Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children

The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European respiratory journal 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87
Hauptverfasser: Timonen, KL, Randell, JT, Salonen, RO, Pekkanen, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title The European respiratory journal
container_volume 10
creator Timonen, KL
Randell, JT
Salonen, RO
Pekkanen, J
description The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.
doi_str_mv 10.1183/09031936.97.10010082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78836014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78836014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1rHDEMhk1oSLdJ_kEKPpTcZmOPPR8-lqVNC4Eempwdr6zJePGMt_ZMS_59PGR3CwKB9OiV9BJyw9ma81bcMcUEV6Jeq2bNGcvRlmdkxYVShWBMfCCrBSkW5iP5lNIuQ7UU_IJc5HopVbMiz7_7EKdiwjjQvyY6M7kwJupGGhI4780U4is1o6Vp72IYcIoOqJ_HF9rNIyx0hq0DTNQMIZcT9CF4Cr3zNuJ4Rc474xNeH_Ilefr-7XHzo3j4df9z8_WhAMnqqehUmb-pK7OtVNkgIFS13DLJrGGltDVKK2oDbbcVjCNYwNYyqxCkQsNLJS7J7bvuPoY_M6ZJDy4B5g9GDHPSTduKmnGZQfkOQgwpRez0PrrBxFfNmV6M1UdjtWr00dg89vmgP28HtKehg5O5_-XQNwmM76IZwaUTVlZVJVT1H-vdS__PRdRpMN5nUa4x7pYTdN72Bvgjjsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78836014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0903-1936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9032497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leeds: Eur Respiratory Soc</publisher><subject>Airway Resistance - physiology ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Chronic Disease ; Cough - physiopathology ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques of respiratory function ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lung - physiology ; Male ; Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology ; Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology ; Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Oscillometry ; Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology ; Spirometry ; Time Factors ; Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><ispartof>The European respiratory journal, 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4028,27932,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2555395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9032497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salonen, RO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><title>The European respiratory journal</title><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</description><subject>Airway Resistance - physiology</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cough - physiopathology</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lung - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology</subject><subject>Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oscillometry</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><issn>0903-1936</issn><issn>1399-3003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1rHDEMhk1oSLdJ_kEKPpTcZmOPPR8-lqVNC4Eempwdr6zJePGMt_ZMS_59PGR3CwKB9OiV9BJyw9ma81bcMcUEV6Jeq2bNGcvRlmdkxYVShWBMfCCrBSkW5iP5lNIuQ7UU_IJc5HopVbMiz7_7EKdiwjjQvyY6M7kwJupGGhI4780U4is1o6Vp72IYcIoOqJ_HF9rNIyx0hq0DTNQMIZcT9CF4Cr3zNuJ4Rc474xNeH_Ilefr-7XHzo3j4df9z8_WhAMnqqehUmb-pK7OtVNkgIFS13DLJrGGltDVKK2oDbbcVjCNYwNYyqxCkQsNLJS7J7bvuPoY_M6ZJDy4B5g9GDHPSTduKmnGZQfkOQgwpRez0PrrBxFfNmV6M1UdjtWr00dg89vmgP28HtKehg5O5_-XQNwmM76IZwaUTVlZVJVT1H-vdS__PRdRpMN5nUa4x7pYTdN72Bvgjjsg</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Timonen, KL</creator><creator>Randell, JT</creator><creator>Salonen, RO</creator><creator>Pekkanen, J</creator><general>Eur Respiratory Soc</general><general>Maney</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</title><author>Timonen, KL ; Randell, JT ; Salonen, RO ; Pekkanen, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f9203165ab5927ecec564b040da024d6e4d36ac8fb301ecdce8d0d9ec49ea1293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Airway Resistance - physiology</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cough - physiopathology</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of respiratory function</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lung - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology</topic><topic>Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oscillometry</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vital Capacity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timonen, KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randell, JT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salonen, RO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekkanen, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timonen, KL</au><au>Randell, JT</au><au>Salonen, RO</au><au>Pekkanen, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children</atitle><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>82-87</pages><issn>0903-1936</issn><eissn>1399-3003</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare immediate, daily and weekly variation in respiratory resistance measured by means of the forced oscillation technique (Rrs,FOT) to spirometric indices in 7-12 year old children with chronic respiratory symptoms. The lung function measurements were performed in 19 children on 4 days, i.e. two consecutive days during two consecutive weeks. On each day, the measurements were carried out at the same time of day and always repeated three times. In addition, Rrs,FOT and spirometric lung function indices were compared with an exercise challenge test in 12 children. Intrasubject coefficients of variation (CoVs) for Rrs,FOT were larger than those for spirometric indices. Only in the immediately repeated measurements was the CoV of maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity larger than that of Rrs,FOT (16.6 vs 14.9%). At all time intervals, the smallest CoVs were observed in forced vital capacity (FVC) or in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (2.0-2.6%). When excluding Rrs,FOT values which were not within 2 SD (0.11 kPa.L-1.s) of the differences between the immediately repeated measurements, the CoV of the immediately repeated measurements of Rrs,FOT was reduced to 9.1%, being smaller than that of maximal mid-expiratory flow (10.1%). However, even then the day-to-day variation in Rrs,FOT was clearly larger (16.0%) than those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes (7.2-8.3%). This was also true for the weekly variation. In the exercise challenge test, there were larger changes in Rrs,FOT values than in the spirometric indices, but Rrs,FOT was the most sensitive index to detect changes in the respiratory system. In conclusion, the variation in Rrs,FOT values was larger than that of most spirometric indices. When a reliability index was applied, the immediate variation in Rrs,FOT values was comparable to those of the airflow indices at specified lung volumes. Rrs,FOT was also the most sensitive index in the exercise challenge test, and therefore it seems to be suitable for detection of short-term functional changes in the respiratory system. However, the relatively low repeatability of Rrs,FOT over days and weeks may limit its applicability to longer-term follow-ups.</abstract><cop>Leeds</cop><pub>Eur Respiratory Soc</pub><pmid>9032497</pmid><doi>10.1183/09031936.97.10010082</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0903-1936
ispartof The European respiratory journal, 1997-01, Vol.10 (1), p.82-87
issn 0903-1936
1399-3003
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78836014
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Airway Resistance - physiology
Asthma - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Chronic Disease
Cough - physiopathology
Exercise Test
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology
Humans
Investigative techniques of respiratory function
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Lung - physiology
Male
Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate - physiology
Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves - physiology
Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate - physiology
Medical sciences
Oscillometry
Pulmonary Ventilation - physiology
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Function Tests
Respiratory Sounds - physiopathology
Spirometry
Time Factors
Vital Capacity - physiology
title Short-term variations in oscillatory and spirometric lung function indices among school children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-term%20variations%20in%20oscillatory%20and%20spirometric%20lung%20function%20indices%20among%20school%20children&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20respiratory%20journal&rft.au=Timonen,%20KL&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=82-87&rft.issn=0903-1936&rft.eissn=1399-3003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1183/09031936.97.10010082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78836014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78836014&rft_id=info:pmid/9032497&rfr_iscdi=true