Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents

Coastal drownings claim on average 82 people per year in Australia. Beach flags are a primary safety strategy used on beaches. They are located away from rip currents, which are the main beach hazard affecting swimmers. Little is known about the behavioural and motivational factors associated with p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2010-11, Vol.42 (6), p.1785-1804
Hauptverfasser: Sherker, Shauna, Williamson, Ann, Hatfield, Julie, Brander, Rob, Hayen, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1804
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1785
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 42
creator Sherker, Shauna
Williamson, Ann
Hatfield, Julie
Brander, Rob
Hayen, Andrew
description Coastal drownings claim on average 82 people per year in Australia. Beach flags are a primary safety strategy used on beaches. They are located away from rip currents, which are the main beach hazard affecting swimmers. Little is known about the behavioural and motivational factors associated with people choosing where to swim in relation to flags and rips. To assess the beliefs and behaviours of beachgoers in relation to beach flags and rip currents. Beachgoers at beaches in NSW were interviewed about their swimming beliefs and behaviours. They were asked to indicate on pictures depicting beach scenarios involving beach flags and fixed rip currents, where they would and would not swim. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine predictors of correct and incorrect swimming behaviour. Beachgoers who are aged from 30 to 49 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16, 0.74, p = 0.006) are less likely to choose to swim between the flags than other swimmers. In addition, beachgoers who are at the beach with children are significantly more likely to choose to swim between the flags (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.39, 5.40, p = 0.004). Beachgoers with basic knowledge about rip currents are significantly more likely to swim away from the rip (OR 11.59, 95% CI 5.89, 22.81, p < 0.001). Ocean swimmers aged from 30 to 49 years may choose to swim outside the flags, though they may not necessarily be swimming in the rip. Swimming outside of the flags may be linked with experience. The flags appear to be attractive to parents and carers of children. Whilst the flags indicate a relatively safe area of the beach, it is still vitally important for parents and carers to supervise children in this area. Basic rip current knowledge is an essential component in developing national interventions aimed at reducing coastal drowning. Beachgoers clearly need to know what a rip looks like in order to actively avoid swimming in it.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457510001363</els_id><sourcerecordid>749005663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cd55d07acf0898eff7b1a9b564f509504a7ea2909173498bed5de7f0d62e95b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFu2zAQhomiQeM4fYAugbZOco8UKYrolBhtEyBAM3gnKPLo0JAlh5QMZMtr9PX6JKFhN2M63R34_T_Aj5AvFBYUaP1tszBmt2CQb-ALYPCBzGgjVclAyI9kBgC05EKKc3KR0iafspHiEzlnIFlTVzAjDzdo7ON6wJj-vvwpWuwC-lSY3uX90ezDMMVUhL6I2JkxDH0xDvklZwrfmfWRjGFX2ClG7Md0Sc686RJ-Ps05Wf38sVrelve_f90tr-9LWzV8LK0TwoE01kOjGvRettSoVtTcC1ACuJFomAJFZcVV06ITDqUHVzNUoq3m5OuxdheHpwnTqLchWew60-MwJZ0_yoBzxv9PcgUg6rrKJD2SNg4pRfR6F8PWxGdNQR-E643OwvVBuAaus_CcuTq1T-0W3Vvin-EMfD8CmGXsA0adbMDeogsR7ajdEN6pfwXgdJEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749005663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sherker, Shauna ; Williamson, Ann ; Hatfield, Julie ; Brander, Rob ; Hayen, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherker, Shauna ; Williamson, Ann ; Hatfield, Julie ; Brander, Rob ; Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal drownings claim on average 82 people per year in Australia. Beach flags are a primary safety strategy used on beaches. They are located away from rip currents, which are the main beach hazard affecting swimmers. Little is known about the behavioural and motivational factors associated with people choosing where to swim in relation to flags and rips. To assess the beliefs and behaviours of beachgoers in relation to beach flags and rip currents. Beachgoers at beaches in NSW were interviewed about their swimming beliefs and behaviours. They were asked to indicate on pictures depicting beach scenarios involving beach flags and fixed rip currents, where they would and would not swim. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine predictors of correct and incorrect swimming behaviour. Beachgoers who are aged from 30 to 49 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16, 0.74, p = 0.006) are less likely to choose to swim between the flags than other swimmers. In addition, beachgoers who are at the beach with children are significantly more likely to choose to swim between the flags (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.39, 5.40, p = 0.004). Beachgoers with basic knowledge about rip currents are significantly more likely to swim away from the rip (OR 11.59, 95% CI 5.89, 22.81, p &lt; 0.001). Ocean swimmers aged from 30 to 49 years may choose to swim outside the flags, though they may not necessarily be swimming in the rip. Swimming outside of the flags may be linked with experience. The flags appear to be attractive to parents and carers of children. Whilst the flags indicate a relatively safe area of the beach, it is still vitally important for parents and carers to supervise children in this area. Basic rip current knowledge is an essential component in developing national interventions aimed at reducing coastal drowning. Beachgoers clearly need to know what a rip looks like in order to actively avoid swimming in it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20728630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Bathing Beaches - standards ; Beach safety ; Child ; Culture ; Dangerous Behavior ; Data Collection ; Drowning - prevention &amp; control ; Drowning prevention ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New South Wales ; Rip currents ; Safety - standards ; Swimming behaviour ; Water Movements ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2010-11, Vol.42 (6), p.1785-1804</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cd55d07acf0898eff7b1a9b564f509504a7ea2909173498bed5de7f0d62e95b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cd55d07acf0898eff7b1a9b564f509504a7ea2909173498bed5de7f0d62e95b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20728630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherker, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brander, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>Coastal drownings claim on average 82 people per year in Australia. Beach flags are a primary safety strategy used on beaches. They are located away from rip currents, which are the main beach hazard affecting swimmers. Little is known about the behavioural and motivational factors associated with people choosing where to swim in relation to flags and rips. To assess the beliefs and behaviours of beachgoers in relation to beach flags and rip currents. Beachgoers at beaches in NSW were interviewed about their swimming beliefs and behaviours. They were asked to indicate on pictures depicting beach scenarios involving beach flags and fixed rip currents, where they would and would not swim. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine predictors of correct and incorrect swimming behaviour. Beachgoers who are aged from 30 to 49 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16, 0.74, p = 0.006) are less likely to choose to swim between the flags than other swimmers. In addition, beachgoers who are at the beach with children are significantly more likely to choose to swim between the flags (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.39, 5.40, p = 0.004). Beachgoers with basic knowledge about rip currents are significantly more likely to swim away from the rip (OR 11.59, 95% CI 5.89, 22.81, p &lt; 0.001). Ocean swimmers aged from 30 to 49 years may choose to swim outside the flags, though they may not necessarily be swimming in the rip. Swimming outside of the flags may be linked with experience. The flags appear to be attractive to parents and carers of children. Whilst the flags indicate a relatively safe area of the beach, it is still vitally important for parents and carers to supervise children in this area. Basic rip current knowledge is an essential component in developing national interventions aimed at reducing coastal drowning. Beachgoers clearly need to know what a rip looks like in order to actively avoid swimming in it.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bathing Beaches - standards</subject><subject>Beach safety</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Dangerous Behavior</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Drowning - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Drowning prevention</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New South Wales</subject><subject>Rip currents</subject><subject>Safety - standards</subject><subject>Swimming