Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs
Little is known about the kinetics of ivermectin formulations following subcutaneous administration in dogs. The vehicle components used in production may change the pharmacokinetics of the drug. The present study was aimed at the comparison of the pharmacokinetics of seven injectable ivermectin for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food and chemical toxicology 2010-08, Vol.48 (8), p.2181-2185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2181 |
container_title | Food and chemical toxicology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Eraslan, Gökhan Kanbur, Murat Liman, Bilal Cem Çam, Yücel Karabacak, Mürsel Altınordulu, Şule |
description | Little is known about the kinetics of ivermectin formulations following subcutaneous administration in dogs. The vehicle components used in production may change the pharmacokinetics of the drug. The present study was aimed at the comparison of the pharmacokinetics of seven injectable ivermectin formulation of different brand names (A–G). The animals were allocated to seven groups, each comprising seven dogs. The dogs were administered ivermectin at a dose of 200
μg/kg
bw by subcutaneous route and blood samples were collected from all groups up to 288
h post-injection. Plasma ivermectin analyses were performed using a HPLC with a fluorescence detector. Compared to Group 1(A), it was determined that statistically significant differences existed in Groups 2(B), 3(C), 4(D), 5(E), and 7(G) for
C
max values; and in Groups 3(C), 4(D), 6(F), 7(G) for AUC
0→288 and AUC
0→∞ values. These values were highest in Group 1(A) and lowest in Group 7(F). The results obtained in the present study demonstrated that, in cases which require subacute administration, optimal exposure is achieved with the preparation A. However, it must be noted that this evaluation was based on pharmacokinetic parameters and not antiparasitic efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787050042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691510003194</els_id><sourcerecordid>787050042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-5ff989a56ba2f93cb29c05a018c05b667c04f43726496468363c3e2fd7d86d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90D1LLDEUgOEgiu5Vf4CNTCNWs558TJLBShb1XhBstLEJmUyiWWeSNZkV_PdGdtXuVofAcw7hRegEwxwD5hfLuTPTnEB5QzMHRnfQDEtBa04bvItmQISseYubA_Qn5yUACCz4PjogwKQkhMzQ0yKOK5305N9ttXrRadQmvvpgJ29yFV2V42grH5bWTLobikl242PIlYlh0j748FyV_TQW5EPRVR-f8xHac3rI9ng7D9HjzfXD4m99d3_7b3F1VxuG2VQ3zrWy1Q3vNHEtNR1pDTQasCyj41wYYI5RQThrOeOScmqoJa4XveQ9YfQQnW_urlJ8W9s8qdFnY4dBBxvXWQkpoAFgpEi8kSbFnJN1apX8qNOHwqC-iqqlKkXVV1EFjSpFy87p9vq6G23_s_GdsICzLdDZ6MElHYzPv45iLAhpi7vcOFtavHubVDbeBmN7n0o31Uf_n298Am_RlAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>787050042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Eraslan, Gökhan ; Kanbur, Murat ; Liman, Bilal Cem ; Çam, Yücel ; Karabacak, Mürsel ; Altınordulu, Şule</creator><creatorcontrib>Eraslan, Gökhan ; Kanbur, Murat ; Liman, Bilal Cem ; Çam, Yücel ; Karabacak, Mürsel ; Altınordulu, Şule</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about the kinetics of ivermectin formulations following subcutaneous administration in dogs. The vehicle components used in production may change the pharmacokinetics of the drug. The present study was aimed at the comparison of the pharmacokinetics of seven injectable ivermectin formulation of different brand names (A–G). The animals were allocated to seven groups, each comprising seven dogs. The dogs were administered ivermectin at a dose of 200
μg/kg
bw by subcutaneous route and blood samples were collected from all groups up to 288
h post-injection. Plasma ivermectin analyses were performed using a HPLC with a fluorescence detector. Compared to Group 1(A), it was determined that statistically significant differences existed in Groups 2(B), 3(C), 4(D), 5(E), and 7(G) for
C
max values; and in Groups 3(C), 4(D), 6(F), 7(G) for AUC
0→288 and AUC
0→∞ values. These values were highest in Group 1(A) and lowest in Group 7(F). The results obtained in the present study demonstrated that, in cases which require subacute administration, optimal exposure is achieved with the preparation A. However, it must be noted that this evaluation was based on pharmacokinetic parameters and not antiparasitic efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20488222</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FCTOD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antiparasitic Agents - administration & dosage ; Antiparasitic Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Area Under Curve ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Comparative pharmacokinetics ; Dog ; Dogs ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Half-Life ; Injectable preparation ; Injections ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Ivermectin ; Ivermectin - administration & dosage ; Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pharmaceutical Solutions ; Reproducibility of Results ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-08, Vol.48 (8), p.2181-2185</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-5ff989a56ba2f93cb29c05a018c05b667c04f43726496468363c3e2fd7d86d243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-5ff989a56ba2f93cb29c05a018c05b667c04f43726496468363c3e2fd7d86d243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23117229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20488222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eraslan, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanbur, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liman, Bilal Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çam, Yücel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabacak, Mürsel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altınordulu, Şule</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>Little is known about the kinetics of ivermectin formulations following subcutaneous administration in dogs. The vehicle components used in production may change the pharmacokinetics of the drug. The present study was aimed at the comparison of the pharmacokinetics of seven injectable ivermectin formulation of different brand names (A–G). The animals were allocated to seven groups, each comprising seven dogs. The dogs were administered ivermectin at a dose of 200
