Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990

In all US states, new arrivals of immigrants are fuelling the growth of the foreign‐born population. For a few states, though, the most recent immigrants do not arrive from abroad; many come from other parts of the US, resettling after their initial arrival. Very little information has previously be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of population geography 1997-03, Vol.3 (1), p.1-13
1. Verfasser: Nogle, June Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of population geography
container_volume 3
creator Nogle, June Marie
description In all US states, new arrivals of immigrants are fuelling the growth of the foreign‐born population. For a few states, though, the most recent immigrants do not arrive from abroad; many come from other parts of the US, resettling after their initial arrival. Very little information has previously been available on the number or characteristics of foreign‐born persons who migrate within the US. Using 1990 census data, this paper calculates the flow volume between states and from abroad; also, a multinomial logistic regression model of destination choice is estimated for resettlers and for migrants from abroad. There are three major findings. Firstly, Florida and California are the largest recipients of foreign‐born resettlers; New York is the biggest loser of secondary migrants. Secondly, the presence of large communities of Mexicans in California and Cubans in Florida are very attractive to both resettlers and migrants from abroad. Thirdly, immigrants that are most in need of ethnic support networks (i.e. new arrivals or immigrants with low human capital resources) are most likely to choose one of the traditional immigration states as a destination. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199703)3:1<1::AID-IJPG55>3.0.CO;2-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78761144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78761144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3145-8862958d955c482d6c88c23a85088e27b3ecc2f379fc720dfa34f1ff5dde9bce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kO9r1DAYx4Mobk7_Bekr2cCc-dE0yU2E2blaOb2Dcwx885BLk9HZa2fSQ_ff29LjfKFIXiR8efh883wQOqdkRglhb07XZV6eUaI1poyRU6q1JPyMz-lbOp9flJe4_LQqhHjHZ2SWL88ZXjxCx4f5x-NbSsxTLY7QsxjvCCEqJelTdEQZZ5Sm2TGal23vQmua5HN9G0xfd22yMv2YxcR3IbleJ1ddcPVti993oX2dUK0EHv5CnqMn3jTRvdjfJ-j66sPX_CNeLIsyv1hgy2kqsFIZ00JVWgibKlZlVinLuFGCKOWY3HBnLfNcam8lI5U3PPXUe1FVTm-s4yfo1cS9D92PnYs9bOtoXdOY1nW7CFLJbFgmHQbX06ANXYzBebgP9daEB6AERqUAo1IYFcGoCCalwIEOBwalMCkdEgL5EhgsBurLff1us3XVH-beIT_s_bNu3MNfnf-r_GfjPhm4eOLWsXe_DlwTvkMmuRRw86UApgv57eaygBX_DaWjnU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78761144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nogle, June Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Nogle, June Marie</creatorcontrib><description>In all US states, new arrivals of immigrants are fuelling the growth of the foreign‐born population. For a few states, though, the most recent immigrants do not arrive from abroad; many come from other parts of the US, resettling after their initial arrival. Very little information has previously been available on the number or characteristics of foreign‐born persons who migrate within the US. Using 1990 census data, this paper calculates the flow volume between states and from abroad; also, a multinomial logistic regression model of destination choice is estimated for resettlers and for migrants from abroad. There are three major findings. Firstly, Florida and California are the largest recipients of foreign‐born resettlers; New York is the biggest loser of secondary migrants. Secondly, the presence of large communities of Mexicans in California and Cubans in Florida are very attractive to both resettlers and migrants from abroad. Thirdly, immigrants that are most in need of ethnic support networks (i.e. new arrivals or immigrants with low human capital resources) are most likely to choose one of the traditional immigration states as a destination. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-3495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199703)3:1&lt;1::AID-IJPG55&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12321146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Americas ; Culture ; Demography ; Developed Countries ; Emigration and Immigration ; Ethnic Groups ; immigrant ; multinomial ; North America ; Population ; Population Characteristics ; Population Dynamics ; PUMS ; resettlement ; secondary migration ; United States</subject><ispartof>International journal of population geography, 1997-03, Vol.3 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>excerpt</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1220%28199703%293%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-IJPG55%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291099-1220%28199703%293%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-IJPG55%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12321146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nogle, June Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990</title><title>International journal of population geography</title><addtitle>International Journal of Population Geography</addtitle><description>In all US states, new arrivals of immigrants are fuelling the growth of the foreign‐born population. For a few states, though, the most recent immigrants do not arrive from abroad; many come from other parts of the US, resettling after their initial arrival. Very little information has previously been available on the number or characteristics of foreign‐born persons who migrate within the US. Using 1990 census data, this paper calculates the flow volume between states and from abroad; also, a multinomial logistic regression model of destination choice is estimated for resettlers and for migrants from abroad. There are three major findings. Firstly, Florida and California are the largest recipients of foreign‐born resettlers; New York is the biggest loser of secondary migrants. Secondly, the presence of large communities of Mexicans in California and Cubans in Florida are very attractive to both resettlers and migrants from abroad. Thirdly, immigrants that are most in need of ethnic support networks (i.e. new arrivals or immigrants with low human capital resources) are most likely to choose one of the traditional immigration states as a destination. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Americas</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>Emigration and Immigration</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>immigrant</subject><subject>multinomial</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Characteristics</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>PUMS</subject><subject>resettlement</subject><subject>secondary migration</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1077-3495</issn><issn>1099-1220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kO9r1DAYx4Mobk7_Bekr2cCc-dE0yU2E2blaOb2Dcwx885BLk9HZa2fSQ_ff29LjfKFIXiR8efh883wQOqdkRglhb07XZV6eUaI1poyRU6q1JPyMz-lbOp9flJe4_LQqhHjHZ2SWL88ZXjxCx4f5x-NbSsxTLY7QsxjvCCEqJelTdEQZZ5Sm2TGal23vQmua5HN9G0xfd22yMv2YxcR3IbleJ1ddcPVti993oX2dUK0EHv5CnqMn3jTRvdjfJ-j66sPX_CNeLIsyv1hgy2kqsFIZ00JVWgibKlZlVinLuFGCKOWY3HBnLfNcam8lI5U3PPXUe1FVTm-s4yfo1cS9D92PnYs9bOtoXdOY1nW7CFLJbFgmHQbX06ANXYzBebgP9daEB6AERqUAo1IYFcGoCCalwIEOBwalMCkdEgL5EhgsBurLff1us3XVH-beIT_s_bNu3MNfnf-r_GfjPhm4eOLWsXe_DlwTvkMmuRRw86UApgv57eaygBX_DaWjnU4</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>Nogle, June Marie</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990</title><author>Nogle, June Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3145-8862958d955c482d6c88c23a85088e27b3ecc2f379fc720dfa34f1ff5dde9bce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Americas</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>Emigration and Immigration</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>immigrant</topic><topic>multinomial</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Characteristics</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>PUMS</topic><topic>resettlement</topic><topic>secondary migration</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nogle, June Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of population geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nogle, June Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990</atitle><jtitle>International journal of population geography</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Population Geography</addtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1077-3495</issn><eissn>1099-1220</eissn><abstract>In all US states, new arrivals of immigrants are fuelling the growth of the foreign‐born population. For a few states, though, the most recent immigrants do not arrive from abroad; many come from other parts of the US, resettling after their initial arrival. Very little information has previously been available on the number or characteristics of foreign‐born persons who migrate within the US. Using 1990 census data, this paper calculates the flow volume between states and from abroad; also, a multinomial logistic regression model of destination choice is estimated for resettlers and for migrants from abroad. There are three major findings. Firstly, Florida and California are the largest recipients of foreign‐born resettlers; New York is the biggest loser of secondary migrants. Secondly, the presence of large communities of Mexicans in California and Cubans in Florida are very attractive to both resettlers and migrants from abroad. Thirdly, immigrants that are most in need of ethnic support networks (i.e. new arrivals or immigrants with low human capital resources) are most likely to choose one of the traditional immigration states as a destination. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>12321146</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199703)3:1&lt;1::AID-IJPG55&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1077-3495
ispartof International journal of population geography, 1997-03, Vol.3 (1), p.1-13
issn 1077-3495
1099-1220
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78761144
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Americas
Culture
Demography
Developed Countries
Emigration and Immigration
Ethnic Groups
immigrant
multinomial
North America
Population
Population Characteristics
Population Dynamics
PUMS
resettlement
secondary migration
United States
title Internal Migration Patterns for US Foreign-Born, 1985-1990
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T03%3A01%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Internal%20Migration%20Patterns%20for%20US%20Foreign-Born,%201985-1990&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20population%20geography&rft.au=Nogle,%20June%20Marie&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1077-3495&rft.eissn=1099-1220&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199703)3:1%3C1::AID-IJPG55%3E3.0.CO;2-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78761144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78761144&rft_id=info:pmid/12321146&rfr_iscdi=true