FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE

We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those expo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of epidemiology 1989-01, Vol.129 (1), p.220-224
Hauptverfasser: WERTHELMER, NANCY, LEEPER, ED
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 1
container_start_page 220
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 129
creator WERTHELMER, NANCY
LEEPER, ED
description We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those exposed and those not exposed to these seasonal sources. However, by analyzing seasonal trends, we have minimized the problem of unaddressed confounders because we did not look at a difference between the user and nonuser groups, but rather at a difference within the user group during months of higher exposure compared with months of lower exposure. Thus, each user group provides its own control. The function of the nonuser control group is simply to assure that any seasonal trend found in the user group is not just a general seasonal variation in reported fetal loss that can be found equally well in the nonuser population. Using this technique, we found that each user group reported fetal loss disproportionately often during the season when electromagnetic field exposure was increasing.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78843939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78843939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-63a52fc38d915597c4c180efd6ae79cfd41c447fe7645fa60cb722d8fa738a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1v0zAYha0JNMrGT0CKYOIuxR-xHXMXZe4aKSyjSbeqN5bn2FJL24y4lca_x1NDJbiZ3gtfnOf98DkAfEJwjKAgX7tn1_Xtujv0O73xY722Y40QRQifgRFKOIsZpuwNGEEIcSwww-_Ae-_XECIkKDwH51ggCFkyAj8mssnKqKzqOsrqusqLrJHX0UPRTKPmoYpqmdXVbSDqaj7LZR1Vk0iWMm9m1ffs5lY2RR5NClleR3JxV9XzmbwEb124yn4Y3gswDzvyaVxWN0WelbEhlO5jRjTFzpC0FYhSwU1iUAqta5m2XBjXJsgkCXeWs4Q6zaB55Bi3qdOcpBozcgG-HOc-9d2vg_V7tV15YzcbvbPdwSuepgkRoV4Dg3GEC4gD-Pk_8K_FChHIGOUco0B9O1Km77zvrVNP_Wqr-98KQfUSj_o3HhXiUUM8ofnjsOLwuLXtqXXII-hXg6690RvX651Z-RMWHEgpf_lSfMRWfm-fT7LufyrGCadqulgqge7EcokW6p78AZeVpZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306657721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>WERTHELMER, NANCY ; LEEPER, ED</creator><creatorcontrib>WERTHELMER, NANCY ; LEEPER, ED</creatorcontrib><description>We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those exposed and those not exposed to these seasonal sources. However, by analyzing seasonal trends, we have minimized the problem of unaddressed confounders because we did not look at a difference between the user and nonuser groups, but rather at a difference within the user group during months of higher exposure compared with months of lower exposure. Thus, each user group provides its own control. The function of the nonuser control group is simply to assure that any seasonal trend found in the user group is not just a general seasonal variation in reported fetal loss that can be found equally well in the nonuser population. Using this technique, we found that each user group reported fetal loss disproportionately often during the season when electromagnetic field exposure was increasing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2910064</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology ; Adult ; Beds ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Electromagnetic Phenomena - adverse effects ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Heating - methods ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Seasons</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1989-01, Vol.129 (1), p.220-224</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-63a52fc38d915597c4c180efd6ae79cfd41c447fe7645fa60cb722d8fa738a263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7228579$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2910064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WERTHELMER, NANCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEEPER, ED</creatorcontrib><title>FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those exposed and those not exposed to these seasonal sources. However, by analyzing seasonal trends, we have minimized the problem of unaddressed confounders because we did not look at a difference between the user and nonuser groups, but rather at a difference within the user group during months of higher exposure compared with months of lower exposure. Thus, each user group provides its own control. The function of the nonuser control group is simply to assure that any seasonal trend found in the user group is not just a general seasonal variation in reported fetal loss that can be found equally well in the nonuser population. Using this technique, we found that each user group reported fetal loss disproportionately often during the season when electromagnetic field exposure was increasing.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beds</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Phenomena - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Heating - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1v0zAYha0JNMrGT0CKYOIuxR-xHXMXZe4aKSyjSbeqN5bn2FJL24y4lca_x1NDJbiZ3gtfnOf98DkAfEJwjKAgX7tn1_Xtujv0O73xY722Y40QRQifgRFKOIsZpuwNGEEIcSwww-_Ae-_XECIkKDwH51ggCFkyAj8mssnKqKzqOsrqusqLrJHX0UPRTKPmoYpqmdXVbSDqaj7LZR1Vk0iWMm9m1ffs5lY2RR5NClleR3JxV9XzmbwEb124yn4Y3gswDzvyaVxWN0WelbEhlO5jRjTFzpC0FYhSwU1iUAqta5m2XBjXJsgkCXeWs4Q6zaB55Bi3qdOcpBozcgG-HOc-9d2vg_V7tV15YzcbvbPdwSuepgkRoV4Dg3GEC4gD-Pk_8K_FChHIGOUco0B9O1Km77zvrVNP_Wqr-98KQfUSj_o3HhXiUUM8ofnjsOLwuLXtqXXII-hXg6690RvX651Z-RMWHEgpf_lSfMRWfm-fT7LufyrGCadqulgqge7EcokW6p78AZeVpZU</recordid><startdate>198901</startdate><enddate>198901</enddate><creator>WERTHELMER, NANCY</creator><creator>LEEPER, ED</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>School of Hygiene and Public Health of the Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198901</creationdate><title>FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE</title><author>WERTHELMER, NANCY ; LEEPER, ED</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-63a52fc38d915597c4c180efd6ae79cfd41c447fe7645fa60cb722d8fa738a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beds</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Phenomena - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Heating - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WERTHELMER, NANCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEEPER, ED</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WERTHELMER, NANCY</au><au>LEEPER, ED</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1989-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>220-224</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those exposed and those not exposed to these seasonal sources. However, by analyzing seasonal trends, we have minimized the problem of unaddressed confounders because we did not look at a difference between the user and nonuser groups, but rather at a difference within the user group during months of higher exposure compared with months of lower exposure. Thus, each user group provides its own control. The function of the nonuser control group is simply to assure that any seasonal trend found in the user group is not just a general seasonal variation in reported fetal loss that can be found equally well in the nonuser population. Using this technique, we found that each user group reported fetal loss disproportionately often during the season when electromagnetic field exposure was increasing.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>2910064</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115112</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 1989-01, Vol.129 (1), p.220-224
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78843939
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
Adult
Beds
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects
Electromagnetic Phenomena - adverse effects
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Heating - methods
Humans
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Seasons
title FETAL LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TWO SEASONAL SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T01%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FETAL%20LOSS%20ASSOCIATED%20WITH%20TWO%20SEASONAL%20SOURCES%20OF%20ELECTROMAGNETIC%20FIELD%20EXPOSURE&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=WERTHELMER,%20NANCY&rft.date=1989-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=220-224&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78843939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306657721&rft_id=info:pmid/2910064&rfr_iscdi=true