μg/kg
bw by subcutaneous route and blood samples were collected from all groups up to 288
h post-injection. Plasma ivermectin analyses were performed using a HPLC with a fluorescence detector. Compared to Group 1(A), it was determined that statistically significant differences existed in Groups 2(B), 3(C), 4(D), 5(E), and 7(G) for
C
max values; and in Groups 3(C), 4(D), 6(F), 7(G) for AUC
0→288 and AUC
0→∞ values. These values were highest in Group 1(A) and lowest in Group 7(F). The results obtained in the present study demonstrated that, in cases which require subacute administration, optimal exposure is achieved with the preparation A. However, it must be noted that this evaluation was based on pharmacokinetic parameters and not antiparasitic efficacy.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Comparative pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dog</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Half-Life</subject><subject>Injectable preparation</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous</subject><subject>Ivermectin</subject><subject>Ivermectin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Solutions</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90D1LLDEUgOEgiu5Vf4CNTCNWs558TJLBShb1XhBstLEJmUyiWWeSNZkV_PdGdtXuVofAcw7hRegEwxwD5hfLuTPTnEB5QzMHRnfQDEtBa04bvItmQISseYubA_Qn5yUACCz4PjogwKQkhMzQ0yKOK5305N9ttXrRadQmvvpgJ29yFV2V42grH5bWTLobikl242PIlYlh0j748FyV_TQW5EPRVR-f8xHac3rI9ng7D9HjzfXD4m99d3_7b3F1VxuG2VQ3zrWy1Q3vNHEtNR1pDTQasCyj41wYYI5RQThrOeOScmqoJa4XveQ9YfQQnW_urlJ8W9s8qdFnY4dBBxvXWQkpoAFgpEi8kSbFnJN1apX8qNOHwqC-iqqlKkXVV1EFjSpFy87p9vq6G23_s_GdsICzLdDZ6MElHYzPv45iLAhpi7vcOFtavHubVDbeBmN7n0o31Uf_n298Am_RlAU</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Eraslan, Gökhan</creator><creator>Kanbur, Murat</creator><creator>Liman, Bilal Cem</creator><creator>Çam, Yücel</creator><creator>Karabacak, Mürsel</creator><creator>Altınordulu, Şule</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs</title><author>Eraslan, Gökhan ; Kanbur, Murat ; Liman, Bilal Cem ; Çam, Yücel ; Karabacak, Mürsel ; Altınordulu, Şule</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-5ff989a56ba2f93cb29c05a018c05b667c04f43726496468363c3e2fd7d86d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Comparative pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dog</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Half-Life</topic><topic>Injectable preparation</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous</topic><topic>Ivermectin</topic><topic>Ivermectin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Solutions</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eraslan, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanbur, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liman, Bilal Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çam, Yücel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabacak, Mürsel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altınordulu, Şule</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eraslan, Gökhan</au><au>Kanbur, Murat</au><au>Liman, Bilal Cem</au><au>Çam, Yücel</au><au>Karabacak, Mürsel</au><au>Altınordulu, Şule</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2181</spage><epage>2185</epage><pages>2181-2185</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><coden>FCTOD7</coden><abstract>Little is known about the kinetics of ivermectin formulations following subcutaneous administration in dogs. The vehicle components used in production may change the pharmacokinetics of the drug. The present study was aimed at the comparison of the pharmacokinetics of seven injectable ivermectin formulation of different brand names (A–G). The animals were allocated to seven groups, each comprising seven dogs. The dogs were administered ivermectin at a dose of 200
μg/kg
bw by subcutaneous route and blood samples were collected from all groups up to 288
h post-injection. Plasma ivermectin analyses were performed using a HPLC with a fluorescence detector. Compared to Group 1(A), it was determined that statistically significant differences existed in Groups 2(B), 3(C), 4(D), 5(E), and 7(G) for
C
max values; and in Groups 3(C), 4(D), 6(F), 7(G) for AUC
0→288 and AUC
0→∞ values. These values were highest in Group 1(A) and lowest in Group 7(F). The results obtained in the present study demonstrated that, in cases which require subacute administration, optimal exposure is achieved with the preparation A. However, it must be noted that this evaluation was based on pharmacokinetic parameters and not antiparasitic efficacy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20488222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.043</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6915 |
ispartof | Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-08, Vol.48 (8), p.2181-2185 |
issn | 0278-6915 1873-6351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_787050042 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Antiparasitic Agents - administration & dosage Antiparasitic Agents - pharmacokinetics Area Under Curve Biological and medical sciences Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Comparative pharmacokinetics Dog Dogs Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Half-Life Injectable preparation Injections Injections, Subcutaneous Ivermectin Ivermectin - administration & dosage Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics Male Medical sciences Pharmaceutical Solutions Reproducibility of Results Toxicology |
title | Comparative pharmacokinetics of some injectable preparations containing ivermectin in dogs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A06%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20pharmacokinetics%20of%20some%20injectable%20preparations%20containing%20ivermectin%20in%20dogs&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Eraslan,%20G%C3%B6khan&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2181&rft.epage=2185&rft.pages=2181-2185&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.coden=FCTOD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E787050042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=787050042&rft_id=info:pmid/20488222&rft_els_id=S0278691510003194&rfr_iscdi=true |