Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers

The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1989-02, Vol.89 (2), p.224-232
Hauptverfasser: Powers, P.M, Hoover, L.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 224
container_title Journal of the American Dietetic Association
container_volume 89
creator Powers, P.M
Hoover, L.W
description The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method were modeled. Four pork entree recipes were selected for analysis: roast pork, pork and noodle casserole, panbroiled pork chops, and pork chops with vegetables. Assumptions were made about changes expected to occur in the ingredients during preparation and cooking. Models were designed to simulate the algorithms of the calculation methods using a microcomputer spreadsheet software package. Identical results were generated in the yield factor, retention factor, and summing-cooked models for roast pork. The retention factor and summing-cooked models also produced identical results for the recipe for pan-broiled pork chops. The summing-raw model gave the highest value for water in all four recipes and the lowest values for most of the other nutrients. A superior method or methods was not identified. However, on the basis of the capabilities provided with the yield factor and retention factor methods, more serious consideration of these two methods is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)02100-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78856622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A7427945</galeid><sourcerecordid>A7427945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-5108c8878e2dac1b656e34b592ca3fcbfa50f35f6d82ac9cdc21640e6247853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV1rFDEUhoModbv6E4qDF1bR0XxMMpkboSxahQUvVq9DNnMyTZlJtkkG9d-b_aColFyE5H3OOe_hReiC4PcEE_FhgzGmtaSUvabkDaYE45o9QgsiW1kz3uLHaHGPPEXnKd2WJ-YEn6Ez2hGOO75AH1d6NPOos_NDlW-g8nOODnyuTJh2Ibnsgq-CrSIYt4NU_XT55qDNGWJ6hp5YPSZ4frqXaPP50_fVl3r97frr6mpdm0bgXJeh0shiDGivDdkKLoA1W95Ro5k1W6s5toxb0UuqTWd6Q4loMAjatJKzJXp17LqL4W6GlNXkkoFx1B7CnFQrJReirLlEL_8Db8McfXGmKJENp5LhAr09QoMeQTlvQ47aDOAh6jF4sK58X7UNbbtmP_vdA3Q5PUzOPIBf_oMXIsOvPOg5JSWv13-T_EiaGFKKYNUuuknH34pgtU9YHRJW-_iKe3VIWLFSd3Hacd5O0N9XnSIt-oujbnVQeoguqR8bignDVMimk4T9AVzBqIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218452830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Powers, P.M ; Hoover, L.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Powers, P.M ; Hoover, L.W</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method were modeled. Four pork entree recipes were selected for analysis: roast pork, pork and noodle casserole, panbroiled pork chops, and pork chops with vegetables. Assumptions were made about changes expected to occur in the ingredients during preparation and cooking. Models were designed to simulate the algorithms of the calculation methods using a microcomputer spreadsheet software package. Identical results were generated in the yield factor, retention factor, and summing-cooked models for roast pork. The retention factor and summing-cooked models also produced identical results for the recipe for pan-broiled pork chops. The summing-raw model gave the highest value for water in all four recipes and the lowest values for most of the other nutrients. A superior method or methods was not identified. However, on the basis of the capabilities provided with the yield factor and retention factor methods, more serious consideration of these two methods is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8223</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2212-2672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-2680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)02100-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2915095</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Science Publishers</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; calculation methods ; Composition ; computer analysis ; Computers ; Dietetics ; Evaluation ; Food ; Food Handling ; Health aspects ; Information management ; Mathematical Computing ; Meat ; nutrient content ; Nutrition ; Nutritive Value ; Product/Service Evaluations ; Recipes ; Swine ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1989-02, Vol.89 (2), p.224-232</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1989 Elsevier Science Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright American Dietetic Association Feb 1989</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-5108c8878e2dac1b656e34b592ca3fcbfa50f35f6d82ac9cdc21640e6247853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-5108c8878e2dac1b656e34b592ca3fcbfa50f35f6d82ac9cdc21640e6247853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2915095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Powers, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, L.W</creatorcontrib><title>Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers</title><title>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</title><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><description>The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method were modeled. Four pork entree recipes were selected for analysis: roast pork, pork and noodle casserole, panbroiled pork chops, and pork chops with vegetables. Assumptions were made about changes expected to occur in the ingredients during preparation and cooking. Models were designed to simulate the algorithms of the calculation methods using a microcomputer spreadsheet software package. Identical results were generated in the yield factor, retention factor, and summing-cooked models for roast pork. The retention factor and summing-cooked models also produced identical results for the recipe for pan-broiled pork chops. The summing-raw model gave the highest value for water in all four recipes and the lowest values for most of the other nutrients. A superior method or methods was not identified. However, on the basis of the capabilities provided with the yield factor and retention factor methods, more serious consideration of these two methods is recommended.