Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study
The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recession...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical periodontology 1997-01, Vol.24 (1), p.51-56 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 56 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical periodontology |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Paolantonio1, Michele Murro, Carlo di Cattabriga, Alessia Cattabriga, Marcello |
| description | The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recessions were chosen for treatment by the 2 procedures. The degree of gingival recession (GR), keratinized tissue (KT) and the exposed root surface area (ERSA) were measured preoperatively and again 5 years post‐surgery. Bilaminar connective grafting showed better results in reducing the amount of GR while both techniques significantly increased the width of KT (p>0.05). The mean % of root coverage obtained in patients in group A was 53.19%±21.48, whereas for the group B. 85.23%±17.86 of exposed root surface was covered post surgical intervention (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78845580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78845580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-58142b4b79f5b39340b341004eb0487007e2eb4418deb904a4e108114872d7473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM2O0zAURi0EGsrAIyBZLNglc107tcMCadQZhkGjAfEzsLNs56a4pEmxk9JueHYcNeoebyzd77vH8iHkFYOcpXOxztkCIIOC_chZWcq8t8CYEvn-EZmdosdkBhx4tihl-ZQ8i3ENwCTn_IyclSDSVM3I3y-D3WLlXYPUdW2Lrvc7pL2PcUC6Cqbu6Q5DHCKtA6aJb1d-Z5op8i3tf46bqWNWSLua4n7bRaxo6LqexiHUxmGkl7TIDmgCdY1vvUuA2A_V4Tl5Upsm4ovpPiff3l1_Xb7P7j7e3C4v7zInJGdZoZiYW2FlWReWl1yA5YIBCLQglASQOEcrBFMV2vQ3I5CBYixl80omxDl5feRuQ_d7wNjrjY8Om8a02A1RS6VEUShIxTfHogtdjAFrvQ1-Y8JBM9CjfL3Wo2E9GtajfD3J1_u0_HJ6ZbAbrE6rk-2Uvz3mf3yDh_8g6w_LT9cFS4DsCPCxx_0JYMIvvZBcFvr7_Y1-uFdXc1Cf9QP_B7GOpG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78845580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Paolantonio1, Michele ; Murro, Carlo di ; Cattabriga, Alessia ; Cattabriga, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Paolantonio1, Michele ; Murro, Carlo di ; Cattabriga, Alessia ; Cattabriga, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recessions were chosen for treatment by the 2 procedures. The degree of gingival recession (GR), keratinized tissue (KT) and the exposed root surface area (ERSA) were measured preoperatively and again 5 years post‐surgery. Bilaminar connective grafting showed better results in reducing the amount of GR while both techniques significantly increased the width of KT (p>0.05). The mean % of root coverage obtained in patients in group A was 53.19%±21.48, whereas for the group B. 85.23%±17.86 of exposed root surface was covered post surgical intervention (p<0.001). In group A. only 3 patients (8.75%) showed a complete resolution of gingival recession after treatment, whereas in group B. 17 subjects (48.57%) presented with complete coverage. On the basis of these results, the authors conclude that the subpedicle graft promises better results in the coverage of exposed root surfaces when compared with the free gingival graft.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-051X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9049798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Connective Tissue - blood supply ; Connective Tissue - surgery ; Dentistry ; Female ; free gingival graft ; Gingiva - transplantation ; Gingival Recession - surgery ; Gingivoplasty - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; root coverage ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; subpedicle graft ; Surgical Flaps - blood supply ; Surgical Flaps - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical periodontology, 1997-01, Vol.24 (1), p.51-56</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-58142b4b79f5b39340b341004eb0487007e2eb4418deb904a4e108114872d7473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-58142b4b79f5b39340b341004eb0487007e2eb4418deb904a4e108114872d7473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9049798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paolantonio1, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murro, Carlo di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattabriga, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattabriga, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study</title><title>Journal of clinical periodontology</title><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><description>The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recessions were chosen for treatment by the 2 procedures. The degree of gingival recession (GR), keratinized tissue (KT) and the exposed root surface area (ERSA) were measured preoperatively and again 5 years post‐surgery. Bilaminar connective grafting showed better results in reducing the amount of GR while both techniques significantly increased the width of KT (p>0.05). The mean % of root coverage obtained in patients in group A was 53.19%±21.48, whereas for the group B. 85.23%±17.86 of exposed root surface was covered post surgical intervention (p<0.001). In group A. only 3 patients (8.75%) showed a complete resolution of gingival recession after treatment, whereas in group B. 17 subjects (48.57%) presented with complete coverage. On the basis of these results, the authors conclude that the subpedicle graft promises better results in the coverage of exposed root surfaces when compared with the free gingival graft.