Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children
The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European respiratory journal 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | The European respiratory journal |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Timonen, KL Randell, JT Salonen, RO Pekkanen, J |
description | The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1183/09031936.97.10010082 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78836014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78836014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1rHDEMhk1oSLdJ_kEKPpTcZmOPPR8-lqVNC4Eempwdr6zJePGMt_ZMS_59PGR3CwKB9OiV9BJyw9ma81bcMcUEV6Jeq2bNGcvRlmdkxYVShWBMfCCrBSkW5iP5lNIuQ7UU_IJc5HopVbMiz7_7EKdiwjjQvyY6M7kwJupGGhI4780U4is1o6Vp72IYcIoOqJ_HF9rNIyx0hq0DTNQMIZcT9CF4Cr3zNuJ4Rc474xNeH_Ilefr-7XHzo3j4df9z8_WhAMnqqehUmb-pK7OtVNkgIFS13DLJrGGltDVKK2oDbbcVjCNYwNYyqxCkQsNLJS7J7bvuPoY_M6ZJDy4B5g9GDHPSTduKmnGZQfkOQgwpRez0PrrBxFfNmV6M1UdjtWr00dg89vmgP28HtKehg5O5_-XQNwmM76IZwaUTVlZVJVT1H-vdS__PRdRpMN5nUa4x7pYTdN72Bvgjjsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78836014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0903-1936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9032497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leeds: Eur Respiratory Soc</publisher><subject>Airway Resistance - physiology ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Chronic Disease ; Cough - physiopathology ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques of respiratory function ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lung - physiology ; Male ; Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology ; Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology ; Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Oscillometry ; Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology ; Spirometry ; Time Factors ; Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><ispartof>The European respiratory journal, 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4028,27932,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2555395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9032497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salonen, RO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><title>The European respiratory journal</title><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</description><subject>Airway Resistance - physiology</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cough - physiopathology</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lung - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oscillometry</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><issn>0903-1936</issn><issn>1399-3003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1rHDEMhk1oSLdJ_kEKPpTcZmOPPR8-lqVNC4Eempwdr6zJePGMt_ZMS_59PGR3CwKB9OiV9BJyw9ma81bcMcUEV6Jeq2bNGcvRlmdkxYVShWBMfCCrBSkW5iP5lNIuQ7UU_IJc5HopVbMiz7_7EKdiwjjQvyY6M7kwJupGGhI4780U4is1o6Vp72IYcIoOqJ_HF9rNIyx0hq0DTNQMIZcT9CF4Cr3zNuJ4Rc474xNeH_Ilefr-7XHzo3j4df9z8_WhAMnqqehUmb-pK7OtVNkgIFS13DLJrGGltDVKK2oDbbcVjCNYwNYyqxCkQsNLJS7J7bvuPoY_M6ZJDy4B5g9GDHPSTduKmnGZQfkOQgwpRez0PrrBxFfNmV6M1UdjtWr00dg89vmgP28HtKehg5O5_-XQNwmM76IZwaUTVlZVJVT1H-vdS__PRdRpMN5nUa4x7pYTdN72Bvgjjsg</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Timonen, KL</creator><creator>Randell, JT</creator><creator>Salonen, RO</creator><creator>Pekkanen, J</creator><general>Eur Respiratory Soc</general><general>Maney</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><author>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Airway Resistance - physiology</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cough - physiopathology</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lung - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oscillometry</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vital Capacity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salonen, RO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timonen, KL</au><au>Randell, JT</au><au>Salonen, RO</au><au>Pekkanen, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</atitle><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>82-87</pages><issn>0903-1936</issn><eissn>1399-3003</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</abstract><cop>Leeds</cop><pub>Eur Respiratory Soc</pub><pmid>9032497</pmid><doi>10.1183/09031936.97.10010082</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0903-1936 |
ispartof | The European respiratory journal, 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87 |
issn | 0903-1936 1399-3003 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78836014 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Airway Resistance - physiology Asthma - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Child Chronic Disease Cough - physiopathology Exercise Test Female Follow-Up Studies Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology Humans Investigative techniques of respiratory function Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Lung - physiology Male Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology Medical sciences Oscillometry Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology Spirometry Time Factors Vital Capacity - physiology |
title | Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-term%20variations%20in%20oscillatory%20and%20spirometric%20lung%20function%20indices%20among%20school%20children&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20respiratory%20journal&rft.au=Timonen,%20KL&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=82-87&rft.issn=0903-1936&rft.eissn=1399-3003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1183/09031936.97.10010082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78836014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78836014&rft_id=info:pmid/9032497&rfr_iscdi=true |