Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection

The greatest risk of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is preterm delivery. According to the Perinatal Information System of Slovenia there were 5.92% preterm deliveries in 1994. We studied 809 deliveries of less than 34 weeks of gestation in the Ljubljana Maternity, from 1992 to 1994;...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 1997-02, Vol.71 (2), p.141-146
Hauptverfasser: Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva, Pajntar, Marjan, Verdenik, Ivan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 71
creator Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva
Pajntar, Marjan
Verdenik, Ivan
description The greatest risk of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is preterm delivery. According to the Perinatal Information System of Slovenia there were 5.92% preterm deliveries in 1994. We studied 809 deliveries of less than 34 weeks of gestation in the Ljubljana Maternity, from 1992 to 1994; 33.7% of these started with PPROM. Risk factors for PPROM were conization, cerclage and use of antibiotics for any reason in current pregnancy. Amnionitis and febrile illness during labour increased with longer duration of PPROM but maternal postpartum infections did not. In neonates, more cases of lower Apgar scores after 1 and 5 min and more cases of suspected sepsis were found with the increased duration of PPROM. In Slovenia, with good facilities for transport in utero and good neonatal care. after PPROM it is best to transport the pregnant women to the third level center and then wait until labour starts or to recur to prompt delivery when maternal or fetal signs so require. From 1987 to 1993 there were 159 264 deliveries in gestations equal to or over 34 weeks; 20.8% started with PROM. In our observational study we found the best results when labour was induced. There are, however, many disagreements about the management of (P)PROM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02624-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78853761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211596026243</els_id><sourcerecordid>78853761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-535e49e069518f2499393511e78237eb84dcbcbc16ebc4abe6fe29f28e34ddb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQx4Mo67r6ERZ6Ej1UM0mTJieRxRcsCD7OoU2nGNk-TFJhv73dB3t15jCH-c_8Z36EzIHeAAV5-045hZQBiCstrymTLEv5EZmCylmaS5Edk-lBckrOQvimY3CuJ2SigSst5JTA29DHwWPS1Un8wqTBpvRFiyEp2irpuxD7wsehSVxbo42ua8_JSV2sAl7s64x8Pj58LJ7T5evTy-J-mVouaUwFF5hppFILUDXLtOaaCwDMFeM5liqrbDkmSCxtVpQoa2S6Zgp5VlUl8Bm53O3tffczYIimccHiajVe1w3B5EoJnsuNUOyE1ncheKxN711T-LUBajaozBaV2XAwWpotKsPHufneYCgbrA5TezZj_27Xx_HLX4feBOuwtVg5P6IwVef-cfgD5nV34g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78853761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva ; Pajntar, Marjan ; Verdenik, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva ; Pajntar, Marjan ; Verdenik, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>The greatest risk of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is preterm delivery. According to the Perinatal Information System of Slovenia there were 5.92% preterm deliveries in 1994. We studied 809 deliveries of less than 34 weeks of gestation in the Ljubljana Maternity, from 1992 to 1994; 33.7% of these started with PPROM. Risk factors for PPROM were conization, cerclage and use of antibiotics for any reason in current pregnancy. Amnionitis and febrile illness during labour increased with longer duration of PPROM but maternal postpartum infections did not. In neonates, more cases of lower Apgar scores after 1 and 5 min and more cases of suspected sepsis were found with the increased duration of PPROM. In Slovenia, with good facilities for transport in utero and good neonatal care. after PPROM it is best to transport the pregnant women to the third level center and then wait until labour starts or to recur to prompt delivery when maternal or fetal signs so require. From 1987 to 1993 there were 159 264 deliveries in gestations equal to or over 34 weeks; 20.8% started with PROM. In our observational study we found the best results when labour was induced. There are, however, many disagreements about the management of (P)PROM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02624-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9138956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Infections - complications ; Female ; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - complications ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Maternal infection ; Neonatal infection ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Term prelabour rupture of membranes</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 1997-02, Vol.71 (2), p.141-146</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-535e49e069518f2499393511e78237eb84dcbcbc16ebc4abe6fe29f28e34ddb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-535e49e069518f2499393511e78237eb84dcbcbc16ebc4abe6fe29f28e34ddb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02624-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9138956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajntar, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdenik, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>The greatest