Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices

Inappropriate electrical therapy and power efficiency play a major role in algorithm implementation for antitachycardia devices (ATD) that capture, store, and analyze the patient electrogram as an adjunct to rate determination. Morphologically based algorithms have been demonstrated to improve speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1997-01, Vol.20 (1), p.34-42
Hauptverfasser: MORRIS, MILTON M., JENKINS, JANICE M., di CARLO, LORENZO A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 20
creator MORRIS, MILTON M.
JENKINS, JANICE M.
di CARLO, LORENZO A.
description Inappropriate electrical therapy and power efficiency play a major role in algorithm implementation for antitachycardia devices (ATD) that capture, store, and analyze the patient electrogram as an adjunct to rate determination. Morphologically based algorithms have been demonstrated to improve specificity, thereby decreasing occurrences of inappropriate electrical therapy. However, morphologically based algorithms are power demanding. Optimization of power efficiency can be achieved by eliminating unnecessary algorithmic computation, but must not compromise the effectiveness of algorithms, which perform direct analysis on raw signals. Significant reductions can be achieved by reduced sampling rates, which allow for increased overall ATD efficiency via concomitant decreases in computation and data storage. This investigation determined the upper and lower bounds for filter cutoff frequency beyond which detection precision by an established morphometric method for arrhythmia classification, correlation waveform analysis (CWA), was unfavorable. Four measurement statistics were used. In ten patients with inducible VT and VF, all bipolar intraventricular electrograms were classified correctly with a minimum passband of 10–50 Hz using any of the four measurement statistics. There was ± 80% correct classification using all four measurement statistics with passbands having low frequency cutoffs ± 15 Hz and high frequency cutoffs ± 50 Hz. Correct classification of ± 90% of unipolar electrograms during NSR, VT, and VF occurred using all four measurement statistics with a passband of 1–50 Hz. There was ± 80% correct classification with passbands 1, 10, 15, or 20–500 Hz and 10–50 Hz. The classification of NSR, VT, and VF was most accurate on an intrapatient basis. Accuracy decreased using an interpatient rhythm classification. Optimum filter settings of 1–50 Hz and 10–50 Hz were determined for unipolar and bipolar electrograms, respectively. Sampling data at 120 Hz was found to be sufficient. Bipolar electrode configuration statistically outperfomed unipolar data. In conclusion, morphometric analysis of bipolar and unipolar intraventricular electrograms appears to be achievable using band limited data and reduced sampling rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78834994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78834994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-ac008c61e699e74ab834fdd9ecd5fe2f92a0522d3bf43f30815a5416fbc7c4c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtv0zAUxy0EGt3gIyBZPPCWYMd2Eu8BqXRjVCrbxG3SXizHOV5dcim2C-23J1GqvnNe_PC_nOMfQm8pSekw7zcpFZwkJRUypVIWaawIL4lM98_Q7CQ9RzNCeZGUrJQv0XkIG0JITrg4Q2eSZlTmcoaePuquTlaudRFq_KX323XfQvTO4Hmnm0NwAfcWxzXgZRe9NtrXThv8zT0N8iVettvGGR1d3wVsez-koovarA-TE1_BH2cgvEIvrG4CvD6-F-jHp-vvi8_J6u5muZivEiMywRNtCClNTiGXEgquq5JxW9cSTC0sZFZmmogsq1llObOMDP_UgtPcVqYw3DB2gd5NvVvf_95BiKp1wUDT6A76XVBFOTRKyQfj5WQ0vg_Bg1Vb71rtD4oSNVJWGzWiVCNKNVJWR8pqP4TfHLfsqhbqU_SIddA_TPpf18DhP5rV_XxxzcbrkqnAhQj7U4H2v1ResEKoh9sb9SgeH77e_8yUYP8AQIed1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78834994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>MORRIS, MILTON M. ; JENKINS, JANICE M. ; di CARLO, LORENZO A.</creator><creatorcontrib>MORRIS, MILTON M. ; JENKINS, JANICE M. ; di CARLO, LORENZO A.</creatorcontrib><description>Inappropriate electrical therapy and power efficiency play a major role in algorithm implementation for antitachycardia devices (ATD) that capture, store, and analyze the patient electrogram as an adjunct to rate determination. Morphologically based algorithms have been demonstrated to improve specificity, thereby decreasing occurrences of inappropriate electrical therapy. However, morphologically based algorithms are power demanding. Optimization of power efficiency can be achieved by eliminating unnecessary algorithmic computation, but must not compromise the effectiveness of algorithms, which perform direct analysis on raw signals. Significant reductions can be achieved by reduced sampling rates, which allow for increased overall ATD efficiency via concomitant decreases in computation and data storage. This investigation determined the upper and lower bounds for filter cutoff frequency beyond which detection precision by an established morphometric method for arrhythmia classification, correlation waveform analysis (CWA), was unfavorable. Four measurement statistics were used. In ten patients with inducible VT and VF, all bipolar intraventricular electrograms were classified correctly with a minimum passband of 10–50 Hz using any of the four measurement statistics. There was ± 80% correct classification using all four measurement statistics with passbands having low frequency cutoffs ± 15 Hz and high frequency cutoffs ± 50 Hz. Correct classification of ± 90% of unipolar electrograms during NSR, VT, and VF occurred using all four measurement statistics with a passband of 1–50 Hz. There