Sustained stress and fixed interval performance
The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiology & behavior 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Physiology & behavior |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | KANT, G. J BAUMAN, R. A WIDHOLM, J. J GHOSH, S SHARMA, N |
description | The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78825412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78825412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-7bd6d391cd872d6ea386f27954282b53f5610fec96ddba2152cf1bd692c123f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j1tLxDAQhYMo61r9CQt9ENGHusmkuT3K4g0WfFgF30qaC1Tabk1acf-9AcvOyzBzvjnMQWhF8D3BhK93GFNSKCrLW8Xv0iCgICdoSaSgBcPi8xQtj8g5uojxC6eiJV2ghcKUAVNLtN5NcdRN72wex-BizHVvc9_8pkXTjy786DYfXPD70OneuEt05nUb3dXcM_Tx9Pi-eSm2b8-vm4dtMQBlYyFqyy1VxFgpwHKnqeQehGIlSKgZ9YwT7J1R3NpaA2FgPEk3CgwB6hXN0M2_7xD235OLY9U10bi21b3bT7ESUgIrE5uh1QxOdedsNYSm0-FQzQmTfj3rOhrd-pBSNPGIgZA4_UT_AG3wX5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78825412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</creator><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9035259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animals ; Arousal ; Association Learning ; Avoidance Learning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning ; Conditioning, Operant ; Escape Reaction ; Feeding Behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Motivation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Retention (Psychology) ; Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><ispartof>Physiology & behavior, 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2780428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9035259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDHOLM, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><title>Physiology & behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Escape Reaction</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j1tLxDAQhYMo61r9CQt9ENGHusmkuT3K4g0WfFgF30qaC1Tabk1acf-9AcvOyzBzvjnMQWhF8D3BhK93GFNSKCrLW8Xv0iCgICdoSaSgBcPi8xQtj8g5uojxC6eiJV2ghcKUAVNLtN5NcdRN72wex-BizHVvc9_8pkXTjy786DYfXPD70OneuEt05nUb3dXcM_Tx9Pi-eSm2b8-vm4dtMQBlYyFqyy1VxFgpwHKnqeQehGIlSKgZ9YwT7J1R3NpaA2FgPEk3CgwB6hXN0M2_7xD235OLY9U10bi21b3bT7ESUgIrE5uh1QxOdedsNYSm0-FQzQmTfj3rOhrd-pBSNPGIgZA4_UT_AG3wX5I</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>KANT, G. J</creator><creator>BAUMAN, R. A</creator><creator>WIDHOLM, J. J</creator><creator>GHOSH, S</creator><creator>SHARMA, N</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><author>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-7bd6d391cd872d6ea386f27954282b53f5610fec96ddba2152cf1bd692c123f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Escape Reaction</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDHOLM, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KANT, G. J</au><au>BAUMAN, R. A</au><au>WIDHOLM, J. J</au><au>GHOSH, S</au><au>SHARMA, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</atitle><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>279-284</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>9035259</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9384 |
ispartof | Physiology & behavior, 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284 |
issn | 0031-9384 1873-507X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78825412 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal Animals Arousal Association Learning Avoidance Learning Biological and medical sciences Conditioning Conditioning, Operant Escape Reaction Feeding Behavior Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Learning. Memory Male Mental Recall Motivation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Reinforcement Schedule Retention (Psychology) Stress, Psychological - complications |
title | Sustained stress and fixed interval performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A35%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustained%20stress%20and%20fixed%20interval%20performance&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=KANT,%20G.%20J&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=279-284&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78825412%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78825412&rft_id=info:pmid/9035259&rfr_iscdi=true |