Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation
We evaluated the predictiveness of sonographically estimated fetal weight as a function of the estimation of probability of having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) before obtaining an ultrasound scan (prior probability). The value of the estimated fetal weight resided more in its high specific...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical ultrasound 1988-06, Vol.16 (5), p.285-294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Journal of clinical ultrasound |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Simon, Nicolas V. Levisky, John S. Shearer, David M. Morris, Kathleen C. Hansberry, Patricia A. |
description | We evaluated the predictiveness of sonographically estimated fetal weight as a function of the estimation of probability of having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) before obtaining an ultrasound scan (prior probability). The value of the estimated fetal weight resided more in its high specificity than in its sensitivity, hence in its ability to confirm that the fetus is normal. The predictiveness of the method was further enhanced when the fetal weight estimation was placed in the context of the prior probability of IUGR. In particular, the positive predictive value of the test as well as the likelihood of having a growth‐retarded infant in spite of an estimated fetal weight within the normal range were considerably higher as the prior probability of IUGR increased. Since the obstetrician using all available evidence is likely to form a rather good estimate of the possibility of IUGR before ordering a scan, this improvement in the predictiveness of estimated fetal weight through a Bayesian approach can be advantageously applied to ultrasound analysis and can effectively support clinical decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcu.1870160502 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78809669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78809669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-b9a9c4bc1655a6da2661c1ad560c8431b71a05b9db365637ffdf351bca7f61343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1vGyEQxVHVKnHTXnuLxKm3dWExsHuMrOajcj8OiSrlggYWbJL1kgAbx-o_XxJbiXrqhREz7_008xD6RMmUElJ_uTHjlDaSUEE4qd-gCSWtrAhpxVs0KYVWteT0EL1P6YYQIjjnB-iAUV6zhk_Qn1_Rdt5k_2AHmxIODqcwhGWEu5U32NkMPd5Yv1xlbFP2a8g-DBgSBuzGwTz_iuku-hDLGzRo3_u8fWr6IUcYs41-sHgZwyavcCzE2D1TPqB3DvpkP-7rEbo6_Xo5P68WP88u5ieLyjDZ1JVuoTUzbWjZHUQHtRDUUOi4IKaZMaolBcJ122kmuGDSuc4xTrUB6QRlM3aEPu-4Zb37sVyh1j4Z2_cw2DAmJZumxCXaIpzuhCaGlKJ1qpy1hrhVlKintFVJW72mXQzHe_Ko17Z7ke_jLfN2N9_43m7_Q1Pf5lf_sKud16dsH1-8EG-VkExy9fvHmboWl98X10Kqmv0FW_ed1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78809669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Simon, Nicolas V. ; Levisky, John S. ; Shearer, David M. ; Morris, Kathleen C. ; Hansberry, Patricia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Nicolas V. ; Levisky, John S. ; Shearer, David M. ; Morris, Kathleen C. ; Hansberry, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated the predictiveness of sonographically estimated fetal weight as a function of the estimation of probability of having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) before obtaining an ultrasound scan (prior probability). The value of the estimated fetal weight resided more in its high specificity than in its sensitivity, hence in its ability to confirm that the fetus is normal. The predictiveness of the method was further enhanced when the fetal weight estimation was placed in the context of the prior probability of IUGR. In particular, the positive predictive value of the test as well as the likelihood of having a growth‐retarded infant in spite of an estimated fetal weight within the normal range were considerably higher as the prior probability of IUGR increased. Since the obstetrician using all available evidence is likely to form a rather good estimate of the possibility of IUGR before ordering a scan, this improvement in the predictiveness of estimated fetal weight through a Bayesian approach can be advantageously applied to ultrasound analysis and can effectively support clinical decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870160502</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3152385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Body Weight ; Female ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis ; Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology ; Fetal weight estimation ; Fetus - physiology ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Intrauterine growth retardation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Risk of intrauterine growth retardation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical ultrasound, 1988-06, Vol.16 (5), p.285-294</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1988 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-b9a9c4bc1655a6da2661c1ad560c8431b71a05b9db365637ffdf351bca7f61343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-b9a9c4bc1655a6da2661c1ad560c8431b71a05b9db365637ffdf351bca7f61343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcu.1870160502$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcu.1870160502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3152385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Nicolas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levisky, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Kathleen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansberry, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation</title><title>Journal of clinical ultrasound</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Ultrasound</addtitle><description>We evaluated the predictiveness of sonographically estimated fetal weight as a function of the estimation of probability of having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) before obtaining an ultrasound scan (prior probability). The value of the estimated fetal weight resided more in its high specificity than in its sensitivity, hence in its ability to confirm that the fetus is normal. The predictiveness of the method was further enhanced when the fetal weight estimation was placed in the context of the prior probability of IUGR. In particular, the positive predictive value of the test as well as the likelihood of having a growth‐retarded infant in spite of an estimated fetal weight within the normal range were considerably higher as the prior probability of IUGR increased. Since the obstetrician using all available evidence is likely to form a rather good estimate of the possibility of IUGR before ordering a scan, this improvement in the predictiveness of estimated fetal weight through a Bayesian approach can be advantageously applied to ultrasound analysis and can effectively support clinical decision making.