was ± 80% correct classification with passbands 1, 10, 15, or 20–500 Hz and 10–50 Hz. The classification of NSR, VT, and VF was most accurate on an intrapatient basis. Accuracy decreased using an interpatient rhythm classification. Optimum filter settings of 1–50 Hz and 10–50 Hz were determined for unipolar and bipolar electrograms, respectively. Sampling data at 120 Hz was found to be sufficient. Bipolar electrode configuration statistically outperfomed unipolar data. In conclusion, morphometric analysis of bipolar and unipolar intraventricular electrograms appears to be achievable using band limited data and reduced sampling rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9121969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; antitachycardia device ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - classification ; bioelectric signal ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Electric Power Supplies ; Electrocardiography - classification ; Electrocardiography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Equipment Design ; filtering ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; intracardiac electrogram ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Tachycardia - therapy ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy ; ventricular fibrillation ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy ; ventricular tachycardia</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1997-01, Vol.20 (1), p.34-42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-ac008c61e699e74ab834fdd9ecd5fe2f92a0522d3bf43f30815a5416fbc7c4c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-ac008c61e699e74ab834fdd9ecd5fe2f92a0522d3bf43f30815a5416fbc7c4c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9121969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MORRIS, MILTON M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JENKINS, JANICE M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>di CARLO, LORENZO A.</creatorcontrib><title>Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Inappropriate electrical therapy and power efficiency play a major role in algorithm implementation for antitachycardia devices (ATD) that capture, store, and analyze the patient electrogram as an adjunct to rate determination. Morphologically based algorithms have been demonstrated to improve specificity, thereby decreasing occurrences of inappropriate electrical therapy. However, morphologically based algorithms are power demanding. Optimization of power efficiency can be achieved by eliminating unnecessary algorithmic computation, but must not compromise the effectiveness of algorithms, which perform direct analysis on raw signals. Significant reductions can be achieved by reduced sampling rates, which allow for increased overall ATD efficiency via concomitant decreases in computation and data storage. This investigation determined the upper and lower bounds for filter cutoff frequency beyond which detection precision by an established morphometric method for arrhythmia classification, correlation waveform analysis (CWA), was unfavorable. Four measurement statistics were used. In ten patients with inducible VT and VF, all bipolar intraventricular electrograms were classified correctly with a minimum passband of 10–50 Hz using any of the four measurement statistics. There was ± 80% correct classification using all four measurement statistics with passbands having low frequency cutoffs ± 15 Hz and high frequency cutoffs ± 50 Hz. Correct classification of ± 90% of unipolar electrograms during NSR, VT, and VF occurred using all four measurement statistics with a passband of 1–50 Hz. There was ± 80% correct classification with passbands 1, 10, 15, or 20–500 Hz and 10–50 Hz. The classification of NSR, VT, and VF was most accurate on an intrapatient basis. Accuracy decreased using an interpatient rhythm classification. Optimum filter settings of 1–50 Hz and 10–50 Hz were determined for unipolar and bipolar electrograms, respectively. Sampling data at 120 Hz was found to be sufficient. Bipolar electrode configuration statistically outperfomed unipolar data. In conclusion, morphometric analysis of bipolar and unipolar intraventricular electrograms appears to be achievable using band limited data and reduced sampling rates.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>antitachycardia device</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - classification</subject><subject>bioelectric signal</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Electric Power Supplies</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - classification</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>filtering</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>intracardiac electrogram</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Tachycardia - therapy</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy</subject><subject>ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>ventricular tachycardia</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFtv0zAUxy0EGt3gIyBZPPCWYMd2Eu8BqXRjVCrbxG3SXizHOV5dcim2C-23J1GqvnNe_PC_nOMfQm8pSekw7zcpFZwkJRUypVIWaawIL4lM98_Q7CQ9RzNCeZGUrJQv0XkIG0JITrg4Q2eSZlTmcoaePuquTlaudRFq_KX323XfQvTO4Hmnm0NwAfcWxzXgZRe9NtrXThv8zT0N8iVettvGGR1d3wVsez-koovarA-TE1_BH2cgvEIvrG4CvD6-F-jHp-vvi8_J6u5muZivEiMywRNtCClNTiGXEgquq5JxW9cSTC0sZFZmmogsq1llObOMDP_UgtPcVqYw3DB2gd5NvVvf_95BiKp1wUDT6A76XVBFOTRKyQfj5WQ0vg_Bg1Vb71rtD4oSNVJWGzWiVCNKNVJWR8pqP4TfHLfsqhbqU_SIddA_TPpf18DhP5rV_XxxzcbrkqnAhQj7U4H2v1ResEKoh9sb9SgeH77e_8yUYP8AQIed1Q</recordid><startdate>199701</startdate><enddate>199701</enddate><creator>MORRIS, MILTON M.