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - blood supply</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>free gingival graft</subject><subject>Gingiva - transplantation</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - surgery</subject><subject>Gingivoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>root coverage</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>subpedicle graft</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0303-6979</issn><issn>1600-051X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM2O0zAURi0EGsrAIyBZLNglc107tcMCadQZhkGjAfEzsLNs56a4pEmxk9JueHYcNeoebyzd77vH8iHkFYOcpXOxztkCIIOC_chZWcq8t8CYEvn-EZmdosdkBhx4tihl-ZQ8i3ENwCTn_IyclSDSVM3I3y-D3WLlXYPUdW2Lrvc7pL2PcUC6Cqbu6Q5DHCKtA6aJb1d-Z5op8i3tf46bqWNWSLua4n7bRaxo6LqexiHUxmGkl7TIDmgCdY1vvUuA2A_V4Tl5Upsm4ovpPiff3l1_Xb7P7j7e3C4v7zInJGdZoZiYW2FlWReWl1yA5YIBCLQglASQOEcrBFMV2vQ3I5CBYixl80omxDl5feRuQ_d7wNjrjY8Om8a02A1RS6VEUShIxTfHogtdjAFrvQ1-Y8JBM9CjfL3Wo2E9GtajfD3J1_u0_HJ6ZbAbrE6rk-2Uvz3mf3yDh_8g6w_LT9cFS4DsCPCxx_0JYMIvvZBcFvr7_Y1-uFdXc1Cf9QP_B7GOpG0</recordid><startdate>199701</startdate><enddate>199701</enddate><creator>Paolantonio1, Michele</creator><creator>Murro, Carlo di</creator><creator>Cattabriga, Alessia</creator><creator>Cattabriga, Marcello</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199701</creationdate><title>Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study</title><author>Paolantonio1, Michele ; Murro, Carlo di ; Cattabriga, Alessia ; Cattabriga, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-58142b4b79f5b39340b341004eb0487007e2eb4418deb904a4e108114872d7473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - blood supply</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>free gingival graft</topic><topic>Gingiva - transplantation</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - surgery</topic><topic>Gingivoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>root coverage</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>subpedicle graft</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paolantonio1, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murro, Carlo di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattabriga, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattabriga, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paolantonio1, Michele</au><au>Murro, Carlo di</au><au>Cattabriga, Alessia</au><au>Cattabriga, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><date>1997-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>51-56</pages><issn>0303-6979</issn><eissn>1600-051X</eissn><abstract>The authors compared the clinical results obtained in gingival recession correction treatment using free gingival and bilaminar connective subpedicle grafts. 35 patients were treated with free gingival grafts (Group A) and 35 with subpedicle grafts (Group B). Class I and II Miller gingival recessions were chosen for treatment by the 2 procedures. The degree of gingival recession (GR), keratinized tissue (KT) and the exposed root surface area (ERSA) were measured preoperatively and again 5 years post‐surgery. Bilaminar connective grafting showed better results in reducing the amount of GR while both techniques significantly increased the width of KT (p>0.05). The mean % of root coverage obtained in patients in group A was 53.19%±21.48, whereas for the group B. 85.23%±17.86 of exposed root surface was covered post surgical intervention (p<0.001). In group A. only 3 patients (8.75%) showed a complete resolution of gingival recession after treatment, whereas in group B. 17 subjects (48.57%) presented with complete coverage. On the basis of these results, the authors conclude that the subpedicle graft promises better results in the coverage of exposed root surfaces when compared with the free gingival graft.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>9049798</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0303-6979 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical periodontology, 1997-01, Vol.24 (1), p.51-56 |
| issn | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78845580 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Connective Tissue - blood supply Connective Tissue - surgery Dentistry Female free gingival graft Gingiva - transplantation Gingival Recession - surgery Gingivoplasty - methods Humans Male Middle Aged root coverage Statistics, Nonparametric subpedicle graft Surgical Flaps - blood supply Surgical Flaps - methods Treatment Outcome |
| title | Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces A 5-year clinical study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T09%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subpedicle%20connective%20tissue%20graft%20versus%20free%20gingival%20graft%20in%20the%20coverage%20of%20exposed%20root%20surfaces%20A%205-year%20clinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20periodontology&rft.au=Paolantonio1,%20Michele&rft.date=1997-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=51-56&rft.issn=0303-6979&rft.eissn=1600-051X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78845580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78845580&rft_id=info:pmid/9049798&rfr_iscdi=true |