The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A Social Dominance Approach
The authors present archival evidence that men disproportionately hold occupational roles that enhance group-based inequality and that women disproportionately hold roles that attenuate group-based inequality. The authors found evidence for 3 processes that may contribute to this pattern: self-selec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1997-01, Vol.72 (1), p.37-53 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 53 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 37 |
| container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Pratto, Felicia Stallworth, Lisa M Sidanius, Jim Siers, Bret |
| description | The authors present archival evidence that men disproportionately hold occupational roles that enhance group-based inequality and that women disproportionately hold roles that attenuate group-based inequality. The authors found evidence for 3 processes that may contribute to this pattern: self-selection that is based on gender-linked differences in support for group inequality (social dominance orientation), hiring biases that are based on matching job applicants' group equality values with the hierarchy function of the job, and gender-stereotyped hiring biases. These processes were found across a number of occupations and participant variables. The social systems nature of these processes and the implications of the results for theoretical understandings of gender roles, social inequality, and theories of stereotyping are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.37 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78800112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39025409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-4134619882c8b1612031b3d89db36b1527cacf7fecbff290d54c1c9cfca408a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSbdJf0APBdOWHgJ2ZzSSJR1DaLeBQKAkZyHLMnXw2q5kH_LvY7PL0pbSPQ3M--YNM4-xdwgFAqkvAJznJFEUihdYkHrBNmjI5EgoX7LNUX_N3qT0CABCcn7GzgyAJkUbVtz_DNk29HWI2daNWdtnd97Po5vaoXdd9mPoQnY1Ta7td6GfLtirxnUpvD3Uc_bw7ev99ff89m57c311m7sScMoFkijRaM29rrBEDoQV1drUFZUVSq68841qgq-ahhuopfDojW-8E6CdonP2ee87xuHXHNJkd23yoetcH4Y5WaU1ACI_CZYoSUpFJ0GplIRS65MgGeBSgFnAD3-Bj8Mcl6etWwUJLEv4H8TBaCSDqxPuIR-HlGJo7BjbnYtPFsGuQds1SLsGaRW3aGn90PuD8VztQn2cOCS76J8OukvedU10vW_TEVtO0Mqs117uMTc6O6Yn7-LU-i4kP8e4BL70xt92fvw3_Af1DO3Mxwo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614341660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A Social Dominance Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Pratto, Felicia ; Stallworth, Lisa M ; Sidanius, Jim ; Siers, Bret</creator><contributor>Kruglanski, Arie W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pratto, Felicia ; Stallworth, Lisa M ; Sidanius, Jim ; Siers, Bret ; Kruglanski, Arie W</creatorcontrib><description>The authors present archival evidence that men disproportionately hold occupational roles that enhance group-based inequality and that women disproportionately hold roles that attenuate group-based inequality. The authors found evidence for 3 processes that may contribute to this pattern: self-selection that is based on gender-linked differences in support for group inequality (social dominance orientation), hiring biases that are based on matching job applicants' group equality values with the hierarchy function of the job, and gender-stereotyped hiring biases. These processes were found across a number of occupations and participant variables. The social systems nature of these processes and the implications of the results for theoretical understandings of gender roles, social inequality, and theories of stereotyping are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.37</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9008373</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitudes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Career Choice ; Dominance ; Dominance Hierarchy ; Equality ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Gender Gap ; Gender Identity ; Hierarchy ; Hierarchy, Social ; Hiring Practices ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Occupational psychology ; Occupational Roles ; Occupational Segregation ; Occupational Status ; Occupations ; Organization and management. Professional relation ; Personnel Selection ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Role ; Roles ; Sex Factors ; Sex Roles ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social cognition ; Social Dominance ; Social dominance theory ; Social Inequality ; Social Processes ; Social psychology ; Social Values ; Stereotyping ; Theories ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1997-01, Vol.72 (1), p.37-53</ispartof><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 1997</rights><rights>1997, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-4134619882c8b1612031b3d89db36b1527cacf7fecbff290d54c1c9cfca408a73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930,31004,31005,33779,33780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2548798$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9008373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kruglanski, Arie W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pratto, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallworth, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidanius, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siers, Bret</creatorcontrib><title>The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A Social Dominance Approach</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>The authors present archival evidence that men disproportionately hold occupational roles that enhance group-based inequality and that women disproportionately hold roles that attenuate group-based inequality. The authors found evidence for 3 processes that may contribute to this pattern: self-selection that is based on gender-linked differences in support for group inequality (social dominance orientation), hiring biases that are based on matching job applicants' group equality values with