Sustained stress and fixed interval performance

The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiology & behavior 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284
Hauptverfasser: KANT, G. J, BAUMAN, R. A, WIDHOLM, J. J, GHOSH, S, SHARMA, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Physiology & behavior
container_volume 61
creator KANT, G. J
BAUMAN, R. A
WIDHOLM, J. J
GHOSH, S
SHARMA, N
description The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78825412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78825412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-7bd6d391cd872d6ea386f27954282b53f5610fec96ddba2152cf1bd692c123f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j1tLxDAQhYMo61r9CQt9ENGHusmkuT3K4g0WfFgF30qaC1Tabk1acf-9AcvOyzBzvjnMQWhF8D3BhK93GFNSKCrLW8Xv0iCgICdoSaSgBcPi8xQtj8g5uojxC6eiJV2ghcKUAVNLtN5NcdRN72wex-BizHVvc9_8pkXTjy786DYfXPD70OneuEt05nUb3dXcM_Tx9Pi-eSm2b8-vm4dtMQBlYyFqyy1VxFgpwHKnqeQehGIlSKgZ9YwT7J1R3NpaA2FgPEk3CgwB6hXN0M2_7xD235OLY9U10bi21b3bT7ESUgIrE5uh1QxOdedsNYSm0-FQzQmTfj3rOhrd-pBSNPGIgZA4_UT_AG3wX5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78825412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</creator><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9035259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animals ; Arousal ; Association Learning ; Avoidance Learning ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning ; Conditioning, Operant ; Escape Reaction ; Feeding Behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Motivation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Retention (Psychology) ; Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><ispartof>Physiology &amp; behavior, 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2780428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9035259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDHOLM, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><title>Physiology &amp; behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Avoidance Learning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Escape Reaction</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j1tLxDAQhYMo61r9CQt9ENGHusmkuT3K4g0WfFgF30qaC1Tabk1acf-9AcvOyzBzvjnMQWhF8D3BhK93GFNSKCrLW8Xv0iCgICdoSaSgBcPi8xQtj8g5uojxC6eiJV2ghcKUAVNLtN5NcdRN72wex-BizHVvc9_8pkXTjy786DYfXPD70OneuEt05nUb3dXcM_Tx9Pi-eSm2b8-vm4dtMQBlYyFqyy1VxFgpwHKnqeQehGIlSKgZ9YwT7J1R3NpaA2FgPEk3CgwB6hXN0M2_7xD235OLY9U10bi21b3bT7ESUgIrE5uh1QxOdedsNYSm0-FQzQmTfj3rOhrd-pBSNPGIgZA4_UT_AG3wX5I</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>KANT, G. J</creator><creator>BAUMAN, R. A</creator><creator>WIDHOLM, J. J</creator><creator>GHOSH, S</creator><creator>SHARMA, N</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</title><author>KANT, G. J ; BAUMAN, R. A ; WIDHOLM, J. J ; GHOSH, S ; SHARMA, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-7bd6d391cd872d6ea386f27954282b53f5610fec96ddba2152cf1bd692c123f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Avoidance Learning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Escape Reaction</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KANT, G. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDHOLM, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARMA, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KANT, G. J</au><au>BAUMAN, R. A</au><au>WIDHOLM, J. J</au><au>GHOSH, S</au><au>SHARMA, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustained stress and fixed interval performance</atitle><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>279-284</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>The effects of sustained stress on response rate and temporal patterning (quarter-life) of rats performing either a previously learned fixed-interval schedule (FI 60) or learning an FI 60 simultaneously with stress onset were determined. Rats lived 24 h/day in operant cages, where they earned all of their food via lever-pressing. During the stress portion of each experiment, one group of rats was able to avoid or escape signalled intermittent footshock (Avoidance/ Escape Group), a second group (Yoked) did not have control over shock termination, a third group never received shock (Control). Shock trials were presented around the clock at approximately 5-min intervals and the stress portion of each study lasted 1-2 weeks. We have previously reported that rats tolerate this paradigm well and avoid/escape 99% of the shock trials. In rats previously trained on the FI task, both rate of responding and quarter-life values were significantly decreased on the first day of stress for both the Avoidance/Escape and Yoked Groups. Food intakes and quarter-life values were not significantly different from the controls by stress Days 3 and 2, respectively. In the acquisition study, controls learned the F1 task by Day 4 as judged by quarter-life of responding. FI task acquisition was significantly impaired in stressed rats compared to controls, not reaching asymptotic performance until Day 9 of stress. There were no major differences between the 2 stress groups in either study. These data demonstrate that stress may impair both the rate and patterning of behavior, and suggest that this rodent paradigm may usefully model some aspects of the effects of stress in humans.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>9035259</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9384
ispartof Physiology & behavior, 1997-02, Vol.61 (2), p.279-284
issn 0031-9384
1873-507X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78825412
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Animal
Animals
Arousal
Association Learning
Avoidance Learning
Biological and medical sciences
Conditioning
Conditioning, Operant
Escape Reaction
Feeding Behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Learning. Memory
Male
Mental Recall
Motivation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reinforcement Schedule
Retention (Psychology)
Stress, Psychological - complications
title Sustained stress and fixed interval performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A35%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustained%20stress%20and%20fixed%20interval%20performance&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=KANT,%20G.%20J&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=279-284&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00372-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78825412%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78825412&rft_id=info:pmid/9035259&rfr_iscdi=true