Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis
The practice of combining forward and backward memory span, as represented so prominently on the various Wechsler Scales, to arrive at a composite score for clinical interpretation is examined historically and actuarially using a large ( N = 1,342) nationally stratified random sample of children fro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 1997, Vol.12 (1), p.29-40 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 40 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 29 |
| container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Reynolds, Cecil R. |
| description | The practice of combining forward and backward memory span, as represented so prominently on the various Wechsler Scales, to arrive at a composite score for clinical interpretation is examined historically and actuarially using a large (
N = 1,342) nationally stratified random sample of children from ages 5 years through 19 years. Past literature does not support the additive nature of forward and backward memory span as elements of a common process. Factor analyses of forward and backward recall using both digits and letters indicate that the two memory processes are distinct as well and should not be combined for clinical interpretation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0887-6177(96)00015-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78764620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0887617796000157</els_id><sourcerecordid>78764620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-159431f2ace99fa1cfd751b0c2389decb4cd4b7e1dcd9e9db83dc338f8bbe4d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5ScRA_VpE2b9CQirgqKB_UckskUo22zJrvK_nu7H-jR0zDwvPMyDyFHnJ1zxquLZ6aUzCou5WldnTHGeJnJLTLmShZZqUSxTca_yIjspfQ-QCXn-S4ZcVGqAcnH5HES4reJjpreUWvgY7V02IW4oGlqeprewrx1tA8zapFC6Kzv0dEmRAqt7z2YdgibdpF8OiA7jWkTHm7mPnmd3Lxc32UPT7f311cPGQimZhkva1HwJjeAdd0YDo2TJbcM8kLVDsEKcMJK5A5cjbWzqnBQFKpR1qJwotgnJ-u70xg-55hmuvMJsG1Nj2GetFSyElXOBrBcgxBDShEbPY2-M3GhOdNLj3rlUS8l6brSK49aDrnjTcHcduj-UhtxA3C5BnB488tj1Ak89oDOR4SZdsH_U_EDG46D7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78764620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Reynolds, Cecil R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Cecil R.</creatorcontrib><description>The practice of combining forward and backward memory span, as represented so prominently on the various Wechsler Scales, to arrive at a composite score for clinical interpretation is examined historically and actuarially using a large (
N = 1,342) nationally stratified random sample of children from ages 5 years through 19 years. Past literature does not support the additive nature of forward and backward memory span as elements of a common process. Factor analyses of forward and backward recall using both digits and letters indicate that the two memory processes are distinct as well and should not be combined for clinical interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6177(96)00015-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14588432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 1997, Vol.12 (1), p.29-40</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-159431f2ace99fa1cfd751b0c2389decb4cd4b7e1dcd9e9db83dc338f8bbe4d43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14588432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Cecil R.</creatorcontrib><title>Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>The practice of combining forward and backward memory span, as represented so prominently on the various Wechsler Scales, to arrive at a composite score for clinical interpretation is examined historically and actuarially using a large (
N = 1,342) nationally stratified random sample of children from ages 5 years through 19 years. Past literature does not support the additive nature of forward and backward memory span as elements of a common process. Factor analyses of forward and backward recall using both digits and letters indicate that the two memory processes are distinct as well and should not be combined for clinical interpretation.</description><issn>0887-6177</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxE5ScRA_VpE2b9CQirgqKB_UckskUo22zJrvK_nu7H-jR0zDwvPMyDyFHnJ1zxquLZ6aUzCou5WldnTHGeJnJLTLmShZZqUSxTca_yIjspfQ-QCXn-S4ZcVGqAcnH5HES4reJjpreUWvgY7V02IW4oGlqeprewrx1tA8zapFC6Kzv0dEmRAqt7z2YdgibdpF8OiA7jWkTHm7mPnmd3Lxc32UPT7f311cPGQimZhkva1HwJjeAdd0YDo2TJbcM8kLVDsEKcMJK5A5cjbWzqnBQFKpR1qJwotgnJ-u70xg-55hmuvMJsG1Nj2GetFSyElXOBrBcgxBDShEbPY2-M3GhOdNLj3rlUS8l6brSK49aDrnjTcHcduj-UhtxA3C5BnB488tj1Ak89oDOR4SZdsH_U_EDG46D7A</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Reynolds, Cecil R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis</title><author>Reynolds, Cecil R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-159431f2ace99fa1cfd751b0c2389decb4cd4b7e1dcd9e9db83dc338f8bbe4d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Cecil R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reynolds, Cecil R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>29-40</pages><issn>0887-6177</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><abstract>The practice of combining forward and backward memory span, as represented so prominently on the various Wechsler Scales, to arrive at a composite score for clinical interpretation is examined historically and actuarially using a large (
N = 1,342) nationally stratified random sample of children from ages 5 years through 19 years. Past literature does not support the additive nature of forward and backward memory span as elements of a common process. Factor analyses of forward and backward recall using both digits and letters indicate that the two memory processes are distinct as well and should not be combined for clinical interpretation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>14588432</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0887-6177(96)00015-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-6177 |
| ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 1997, Vol.12 (1), p.29-40 |
| issn | 0887-6177 1873-5843 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78764620 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| title | Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forward%20and%20backward%20memory%20span%20should%20not%20be%20combined%20for%20clinical%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Reynolds,%20Cecil%20R.&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=29-40&rft.issn=0887-6177&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0887-6177(96)00015-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78764620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78764620&rft_id=info:pmid/14588432&rft_els_id=S0887617796000157&rfr_iscdi=true |