Low back pain : A primary care challenge

Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976) PA. 1976), 1996-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2826-2832
Hauptverfasser: DEYO, R. A, PHILLIPS, W. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2832
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2826
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976)
container_volume 21
creator DEYO, R. A
PHILLIPS, W. R
description Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78724014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78724014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-766f71b73abbc87e96d8681be60a3d8e5ad132e909d5fc6f67b54822214cf2c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gpCDiJfVTLL58laKX1DwoueQZBNd3e7WpIv4793atXMZmPd9Z4YHIQzkGoiWN2QoKRgtQGsBFDgptiN2gKbAqSoAuD5EU8IELWjJxDE6yfljcAgGeoImGoBKIqboatl9Y2f9J17busW3eI7XqV7Z9IO9TQH7d9s0oX0Lp-go2iaHs7HP0Ov93cvisVg-Pzwt5svCU1VuCilElOAks855JYMWlRIKXBDEskoFbitgNGiiKx69iEI6XipKKZQ-Ug9shi53e9ep--pD3phVnX1oGtuGrs9GKklLAuVgVDujT13OKUQzPm6AmC0k8w_J7CH9jdgQPR9v9G4Vqn1wpDLoF6Nus7dNTLb1dd7bKGecCc5-AQaLa-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78724014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low back pain : A primary care challenge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>DEYO, R. A ; PHILLIPS, W. R</creator><creatorcontrib>DEYO, R. A ; PHILLIPS, W. R</creatorcontrib><description>Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9112706</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Diseases of the spine ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Low Back Pain - etiology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Medical sciences ; Primary Health Care</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976), 1996-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2826-2832</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-766f71b73abbc87e96d8681be60a3d8e5ad132e909d5fc6f67b54822214cf2c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2535365$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9112706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DEYO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, W. R</creatorcontrib><title>Low back pain : A primary care challenge</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the spine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gpCDiJfVTLL58laKX1DwoueQZBNd3e7WpIv4793atXMZmPd9Z4YHIQzkGoiWN2QoKRgtQGsBFDgptiN2gKbAqSoAuD5EU8IELWjJxDE6yfljcAgGeoImGoBKIqboatl9Y2f9J17busW3eI7XqV7Z9IO9TQH7d9s0oX0Lp-go2iaHs7HP0Ov93cvisVg-Pzwt5svCU1VuCilElOAks855JYMWlRIKXBDEskoFbitgNGiiKx69iEI6XipKKZQ-Ug9shi53e9ep--pD3phVnX1oGtuGrs9GKklLAuVgVDujT13OKUQzPm6AmC0k8w_J7CH9jdgQPR9v9G4Vqn1wpDLoF6Nus7dNTLb1dd7bKGecCc5-AQaLa-0</recordid><startdate>19961215</startdate><enddate>19961215</enddate><creator>DEYO, R. A</creator><creator>PHILLIPS, W. R</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961215</creationdate><title>Low back pain : A primary care challenge</title><author>DEYO, R. A ; PHILLIPS, W. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-766f71b73abbc87e96d8681be60a3d8e5ad132e909d5fc6f67b54822214cf2c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the spine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DEYO, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, W. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DEYO, R. A</au><au>PHILLIPS, W. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low back pain : A primary care challenge</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1996-12-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2826</spage><epage>2832</epage><pages>2826-2832</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>9112706</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976), 1996-12, Vol.21 (24), p.2826-2832
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78724014
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Diseases of the spine
Humans
Low Back Pain - diagnosis
Low Back Pain - etiology
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Medical sciences
Primary Health Care
title Low back pain : A primary care challenge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A40%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20back%20pain%20:%20A%20primary%20care%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20PA.%201976)&rft.au=DEYO,%20R.%20A&rft.date=1996-12-15&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2826&rft.epage=2832&rft.pages=2826-2832&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78724014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78724014&rft_id=info:pmid/9112706&rfr_iscdi=true