Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study

In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 1996-01, Vol.6 (6), p.427-431
Hauptverfasser: GRAAFMANS, W. C, OOMS, M. E, BEZEMER, P. D, BOUTER, L. M, LIPS, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 431
container_issue 6
container_start_page 427
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 6
creator GRAAFMANS, W. C
OOMS, M. E
BEZEMER, P. D
BOUTER, L. M
LIPS, P
description In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (> 85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3-21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70-75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilities of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/bf01629573
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78686344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78686344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-d694f3aa8b14689a651e08ea76e7a2f3e2fb806c41f8d4127da4a8850b08737b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUx4Moc04v3oUexINQTZo0P7zN6VQYeFHwIJQ0fcFou9WkFfbfm7E6PD1438_78vggdErwFcFYXJcWE56pXNA9NCaM0jRTPN9HY6yoSBUjb4foKIRPHGGlxAiNFCGcSj5G73fOWvCw7BLvwlfS-pV1NYTErnzy4drEem263seNXlZJ5UKn600I2jf_wptkurkNLZjO_UASur5aH6MDq-sAJ8OcoNf5_cvsMV08PzzNpovUUCG6tOKKWaq1LAnjUmmeE8AStOAgdGYpZLaUmBtGrKwYyUSlmZYyxyWWgoqSTtDFtjd-8N1D6IrGBQN1rZew6kMhJJecMhbByy1o4qvBgy1a7xrt1wXBxUZlcTv_Uxnhs6G1LxuodujgLubnQ66D0XV0sTQu7LAsJxITTH8BIAd7VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78686344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>GRAAFMANS, W. C ; OOMS, M. E ; BEZEMER, P. D ; BOUTER, L. M ; LIPS, P</creator><creatorcontrib>GRAAFMANS, W. C ; OOMS, M. E ; BEZEMER, P. D ; BOUTER, L. M ; LIPS, P</creatorcontrib><description>In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (&gt; 85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3-21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70-75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilities of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf01629573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9116386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Hip Fractures - epidemiology ; Hip Fractures - etiology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Life Style ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radius Fractures - epidemiology ; Radius Fractures - etiology ; Risk Factors ; Ulna Fractures - epidemiology ; Ulna Fractures - etiology</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 1996-01, Vol.6 (6), p.427-431</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-d694f3aa8b14689a651e08ea76e7a2f3e2fb806c41f8d4127da4a8850b08737b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-d694f3aa8b14689a651e08ea76e7a2f3e2fb806c41f8d4127da4a8850b08737b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2518010$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9116386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GRAAFMANS, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OOMS, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEZEMER, P. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUTER, L. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIPS, P</creatorcontrib><title>Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (&gt; 85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3-21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70-75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilities of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - etiology</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUx4Moc04v3oUexINQTZo0P7zN6VQYeFHwIJQ0fcFou9WkFfbfm7E6PD1438_78vggdErwFcFYXJcWE56pXNA9NCaM0jRTPN9HY6yoSBUjb4foKIRPHGGlxAiNFCGcSj5G73fOWvCw7BLvwlfS-pV1NYTErnzy4drEem263seNXlZJ5UKn600I2jf_wptkurkNLZjO_UASur5aH6MDq-sAJ8OcoNf5_cvsMV08PzzNpovUUCG6tOKKWaq1LAnjUmmeE8AStOAgdGYpZLaUmBtGrKwYyUSlmZYyxyWWgoqSTtDFtjd-8N1D6IrGBQN1rZew6kMhJJecMhbByy1o4qvBgy1a7xrt1wXBxUZlcTv_Uxnhs6G1LxuodujgLubnQ66D0XV0sTQu7LAsJxITTH8BIAd7VA</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>GRAAFMANS, W. C</creator><creator>OOMS, M. E</creator><creator>BEZEMER, P. D</creator><creator>BOUTER, L. M</creator><creator>LIPS, P</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study</title><author>GRAAFMANS, W. C ; OOMS, M. E ; BEZEMER, P. D ; BOUTER, L. M ; LIPS, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-d694f3aa8b14689a651e08ea76e7a2f3e2fb806c41f8d4127da4a8850b08737b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GRAAFMANS, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OOMS, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEZEMER, P. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUTER, L. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIPS, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GRAAFMANS, W. C</au><au>OOMS, M. E</au><au>BEZEMER, P. D</au><au>BOUTER, L. M</au><au>LIPS, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>427-431</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (&gt; 85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3-21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70-75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilities of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>9116386</pmid><doi>10.1007/bf01629573</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 1996-01, Vol.6 (6), p.427-431
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78686344
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accidental Falls
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Hip Fractures - epidemiology
Hip Fractures - etiology
Humans
Incidence
Life Style
Male
Medical sciences
Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Radius Fractures - epidemiology
Radius Fractures - etiology
Risk Factors
Ulna Fractures - epidemiology
Ulna Fractures - etiology
title Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures : A prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20risk%20profiles%20for%20hip%20fractures%20and%20distal%20forearm%20fractures%20:%20A%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=GRAAFMANS,%20W.%20C&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=427-431&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf01629573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78686344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78686344&rft_id=info:pmid/9116386&rfr_iscdi=true