Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets

In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too hi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Telecommunications policy 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561
Hauptverfasser: Briglauer, Wolfgang, Götz, Georg, Schwarz, Anton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 561
container_issue 10
container_start_page 551
container_title Telecommunications policy
container_volume 34
creator Briglauer, Wolfgang
Götz, Georg
Schwarz, Anton
description In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308596110000406</els_id><sourcerecordid>2184895221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxidGE9fqf-CBeNHLrDAMMHPRmE1rG5v00p4JA48u01kYgV1d_3rZTuPBQw8PXuD3feHxVdV7gtcEE_55XGeY5jCtG1yOcLvGmLyoVqQTfU0b1r2sVpjirmY9J6-rNymNBRCkx6tq3CiPFNqpeO88Sj_3AH8AOW-cVhlQ3gLyAAbZEJGBCPf7SWUX_Fd0W660SoCCRdb9LoyH_CvEB3QIThcpTDBvgz-ezB8gp7fVK6umBO-e9rPq7uL8dnNZX998v9p8u641a_pc9wNuO2Nb25F2IFQQxrEhVhNuGKYdiIEKOwx2aMwAvTWC8kYB6zg0QoA29Kz6uPjOMZR5UpY7lzRMk_IQ9kmKjvcCN4IV8tOzJOGCNJRj1hb0w3_oGPbRlzmk4JSSru9pgdoF0jGkFMHKOboy_VESLE9JyVEuSclTUhK3sgRRZD8WWYQZ9D8NADzBB0kVbctyLPWopMqVemzmUowRyTiR27wrbl8WNyh_fHAQZdIOvAbjIugsTXDPP-cvKW-4DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763318993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</creator><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><description>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-5961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TEPODJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Access charges ; Access regulation ; Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks ; Competition ; Competitiveness ; Control ; Deregulation ; Europe ; Fixed networks ; Foreclosure ; Liberalization ; Market analysis ; Markets ; Mobile phones ; Modelling ; Networks ; Price squeeze ; Regulators ; Retail prices ; Studies ; Switching theory ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications industry ; Telecommunications policy ; Telephony ; Vertical integration</subject><ispartof>Telecommunications policy, 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Butterworth-Heinemann Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeetelpol/v_3a34_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a551-561.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><title>Telecommunications policy</title><description>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</description><subject>Access charges</subject><subject>Access regulation</subject><subject>Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Fixed networks</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Market analysis</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Price squeeze</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Retail prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Switching theory</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications industry</subject><subject>Telecommunications policy</subject><subject>Telephony</subject><subject>Vertical integration</subject><issn>0308-5961</issn><issn>1879-3258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxidGE9fqf-CBeNHLrDAMMHPRmE1rG5v00p4JA48u01kYgV1d_3rZTuPBQw8PXuD3feHxVdV7gtcEE_55XGeY5jCtG1yOcLvGmLyoVqQTfU0b1r2sVpjirmY9J6-rNymNBRCkx6tq3CiPFNqpeO88Sj_3AH8AOW-cVhlQ3gLyAAbZEJGBCPf7SWUX_Fd0W660SoCCRdb9LoyH_CvEB3QIThcpTDBvgz-ezB8gp7fVK6umBO-e9rPq7uL8dnNZX998v9p8u641a_pc9wNuO2Nb25F2IFQQxrEhVhNuGKYdiIEKOwx2aMwAvTWC8kYB6zg0QoA29Kz6uPjOMZR5UpY7lzRMk_IQ9kmKjvcCN4IV8tOzJOGCNJRj1hb0w3_oGPbRlzmk4JSSru9pgdoF0jGkFMHKOboy_VESLE9JyVEuSclTUhK3sgRRZD8WWYQZ9D8NADzBB0kVbctyLPWopMqVemzmUowRyTiR27wrbl8WNyh_fHAQZdIOvAbjIugsTXDPP-cvKW-4DA</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Götz, Georg</creator><creator>Schwarz, Anton</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Butterworth-Heinemann</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><author>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Access charges</topic><topic>Access regulation</topic><topic>Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Fixed networks</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Market analysis</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Price squeeze</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Retail prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Switching theory</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications industry</topic><topic>Telecommunications policy</topic><topic>Telephony</topic><topic>Vertical integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Telecommunications policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briglauer, Wolfgang</au><au>Götz, Georg</au><au>Schwarz, Anton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</atitle><jtitle>Telecommunications policy</jtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>551-561</pages><issn>0308-5961</issn><eissn>1879-3258</eissn><coden>TEPODJ</coden><abstract>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-5961
ispartof Telecommunications policy, 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561
issn 0308-5961
1879-3258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970275
source RePEc; PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Access charges
Access regulation
Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks
Competition
Competitiveness
Control
Deregulation
Europe
Fixed networks
Foreclosure
Liberalization
Market analysis
Markets
Mobile phones
Modelling
Networks
Price squeeze
Regulators
Retail prices
Studies
Switching theory
Telecommunications
Telecommunications industry
Telecommunications policy
Telephony
Vertical integration
title Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20margin%20squeeze%20indicate%20the%20need%20for%20deregulation?%20The%20case%20of%20fixed%20network%20voice%20telephony%20markets&rft.jtitle=Telecommunications%20policy&rft.au=Briglauer,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=551-561&rft.issn=0308-5961&rft.eissn=1879-3258&rft.coden=TEPODJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2184895221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763318993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308596110000406&rfr_iscdi=true