UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law
While the Geneva Conventions contain gender-specific provisions, the reality of women's and men's experiences of armed conflict have highlighted gender limitations and conceptual constraints within international humanitarian law. Judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the fo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International review of the Red Cross (2005) 2010-03, Vol.92 (877), p.221-234 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 234 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 877 |
| container_start_page | 221 |
| container_title | International review of the Red Cross (2005) |
| container_volume | 92 |
| creator | Barrow, Amy |
| description | While the Geneva Conventions contain gender-specific provisions, the reality of women's and men's experiences of armed conflict have highlighted gender limitations and conceptual constraints within international humanitarian law. Judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ad hoc tribunals have gone some way towards expanding the scope of definitions of sexual violence and rape in conflict. More recent developments in public international law, including the adoption of Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 focused on women, peace and security, have sought to increase the visibility of gender in situations of armed conflict. This paper highlights important developing norms on women, peace and security. Although these norms are significant, they may not be radical enough to expand constructions of gender within international humanitarian law. This leaves existing provisions open to continued scrutiny. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1816383110000081 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1816383110000081</cupid><sourcerecordid>758116979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-442330b1dbd099588db2b49acb5001f7d74bb1c30cb95b4d6bc8d65e1691a4093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhgdRsFZ_gLvgxtXUnMnHJO70olUoSm3rNuTrXlMzmZpkaPvvzXiLgiLNJiHv877nHE7XPQd8BBjGV2cggBNBAPB6BDzoDoDjsWdCyIft3eR-1R93T0q5xJiSgeGD7vriEzrzdsmh3qLNvCQbIvriyxyXGuZUEDQO6eQQiAG_Rrb91bzYGtIO7XxyPqOQkM6Td6u4jcHWX3xI1eek1xQd0bdl0ilUnYNOKOrrp92jrY7FP7u7D7uL9-_ONx_6k8_HHzdvTnpLQdSe0oEQbMAZh6VsszgzGCq1NQxj2I5upMaAJdgayQx13FjhOPPAJWiKJTnsXu5zr_L8Y_GlqikU62PUyc9LUaPgcsQg8P0kE9BixzXzxV_k5by0UWNRDJNBMjLQBsEesnkuJfutusph0vlWAVbrytQ_K2uefu8Jpfqb3wadvys-kpEpfnyqhq9vGeP0XK2NkLsaejI5uJ3_08n_q_wEJAel2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>503295324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Barrow, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>While the Geneva Conventions contain gender-specific provisions, the reality of women's and men's experiences of armed conflict have highlighted gender limitations and conceptual constraints within international humanitarian law. Judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ad hoc tribunals have gone some way towards expanding the scope of definitions of sexual violence and rape in conflict. More recent developments in public international law, including the adoption of Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 focused on women, peace and security, have sought to increase the visibility of gender in situations of armed conflict. This paper highlights important developing norms on women, peace and security. Although these norms are significant, they may not be radical enough to expand constructions of gender within international humanitarian law. This leaves existing provisions open to continued scrutiny.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1816-3831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1607-5889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1816383110000081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Armed conflict ; Conflict ; Gender ; Geneva conventions ; Human rights ; Humanitarian law ; International criminal law ; International humanitarian law ; International law ; International organizations ; Legislation ; Peace ; Rape ; Sexual assault ; UN Security Council ; United Nations Security council ; Victims of violence ; War ; Women ; Women's rights</subject><ispartof>International review of the Red Cross (2005), 2010-03, Vol.92 (877), p.221-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-442330b1dbd099588db2b49acb5001f7d74bb1c30cb95b4d6bc8d65e1691a4093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-442330b1dbd099588db2b49acb5001f7d74bb1c30cb95b4d6bc8d65e1691a4093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1816383110000081/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27842,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law</title><title>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</title><addtitle>Int. rev. Red Cross</addtitle><description>While the Geneva Conventions contain gender-specific provisions, the reality of women's and men's experiences of armed conflict have highlighted gender limitations and conceptual constraints within international humanitarian law. Judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ad hoc tribunals have gone some way towards expanding the scope of definitions of sexual violence and rape in conflict. More recent developments in public international law, including the adoption of Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 focused on women, peace and security, have sought to increase the visibility of gender in situations of armed conflict. This paper highlights important developing norms on women, peace and security. Although these norms are significant, they may not be radical enough to expand constructions of gender within international humanitarian law. This leaves existing provisions open to continued scrutiny.