Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA
This study found that stream buffers were effective in reducing the impact of clearcut harvest on 2 species of stream-associated amphibians in Washington. However, 1 species was more abundant in streams without buffers. We also identified a stream temperature regime that influenced stream occupancy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2010-08, Vol.260 (6), p.1083-1087 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1087 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1083 |
container_title | Forest ecology and management |
container_volume | 260 |
creator | Pollett, Kathleen L. MacCracken, James G. MacMahon, James A. |
description | This study found that stream buffers were effective in reducing the impact of clearcut harvest on 2 species of stream-associated amphibians in Washington. However, 1 species was more abundant in streams without buffers. We also identified a stream temperature regime that influenced stream occupancy by 1 species in terms of maximum temperature and duration, which has not been previously identified.
We addressed the efficacy of stream-side buffers in ameliorating the effects of clearcut timber harvest on Cascade torrent salamanders (
Rhyacotriton cascadae), coastal/Cope's giant salamanders (
Dicamptodon tenebrosus/
D. copei), coastal tailed frogs (
Ascaphus truei), and water temperature regimes in the Cascade Range in southern Washington. Forty-one streams in 4 categories were sampled; streams in clearcuts with and without buffers, streams in 35+ year old second-growth forest, and streams in unharvested forest (150+ years old). Tailed frog and Cascade torrent salamander densities were 2–7-fold lower (
P
<
0.05), respectively, in streams in managed forests than in streams in unharvested forest. In addition, both these species were less abundant (
P
<
0.05) in unbuffered streams than streams with buffers or in second-growth forest. In contrast, giant salamander densities were 5–50% greater (
P
>
0.05) in managed streams than unharvested, being greatest in unbuffered and second-growth streams. We used the differences in density estimates of unbuffered streams and unharvested streams to define an ecologically important effect size for each species and then compared the mean effect size and 95% confidence intervals of contrasts between managed stream categories to assess buffer effectiveness. Buffers had a positive ecologically important effect on the density of torrent salamanders and tailed frogs, but had an ecologically negative effect on giant salamanders. Water temperatures were similar among stream categories. However, Cascade torrent salamanders were nearly absent from streams where temperatures were ≥14
°C for ≥35 consecutive hours. Issues that need further study include effective buffer width and longitudinal extent, and confirmation of the water temperature threshold we identified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787114375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112710003671</els_id><sourcerecordid>1685829119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-259d836a3311862de94a70c20af9cb512ef57f7934699801d2ff7cb12c2390623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcFz9BoK5iHuwx1TS6aQvwjL4DxYEx8FjSKcrMxl6kjHpGfDbm7YXj3sqePzeq6JeVb0GugYK7Yfj2sWENq4ZLRJt15SLJ9UKlGS1pA17Wq0ol6oGYPJ59SLnI6VUiEatqut2SmhOpL84hykTc8LRx2QmJNMBCRbVTplERyZ_6jGRg0lXzBOJobDng--9CZn48A_fmGzNgOSHCXucTdt4KXoK5JfJBx_2UwzvyW5797J65syY8dXDvKl2nz_93Hyt779_-ba5u69tw8RUM9ENireGcwDVsgG7xkhqGTWus70Ahk5IJzvetF2nKAzMOWl7YJbxjraM31Tvltxzir8v5W598tniOJqA8ZK1VBKg4VIU8vZRElolFOsAuoI2C2pTzDmh0-fkTyb90UD1XIg-6qUQPReiaatLIcX29mHD_KXRJROsz_-9jEMnmoYX7s3CORO12afC7LYliFNQinKYkz4uBJbXXT0mna3HYHHwZeukh-gfP-Uv6dWrTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685829119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pollett, Kathleen L. ; MacCracken, James G. ; MacMahon, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pollett, Kathleen L. ; MacCracken, James G. ; MacMahon, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study found that stream buffers were effective in reducing the impact of clearcut harvest on 2 species of stream-associated amphibians in Washington. However, 1 species was more abundant in streams without buffers. We also identified a stream temperature regime that influenced stream occupancy by 1 species in terms of maximum temperature and duration, which has not been previously identified.
