Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results
Standard laboratory techniques, such as viral culture and serology, provide only circumstantial or retrospective evidence of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1997-02, Vol.349 (9048), p.313-317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9048 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 349 |
creator | Jeffery, Katie JM Read, Steven J Peto, Timothy EA Mayon-White, Richard T Bangham, Charles RM |
description | Standard laboratory techniques, such as viral culture and serology, provide only circumstantial or retrospective evidence of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS.
We examined all the CSF samples that were received at our diagnostic virology laboratory between May, 1994, and May, 1996, by nested PCR for viruses associated with CNS infections in the UK. We collected clinical and laboratory data for 410 patients from Oxford city hospitals (the Oxford cohort) whose CSF was examined between May, 1994, and May, 1995. These patients were classified according to the likelihood of a viral infection of the CNS. We used stratified logistic regression analysis to identify the clinical factors independently associated with a positive PCR result. We calculated likelihood ratios to estimate the clinical usefulness of PCR amplification of CSF.
We tested 2233 consecutive CSF samples from 2162 patients. A positive PCR result was obtained in 143 patients, including 22 from the Oxford cohort. Logistic regression analysis of the Oxford cohort showed that fever, a virus-specific rash, and a CSF white-cell count of 5/μL or more were independent predictors of a positive PCR result. The likelihood ratio for a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a positive PCR result, relative to a negative PCR result, was 88·2 (95% CI 20·6–378). The likelihood ratio for a possible diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a negative PCR result, relative to a positive PCR result, was 0·10 (0·03–0·39).
A patient with a positive PCR result was 88 times as likely to have a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS as a patient with a negative PCR result. A negative PCR result can be used with moderate confidence to rule out a diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS. We believe that PCR will become the first-line diagnostic test for viral meningitis and encephalitis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08107-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78802676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014067369608107X</els_id><sourcerecordid>11075018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6fc66c60b0a9def8047d90e6320b07aef1e463289c7de3871a606339ff2827e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoSDd_PkLAlFLSg9ORLUtWLqFs27QQSGgT2JtQ5FGr4JU3kryQb195d9lDLz0Jzfze8HiPkHMKlxQo__QLKIOSi5pfSP4RWgqiXByQGWWClQ0TizdktkfekuMYnwGAcWiOyJGEitWCzYj54vRvP0QXi8EWaxd0Xzhv0SQ3-M0s_cHCoE_TxmNYD2Ms4mtMuLwqTO-8MxtJwrAKmPSkm2T3859FwDj2KZ6SQ6v7iGe794Q8fvv6MP9e3t7d_Jh_vi0NozyV3BrODYcn0LJD2wITnQTkdZVHQqOlyPKnlUZ0WLeCag68rqW1VVsJZPUJ-bC9uwrDy4gxqaWLBvtee8yulWhbqLjgGXz3D_g8jMFnb4pKCQ00UmSo2UImDDEGtGoV3FKHV0VBTQ2oTQNqildJrjYNqEXWne-Oj09L7PaqXeR5_3631zFHZ4P2xsU9VjVMigoydr3FMCe2dhhUNA69wc6F3I7qBvcfI38BiLqiuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199050597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jeffery, Katie JM ; Read, Steven J ; Peto, Timothy EA ; Mayon-White, Richard T ; Bangham, Charles RM</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Katie JM ; Read, Steven J ; Peto, Timothy EA ; Mayon-White, Richard T ; Bangham, Charles RM</creatorcontrib><description>Standard laboratory techniques, such as viral culture and serology, provide only circumstantial or retrospective evidence of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS.
We examined all the CSF samples that were received at our diagnostic virology laboratory between May, 1994, and May, 1996, by nested PCR for viruses associated with CNS infections in the UK. We collected clinical and laboratory data for 410 patients from Oxford city hospitals (the Oxford cohort) whose CSF was examined between May, 1994, and May, 1995. These patients were classified according to the likelihood of a viral infection of the CNS. We used stratified logistic regression analysis to identify the clinical factors independently associated with a positive PCR result. We calculated likelihood ratios to estimate the clinical usefulness of PCR amplification of CSF.