</description><subject>Armed conflict</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Geneva conventions</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Humanitarian law</subject><subject>International criminal law</subject><subject>International humanitarian law</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Sexual assault</subject><subject>UN Security Council</subject><subject>United Nations Security council</subject><subject>Victims of violence</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's rights</subject><issn>1816-3831</issn><issn>1607-5889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhgdRsFZ_gLvgxtXUnMnHJO70olUoSm3rNuTrXlMzmZpkaPvvzXiLgiLNJiHv877nHE7XPQd8BBjGV2cggBNBAPB6BDzoDoDjsWdCyIft3eR-1R93T0q5xJiSgeGD7vriEzrzdsmh3qLNvCQbIvriyxyXGuZUEDQO6eQQiAG_Rrb91bzYGtIO7XxyPqOQkM6Td6u4jcHWX3xI1eek1xQd0bdl0ilUnYNOKOrrp92jrY7FP7u7D7uL9-_ONx_6k8_HHzdvTnpLQdSe0oEQbMAZh6VsszgzGCq1NQxj2I5upMaAJdgayQx13FjhOPPAJWiKJTnsXu5zr_L8Y_GlqikU62PUyc9LUaPgcsQg8P0kE9BixzXzxV_k5by0UWNRDJNBMjLQBsEesnkuJfutusph0vlWAVbrytQ_K2uefu8Jpfqb3wadvys-kpEpfnyqhq9vGeP0XK2NkLsaejI5uJ3_08n_q_wEJAel2A</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Barrow, Amy</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law</title><author>Barrow, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-442330b1dbd099588db2b49acb5001f7d74bb1c30cb95b4d6bc8d65e1691a4093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Armed conflict</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Geneva conventions</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Humanitarian law</topic><topic>International criminal law</topic><topic>International humanitarian law</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Sexual assault</topic><topic>UN Security Council</topic><topic>United Nations Security council</topic><topic>Victims of violence</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrow, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law</atitle><jtitle>International review of the Red Cross (2005)</jtitle><addtitle>Int. rev. Red Cross</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>877</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>221-234</pages><issn>1816-3831</issn><eissn>1607-5889</eissn><abstract>While the Geneva Conventions contain gender-specific provisions, the reality of women's and men's experiences of armed conflict have highlighted gender limitations and conceptual constraints within international humanitarian law. Judgements at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ad hoc tribunals have gone some way towards expanding the scope of definitions of sexual violence and rape in conflict. More recent developments in public international law, including the adoption of Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 focused on women, peace and security, have sought to increase the visibility of gender in situations of armed conflict. This paper highlights important developing norms on women, peace and security. Although these norms are significant, they may not be radical enough to expand constructions of gender within international humanitarian law. This leaves existing provisions open to continued scrutiny.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1816383110000081</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1816-3831 |
| ispartof | International review of the Red Cross (2005), 2010-03, Vol.92 (877), p.221-234 |
| issn | 1816-3831 1607-5889 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_786970180 |
| source | PAIS Index; Free E- Journals; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Armed conflict Conflict Gender Geneva conventions Human rights Humanitarian law International criminal law International humanitarian law International law International organizations Legislation Peace Rape Sexual assault UN Security Council United Nations Security council Victims of violence War Women Women's rights |
| title | UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820: constructing gender in armed conflict and international humanitarian law |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UN%20Security%20Council%20Resolutions%201325%20and%201820:%20constructing%20gender%20in%20armed%20conflict%20and%20international%20humanitarian%20law&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20the%20Red%20Cross%20(2005)&rft.au=Barrow,%20Amy&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=877&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=221-234&rft.issn=1816-3831&rft.eissn=1607-5889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1816383110000081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E758116979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=503295324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1816383110000081&rfr_iscdi=true |