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fetal weight estimation</subject><subject>Fetus - physiology</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine growth retardation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk of intrauterine growth retardation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0091-2751</issn><issn>1097-0096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1vGyEQxVHVKnHTXnuLxKm3dWExsHuMrOajcj8OiSrlggYWbJL1kgAbx-o_XxJbiXrqhREz7_008xD6RMmUElJ_uTHjlDaSUEE4qd-gCSWtrAhpxVs0KYVWteT0EL1P6YYQIjjnB-iAUV6zhk_Qn1_Rdt5k_2AHmxIODqcwhGWEu5U32NkMPd5Yv1xlbFP2a8g-DBgSBuzGwTz_iuku-hDLGzRo3_u8fWr6IUcYs41-sHgZwyavcCzE2D1TPqB3DvpkP-7rEbo6_Xo5P68WP88u5ieLyjDZ1JVuoTUzbWjZHUQHtRDUUOi4IKaZMaolBcJ122kmuGDSuc4xTrUB6QRlM3aEPu-4Zb37sVyh1j4Z2_cw2DAmJZumxCXaIpzuhCaGlKJ1qpy1hrhVlKintFVJW72mXQzHe_Ko17Z7ke_jLfN2N9_43m7_Q1Pf5lf_sKud16dsH1-8EG-VkExy9fvHmboWl98X10Kqmv0FW_ed1w</recordid><startdate>198806</startdate><enddate>198806</enddate><creator>Simon, Nicolas V.</creator><creator>Levisky, John S.</creator><creator>Shearer, David M.</creator><creator>Morris, Kathleen C.</creator><creator>Hansberry, Patricia A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198806</creationdate><title>Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation</title><author>Simon, Nicolas V. ; Levisky, John S. ; Shearer, David M. ; Morris, Kathleen C. ; Hansberry, Patricia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3782-b9a9c4bc1655a6da2661c1ad560c8431b71a05b9db365637ffdf351bca7f61343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fetal weight estimation</topic><topic>Fetus - physiology</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine growth retardation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk of intrauterine growth retardation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Nicolas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levisky, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Kathleen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansberry, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Nicolas V.</au><au>Levisky, John S.</au><au>Shearer, David M.</au><au>Morris, Kathleen C.</au><au>Hansberry, Patricia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Ultrasound</addtitle><date>1988-06</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>285-294</pages><issn>0091-2751</issn><eissn>1097-0096</eissn><abstract>We evaluated the predictiveness of sonographically estimated fetal weight as a function of the estimation of probability of having intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) before obtaining an ultrasound scan (prior probability). The value of the estimated fetal weight resided more in its high specificity than in its sensitivity, hence in its ability to confirm that the fetus is normal. The predictiveness of the method was further enhanced when the fetal weight estimation was placed in the context of the prior probability of IUGR. In particular, the positive predictive value of the test as well as the likelihood of having a growth‐retarded infant in spite of an estimated fetal weight within the normal range were considerably higher as the prior probability of IUGR increased. Since the obstetrician using all available evidence is likely to form a rather good estimate of the possibility of IUGR before ordering a scan, this improvement in the predictiveness of estimated fetal weight through a Bayesian approach can be advantageously applied to ultrasound analysis and can effectively support clinical decision making.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>3152385</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcu.1870160502</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-2751 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical ultrasound, 1988-06, Vol.16 (5), p.285-294 |
issn | 0091-2751 1097-0096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78809669 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bayes Theorem Body Weight Female Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis Fetal Growth Retardation - physiopathology Fetal weight estimation Fetus - physiology Gestational Age Humans Intrauterine growth retardation Predictive Value of Tests Pregnancy Risk of intrauterine growth retardation Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography |
title | Predictiveness of sonographic fetal weight estimation as a function of prior probability of intrauterine growth retardation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A37%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictiveness%20of%20sonographic%20fetal%20weight%20estimation%20as%20a%20function%20of%20prior%20probability%20of%20intrauterine%20growth%20retardation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20ultrasound&rft.au=Simon,%20Nicolas%20V.&rft.date=1988-06&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=285-294&rft.issn=0091-2751&rft.eissn=1097-0096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcu.1870160502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78809669%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78809669&rft_id=info:pmid/3152385&rfr_iscdi=true |