We tested 2233 consecutive CSF samples from 2162 patients. A positive PCR result was obtained in 143 patients, including 22 from the Oxford cohort. Logistic regression analysis of the Oxford cohort showed that fever, a virus-specific rash, and a CSF white-cell count of 5/μL or more were independent predictors of a positive PCR result. The likelihood ratio for a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a positive PCR result, relative to a negative PCR result, was 88·2 (95% CI 20·6–378). The likelihood ratio for a possible diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a negative PCR result, relative to a positive PCR result, was 0·10 (0·03–0·39).
A patient with a positive PCR result was 88 times as likely to have a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS as a patient with a negative PCR result. A negative PCR result can be used with moderate confidence to rule out a diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS. We believe that PCR will become the first-line diagnostic test for viral meningitis and encephalitis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08107-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9024374</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body fluids ; Central nervous system ; Central Nervous System Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid ; Central Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis ; Central Nervous System Diseases - virology ; Clinical Protocols ; Cohort Studies ; DNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid ; Female ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nervous system ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Prospective Studies ; Regression analysis ; RNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid ; Tests ; United Kingdom ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the nervous system ; Virus Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid ; Virus Diseases - diagnosis ; Virus Diseases - virology ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1997-02, Vol.349 (9048), p.313-317</ispartof><rights>1997 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Feb 1, 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6fc66c60b0a9def8047d90e6320b07aef1e463289c7de3871a606339ff2827e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6fc66c60b0a9def8047d90e6320b07aef1e463289c7de3871a606339ff2827e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067369608107X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2549720$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9024374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Katie JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Timothy EA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayon-White, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangham, Charles RM</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Standard laboratory techniques, such as viral culture and serology, provide only circumstantial or retrospective evidence of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS.
We examined all the CSF samples that were received at our diagnostic virology laboratory between May, 1994, and May, 1996, by nested PCR for viruses associated with CNS infections in the UK. We collected clinical and laboratory data for 410 patients from Oxford city hospitals (the Oxford cohort) whose CSF was examined between May, 1994, and May, 1995. These patients were classified according to the likelihood of a viral infection of the CNS. We used stratified logistic regression analysis to identify the clinical factors independently associated with a positive PCR result. We calculated likelihood ratios to estimate the clinical usefulness of PCR amplification of CSF.
We tested 2233 consecutive CSF samples from 2162 patients. A positive PCR result was obtained in 143 patients, including 22 from the Oxford cohort. Logistic regression analysis of the Oxford cohort showed that fever, a virus-specific rash, and a CSF white-cell count of 5/μL or more were independent predictors of a positive PCR result. The likelihood ratio for a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a positive PCR result, relative to a negative PCR result, was 88·2 (95% CI 20·6–378). The likelihood ratio for a possible diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a negative PCR result, relative to a positive PCR result, was 0·10 (0·03–0·39).
