A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 1997-02, Vol.82 (2), p.620-628
Hauptverfasser: HODSMAN, A. B, FRAHER, L. J, WATSON, P. H, OSTBYE, T, STITT, L. W, ADACHI, J. D, TAVES, D. H, DROST, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 628
container_issue 2
container_start_page 620
container_title The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
container_volume 82
creator HODSMAN, A. B
FRAHER, L. J
WATSON, P. H
OSTBYE, T
STITT, L. W
ADACHI, J. D
TAVES, D. H
DROST, D
description Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test this hypothesis, 30 women with osteoporosis, aged 67 +/- 8 yr, completed a 2-yr protocol that comprised 28-day courses of hPTH-(1-34) (800 U) given by daily sc injections; each course was repeated at 3-month intervals. By random allocation, patients either received sequential calcitonin (CT) immediately following the cycle of hPTH-(1-34) (75 U/day, sc; PTH + CT; n = 16) or placebo CT (PTH alone; n = 14) for 42 days. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine site revealed t scores of -3.7 +/- 1.2 (+/-SD) for the PTH alone group and -3.0 +/- 1.4 for the PTH + CT groups, who had 2.0 +/- 2.3 and 1.8 +/- 2.4 vertebral fractures, respectively, at entry to the study. At the end of the 2 yr, the lumbar spine BMD increased from 0.720 +/- 0.130 to 0.793 +/- 0.177 g/cm2 (10.2%) in the PTH group and from 0.760 +/- 0.168 to 0.820 +/- 0.149 g/cm2 (7.9%) in the PTH + CT group. These changes were significant over time in both groups (P < 0.001). Although the final 2-yr lumbar spine BMD was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, those patients receiving sequential CT injections gained bone mass at a consistently slower rate. Changes in BMD at the femoral neck averaged +2.4% and -1.8% in the PTH and PTH + CT groups, respectively, neither of which was significant. In the group receiving only cyclical hPTH-(1-34), the observed 2-yr vertebral fracture incidence was 4.5 compared to 23.0/100 patient yr in the PTH + CT group (P = 0.078). During the first two cycles, changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (serum total alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) and bone resorption (fasting urinary hydroxyproline and N-telopeptide excretion) were significantly increased over pretreatment values after 28 days of hPTH-(1-34) injections (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01 for both groups). Even end of cycle values remained elevated over the study baseline across time (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences for any outcome parameter between the two treatment groups. We conclude that short cycles (28 days) of daily hPTH-(1-34) injections result in significant increases in lumbar spine BMD, without significant changes i
doi_str_mv 10.1210/jc.82.2.620
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78817441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16226658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-22b2b80f57942a36d828e175740704bbcd4ccad5d665d98ceb75721cee5073543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhxBnJB8SlymJP7Dg5VhUUpEq9AOIWOc5E61USB9uh2v7M_iJm1VWP9GR73ud5Hj_G3kuxlSDF573b1rCFbQXiBdvIRunCyMa8ZBshQBaNgd-v2ZuU9kJIpXR5xs4aAQoqvWEPlzzauQ-Tv8eeuzDnGMaRtjl6O_IcqDYtNiLPO-Q4DN5Zd-Bh4O7gRjqMnFSbd4cYfM93IU5hRv4LY1rT_xmy5Qn_rDjnoxVhzucw-_no6qclhr_IuyM52ZQ41ZeQ8oRzWOya6MZdoAO_83nHScCwhBiST2_Zq8GOCd-d1nP28-uXH1ffipvb6-9XlzeFK5XKBUAHXS0GbRoFtqz6GmqURhsljFBd53rlnO11X1W6b2qHHWkgHaIWptSqPGefHvvSS2mKlNvJJ4fjaGcMa2pNXUujlHwWlBUAmdQEXjyCjgZJEYd2iX6y8dBK0R6jbveuraGFlqIm-sOp7dpN2D-xp2xJ_3jSbaLPHShn59MTBrqSwujyH0PGt5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16226658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>HODSMAN, A. B ; FRAHER, L. J ; WATSON, P. H ; OSTBYE, T ; STITT, L. W ; ADACHI, J. D ; TAVES, D. H ; DROST, D</creator><creatorcontrib>HODSMAN, A. B ; FRAHER, L. J ; WATSON, P. H ; OSTBYE, T ; STITT, L. W ; ADACHI, J. D ; TAVES, D. H ; DROST, D</creatorcontrib><description>Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test this hypothesis, 30 women with osteoporosis, aged 67 +/- 8 yr, completed a 2-yr protocol that comprised 28-day courses of hPTH-(1-34) (800 U) given by daily sc injections; each course was repeated at 3-month intervals. By random allocation, patients either received sequential calcitonin (CT) immediately following the cycle of hPTH-(1-34) (75 U/day, sc; PTH + CT; n = 16) or placebo CT (PTH alone; n = 14) for 42 days. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine site revealed t scores of -3.7 +/- 1.2 (+/-SD) for the PTH alone group and -3.0 +/- 1.4 for the PTH + CT groups, who had 2.0 +/- 2.3 and 1.8 +/- 2.4 vertebral fractures, respectively, at entry to the study. At the end of the 2 yr, the lumbar spine BMD increased from 0.720 +/- 0.130 to 0.793 +/- 0.177 g/cm2 (10.2%) in the PTH group and from 0.760 +/- 0.168 to 0.820 +/- 0.149 g/cm2 (7.9%) in the PTH + CT group. These changes were significant over time in both groups (P &lt; 0.001). Although the final 2-yr lumbar spine BMD was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, those patients receiving sequential CT injections gained bone mass at a consistently slower rate. Changes in BMD at the femoral neck averaged +2.4% and -1.8% in the PTH and PTH + CT groups, respectively, neither of which was significant. In the group receiving only cyclical hPTH-(1-34), the observed 2-yr vertebral fracture incidence was 4.5 compared to 23.0/100 patient yr in the PTH + CT group (P = 0.078). During the first two cycles, changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (serum total alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) and bone resorption (fasting urinary hydroxyproline and N-telopeptide excretion) were significantly increased over pretreatment values after 28 days of hPTH-(1-34) injections (P &lt; 0.05 to P &lt; 0.01 for both groups). Even end of cycle values remained elevated over the study baseline across time (P &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences for any outcome parameter between the two treatment groups. We conclude that short cycles (28 days) of daily hPTH-(1-34) injections result in significant increases in lumbar spine BMD, without significant changes in cortical bone mass at the femoral neck. Very low incident vertebral fracture rates were documented over 2 yr. However, there is no evidence that sequential antiresorptive therapy with CT is of any benefit over that conferred by cyclical PTH alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-972X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1210/jc.82.2.620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9024265</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEMAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Endocrine Society</publisher><subject>Aged ; Alkaline Phosphatase - blood ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density - drug effects ; Calcitonin - administration &amp; dosage ; Calcitonin - therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Femur Neck - metabolism ; Hormones. Endocrine system ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lumbar Vertebrae - metabolism ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - complications ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism ; Parathyroid Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Parathyroid Hormone - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Spinal Fractures - epidemiology ; Spinal Fractures - etiology</subject><ispartof>The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 1997-02, Vol.82 (2), p.620-628</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-22b2b80f57942a36d828e175740704bbcd4ccad5d665d98ceb75721cee5073543</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2561075$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9024265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HODSMAN, A. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRAHER, L. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WATSON, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSTBYE, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STITT, L. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADACHI, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAVES, D. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DROST, D</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis</title><title>The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism</title><addtitle>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</addtitle><description>Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test this hypothesis, 30 women with osteoporosis, aged 67 +/- 8 yr, completed a 2-yr protocol that comprised 28-day courses of hPTH-(1-34) (800 U) given by daily sc injections; each course was repeated at 3-month intervals. By random allocation, patients either received sequential calcitonin (CT) immediately following the cycle of hPTH-(1-34) (75 U/day, sc; PTH + CT; n = 16) or placebo CT (PTH alone; n = 14) for 42 days. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine site revealed t scores of -3.7 +/- 1.2 (+/-SD) for the PTH alone group and -3.0 +/- 1.4 for the PTH + CT groups, who had 2.0 +/- 2.3 and 1.8 +/- 2.4 vertebral fractures, respectively, at entry to the study. At the end of the 2 yr, the lumbar spine BMD increased from 0.720 +/- 0.130 to 0.793 +/- 0.177 g/cm2 (10.2%) in the PTH group and from 0.760 +/- 0.168 to 0.820 +/- 0.149 g/cm2 (7.9%) in the PTH + CT group. These changes were significant over time in both groups (P &lt; 0.001). Although the final 2-yr lumbar spine BMD was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, those patients receiving sequential CT injections gained bone mass at a consistently slower rate. Changes in BMD at the femoral neck averaged +2.4% and -1.8% in the PTH and PTH + CT groups, respectively, neither of which was significant. In the group receiving only cyclical hPTH-(1-34), the observed 2-yr vertebral fracture incidence was 4.5 compared to 23.0/100 patient yr in the PTH + CT group (P = 0.078). During the first two cycles, changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (serum total alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) and bone resorption (fasting urinary hydroxyproline and N-telopeptide excretion) were significantly increased over pretreatment values after 28 days of hPTH-(1-34) injections (P &lt; 0.05 to P &lt; 0.01 for both groups). Even end of cycle values remained elevated over the study baseline across time (P &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences for any outcome parameter between the two treatment groups. We conclude that short cycles (28 days) of daily hPTH-(1-34) injections result in significant increases in lumbar spine BMD, without significant changes in cortical bone mass at the femoral neck. Very low incident vertebral fracture rates were documented over 2 yr. However, there is no evidence that sequential antiresorptive therapy with CT is of any benefit over that conferred by cyclical PTH alone.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - blood</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density - drug effects</subject><subject>Calcitonin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Calcitonin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Neck - metabolism</subject><subject>Hormones. Endocrine system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - metabolism</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - etiology</subject><issn>0021-972X</issn><issn>1945-7197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhxBnJB8SlymJP7Dg5VhUUpEq9AOIWOc5E61USB9uh2v7M_iJm1VWP9GR73ud5Hj_G3kuxlSDF573b1rCFbQXiBdvIRunCyMa8ZBshQBaNgd-v2ZuU9kJIpXR5xs4aAQoqvWEPlzzauQ-Tv8eeuzDnGMaRtjl6O_IcqDYtNiLPO-Q4DN5Zd-Bh4O7gRjqMnFSbd4cYfM93IU5hRv4LY1rT_xmy5Qn_rDjnoxVhzucw-_no6qclhr_IuyM52ZQ41ZeQ8oRzWOya6MZdoAO_83nHScCwhBiST2_Zq8GOCd-d1nP28-uXH1ffipvb6-9XlzeFK5XKBUAHXS0GbRoFtqz6GmqURhsljFBd53rlnO11X1W6b2qHHWkgHaIWptSqPGefHvvSS2mKlNvJJ4fjaGcMa2pNXUujlHwWlBUAmdQEXjyCjgZJEYd2iX6y8dBK0R6jbveuraGFlqIm-sOp7dpN2D-xp2xJ_3jSbaLPHShn59MTBrqSwujyH0PGt5w</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>HODSMAN, A. B</creator><creator>FRAHER, L. J</creator><creator>WATSON, P. H</creator><creator>OSTBYE, T</creator><creator>STITT, L. W</creator><creator>ADACHI, J. D</creator><creator>TAVES, D. H</creator><creator>DROST, D</creator><general>Endocrine Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis</title><author>HODSMAN, A. B ; FRAHER, L. J ; WATSON, P. H ; OSTBYE, T ; STITT, L. W ; ADACHI, J. D ; TAVES, D. H ; DROST, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-22b2b80f57942a36d828e175740704bbcd4ccad5d665d98ceb75721cee5073543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alkaline Phosphatase - blood</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density - drug effects</topic><topic>Calcitonin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Calcitonin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Neck - metabolism</topic><topic>Hormones. Endocrine system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - metabolism</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HODSMAN, A. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRAHER, L. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WATSON, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSTBYE, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STITT, L. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADACHI, J. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAVES, D. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DROST, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HODSMAN, A. B</au><au>FRAHER, L. J</au><au>WATSON, P. H</au><au>OSTBYE, T</au><au>STITT, L. W</au><au>ADACHI, J. D</au><au>TAVES, D. H</au><au>DROST, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis</atitle><jtitle>The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>620-628</pages><issn>0021-972X</issn><eissn>1945-7197</eissn><coden>JCEMAZ</coden><abstract>Short cycles of human (h) PTH-(1-34) may have an anabolic effect to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. As PTH also stimulates bone resorption, it is theoretically possible to enhance the anabolic effects of PTH by using a sequential antiresorptive agent in the treatment cycle. To test this hypothesis, 30 women with osteoporosis, aged 67 +/- 8 yr, completed a 2-yr protocol that comprised 28-day courses of hPTH-(1-34) (800 U) given by daily sc injections; each course was repeated at 3-month intervals. By random allocation, patients either received sequential calcitonin (CT) immediately following the cycle of hPTH-(1-34) (75 U/day, sc; PTH + CT; n = 16) or placebo CT (PTH alone; n = 14) for 42 days. Baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine site revealed t scores of -3.7 +/- 1.2 (+/-SD) for the PTH alone group and -3.0 +/- 1.4 for the PTH + CT groups, who had 2.0 +/- 2.3 and 1.8 +/- 2.4 vertebral fractures, respectively, at entry to the study. At the end of the 2 yr, the lumbar spine BMD increased from 0.720 +/- 0.130 to 0.793 +/- 0.177 g/cm2 (10.2%) in the PTH group and from 0.760 +/- 0.168 to 0.820 +/- 0.149 g/cm2 (7.9%) in the PTH + CT group. These changes were significant over time in both groups (P &lt; 0.001). Although the final 2-yr lumbar spine BMD was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, those patients receiving sequential CT injections gained bone mass at a consistently slower rate. Changes in BMD at the femoral neck averaged +2.4% and -1.8% in the PTH and PTH + CT groups, respectively, neither of which was significant. In the group receiving only cyclical hPTH-(1-34), the observed 2-yr vertebral fracture incidence was 4.5 compared to 23.0/100 patient yr in the PTH + CT group (P = 0.078). During the first two cycles, changes in biochemical markers of bone formation (serum total alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) and bone resorption (fasting urinary hydroxyproline and N-telopeptide excretion) were significantly increased over pretreatment values after 28 days of hPTH-(1-34) injections (P &lt; 0.05 to P &lt; 0.01 for both groups). Even end of cycle values remained elevated over the study baseline across time (P &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences for any outcome parameter between the two treatment groups. We conclude that short cycles (28 days) of daily hPTH-(1-34) injections result in significant increases in lumbar spine BMD, without significant changes in cortical bone mass at the femoral neck. Very low incident vertebral fracture rates were documented over 2 yr. However, there is no evidence that sequential antiresorptive therapy with CT is of any benefit over that conferred by cyclical PTH alone.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Endocrine Society</pub><pmid>9024265</pmid><doi>10.1210/jc.82.2.620</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-972X
ispartof The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 1997-02, Vol.82 (2), p.620-628
issn 0021-972X
1945-7197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78817441
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Alkaline Phosphatase - blood
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density - drug effects
Calcitonin - administration & dosage
Calcitonin - therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Femur Neck - metabolism
Hormones. Endocrine system
Humans
Incidence
Lumbar Vertebrae - metabolism
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - complications
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism
Parathyroid Hormone - administration & dosage
Parathyroid Hormone - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Spinal Fractures - epidemiology
Spinal Fractures - etiology
title A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone Versus cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A57%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20to%20compare%20the%20efficacy%20of%20cyclical%20parathyroid%20hormone%20Versus%20cyclical%20parathyroid%20hormone%20and%20sequential%20calcitonin%20to%20improve%20bone%20mass%20in%20postmenopausal%20women%20with%20osteoporosis&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20clinical%20endocrinology%20and%20metabolism&rft.au=HODSMAN,%20A.%20B&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=620-628&rft.issn=0021-972X&rft.eissn=1945-7197&rft.coden=JCEMAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1210/jc.82.2.620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16226658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16226658&rft_id=info:pmid/9024265&rfr_iscdi=true