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>calculation methods</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>computer analysis</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Dietetics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Handling</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Product/Service Evaluations</subject><subject>Recipes</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0002-8223</issn><issn>2212-2672</issn><issn>1878-3570</issn><issn>2212-2680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV1rFDEUhoModbv6E4qDF1bR0XxMMpkboSxahQUvVq9DNnMyTZlJtkkG9d-b_aColFyE5H3OOe_hReiC4PcEE_FhgzGmtaSUvabkDaYE45o9QgsiW1kz3uLHaHGPPEXnKd2WJ-YEn6Ez2hGOO75AH1d6NPOos_NDlW-g8nOODnyuTJh2Ibnsgq-CrSIYt4NU_XT55qDNGWJ6hp5YPSZ4frqXaPP50_fVl3r97frr6mpdm0bgXJeh0shiDGivDdkKLoA1W95Ro5k1W6s5toxb0UuqTWd6Q4loMAjatJKzJXp17LqL4W6GlNXkkoFx1B7CnFQrJReirLlEL_8Db8McfXGmKJENp5LhAr09QoMeQTlvQ47aDOAh6jF4sK58X7UNbbtmP_vdA3Q5PUzOPIBf_oMXIsOvPOg5JSWv13-T_EiaGFKKYNUuuknH34pgtU9YHRJW-_iKe3VIWLFSd3Hacd5O0N9XnSIt-oujbnVQeoguqR8bignDVMimk4T9AVzBqIk</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>Powers, P.M</creator><creator>Hoover, L.W</creator><general>Elsevier Science Publishers</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers</title><author>Powers, P.M ; Hoover, L.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-5108c8878e2dac1b656e34b592ca3fcbfa50f35f6d82ac9cdc21640e6247853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>calculation methods</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>computer analysis</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Dietetics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Handling</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Product/Service Evaluations</topic><topic>Recipes</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Powers, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, L.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Powers, P.M</au><au>Hoover, L.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>224-232</pages><issn>0002-8223</issn><issn>2212-2672</issn><eissn>1878-3570</eissn><eissn>2212-2680</eissn><coden>JADAAE</coden><abstract>The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method were modeled. Four pork entree recipes were selected for analysis: roast pork, pork and noodle casserole, panbroiled pork chops, and pork chops with vegetables. Assumptions were made about changes expected to occur in the ingredients during preparation and cooking. Models were designed to simulate the algorithms of the calculation methods using a microcomputer spreadsheet software package. Identical results were generated in the yield factor, retention factor, and summing-cooked models for roast pork. The retention factor and summing-cooked models also produced identical results for the recipe for pan-broiled pork chops. The summing-raw model gave the highest value for water in all four recipes and the lowest values for most of the other nutrients. A superior method or methods was not identified. However, on the basis of the capabilities provided with the yield factor and retention factor methods, more serious consideration of these two methods is recommended.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Publishers</pub><pmid>2915095</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-8223(21)02100-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8223
ispartof Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1989-02, Vol.89 (2), p.224-232
issn 0002-8223
2212-2672
1878-3570
2212-2680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78856622
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Algorithms
Animals
calculation methods
Composition
computer analysis
Computers
Dietetics
Evaluation
Food
Food Handling
Health aspects
Information management
Mathematical Computing
Meat
nutrient content
Nutrition
Nutritive Value
Product/Service Evaluations
Recipes
Swine
Vegetables
title Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calculating%20the%20nutrient%20composition%20of%20recipes%20with%20computers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Dietetic%20Association&rft.au=Powers,%20P.M&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=224-232&rft.issn=0002-8223&rft.eissn=1878-3570&rft.coden=JADAAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-8223(21)02100-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA7427945%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218452830&rft_id=info:pmid/2915095&rft_galeid=A7427945&rfr_iscdi=true