A patient with a positive PCR result was 88 times as likely to have a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS as a patient with a negative PCR result. A negative PCR result can be used with moderate confidence to rule out a diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS. We believe that PCR will become the first-line diagnostic test for viral meningitis and encephalitis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Diseases - virology</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>RNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Virus Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Virus Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Virus Diseases - virology</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoSDd_PkLAlFLSg9ORLUtWLqFs27QQSGgT2JtQ5FGr4JU3kryQb195d9lDLz0Jzfze8HiPkHMKlxQo__QLKIOSi5pfSP4RWgqiXByQGWWClQ0TizdktkfekuMYnwGAcWiOyJGEitWCzYj54vRvP0QXi8EWaxd0Xzhv0SQ3-M0s_cHCoE_TxmNYD2Ms4mtMuLwqTO-8MxtJwrAKmPSkm2T3859FwDj2KZ6SQ6v7iGe794Q8fvv6MP9e3t7d_Jh_vi0NozyV3BrODYcn0LJD2wITnQTkdZVHQqOlyPKnlUZ0WLeCag68rqW1VVsJZPUJ-bC9uwrDy4gxqaWLBvtee8yulWhbqLjgGXz3D_g8jMFnb4pKCQ00UmSo2UImDDEGtGoV3FKHV0VBTQ2oTQNqildJrjYNqEXWne-Oj09L7PaqXeR5_3631zFHZ4P2xsU9VjVMigoydr3FMCe2dhhUNA69wc6F3I7qBvcfI38BiLqiuw</recordid><startdate>19970201</startdate><enddate>19970201</enddate><creator>Jeffery, Katie JM</creator><creator>Read, Steven J</creator><creator>Peto, Timothy EA</creator><creator>Mayon-White, Richard T</creator><creator>Bangham, Charles RM</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Lancet</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970201</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results</title><author>Jeffery, Katie JM ; Read, Steven J ; Peto, Timothy EA ; Mayon-White, Richard T ; Bangham, Charles RM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-6fc66c60b0a9def8047d90e6320b07aef1e463289c7de3871a606339ff2827e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Diseases - virology</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>RNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Virus Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Virus Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Virus Diseases - virology</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Katie JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Timothy EA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayon-White, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangham, Charles RM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeffery, Katie JM</au><au>Read, Steven J</au><au>Peto, Timothy EA</au><au>Mayon-White, Richard T</au><au>Bangham, Charles RM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>1997-02-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>349</volume><issue>9048</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>313-317</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Standard laboratory techniques, such as viral culture and serology, provide only circumstantial or retrospective evidence of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of PCR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS.
We examined all the CSF samples that were received at our diagnostic virology laboratory between May, 1994, and May, 1996, by nested PCR for viruses associated with CNS infections in the UK. We collected clinical and laboratory data for 410 patients from Oxford city hospitals (the Oxford cohort) whose CSF was examined between May, 1994, and May, 1995. These patients were classified according to the likelihood of a viral infection of the CNS. We used stratified logistic regression analysis to identify the clinical factors independently associated with a positive PCR result. We calculated likelihood ratios to estimate the clinical usefulness of PCR amplification of CSF.
We tested 2233 consecutive CSF samples from 2162 patients. A positive PCR result was obtained in 143 patients, including 22 from the Oxford cohort. Logistic regression analysis of the Oxford cohort showed that fever, a virus-specific rash, and a CSF white-cell count of 5/μL or more were independent predictors of a positive PCR result. The likelihood ratio for a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a positive PCR result, relative to a negative PCR result, was 88·2 (95% CI 20·6–378). The likelihood ratio for a possible diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS in a patient with a negative PCR result, relative to a positive PCR result, was 0·10 (0·03–0·39).
A patient with a positive PCR result was 88 times as likely to have a definite diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS as a patient with a negative PCR result. A negative PCR result can be used with moderate confidence to rule out a diagnosis of viral infection of the CNS. We believe that PCR will become the first-line diagnostic test for viral meningitis and encephalitis.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9024374</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08107-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 1997-02, Vol.349 (9048), p.313-317 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78802676 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Body fluids Central nervous system Central Nervous System Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid Central Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis Central Nervous System Diseases - virology Clinical Protocols Cohort Studies DNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid Female Human viral diseases Humans Infections Infectious diseases Logistic Models Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nervous system Polymerase Chain Reaction Prospective Studies Regression analysis RNA, Viral - cerebrospinal fluid Tests United Kingdom Viral diseases Viral diseases of the nervous system Virus Diseases - cerebrospinal fluid Virus Diseases - diagnosis Virus Diseases - virology Viruses |
title | Diagnosis of viral infections of the central nervous system: clinical interpretation of PCR results |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A12%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20viral%20infections%20of%20the%20central%20nervous%20system:%20clinical%20interpretation%20of%20PCR%20results&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Jeffery,%20Katie%20JM&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.volume=349&rft.issue=9048&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=313-317&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08107-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E11075018%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199050597&rft_id=info:pmid/9024374&rft_els_id=S014067369608107X&rfr_iscdi=true |