risk of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is preterm delivery. According to the Perinatal Information System of Slovenia there were 5.92% preterm deliveries in 1994. We studied 809 deliveries of less than 34 weeks of gestation in the Ljubljana Maternity, from 1992 to 1994; 33.7% of these started with PPROM. Risk factors for PPROM were conization, cerclage and use of antibiotics for any reason in current pregnancy. Amnionitis and febrile illness during labour increased with longer duration of PPROM but maternal postpartum infections did not. In neonates, more cases of lower Apgar scores after 1 and 5 min and more cases of suspected sepsis were found with the increased duration of PPROM. In Slovenia, with good facilities for transport in utero and good neonatal care. after PPROM it is best to transport the pregnant women to the third level center and then wait until labour starts or to recur to prompt delivery when maternal or fetal signs so require. From 1987 to 1993 there were 159 264 deliveries in gestations equal to or over 34 weeks; 20.8% started with PROM. In our observational study we found the best results when labour was induced. There are, however, many disagreements about the management of (P)PROM.</description><subject>Bacterial Infections - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Maternal infection</subject><subject>Neonatal infection</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Term prelabour rupture of membranes</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQx4Mo67r6ERZ6Ej1UM0mTJieRxRcsCD7OoU2nGNk-TFJhv73dB3t15jCH-c_8Z36EzIHeAAV5-045hZQBiCstrymTLEv5EZmCylmaS5Edk-lBckrOQvimY3CuJ2SigSst5JTA29DHwWPS1Un8wqTBpvRFiyEp2irpuxD7wsehSVxbo42ua8_JSV2sAl7s64x8Pj58LJ7T5evTy-J-mVouaUwFF5hppFILUDXLtOaaCwDMFeM5liqrbDkmSCxtVpQoa2S6Zgp5VlUl8Bm53O3tffczYIimccHiajVe1w3B5EoJnsuNUOyE1ncheKxN711T-LUBajaozBaV2XAwWpotKsPHufneYCgbrA5TezZj_27Xx_HLX4feBOuwtVg5P6IwVef-cfgD5nV34g</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva</creator><creator>Pajntar, Marjan</creator><creator>Verdenik, Ivan</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection</title><author>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva ; Pajntar, Marjan ; Verdenik, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-535e49e069518f2499393511e78237eb84dcbcbc16ebc4abe6fe29f28e34ddb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Infections - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Maternal infection</topic><topic>Neonatal infection</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Term prelabour rupture of membranes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajntar, Marjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdenik, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novak-Antolič, Z̆iva</au><au>Pajntar, Marjan</au><au>Verdenik, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>141-146</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>The greatest risk of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is preterm delivery. According to the Perinatal Information System of Slovenia there were 5.92% preterm deliveries in 1994. We studied 809 deliveries of less than 34 weeks of gestation in the Ljubljana Maternity, from 1992 to 1994; 33.7% of these started with PPROM. Risk factors for PPROM were conization, cerclage and use of antibiotics for any reason in current pregnancy. Amnionitis and febrile illness during labour increased with longer duration of PPROM but maternal postpartum infections did not. In neonates, more cases of lower Apgar scores after 1 and 5 min and more cases of suspected sepsis were found with the increased duration of PPROM. In Slovenia, with good facilities for transport in utero and good neonatal care. after PPROM it is best to transport the pregnant women to the third level center and then wait until labour starts or to recur to prompt delivery when maternal or fetal signs so require. From 1987 to 1993 there were 159 264 deliveries in gestations equal to or over 34 weeks; 20.8% started with PROM. In our observational study we found the best results when labour was induced. There are, however, many disagreements about the management of (P)PROM.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>9138956</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02624-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 1997-02, Vol.71 (2), p.141-146
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78853761
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Bacterial Infections - complications
Female
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - complications
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Maternal infection
Neonatal infection
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Term prelabour rupture of membranes
title Rupture of the membranes and postpartum infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rupture%20of%20the%20membranes%20and%20postpartum%20infection&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Novak-Antoli%C4%8D,%20Z%CC%86iva&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=141-146&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02624-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78853761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78853761&rft_id=info:pmid/9138956&rft_els_id=S0301211596026243&rfr_iscdi=true