behaviour</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFu2zAQhomiQeM4fYAugbZOco8UKYrolBhtEyBAM3gnKPLo0JAlh5QMZMtr9PX6JKFhN2M63R34_T_Aj5AvFBYUaP1tszBmt2CQb-ALYPCBzGgjVclAyI9kBgC05EKKc3KR0iafspHiEzlnIFlTVzAjDzdo7ON6wJj-vvwpWuwC-lSY3uX90ezDMMVUhL6I2JkxDH0xDvklZwrfmfWRjGFX2ClG7Md0Sc686RJ-Ps05Wf38sVrelve_f90tr-9LWzV8LK0TwoE01kOjGvRettSoVtTcC1ACuJFomAJFZcVV06ITDqUHVzNUoq3m5OuxdheHpwnTqLchWew60-MwJZ0_yoBzxv9PcgUg6rrKJD2SNg4pRfR6F8PWxGdNQR-E643OwvVBuAaus_CcuTq1T-0W3Vvin-EMfD8CmGXsA0adbMDeogsR7ajdEN6pfwXgdJEu</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Sherker, Shauna</creator><creator>Williamson, Ann</creator><creator>Hatfield, Julie</creator><creator>Brander, Rob</creator><creator>Hayen, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents</title><author>Sherker, Shauna ; Williamson, Ann ; Hatfield, Julie ; Brander, Rob ; Hayen, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cd55d07acf0898eff7b1a9b564f509504a7ea2909173498bed5de7f0d62e95b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bathing Beaches - standards</topic><topic>Beach safety</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Dangerous Behavior</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Drowning - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Drowning prevention</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New South Wales</topic><topic>Rip currents</topic><topic>Safety - standards</topic><topic>Swimming behaviour</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherker, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brander, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherker, Shauna</au><au>Williamson, Ann</au><au>Hatfield, Julie</au><au>Brander, Rob</au><au>Hayen, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1785</spage><epage>1804</epage><pages>1785-1804</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>Coastal drownings claim on average 82 people per year in Australia. Beach flags are a primary safety strategy used on beaches. They are located away from rip currents, which are the main beach hazard affecting swimmers. Little is known about the behavioural and motivational factors associated with people choosing where to swim in relation to flags and rips. To assess the beliefs and behaviours of beachgoers in relation to beach flags and rip currents. Beachgoers at beaches in NSW were interviewed about their swimming beliefs and behaviours. They were asked to indicate on pictures depicting beach scenarios involving beach flags and fixed rip currents, where they would and would not swim. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine predictors of correct and incorrect swimming behaviour. Beachgoers who are aged from 30 to 49 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16, 0.74, p = 0.006) are less likely to choose to swim between the flags than other swimmers. In addition, beachgoers who are at the beach with children are significantly more likely to choose to swim between the flags (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.39, 5.40, p = 0.004). Beachgoers with basic knowledge about rip currents are significantly more likely to swim away from the rip (OR 11.59, 95% CI 5.89, 22.81, p &lt; 0.001). Ocean swimmers aged from 30 to 49 years may choose to swim outside the flags, though they may not necessarily be swimming in the rip. Swimming outside of the flags may be linked with experience. The flags appear to be attractive to parents and carers of children. Whilst the flags indicate a relatively safe area of the beach, it is still vitally important for parents and carers to supervise children in this area. Basic rip current knowledge is an essential component in developing national interventions aimed at reducing coastal drowning. Beachgoers clearly need to know what a rip looks like in order to actively avoid swimming in it.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20728630</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.020</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2010-11, Vol.42 (6), p.1785-1804
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787204424
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Bathing Beaches - standards
Beach safety
Child
Culture
Dangerous Behavior
Data Collection
Drowning - prevention & control
Drowning prevention
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
New South Wales
Rip currents
Safety - standards
Swimming behaviour
Water Movements
Young Adult
title Beachgoers’ beliefs and behaviours in relation to beach flags and rip currents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beachgoers%E2%80%99%20beliefs%20and%20behaviours%20in%20relation%20to%20beach%20flags%20and%20rip%20currents&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Sherker,%20Shauna&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1785&rft.epage=1804&rft.pages=1785-1804&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E749005663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749005663&rft_id=info:pmid/20728630&rft_els_id=S0001457510001363&rfr_iscdi=true