Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction

To the Editor: The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group (Aug. 18 issue)1 reported no overall effect of diltiazem on cardiac events and mortality in a randomized trial in 2466 patients with previous infarction. The authors suggested that this lack of superiority to placebo may ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1989-01, Vol.320 (2), p.123-124
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 2
container_start_page 123
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 320
description To the Editor: The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group (Aug. 18 issue)1 reported no overall effect of diltiazem on cardiac events and mortality in a randomized trial in 2466 patients with previous infarction. The authors suggested that this lack of superiority to placebo may have been due to an apparently striking (P = 0.0042) bidirectional effect, depending on the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Although they are cautious in the analysis and interpretation of the trial, they nevertheless state that these data constitute "strong evidence" of a treatment-by-subset interaction and finally conclude ambiguously that "diltiazem is not appropriate for . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM198901123200212
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78835185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78835185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-a01feec681b6047076d76e6672ee36244945c6924ff2852def6fe49d940a2ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwCxBSTlxQwK_4cURtgaIWJATnyE3Wkqs4KbZ7KL-eQKueEHtZ7c7MdxiELgm-JbgQdy_T5wXRSmNCKKMYU0KP0JAUjOWcY3GMhv1P5VxqdorOYlzhfgjXAzSgus8oOUSTiWuSM1_gM9PW2aILyTQubX-vN3CtNaFKrmszYxOEbLHtKhNqZ5psdtDO0Yk1TYSL_R6hj4fp-_gpn78-zsb387xiTKTcYGIBKqHIUmAusRS1FCCEpABMUM41LyqhKbeWqoLWYIUFrmvNsaFmqdkIXe-469B9biCm0rtYQdOYFrpNLKVSrCCq6I1sZ6xCF2MAW66D8yZsS4LLn-7KP7rrU1d7_GbpoT5k9mX1-s1O9z6WLaz8v7RvR_91Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78835185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor: The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group (Aug. 18 issue)1 reported no overall effect of diltiazem on cardiac events and mortality in a randomized trial in 2466 patients with previous infarction. The authors suggested that this lack of superiority to placebo may have been due to an apparently striking (P = 0.0042) bidirectional effect, depending on the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Although they are cautious in the analysis and interpretation of the trial, they nevertheless state that these data constitute "strong evidence" of a treatment-by-subset interaction and finally conclude ambiguously that "diltiazem is not appropriate for . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2911287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Diltiazem - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Recurrence</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1989-01, Vol.320 (2), p.123-124</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-a01feec681b6047076d76e6672ee36244945c6924ff2852def6fe49d940a2ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-a01feec681b6047076d76e6672ee36244945c6924ff2852def6fe49d940a2ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2911287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor: The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group (Aug. 18 issue)1 reported no overall effect of diltiazem on cardiac events and mortality in a randomized trial in 2466 patients with previous infarction. The authors suggested that this lack of superiority to placebo may have been due to an apparently striking (P = 0.0042) bidirectional effect, depending on the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Although they are cautious in the analysis and interpretation of the trial, they nevertheless state that these data constitute "strong evidence" of a treatment-by-subset interaction and finally conclude ambiguously that "diltiazem is not appropriate for . . .</description><subject>Diltiazem - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwCxBSTlxQwK_4cURtgaIWJATnyE3Wkqs4KbZ7KL-eQKueEHtZ7c7MdxiELgm-JbgQdy_T5wXRSmNCKKMYU0KP0JAUjOWcY3GMhv1P5VxqdorOYlzhfgjXAzSgus8oOUSTiWuSM1_gM9PW2aILyTQubX-vN3CtNaFKrmszYxOEbLHtKhNqZ5psdtDO0Yk1TYSL_R6hj4fp-_gpn78-zsb387xiTKTcYGIBKqHIUmAusRS1FCCEpABMUM41LyqhKbeWqoLWYIUFrmvNsaFmqdkIXe-469B9biCm0rtYQdOYFrpNLKVSrCCq6I1sZ6xCF2MAW66D8yZsS4LLn-7KP7rrU1d7_GbpoT5k9mX1-s1O9z6WLaz8v7RvR_91Hg</recordid><startdate>19890112</startdate><enddate>19890112</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890112</creationdate><title>Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-a01feec681b6047076d76e6672ee36244945c6924ff2852def6fe49d940a2ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Diltiazem - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1989-01-12</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>320</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>123-124</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: The Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Research Group (Aug. 18 issue)1 reported no overall effect of diltiazem on cardiac events and mortality in a randomized trial in 2466 patients with previous infarction. The authors suggested that this lack of superiority to placebo may have been due to an apparently striking (P = 0.0042) bidirectional effect, depending on the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. Although they are cautious in the analysis and interpretation of the trial, they nevertheless state that these data constitute "strong evidence" of a treatment-by-subset interaction and finally conclude ambiguously that "diltiazem is not appropriate for . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>2911287</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198901123200212</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1989-01, Vol.320 (2), p.123-124
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78835185
source MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Diltiazem - therapeutic use
Humans
Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy
Myocardial Infarction - mortality
Recurrence
title Diltiazem and Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial Infarction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diltiazem%20and%20Mortality%20and%20Reinfarction%20after%20Myocardial%20Infarction&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1989-01-12&rft.volume=320&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=123-124&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198901123200212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78835185%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78835185&rft_id=info:pmid/2911287&rfr_iscdi=true