the hierarchy function of the job, and gender-stereotyped hiring biases. These processes were found across a number of occupations and participant variables. The social systems nature of these processes and the implications of the results for theoretical understandings of gender roles, social inequality, and theories of stereotyping are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Dominance Hierarchy</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Gap</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Hierarchy, Social</subject><subject>Hiring Practices</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Roles</subject><subject>Occupational Segregation</subject><subject>Occupational Status</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Organization and management. Professional relation</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sex Roles</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social cognition</subject><subject>Social Dominance</subject><subject>Social dominance theory</subject><subject>Social Inequality</subject><subject>Social Processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSbdJf0APBdOWHgJ2ZzSSJR1DaLeBQKAkZyHLMnXw2q5kH_LvY7PL0pbSPQ3M--YNM4-xdwgFAqkvAJznJFEUihdYkHrBNmjI5EgoX7LNUX_N3qT0CABCcn7GzgyAJkUbVtz_DNk29HWI2daNWdtnd97Po5vaoXdd9mPoQnY1Ta7td6GfLtirxnUpvD3Uc_bw7ev99ff89m57c311m7sScMoFkijRaM29rrBEDoQV1drUFZUVSq68841qgq-ahhuopfDojW-8E6CdonP2ee87xuHXHNJkd23yoetcH4Y5WaU1ACI_CZYoSUpFJ0GplIRS65MgGeBSgFnAD3-Bj8Mcl6etWwUJLEv4H8TBaCSDqxPuIR-HlGJo7BjbnYtPFsGuQds1SLsGaRW3aGn90PuD8VztQn2cOCS76J8OukvedU10vW_TEVtO0Mqs117uMTc6O6Yn7-LU-i4kP8e4BL70xt92fvw3_Af1DO3Mxwo</recordid><startdate>199701</startdate><enddate>199701</enddate><creator>Pratto, Felicia</creator><creator>Stallworth, Lisa M</creator><creator>Sidanius, Jim</creator><creator>Siers, Bret</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199701</creationdate><title>The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment</title><author>Pratto, Felicia ; Stallworth, Lisa M ; Sidanius, Jim ; Siers, Bret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-4134619882c8b1612031b3d89db36b1527cacf7fecbff290d54c1c9cfca408a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Dominance Hierarchy</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Gap</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Hierarchy, Social</topic><topic>Hiring Practices</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Roles</topic><topic>Occupational Segregation</topic><topic>Occupational Status</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Organization and management. Professional relation</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sex Roles</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social cognition</topic><topic>Social Dominance</topic><topic>Social dominance theory</topic><topic>Social Inequality</topic><topic>Social Processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pratto, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallworth, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidanius, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siers, Bret</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pratto, Felicia</au><au>Stallworth, Lisa M</au><au>Sidanius, Jim</au><au>Siers, Bret</au><au>Kruglanski, Arie W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A Social Dominance Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>1997-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>37-53</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>The authors present archival evidence that men disproportionately hold occupational roles that enhance group-based inequality and that women disproportionately hold roles that attenuate group-based inequality. The authors found evidence for 3 processes that may contribute to this pattern: self-selection that is based on gender-linked differences in support for group inequality (social dominance orientation), hiring biases that are based on matching job applicants' group equality values with the hierarchy function of the job, and gender-stereotyped hiring biases. These processes were found across a number of occupations and participant variables. The social systems nature of these processes and the implications of the results for theoretical understandings of gender roles, social inequality, and theories of stereotyping are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>9008373</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.37</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 1997-01, Vol.72 (1), p.37-53 |
| issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78800112 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Attitudes Biological and medical sciences Career Choice Dominance Dominance Hierarchy Equality Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender Gender differences Gender Gap Gender Identity Hierarchy Hierarchy, Social Hiring Practices Human Human Sex Differences Humans Linear Models Male Men Middle Aged Occupational psychology Occupational Roles Occupational Segregation Occupational Status Occupations Organization and management. Professional relation Personnel Selection Psychological Theory Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Role Roles Sex Factors Sex Roles Sex Stereotypes Social cognition Social Dominance Social dominance theory Social Inequality Social Processes Social psychology Social Values Stereotyping Theories Women |
| title | The Gender Gap in Occupational Role Attainment: A Social Dominance Approach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T18%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gender%20Gap%20in%20Occupational%20Role%20Attainment:%20A%20Social%20Dominance%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Pratto,%20Felicia&rft.date=1997-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=37-53&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.37&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E39025409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614341660&rft_id=info:pmid/9008373&rfr_iscdi=true |