We addressed the efficacy of stream-side buffers in ameliorating the effects of clearcut timber harvest on Cascade torrent salamanders (
Rhyacotriton cascadae), coastal/Cope's giant salamanders (
Dicamptodon tenebrosus/
D. copei), coastal tailed frogs (
Ascaphus truei), and water temperature regimes in the Cascade Range in southern Washington. Forty-one streams in 4 categories were sampled; streams in clearcuts with and without buffers, streams in 35+ year old second-growth forest, and streams in unharvested forest (150+ years old). Tailed frog and Cascade torrent salamander densities were 2–7-fold lower (
P
<
0.05), respectively, in streams in managed forests than in streams in unharvested forest. In addition, both these species were less abundant (
P
<
0.05) in unbuffered streams than streams with buffers or in second-growth forest. In contrast, giant salamander densities were 5–50% greater (
P
>
0.05) in managed streams than unharvested, being greatest in unbuffered and second-growth streams. We used the differences in density estimates of unbuffered streams and unharvested streams to define an ecologically important effect size for each species and then compared the mean effect size and 95% confidence intervals of contrasts between managed stream categories to assess buffer effectiveness. Buffers had a positive ecologically important effect on the density of torrent salamanders and tailed frogs, but had an ecologically negative effect on giant salamanders. Water temperatures were similar among stream categories. However, Cascade torrent salamanders were nearly absent from streams where temperatures were ≥14
°C for ≥35 consecutive hours. Issues that need further study include effective buffer width and longitudinal extent, and confirmation of the water temperature threshold we identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anura ; Ascaphus truei ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bootstrap re-sampling ; Buffers ; Cascade torrent salamanders ; Cascades ; Categories ; Caudata ; clearcutting ; Coastal and Cope's giant salamander ; Confidence intervals ; conservation areas ; Density ; Dicamptodon copei ; Dicamptodon tenebrosus ; Effect size ; environmental factors ; Forest harvesting and working in forest ; Forestry ; Forests ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; logging ; old-growth forests ; population density ; population dynamics ; Rhyacotriton cascadae ; Riparian buffers ; salamanders and newts ; secondary forests ; species differences ; Streams ; Synecology ; Tailed frogs ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Torrents ; tree age ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2010-08, Vol.260 (6), p.1083-1087</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-259d836a3311862de94a70c20af9cb512ef57f7934699801d2ff7cb12c2390623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-259d836a3311862de94a70c20af9cb512ef57f7934699801d2ff7cb12c2390623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23195443$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pollett, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCracken, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>This study found that stream buffers were effective in reducing the impact of clearcut harvest on 2 species of stream-associated amphibians in Washington. However, 1 species was more abundant in streams without buffers. We also identified a stream temperature regime that influenced stream occupancy by 1 species in terms of maximum temperature and duration, which has not been previously identified.
We addressed the efficacy of stream-side buffers in ameliorating the effects of clearcut timber harvest on Cascade torrent salamanders (
Rhyacotriton cascadae), coastal/Cope's giant salamanders (
Dicamptodon tenebrosus/
D. copei), coastal tailed frogs (
Ascaphus truei), and water temperature regimes in the Cascade Range in southern Washington. Forty-one streams in 4 categories were sampled; streams in clearcuts with and without buffers, streams in 35+ year old second-growth forest, and streams in unharvested forest (150+ years old). Tailed frog and Cascade torrent salamander densities were 2–7-fold lower (
P
<
0.05), respectively, in streams in managed forests than in streams in unharvested forest. In addition, both these species were less abundant (
P
<
0.05) in unbuffered streams than streams with buffers or in second-growth forest. In contrast, giant salamander densities were 5–50% greater (
P
>
0.05) in managed streams than unharvested, being greatest in unbuffered and second-growth streams. We used the differences in density estimates of unbuffered streams and unharvested streams to define an ecologically important effect size for each species and then compared the mean effect size and 95% confidence intervals of contrasts between managed stream categories to assess buffer effectiveness. Buffers had a positive ecologically important effect on the density of torrent salamanders and tailed frogs, but had an ecologically negative effect on giant salamanders. Water temperatures were similar among stream categories. However, Cascade torrent salamanders were nearly absent from streams where temperatures were ≥14
°C for ≥35 consecutive hours. Issues that need further study include effective buffer width and longitudinal extent, and confirmation of the water temperature threshold we identified.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Ascaphus truei</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bootstrap re-sampling</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Cascade torrent salamanders</subject><subject>Cascades</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Caudata</subject><subject>clearcutting</subject><subject>Coastal and Cope's giant salamander</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dicamptodon copei</subject><subject>Dicamptodon tenebrosus</subject><subject>Effect size</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Forest harvesting and working in forest</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>old-growth forests</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Rhyacotriton cascadae</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>salamanders and newts</subject><subject>secondary forests</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tailed frogs</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Torrents</subject><subject>tree age</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxRtRcFz9BoK5iHuwx1TS6aQvwjL4DxYEx8FjSKcrMxl6kjHpGfDbm7YXj3sqePzeq6JeVb0GugYK7Yfj2sWENq4ZLRJt15SLJ9UKlGS1pA17Wq0ol6oGYPJ59SLnI6VUiEatqut2SmhOpL84hykTc8LRx2QmJNMBCRbVTplERyZ_6jGRg0lXzBOJobDng--9CZn48A_fmGzNgOSHCXucTdt4KXoK5JfJBx_2UwzvyW5797J65syY8dXDvKl2nz_93Hyt779_-ba5u69tw8RUM9ENireGcwDVsgG7xkhqGTWus70Ahk5IJzvetF2nKAzMOWl7YJbxjraM31Tvltxzir8v5W598tniOJqA8ZK1VBKg4VIU8vZRElolFOsAuoI2C2pTzDmh0-fkTyb90UD1XIg-6qUQPReiaatLIcX29mHD_KXRJROsz_-9jEMnmoYX7s3CORO12afC7LYliFNQinKYkz4uBJbXXT0mna3HYHHwZeukh-gfP-Uv6dWrTQ</recordid><startdate>20100815</startdate><enddate>20100815</enddate><creator>Pollett, Kathleen L.