Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door
Adopting the stage metaphor suggested in Brown’s review, and treating Scientific perspectivism as a play in five acts, I respond to his review as a playwright might respond to a generally favorable review. Taking the reader behind the stage door, I discuss the playwright’s intentions for each act, p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A 2009-06, Vol.40 (2), p.221-223 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 223 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 221 |
| container_title | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Giere, Ronald N. |
| description | Adopting the stage metaphor suggested in Brown’s review, and treating
Scientific perspectivism as a play in five acts, I respond to his review as a playwright might respond to a generally favorable review. Taking the reader behind the stage door, I discuss the playwright’s intentions for each act, paying special attention to the expected audience for the play as a whole. The result, therefore, supplements the review from the standpoint of the playwright. It also provides answers to some of the reviewer’s questions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786971986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039368109000168</els_id><sourcerecordid>1805396661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-67368afb8cd33d41f96568d217d82894250ba02e4216acd65adb7e6287443cf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1giFqakZzuxHSQGVPElVWIAZsuxL9RR2wQ7rcS_x6VMDEy3PO97dw8hlxQKClTMuiIuh2gKBlAXwAuA8ohMqJJ1zioKx2QCwOucC0VPyVmMHQCVVKkJmb1aj5vRt95mA4Y4oB39zsf1Tdbg0m9cNi4xi6P5wMz1fTgnJ61ZRbz4nVPy_nD_Nn_KFy-Pz_O7RW65YGMuZNpl2kZZx7kraVuLSijHqHSKqbpkFTQGGJaMCmOdqIxrJAqmZFly21Z8Sq4PvUPoP7cYR7320eJqZTbYb6OWStSS1kok8uoP2fXbsEnHacYZVRxkmSB-gGzoYwzY6iH4tQlfmoLeK9Sd_lGo9wo1cJ0UptTtIYXp053HoOPelkXnQ_KkXe__zX8Def55Hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232183074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giere, Ronald N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giere, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><description>Adopting the stage metaphor suggested in Brown’s review, and treating
Scientific perspectivism as a play in five acts, I respond to his review as a playwright might respond to a generally favorable review. Taking the reader behind the stage door, I discuss the playwright’s intentions for each act, paying special attention to the expected audience for the play as a whole. The result, therefore, supplements the review from the standpoint of the playwright. It also provides answers to some of the reviewer’s questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SHPSB5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brown, Matthew ; Conceptualization ; Constructivism ; Dramatists ; Matthew Brown ; Philosophy of science ; Realism ; Scientific perspectivism ; Social construction ; Theater</subject><ispartof>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, 2009-06, Vol.40 (2), p.221-223</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-67368afb8cd33d41f96568d217d82894250ba02e4216acd65adb7e6287443cf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-67368afb8cd33d41f96568d217d82894250ba02e4216acd65adb7e6287443cf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368109000168$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giere, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><title>Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door</title><title>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</title><description>Adopting the stage metaphor suggested in Brown’s review, and treating
Scientific perspectivism as a play in five acts, I respond to his review as a playwright might respond to a generally favorable review. Taking the reader behind the stage door, I discuss the playwright’s intentions for each act, paying special attention to the expected audience for the play as a whole. The result, therefore, supplements the review from the standpoint of the playwright. It also provides answers to some of the reviewer’s questions.</description><subject>Brown, Matthew</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Constructivism</subject><subject>Dramatists</subject><subject>Matthew Brown</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Scientific perspectivism</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Theater</subject><issn>0039-3681</issn><issn>1879-2510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1giFqakZzuxHSQGVPElVWIAZsuxL9RR2wQ7rcS_x6VMDEy3PO97dw8hlxQKClTMuiIuh2gKBlAXwAuA8ohMqJJ1zioKx2QCwOucC0VPyVmMHQCVVKkJmb1aj5vRt95mA4Y4oB39zsf1Tdbg0m9cNi4xi6P5wMz1fTgnJ61ZRbz4nVPy_nD_Nn_KFy-Pz_O7RW65YGMuZNpl2kZZx7kraVuLSijHqHSKqbpkFTQGGJaMCmOdqIxrJAqmZFly21Z8Sq4PvUPoP7cYR7320eJqZTbYb6OWStSS1kok8uoP2fXbsEnHacYZVRxkmSB-gGzoYwzY6iH4tQlfmoLeK9Sd_lGo9wo1cJ0UptTtIYXp053HoOPelkXnQ_KkXe__zX8Def55Hw</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Giere, Ronald N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door</title><author>Giere, Ronald N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-67368afb8cd33d41f96568d217d82894250ba02e4216acd65adb7e6287443cf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Brown, Matthew</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Constructivism</topic><topic>Dramatists</topic><topic>Matthew Brown</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Scientific perspectivism</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Theater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giere, Ronald N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giere, Ronald N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door</atitle><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</jtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>221-223</pages><issn>0039-3681</issn><eissn>1879-2510</eissn><coden>SHPSB5</coden><abstract>Adopting the stage metaphor suggested in Brown’s review, and treating
Scientific perspectivism as a play in five acts, I respond to his review as a playwright might respond to a generally favorable review. Taking the reader behind the stage door, I discuss the playwright’s intentions for each act, paying special attention to the expected audience for the play as a whole. The result, therefore, supplements the review from the standpoint of the playwright. It also provides answers to some of the reviewer’s questions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.004</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-3681 |
| ispartof | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, 2009-06, Vol.40 (2), p.221-223 |
| issn | 0039-3681 1879-2510 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786971986 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Brown, Matthew Conceptualization Constructivism Dramatists Matthew Brown Philosophy of science Realism Scientific perspectivism Social construction Theater |
| title | Scientific perspectivism: behind the stage door |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientific%20perspectivism:%20behind%20the%20stage%20door&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20history%20and%20philosophy%20of%20science.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Giere,%20Ronald%20N.&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=221-223&rft.issn=0039-3681&rft.eissn=1879-2510&rft.coden=SHPSB5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1805396661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232183074&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0039368109000168&rfr_iscdi=true |