Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors

An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion science 1996-12, Vol.17 (4), p.611-618
Hauptverfasser: Kadar, J G, Arseniev, L, Schnitger, K, Südmeier, I, Zaki, M, Battmer, K, Jacobs, R, Diedrich, H, Poliwoda, H, Stangel, W, Link, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 618
container_issue 4
container_start_page 611
container_title Transfusion science
container_volume 17
creator Kadar, J G
Arseniev, L
Schnitger, K
Südmeier, I
Zaki, M
Battmer, K
Jacobs, R
Diedrich, H
Poliwoda, H
Stangel, W
Link, H
description An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0955-3886(96)90099-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78733255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78733255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-de3f0b9103336e08a9dea0cb6be4cef645aa4275991ed085ca4c7de5d5d9be3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx_OguDn9E5Q8iT5Uk6Vpm0cZbgoDHzafwzW5aqRtatMi86-33YYIBwd33-_9-BByxdk9Zzx52DAlZSSyLLlVyZ1iTKlInpDpX3lCzkP4ZIzFnLMzMhldmUz4lNgtmo_aGSgp1JYGKLDbUQgNmi5QX9C89N7uexW0rf-mXQt1aEqoO-icr2kfXP1OV9Fis6SVz13pftDSAipX7qj1tW_DBTktoAx4ecwz8rZ82i6eo_Xr6mXxuI6MYLKLLIqC5YozIUSCLANlEZjJkxxjg0USS4B4nkqlOFqWSQOxSS1KK63KUYCYkZvD3Kb1Xz2GTlcuGCyHY9H3QadZKsRcykEoD0LT-hBaLHTTuuG_neZMj3D0Hqke2Wk1xIhUj77r44I-r9D-cx14il9fHHYe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78733255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kadar, J G ; Arseniev, L ; Schnitger, K ; Südmeier, I ; Zaki, M ; Battmer, K ; Jacobs, R ; Diedrich, H ; Poliwoda, H ; Stangel, W ; Link, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadar, J G ; Arseniev, L ; Schnitger, K ; Südmeier, I ; Zaki, M ; Battmer, K ; Jacobs, R ; Diedrich, H ; Poliwoda, H ; Stangel, W ; Link, H</creatorcontrib><description>An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0955-3886(96)90099-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10168561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration &amp; dosage ; Health technology assessment ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Leukapheresis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>Transfusion science, 1996-12, Vol.17 (4), p.611-618</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-de3f0b9103336e08a9dea0cb6be4cef645aa4275991ed085ca4c7de5d5d9be3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10168561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadar, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arseniev, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Südmeier, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battmer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliwoda, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangel, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, H</creatorcontrib><title>Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors</title><title>Transfusion science</title><addtitle>Transfus Sci</addtitle><description>An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukapheresis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>0955-3886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx_OguDn9E5Q8iT5Uk6Vpm0cZbgoDHzafwzW5aqRtatMi86-33YYIBwd33-_9-BByxdk9Zzx52DAlZSSyLLlVyZ1iTKlInpDpX3lCzkP4ZIzFnLMzMhldmUz4lNgtmo_aGSgp1JYGKLDbUQgNmi5QX9C89N7uexW0rf-mXQt1aEqoO-icr2kfXP1OV9Fis6SVz13pftDSAipX7qj1tW_DBTktoAx4ecwz8rZ82i6eo_Xr6mXxuI6MYLKLLIqC5YozIUSCLANlEZjJkxxjg0USS4B4nkqlOFqWSQOxSS1KK63KUYCYkZvD3Kb1Xz2GTlcuGCyHY9H3QadZKsRcykEoD0LT-hBaLHTTuuG_neZMj3D0Hqke2Wk1xIhUj77r44I-r9D-cx14il9fHHYe</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Kadar, J G</creator><creator>Arseniev, L</creator><creator>Schnitger, K</creator><creator>Südmeier, I</creator><creator>Zaki, M</creator><creator>Battmer, K</creator><creator>Jacobs, R</creator><creator>Diedrich, H</creator><creator>Poliwoda, H</creator><creator>Stangel, W</creator><creator>Link, H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors</title><author>Kadar, J G ; Arseniev, L ; Schnitger, K ; Südmeier, I ; Zaki, M ; Battmer, K ; Jacobs, R ; Diedrich, H ; Poliwoda, H ; Stangel, W ; Link, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-de3f0b9103336e08a9dea0cb6be4cef645aa4275991ed085ca4c7de5d5d9be3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukapheresis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadar, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arseniev, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Südmeier, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaki, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battmer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliwoda, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangel, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadar, J G</au><au>Arseniev, L</au><au>Schnitger, K</au><au>Südmeier, I</au><au>Zaki, M</au><au>Battmer, K</au><au>Jacobs, R</au><au>Diedrich, H</au><au>Poliwoda, H</au><au>Stangel, W</au><au>Link, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion science</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Sci</addtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>611-618</pages><issn>0955-3886</issn><abstract>An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>10168561</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0955-3886(96)90099-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-3886
ispartof Transfusion science, 1996-12, Vol.17 (4), p.611-618
issn 0955-3886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78733255
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Female
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage
Health technology assessment
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Leukapheresis
Male
Middle Aged
Tissue Donors
title Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical%20and%20safety%20aspects%20of%20blood%20and%20marrow%20transplantation%20using%20G-CSF%20mobilized%20family%20donors&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20science&rft.au=Kadar,%20J%20G&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=611-618&rft.issn=0955-3886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0955-3886(96)90099-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78733255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78733255&rft_id=info:pmid/10168561&rfr_iscdi=true