</creator><creator>MacCracken, James G.</creator><creator>MacMahon, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100815</creationdate><title>Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA</title><author>Pollett, Kathleen L. ; MacCracken, James G. ; MacMahon, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-259d836a3311862de94a70c20af9cb512ef57f7934699801d2ff7cb12c2390623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Ascaphus truei</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bootstrap re-sampling</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Cascade torrent salamanders</topic><topic>Cascades</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Caudata</topic><topic>clearcutting</topic><topic>Coastal and Cope's giant salamander</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dicamptodon copei</topic><topic>Dicamptodon tenebrosus</topic><topic>Effect size</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Forest harvesting and working in forest</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>old-growth forests</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Rhyacotriton cascadae</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>salamanders and newts</topic><topic>secondary forests</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tailed frogs</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Torrents</topic><topic>tree age</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pollett, Kathleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCracken, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pollett, Kathleen L.</au><au>MacCracken, James G.</au><au>MacMahon, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2010-08-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>260</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1083-1087</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>This study found that stream buffers were effective in reducing the impact of clearcut harvest on 2 species of stream-associated amphibians in Washington. However, 1 species was more abundant in streams without buffers. We also identified a stream temperature regime that influenced stream occupancy by 1 species in terms of maximum temperature and duration, which has not been previously identified.
We addressed the efficacy of stream-side buffers in ameliorating the effects of clearcut timber harvest on Cascade torrent salamanders (
Rhyacotriton cascadae), coastal/Cope's giant salamanders (
Dicamptodon tenebrosus/
D. copei), coastal tailed frogs (
Ascaphus truei), and water temperature regimes in the Cascade Range in southern Washington. Forty-one streams in 4 categories were sampled; streams in clearcuts with and without buffers, streams in 35+ year old second-growth forest, and streams in unharvested forest (150+ years old). Tailed frog and Cascade torrent salamander densities were 2–7-fold lower (
P
<
0.05), respectively, in streams in managed forests than in streams in unharvested forest. In addition, both these species were less abundant (
P
<
0.05) in unbuffered streams than streams with buffers or in second-growth forest. In contrast, giant salamander densities were 5–50% greater (
P
>
0.05) in managed streams than unharvested, being greatest in unbuffered and second-growth streams. We used the differences in density estimates of unbuffered streams and unharvested streams to define an ecologically important effect size for each species and then compared the mean effect size and 95% confidence intervals of contrasts between managed stream categories to assess buffer effectiveness. Buffers had a positive ecologically important effect on the density of torrent salamanders and tailed frogs, but had an ecologically negative effect on giant salamanders. Water temperatures were similar among stream categories. However, Cascade torrent salamanders were nearly absent from streams where temperatures were ≥14
°C for ≥35 consecutive hours. Issues that need further study include effective buffer width and longitudinal extent, and confirmation of the water temperature threshold we identified.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.035</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2010-08, Vol.260 (6), p.1083-1087 |
issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787114375 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Anura Ascaphus truei Biological and medical sciences Bootstrap re-sampling Buffers Cascade torrent salamanders Cascades Categories Caudata clearcutting Coastal and Cope's giant salamander Confidence intervals conservation areas Density Dicamptodon copei Dicamptodon tenebrosus Effect size environmental factors Forest harvesting and working in forest Forestry Forests Frogs Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology logging old-growth forests population density population dynamics Rhyacotriton cascadae Riparian buffers salamanders and newts secondary forests species differences Streams Synecology Tailed frogs Terrestrial ecosystems Torrents tree age Water temperature |
title | Stream buffers ameliorate the effects of timber harvest on amphibians in the Cascade Range of Southern Washington, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stream%20buffers%20ameliorate%20the%20effects%20of%20timber%20harvest%20on%20amphibians%20in%20the%20Cascade%20Range%20of%20Southern%20Washington,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Pollett,%20Kathleen%20L.&rft.date=2010-08-15&rft.volume=260&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1083-1087&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685829119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685829119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112710003671&rfr_iscdi=true |