Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets
In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Telecommunications policy 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | Telecommunications policy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Briglauer, Wolfgang Götz, Georg Schwarz, Anton |
description | In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308596110000406</els_id><sourcerecordid>2184895221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxidGE9fqf-CBeNHLrDAMMHPRmE1rG5v00p4JA48u01kYgV1d_3rZTuPBQw8PXuD3feHxVdV7gtcEE_55XGeY5jCtG1yOcLvGmLyoVqQTfU0b1r2sVpjirmY9J6-rNymNBRCkx6tq3CiPFNqpeO88Sj_3AH8AOW-cVhlQ3gLyAAbZEJGBCPf7SWUX_Fd0W660SoCCRdb9LoyH_CvEB3QIThcpTDBvgz-ezB8gp7fVK6umBO-e9rPq7uL8dnNZX998v9p8u641a_pc9wNuO2Nb25F2IFQQxrEhVhNuGKYdiIEKOwx2aMwAvTWC8kYB6zg0QoA29Kz6uPjOMZR5UpY7lzRMk_IQ9kmKjvcCN4IV8tOzJOGCNJRj1hb0w3_oGPbRlzmk4JSSru9pgdoF0jGkFMHKOboy_VESLE9JyVEuSclTUhK3sgRRZD8WWYQZ9D8NADzBB0kVbctyLPWopMqVemzmUowRyTiR27wrbl8WNyh_fHAQZdIOvAbjIugsTXDPP-cvKW-4DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763318993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</creator><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><description>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-5961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TEPODJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Access charges ; Access regulation ; Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks ; Competition ; Competitiveness ; Control ; Deregulation ; Europe ; Fixed networks ; Foreclosure ; Liberalization ; Market analysis ; Markets ; Mobile phones ; Modelling ; Networks ; Price squeeze ; Regulators ; Retail prices ; Studies ; Switching theory ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications industry ; Telecommunications policy ; Telephony ; Vertical integration</subject><ispartof>Telecommunications policy, 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Butterworth-Heinemann Nov 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeetelpol/v_3a34_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a551-561.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><title>Telecommunications policy</title><description>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</description><subject>Access charges</subject><subject>Access regulation</subject><subject>Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Fixed networks</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Market analysis</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Price squeeze</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Retail prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Switching theory</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications industry</subject><subject>Telecommunications policy</subject><subject>Telephony</subject><subject>Vertical integration</subject><issn>0308-5961</issn><issn>1879-3258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFvFCEUxidGE9fqf-CBeNHLrDAMMHPRmE1rG5v00p4JA48u01kYgV1d_3rZTuPBQw8PXuD3feHxVdV7gtcEE_55XGeY5jCtG1yOcLvGmLyoVqQTfU0b1r2sVpjirmY9J6-rNymNBRCkx6tq3CiPFNqpeO88Sj_3AH8AOW-cVhlQ3gLyAAbZEJGBCPf7SWUX_Fd0W660SoCCRdb9LoyH_CvEB3QIThcpTDBvgz-ezB8gp7fVK6umBO-e9rPq7uL8dnNZX998v9p8u641a_pc9wNuO2Nb25F2IFQQxrEhVhNuGKYdiIEKOwx2aMwAvTWC8kYB6zg0QoA29Kz6uPjOMZR5UpY7lzRMk_IQ9kmKjvcCN4IV8tOzJOGCNJRj1hb0w3_oGPbRlzmk4JSSru9pgdoF0jGkFMHKOboy_VESLE9JyVEuSclTUhK3sgRRZD8WWYQZ9D8NADzBB0kVbctyLPWopMqVemzmUowRyTiR27wrbl8WNyh_fHAQZdIOvAbjIugsTXDPP-cvKW-4DA</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Götz, Georg</creator><creator>Schwarz, Anton</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Butterworth-Heinemann</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</title><author>Briglauer, Wolfgang ; Götz, Georg ; Schwarz, Anton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-9b048df4f814b1371560d1fc16d5038e7b37fbbfb2dbe9fd7362ae586e277ecd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Access charges</topic><topic>Access regulation</topic><topic>Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Fixed networks</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Market analysis</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Price squeeze</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Retail prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Switching theory</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications industry</topic><topic>Telecommunications policy</topic><topic>Telephony</topic><topic>Vertical integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briglauer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götz, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Anton</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Telecommunications policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briglauer, Wolfgang</au><au>Götz, Georg</au><au>Schwarz, Anton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets</atitle><jtitle>Telecommunications policy</jtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>551-561</pages><issn>0308-5961</issn><eissn>1879-3258</eissn><coden>TEPODJ</coden><abstract>In the beginning of fixed network liberalisation in Europe in the late 1990s, the main concern of regulators was to lower retail call prices. This was done by introducing wholesale regulation and promoting service-based competition. Some years later, the concern of some regulators turned from too high retail call prices to too low call prices, which might ‘squeeze’ entrants out of the market. This paper looks at a simple model in which this development is explained by increasing competitive pressure from an ‘outside opportunity’, most notably mobile telephony and cable. It is concluded that a margin squeeze is not necessarily used by the incumbent as a device to drive competitors out of the market and to increase market power but can also result from increased inter-modal competition. If this is the case, it is argued that the appropriate response would be deregulation or – under particular circumstances – a switch from cost-oriented access prices to alternatives such as retail-minus or capacity-based interconnection.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-5961 |
ispartof | Telecommunications policy, 2010-11, Vol.34 (10), p.551-561 |
issn | 0308-5961 1879-3258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970275 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | Access charges Access regulation Access regulation Vertical integration Foreclosure Price squeeze Telecommunications Fixed networks Competition Competitiveness Control Deregulation Europe Fixed networks Foreclosure Liberalization Market analysis Markets Mobile phones Modelling Networks Price squeeze Regulators Retail prices Studies Switching theory Telecommunications Telecommunications industry Telecommunications policy Telephony Vertical integration |
title | Can a margin squeeze indicate the need for deregulation? The case of fixed network voice telephony markets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20margin%20squeeze%20indicate%20the%20need%20for%20deregulation?%20The%20case%20of%20fixed%20network%20voice%20telephony%20markets&rft.jtitle=Telecommunications%20policy&rft.au=Briglauer,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=551-561&rft.issn=0308-5961&rft.eissn=1879-3258&rft.coden=TEPODJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2184895221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763318993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308596110000406&rfr_iscdi=true |