Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model
Four factors of clinical decision making identified by medical students include quality of care, cost, ethics, and legal concerns. This paper argues that physicians have two responsibilities in the clinical decision-making model: to be the primary advocate for quality health care and to ensure balan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Academic Medicine 1996-06, Vol.71 (6), p.644-6 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 644 |
| container_title | Academic Medicine |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Leist, James C Konen, Joseph C |
| description | Four factors of clinical decision making identified by medical students include quality of care, cost, ethics, and legal concerns. This paper argues that physicians have two responsibilities in the clinical decision-making model: to be the primary advocate for quality health care and to ensure balance among the four factors, working in partnership with patients, payers, lawyers, ethicists, and government. (Author/MSE) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00001888-199606000-00017 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78714028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ527869</ericid><sourcerecordid>78714028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-497378b165b886101f6897530d5c7e186d38a091aa6a36d9577ddebcf56bad123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlSAjEQhnPQQkTfQKty8jaaniULNwrBpaC84DmVSTIaHSaYMAfe3iBIX3r5e6sPIQzkHohgDyQZcM4zEIISmrJsX2FnaAikJFlelvQCXcb4lcqUVcUADQTklchhiMZz3wc8V3rrQ8S-wdPWdU6rFj9a7aLzHV6qb9d9jPEEr6zSnynGS29se4XOG9VGe330I_Q-n62mz9ni7ellOllkOid8m5WCFYzXQKuacwoEGspF-oKYSjMLnJqCKyJAKaoKakTFmDG21k1Fa2UgL0bo7rB3E_xPb-NWrl3Utm1VZ30fJeMMSpLz1MgPjTr4GINt5Ca4tQo7CUTuUcl_VPKESv6hSqO3xxt9vbbmNHjklPSbg26D0yd19lrljFNR_AJG8GzI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78714028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Leist, James C ; Konen, Joseph C</creator><creatorcontrib>Leist, James C ; Konen, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><description>Four factors of clinical decision making identified by medical students include quality of care, cost, ethics, and legal concerns. This paper argues that physicians have two responsibilities in the clinical decision-making model: to be the primary advocate for quality health care and to ensure balance among the four factors, working in partnership with patients, payers, lawyers, ethicists, and government. (Author/MSE)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-2446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199606000-00017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9125921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Clinical Clerkship ; Clinical Experience ; Clinical Teaching (Health Professions) ; Cost Control ; Costs ; Decision Making ; Educational Strategies ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical ; Higher Education ; Legal Problems ; Medical Education ; Models, Educational ; North Carolina ; Physician Patient Relationship ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Primary Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Professional Education ; Quality Control ; Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Teaching - methods</subject><ispartof>Academic Medicine, 1996-06, Vol.71 (6), p.644-6</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ527869$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9125921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leist, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konen, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><title>Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model</title><title>Academic Medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><description>Four factors of clinical decision making identified by medical students include quality of care, cost, ethics, and legal concerns. This paper argues that physicians have two responsibilities in the clinical decision-making model: to be the primary advocate for quality health care and to ensure balance among the four factors, working in partnership with patients, payers, lawyers, ethicists, and government. (Author/MSE)</description><subject>Clinical Clerkship</subject><subject>Clinical Experience</subject><subject>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</subject><subject>Cost Control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Legal Problems</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Models, Educational</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Physician Patient Relationship</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><issn>1040-2446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMlSAjEQhnPQQkTfQKty8jaaniULNwrBpaC84DmVSTIaHSaYMAfe3iBIX3r5e6sPIQzkHohgDyQZcM4zEIISmrJsX2FnaAikJFlelvQCXcb4lcqUVcUADQTklchhiMZz3wc8V3rrQ8S-wdPWdU6rFj9a7aLzHV6qb9d9jPEEr6zSnynGS29se4XOG9VGe330I_Q-n62mz9ni7ellOllkOid8m5WCFYzXQKuacwoEGspF-oKYSjMLnJqCKyJAKaoKakTFmDG21k1Fa2UgL0bo7rB3E_xPb-NWrl3Utm1VZ30fJeMMSpLz1MgPjTr4GINt5Ca4tQo7CUTuUcl_VPKESv6hSqO3xxt9vbbmNHjklPSbg26D0yd19lrljFNR_AJG8GzI</recordid><startdate>19960601</startdate><enddate>19960601</enddate><creator>Leist, James C</creator><creator>Konen, Joseph C</creator><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960601</creationdate><title>Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model</title><author>Leist, James C ; Konen, Joseph C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-497378b165b886101f6897530d5c7e186d38a091aa6a36d9577ddebcf56bad123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Clinical Clerkship</topic><topic>Clinical Experience</topic><topic>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</topic><topic>Cost Control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Legal Problems</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Models, Educational</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Physician Patient Relationship</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leist, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konen, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leist, James C</au><au>Konen, Joseph C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ527869</ericid><atitle>Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model</atitle><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><date>1996-06-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>644</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>644-6</pages><issn>1040-2446</issn><abstract>Four factors of clinical decision making identified by medical students include quality of care, cost, ethics, and legal concerns. This paper argues that physicians have two responsibilities in the clinical decision-making model: to be the primary advocate for quality health care and to ensure balance among the four factors, working in partnership with patients, payers, lawyers, ethicists, and government. (Author/MSE)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9125921</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001888-199606000-00017</doi><tpages>-637</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-2446 |
| ispartof | Academic Medicine, 1996-06, Vol.71 (6), p.644-6 |
| issn | 1040-2446 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78714028 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Clinical Clerkship Clinical Experience Clinical Teaching (Health Professions) Cost Control Costs Decision Making Educational Strategies Ethics Ethics, Medical Higher Education Legal Problems Medical Education Models, Educational North Carolina Physician Patient Relationship Physician-Patient Relations Physicians Primary Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence Primary Health Care - organization & administration Professional Education Quality Control Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence Teaching - methods |
| title | Four Factors of Clinical Decision Making: A Teaching Model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20Factors%20of%20Clinical%20Decision%20Making:%20A%20Teaching%20Model&rft.jtitle=Academic%20Medicine&rft.au=Leist,%20James%20C&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=644&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=644-6&rft.issn=1040-2446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001888-199606000-00017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78714028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78714028&rft_id=info:pmid/9125921&rft_ericid=EJ527869&rfr_iscdi=true |