In terms of risk disclosure, 436 (93.4%) preferred that their physician disclose risk information to them. Of these 436 patients, 42.7% preferred disclosure of information about the probability of adverse outcomes using qualitative (verbal) expressions of probability; 35.7% preferred disclosure in terms of quantitative (numeric) expressions of probability; and 9.8% preferred disclosure in both qualitative and quantitative terms. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.99), patients who had at least one stroke (OR 3.03; CI 1.03, 8.90), and patients who preferred to discuss risk information with their physicians in terms of numbers (OR 2.39; CI 1.40, 4.06) tended to prefer patient-based or shared decision making. Male veterans consistently preferred shared patient-physician decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>9051561</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-006-5006-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1997-02, Vol.12 (2), p.114-117
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78872337
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bioethics
Biological and medical sciences
Blood vessels
Catheters
Chi-Square Distribution
Communication
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Disclosure
Female
Humans
Informed Consent
Internal medicine
Intervention
Interviews as Topic
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous. Technology
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians
Preferences
R&D
Research & development
Veterans
title Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A08%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20preferences%20for%20risk%20disclosure%20and%20role%20in%20decision%20making%20for%20invasive%20medical%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=MAZUR,%20D.%20J&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=114-117&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-006-5006-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78872337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876301584&rft_id=info:pmid/9051561&rfr_iscdi=true