</creator><creator>JENKINS, JANICE M.</creator><creator>di CARLO, LORENZO A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199701</creationdate><title>Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices</title><author>MORRIS, MILTON M. ; JENKINS, JANICE M. ; di CARLO, LORENZO A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-ac008c61e699e74ab834fdd9ecd5fe2f92a0522d3bf43f30815a5416fbc7c4c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>antitachycardia device</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - classification</topic><topic>bioelectric signal</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Electric Power Supplies</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - classification</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>filtering</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>intracardiac electrogram</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Tachycardia - therapy</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy</topic><topic>ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>ventricular tachycardia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MORRIS, MILTON M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JENKINS, JANICE M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>di CARLO, LORENZO A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MORRIS, MILTON M.</au><au>JENKINS, JANICE M.</au><au>di CARLO, LORENZO A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1997-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>34-42</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Inappropriate electrical therapy and power efficiency play a major role in algorithm implementation for antitachycardia devices (ATD) that capture, store, and analyze the patient electrogram as an adjunct to rate determination. Morphologically based algorithms have been demonstrated to improve specificity, thereby decreasing occurrences of inappropriate electrical therapy. However, morphologically based algorithms are power demanding. Optimization of power efficiency can be achieved by eliminating unnecessary algorithmic computation, but must not compromise the effectiveness of algorithms, which perform direct analysis on raw signals. Significant reductions can be achieved by reduced sampling rates, which allow for increased overall ATD efficiency via concomitant decreases in computation and data storage. This investigation determined the upper and lower bounds for filter cutoff frequency beyond which detection precision by an established morphometric method for arrhythmia classification, correlation waveform analysis (CWA), was unfavorable. Four measurement statistics were used. In ten patients with inducible VT and VF, all bipolar intraventricular electrograms were classified correctly with a minimum passband of 10–50 Hz using any of the four measurement statistics. There was ± 80% correct classification using all four measurement statistics with passbands having low frequency cutoffs ± 15 Hz and high frequency cutoffs ± 50 Hz. Correct classification of ± 90% of unipolar electrograms during NSR, VT, and VF occurred using all four measurement statistics with a passband of 1–50 Hz. There was ± 80% correct classification with passbands 1, 10, 15, or 20–500 Hz and 10–50 Hz. The classification of NSR, VT, and VF was most accurate on an intrapatient basis. Accuracy decreased using an interpatient rhythm classification. Optimum filter settings of 1–50 Hz and 10–50 Hz were determined for unipolar and bipolar electrograms, respectively. Sampling data at 120 Hz was found to be sufficient. Bipolar electrode configuration statistically outperfomed unipolar data. In conclusion, morphometric analysis of bipolar and unipolar intraventricular electrograms appears to be achievable using band limited data and reduced sampling rates.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>9121969</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1997-01, Vol.20 (1), p.34-42
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78834994
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Algorithms
antitachycardia device
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - classification
bioelectric signal
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics & numerical data
Electric Power Supplies
Electrocardiography - classification
Electrocardiography - statistics & numerical data
Electrodes, Implanted
Equipment Design
filtering
Heart Rate
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
intracardiac electrogram
Pacemaker, Artificial
Sensitivity and Specificity
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Tachycardia - therapy
Tachycardia, Ventricular - therapy
ventricular fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
ventricular tachycardia
title Band-Limited Morphometric Analysis of the Intracardiac Signal: Implications for Antitachycardia Devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Band-Limited%20Morphometric%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Intracardiac%20Signal:%20Implications%20for%20Antitachycardia%20Devices&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=MORRIS,%20MILTON%20M.&rft.date=1997-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=34-42&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04809.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78834994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78834994&rft_id=info:pmid/9121969&rfr_iscdi=true